{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T20:37:14Z","timestamp":1790973434478,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,8]],"date-time":"2020-12-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1607385600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003744","name":"Stiftelsen Handlanden Hjalmar Svenssons","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["HJSV2019066, HJSV2020025"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["HJSV2019066, HJSV2020025"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003744","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005761","name":"Sahlgrenska Akademin","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["ALFGBG-718721, VGFOUREG854081"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["ALFGBG-718721, VGFOUREG854081"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005761","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosmedicine.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS Med"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n<jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The risk of perinatal death and severe neonatal morbidity increases gradually after 41 weeks of pregnancy. Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed if induction of labour (IOL) in uncomplicated pregnancies at 41 weeks will improve perinatal outcomes. We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) on this subject.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n<jats:title>Methods and findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (Embase), The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO on February 21, 2020 for RCTs comparing IOL at 41 weeks with expectant management until 42 weeks in women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Individual participant data (IPD) were sought from eligible RCTs. Primary outcome was a composite of severe adverse perinatal outcomes: mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. Additional outcomes included neonatal admission, mode of delivery, perineal lacerations, and postpartum haemorrhage. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted for parity (nulliparous\/multiparous), maternal age (&lt;35\/\u226535 years), and body mass index (BMI) (&lt;30\/\u226530). Aggregate data meta-analysis (MA) was performed to include data from RCTs for which IPD was not available.<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p>From 89 full-text articles, we identified three eligible RCTs (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 5,161), and two contributed with IPD (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 4,561). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups regarding age, parity, BMI, and higher level of education. IOL resulted overall in a decrease of severe adverse perinatal outcome (0.4% [10\/2,281] versus 1.0% [23\/2,280]; relative risk [RR] 0.43 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21 to 0.91], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-value 0.027, risk difference [RD] \u221257\/10,000 [95% CI \u2212106\/10,000 to \u22128\/10,000], I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> 0%). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 175 (95% CI 94 to 1,267).<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p>Perinatal deaths occurred in one (&lt;0.1%) versus eight (0.4%) pregnancies (Peto odds ratio [OR] 0.21 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.78], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-value 0.019, RD \u221231\/10,000, [95% CI \u221256\/10,000 to \u22125\/10,000], I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> 0%, NNT 326, [95% CI 177 to 2,014]) and admission to a neonatal care unit \u22654 days occurred in 1.1% (24\/2,280) versus 1.9% (46\/2,273), (RR 0.52 [95% CI 0.32 to 0.85], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-value 0.009, RD \u221297\/10,000 [95% CI \u2212169\/10,000 to \u221226\/10,000], I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> 0%, NNT 103 [95% CI 59 to 385]). There was no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery (10.5% versus 10.7%; RR 0.98, [95% CI 0.83 to 1.16], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-value 0.81) nor in other important perinatal, delivery, and maternal outcomes. MA on aggregate data showed similar results.<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p>Prespecified subgroup analyses for the primary outcome showed a significant difference in the treatment effect (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.01 for interaction) for parity, but not for maternal age or BMI. The risk of severe adverse perinatal outcome was decreased for nulliparous women in the IOL group (0.3% [4\/1,219] versus 1.6% [20\/1,264]; RR 0.20 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.60], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-value 0.004, RD \u2212127\/10,000, [95% CI \u2212204\/10,000 to \u221250\/10,000], I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> 0%, NNT 79 [95% CI 49 to 201]) but not for multiparous women (0.6% [6\/1,219] versus 0.3% [3\/1,264]; RR 1.59 [95% CI 0.15 to 17.30], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-value 0.35, RD 27\/10,000, [95% CI \u221229\/10,000 to 84\/10,000], I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> 55%).<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p>A limitation of this IPD-MA was the risk of overestimation of the effect on perinatal mortality due to early stopping of the largest included trial for safety reasons after the advice of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Furthermore, only two RCTs were eligible for the IPD-MA; thus, the possibility to assess severe adverse neonatal outcomes with few events was limited.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n<jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>In this study, we found that, overall, IOL at 41 weeks improved perinatal outcome compared with expectant management until 42 weeks without increasing the cesarean delivery rate. This benefit is shown only in nulliparous women, whereas for multiparous women, the incidence of mortality and morbidity was too low to demonstrate any effect. The magnitude of risk reduction of perinatal mortality remains uncertain. Women with pregnancies approaching 41 weeks should be informed on the risk differences according to parity so that they are able to make an informed choice for IOL at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks.