{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T01:22:35Z","timestamp":1788398555768,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Guttmacher Institute","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,4]],"date-time":"2011-11-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1320364800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Perspect Sexual Reproductive"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:italic>\n            <jats:bold>CONTEXT:<\/jats:bold> Health care providers may influence patients\u2019 choice of contraceptive method, yet little is known about the recommendations they make to their patients.<\/jats:italic><\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>\n            <jats:bold>METHODS:<\/jats:bold> In 2007\u20132008, a total of 468 physicians at four family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology meetings were randomly assigned to view one of 18 videos of a patient seeking contraceptive advice; the patients were standardized for most relevant behaviors and characteristics, but differed by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status and gynecologic history. Participants provided their demographic and practice characteristics and completed a survey about their contraceptive recommendations for the patient. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify associations between physician characteristics and recommendations for specific contraceptive methods.<\/jats:italic><\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>\n            <jats:bold>RESULTS<\/jats:bold>: The most frequently recommended methods were the pill (89%) and ring (80%), followed by the levonor\u2010gestrel IUD (64%), patch (56%), injectable (49%) and copper IUD (45%). Oral contraceptives were more likely to be recommended by private practice physicians than by academic physicians (odds ratio, 2.9). Recommendations for the ring were less common among family physicians and those 56 or older than among obstetrician\u2010gynecologists and those 35 or younger (0.6 and 0.3, respectively), and more common among physicians in private practice than among those in academia (2.4). The patch and injectable were more commonly recommended by family physicians than by obstetrician\u2010gynecologists (2.6 and 2.5, respectively). Both IUD types were recommended less often by physicians 36 or older than by younger ones (0.2\u20130.5).<\/jats:italic><\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>\n            <jats:bold>DISCUSSION<\/jats:bold>: The advice women receive about contraception may vary according to the characteristics of their provider. Research on the reasons for these differences is needed.<\/jats:italic><\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1363\/4322411","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,4]],"date-time":"2011-11-04T15:52:33Z","timestamp":1320421953000},"page":"224-229","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["A Study of Physician Recommendations for Reversible Contraceptive Methods Using Standardized Patients"],"prefix":"10.1363","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Christine","family":"Dehlendorf","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin","family":"Grumbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eric","family":"Vittinghoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rachel","family":"Ruskin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jody","family":"Steinauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"259","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","first-page":"259","article-title":"Contraceptive prescription: physician beliefs, attitudes and socio\u2010demographic characteristics","volume":"82","author":"Russell ML","year":"1991","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Public Health"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318173fd83"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.01.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01726-4"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","first-page":"560","article-title":"The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out? Family physicians\u2019 perceptions of risk and indications","volume":"54","author":"Stubbs E","year":"2008","journal-title":"Canadian Family Physician"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","volume-title":"Contraception","author":"Finer LB"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.05.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.02.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1049-3867(02)00139-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.05.085"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","volume-title":"Vital and Health Statistics","author":"Mosher WD","year":"2010"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ogx.0000175805.90122.af"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.11.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(94)90109-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.09.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2007.02.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.10.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","unstructured":"Food and Drug Administration FDA updates labeling for Ortho Evra contraceptive patch news release 2009 <http:\/\/www.fda.gov\/NewsEvents\/Newsroom\/PressAnnouncements\/2005\/ucm108517.htm> accessedApr. 18 2011."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","unstructured":"American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the US Chicago: AMA 2009."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","volume-title":"Diversity in the Physician Workforce: Facts & Figures 2010","author":"Castillo\u2010Page L","year":"2010"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1300\/J013v21n04_05"}],"container-title":["Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1363%2F4322411","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1363\/4322411","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,31]],"date-time":"2023-10-31T19:41:24Z","timestamp":1698781284000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1363\/4322411"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,4]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1363\/4322411"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1363\/4322411","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1538-6341","1931-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1538-6341","type":"print"},{"value":"1931-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,4]]}}}