{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,17]],"date-time":"2026-03-17T05:18:14Z","timestamp":1773724694575,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Guttmacher Institute","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]],"date-time":"2016-08-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1470268800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Perspect Sexual Reproductive"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>CONTEXT<\/jats:title><jats:p>Understanding how women's preferences for certain attributes of contraceptive methods relate to their method choice can inform the content of contraceptive counseling.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Data from 715 women aged 18\u201329 who had ever used contraceptives were drawn from the 2009 National Survey of Reproductive and Contraceptive Knowledge. Chi\u2010square tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine how women's preferences for specific contraceptive attributes were related to their social and demographic characteristics and their current contraceptive choice.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title><jats:p>The majority of women considered it extremely important for a method to be very effective at preventing pregnancy (79%) and to be effective at preventing <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HIV<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">STDs<\/jats:styled-content> (67%); fewer than one\u2010quarter felt similarly about a method's being hormone\u2010free (22%). Women who felt it was quite or extremely important for a method to be very effective at preventing pregnancy were not more likely to use the most effective methods than were women who considered this attribute not at all or only slightly important. Women who considered it quite or extremely important for a method to be hormone\u2010free were less likely than others to use hormonal methods (odds ratio, 0.4), and women who considered <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">STD<\/jats:styled-content> protection quite or extremely important had elevated odds of relying on condoms alone, rather than on an effective contraceptive method alone (3.6).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Most women desire a very effective method for pregnancy prevention, but it is unclear how this translates to their contraceptive use. The associations between women's preferred contraceptive attributes and method choice warrant further attention.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1363\/48e10116","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]],"date-time":"2016-08-04T20:57:03Z","timestamp":1470344223000},"page":"119-127","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Young Women's Contraceptive Decision Making: Do Preferences for Contraceptive Attributes Align with Method Choice?"],"prefix":"10.1363","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"Cassondra","family":"Marshall","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Public Health University of California  Berkeley"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sylvia","family":"Guendelman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Maternal and Child Health University of California  Berkeley"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jane","family":"Mauldon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Richard and Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy University of California  Berkeley"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Amani","family":"Nuru\u2010Jeter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Epidemiology and Community Health and Human Development University of California  Berkeley"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"259","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.12.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.07.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2013.301416"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318273eb56"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","volume-title":"Improving contraceptive use in the United States","author":"Frost JJ","year":"2008"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","article-title":"Vital and Health Statistics, 2010","volume":"23","author":"Mosher WD","year":"1982","journal-title":"Series"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","volume-title":"Contraceptive methods women have ever used: United States, 1982\u20132010","author":"Daniels K","year":"2013"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/4009408"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","first-page":"48","article-title":"Perspectives on","volume":"39","author":"Frost JJ","year":"2004","journal-title":"Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2007"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.06.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.12.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1966904"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/4419412"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.04.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/46e2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2991589"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00548.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.10.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2013.4247"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.051"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","volume-title":"The Fog Zone: How Misperceptions, Magical Thinking and Ambivalence Put Young Adults at Risk for Unplanned Pregnancy","author":"Kaye K","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Effectiveness of Family Planning Methods no date http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/reproductivehealth\/unintendedpregnancy\/pdf\/contraceptive_methods_508.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203108550"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/4410712"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00662-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/4513913"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa1506575"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.08.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2016.01.008"}],"container-title":["Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1363%2F48e10116","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1363\/48e10116","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,30]],"date-time":"2023-09-30T03:26:23Z","timestamp":1696044383000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1363\/48e10116"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1363\/48e10116"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1363\/48e10116","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1538-6341","1931-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1538-6341","type":"print"},{"value":"1931-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,4]]}}}