{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T03:41:05Z","timestamp":1788579665597,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Guttmacher Institute","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,24]],"date-time":"2016-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1458777600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Perspect Sexual Reproductive"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Context<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In 2012, Utah became the first state to enact a 72\u2010hour waiting period for abortion. Despite debate about the law's potential effects, research has not examined women's experiences with it.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A cohort of 500 women recruited at four family planning facilities in Utah in 2013\u20132014 completed baseline surveys at the time of an abortion information visit and follow\u2010up telephone interviews three weeks later. Logistic regression and coding of open\u2010ended responses were used to examine which women had abortions and, for those who did not, their reasons.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Among the 309 women completing follow\u2010up, 86% had had an abortion, 8% were no longer seeking abortion, 3% had miscarried or discovered they had not been pregnant, and 2% were still seeking abortion; one woman was still deciding, and the waiting period had pushed one woman beyond her facility's gestational limit for abortion. At the information visit, women reported little conflict about the abortion decision (mean score on a scale of 0\u2013100 was 13.9 for those who eventually had an abortion and 28.5 for others). Low decisional conflict, but not socioeconomic status, was associated with having an abortion (odds ratio, 1.1). On average, eight days elapsed between the information visit and the abortion.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>As most women in this cohort were not conflicted about their decision when they sought care, the 72\u2010hour waiting requirement seems to have been unnecessary. Individualized patient counseling for the small minority who were conflicted when they presented for care may have been more appropriate.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1363\/48e8216","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,24]],"date-time":"2016-03-24T10:09:16Z","timestamp":1458814156000},"page":"179-187","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":60,"title":["Utah's 72\u2010Hour Waiting Period for Abortion: Experiences Among a Clinic\u2010Based Sample of Women"],"prefix":"10.1363","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"Sarah C.M.","family":"Roberts","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California  San Francisco, Oakland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David K.","family":"Turok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Utah, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology  Salt Lake City"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elise","family":"Belusa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California  San Francisco, Oakland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Combellick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California  San Francisco, Oakland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ushma D.","family":"Upadhyay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California  San Francisco, Oakland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"259","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2134696"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2134898"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3325303"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07399332.2013.841699"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","volume-title":"Counseling and waiting periods for abortion, State Policies in Brief (as of November 2015)","author":"Institute Guttmacher","year":"2015"},{"issue":"8","key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1997.03550080063040","article-title":"The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on abortions and births","volume":"278","author":"Joyce T","year":"1997","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","volume-title":"The Impact of State Mandatory Counseling and Waiting Period Laws on Abortion: A Literature Review","author":"Joyce TJ","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2015.10.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","article-title":"The next abortion battleground: 72\u2010hour waiting periods, Talking Points Memo","volume":"20","author":"Marty R","year":"2015","journal-title":"Jan."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000053"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/4411712"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.10.032"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","volume-title":"User Manual\u2014Decisional Conflict Scale","author":"O'Connor AM"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2529"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.05.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2012.12.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.23307"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soard.2013.09.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X13491463"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","volume-title":"Stable Resource Toolkit: AUDIT\u2010C\u2013Overview","author":"California Department of Health Care Services"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","volume-title":"Statistics for Epidemiology","author":"Jewell NP","year":"2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2013.03.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2014.01.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","article-title":"State funding of abortion under Medicaid","author":"Guttmacher Institute","year":"2015","journal-title":"State Policies in Brief (as of November 2015)"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","article-title":"North Carolina OKs bill seeking to curb abortion with extended 72\u2010hour waiting period","volume":"10","author":"Basilan M","year":"2015","journal-title":"Christian Today"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","article-title":"North Carolina passes pro\u2010life bill for 72\u2010hour abortion waiting period","volume":"4","author":"Ertelt S","year":"2015","journal-title":"Life News, June"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","article-title":"South Dakota advances bill mandating controversial anti\u2010abortion counseling","volume":"22","author":"Sheppard K","year":"2011","journal-title":"Mother Jones"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2012.301159"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.05.040"}],"container-title":["Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1363%2F48e8216","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1363%2F48e8216","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1363\/48e8216","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,13]],"date-time":"2023-09-13T19:26:16Z","timestamp":1694633176000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1363\/48e8216"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,24]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1363\/48e8216"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1363\/48e8216","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1538-6341","1931-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1538-6341","type":"print"},{"value":"1931-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,24]]}}}