<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p><jats:bold>Study Registration:<\/jats:bold> PROSPERO <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/prospero\/display_record.php?RecordID=163174\" xlink:type=\"simple\">CRD42020163174<\/jats:ext-link><\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003436","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,8]],"date-time":"2020-12-08T22:03:21Z","timestamp":1607465001000},"page":"e1003436","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":60,"title":["Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5648-3505","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"M\u00e5rten","family":"Alkmark","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0694-0637","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Judit K. J.","family":"Keulen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5851-3728","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Joep C.","family":"Kortekaas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6049-7731","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Christina","family":"Bergh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6958-572X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jeroen","family":"van Dillen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4784-4396","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ruben G.","family":"Duijnhoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3962-1448","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Henrik","family":"Hagberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8337-550X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ben Willem","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mattias","family":"Molin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3311-2116","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Joris A. M.","family":"van der Post","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sissel","family":"Saltvedt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna-Karin","family":"Wikstr\u00f6m","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2475-2226","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ulla-Britt","family":"Wennerholm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0392-4626","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Esteriek","family":"de Miranda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1003436.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002838","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002838","article-title":"Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies.","volume":"16","author":"J Muglu","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"pmed.1003436.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F286","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2015-308553","article-title":"Post-term pregnancy is an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity even in low-risk singleton pregnancies","volume":"102","author":"N Linder","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"issue":"5","key":"pmed.1003436.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1003103","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003103","article-title":"Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study.","volume":"17","author":"AE Seijmonsbergen-Schermers","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref004","unstructured":"The Swedish Pregnancy Register. Available from: https:\/\/www.medscinet.com\/GR\/english.aspx."},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref005","unstructured":"Perined. Perinatale zorg in Nederland anno 2018: landelijke perinatale cijfers en duiding. Utrecht 2019."},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l344","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l344","article-title":"Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"364","author":"JK Keulen","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l6131","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l6131","article-title":"Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial","volume":"367","author":"UB Wennerholm","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref008","first-page":"Cd004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"P Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref009","first-page":"Cd004945","article-title":"Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"7","author":"P Middleton","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1003436.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.11124\/JBISRIR-2017-003587","article-title":"Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review","volume":"17","author":"E Rydahl","year":"2019","journal-title":"JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1003436.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000452744.06088.48","article-title":"Practice bulletin no. 146: Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies","volume":"124","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pmed.1003436.ref012","first-page":"8","article-title":"Induction of labour: new NICE quality standard","volume":"17","year":"2014","journal-title":"Midwives"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref013","author":"WHO","year":"2018"},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1003436.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2010.057","article-title":"Guidelines for the management of postterm pregnancy","volume":"38","author":"G Mandruzzato","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref015","article-title":"Prolonged Pregnancy.","author":"SAPPG","year":"2017","journal-title":"Perinatal Practice Guideline"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1003436.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001855","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001855","article-title":"Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use","volume":"12","author":"JF Tierney","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"16","key":"pmed.1003436.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1657","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.3656","article-title":"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement","volume":"313","author":"LA Stewart","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref018","author":"U-B Wennerholm","year":"2012"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref019","unstructured":"WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems 10th Revision. ICD-10. 2019."},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","article-title":"The Cochrane Collaboration\u2019s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"343","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"pmed.1003436.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e52","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001108","article-title":"Committee Opinion No. 644: The Apgar Score.","volume":"126","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1003436.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14164.x","article-title":"Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights","volume":"85","author":"K Marsal","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref023","year":"2008","journal-title":"Perined. PRN geboortegewichtcurven"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref024","article-title":"EUROCAT Guide 1.4: Instruction for the registration of congenital anomalies, section 3.2 Minor Anomalies and other conditions for Exclusion University of Ulster 2013.","author":"J-EC Registry"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119536604.ch10","article-title":"Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses","author":"JJ Deeks","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019)"},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1003436.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.","volume":"120","author":"O Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"12","key":"pmed.1003436.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1180","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2010.310","article-title":"Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis","volume":"303","author":"D Bassler","year":"2010","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1003436.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709024606","article-title":"Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761 postterm pregnancies in Sweden, 1982\u20131991: a register study","volume":"76","author":"I Ingemarsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10018","key":"pmed.1003436.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00837-5","article-title":"Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030","volume":"387","author":"JE Lawn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"12","key":"pmed.1003436.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1467","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13237","article-title":"Improved neonatal outcome after active management of prolonged pregnancies beyond 41(+2) weeks in nulliparous, but not among multiparous women.","volume":"96","author":"L Lindegren","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1003436.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2010.01019.x","article-title":"Significant effects on neonatal morbidity and mortality after regional change in management of post-term pregnancy","volume":"90","author":"C Grunewald","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1003436.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"862","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13113","article-title":"Decline in stillbirths and perinatal mortality after implementation of a more aggressive induction policy in post-date pregnancies: a nationwide register study","volume":"96","author":"AR Zizzo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"pmed.1003436.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13214","article-title":"Propensity score method for analyzing the effect of labor induction in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"97","author":"A Pyykonen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"12","key":"pmed.1003436.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e032815","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-032815","article-title":"Routine induction in late-term pregnancies: follow-up of a Danish induction of labour paradigm","volume":"9","author":"E Rydahl","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1003436.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1177\/0163278702025001006","article-title":"To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data","volume":"25","author":"LA Stewart","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eval Health Prof"},{"issue":"8","key":"pmed.1003436.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020","article-title":"No. 214-Guidelines for the Management of Pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 Weeks","volume":"39","author":"M Delaney","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l5517","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5517","article-title":"Effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasonography to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancy (the IRIS study): nationwide, pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial","volume":"367","author":"J Henrichs","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"pmed.1003436.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12654","article-title":"Routine ultrasound examination at 41 weeks of gestation and risk of post-term severe adverse fetal outcome: a retrospective evaluation of two units, within the same hospital, with different guidelines","volume":"121","author":"PG Lindqvist","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"pmed.1003436.ref039","first-page":"Cd006593","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome","author":"AF Nabhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1003436.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2294-7","article-title":"Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care","volume":"19","author":"JC Kortekaas","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"5","key":"pmed.1003436.ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13084","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases","volume":"122","author":"A de Jonge","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"pmed.1003436.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0126266","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0126266","article-title":"Severe Adverse Maternal Outcomes among Women in Midwife-Led versus Obstetrician-Led Care at the Onset of Labour in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Cohort Study","volume":"10","author":"A de Jonge","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"pmed.1003436.ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f3263","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f3263","article-title":"Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort study","volume":"346","author":"A de Jonge","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1003436.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0180846","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0180846","article-title":"Mode of birth and medical interventions among women at low risk of complications: A cross-national comparison of birth settings in England and the Netherlands","volume":"12","author":"A de Jonge","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS ONE."}],"container-title":["PLOS Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003436","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,8]],"date-time":"2020-12-08T22:04:13Z","timestamp":1607465053000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003436"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Lars \u00c5ke","family":"Persson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,8]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,8]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003436","relation":{},"ISSN":["1549-1676"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1549-1676","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,8]]}}}