{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T04:19:34Z","timestamp":1790223574090,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,6]],"date-time":"2023-04-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1680739200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosmedicine.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS Med"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n<jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Accurate knowledge of fetal presentation at term is vital for optimal antenatal and intrapartum care. The primary objective was to compare the impact of routine third trimester ultrasound or point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) with standard antenatal care, on the incidence of overall and proportion of all term breech presentations that were undiagnosed at term, and on the related adverse perinatal outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n<jats:title>Methods and findings<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study where we included data from St. George\u2019s (SGH) and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals (NNUH). Pregnancies were grouped according to whether they received routine third trimester scan (SGH) or POCUS (NNUH). Women with multiple pregnancy, preterm birth prior to 37 weeks, congenital abnormality, and those undergoing planned cesarean section for breech presentation were excluded. Undiagnosed breech presentation was defined as follows: (a) women presenting in labour or with ruptured membranes at term subsequently discovered to have a breech presentation; and (b) women attending for induction of labour at term found to have a breech presentation before induction. The primary outcome was the proportion of all term breech presentations that were undiagnosed. The secondary outcomes included mode of birth, gestational age at birth, birth weight, incidence of emergency cesarean section, and the following neonatal adverse outcomes: Apgar score &lt;7 at 5 minutes, unexpected neonatal unit (NNU) admission, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and perinatal mortality (including stillbirths and early neonatal deaths). We employed a Bayesian approach using informative priors from a previous similar study; updating their estimates (prior) with our own data (likelihood). The association of undiagnosed breech presentation at birth with adverse perinatal outcomes was analyzed with Bayesian log-binomial regression models. All analyses were conducted using R for Statistical Software (v.4.2.0).<\/jats:p>\n<jats:p>Before and after the implementation of routine third trimester scan or POCUS, there were 16,777 and 7,351 births in SGH and 5,119 and 4,575 in NNUH, respectively. The rate of breech presentation in labour was consistent across all groups (3% to 4%). In the SGH cohort, the percentage of all term breech presentations that were undiagnosed was 14.2% (82\/578) before (years 2016 to 2020) and 2.8% (7\/251) after (year 2020 to 2021) the implementation of universal screening (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Similarly, in the NNUH cohort, the percentage of all term breech presentations that were undiagnosed was 16.2% (27\/167) before (year 2015) and 3.5% (5\/142) after (year 2020 to 2021) the implementation of universal POCUS screening (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Bayesian regression analysis with informative priors showed that the rate of undiagnosed breech was 71% lower after the implementation of universal ultrasound (RR, 0.29; 95% CrI 0.20, 0.38) with a posterior probability greater than 99.9%. Among the pregnancies with breech presentation, there was also a very high probability (&gt;99.9%) of reduced rate of low Apgar score (&lt;7) at 5 minutes by 77% (RR, 0.23; 95% CrI 0.14, 0.38). There was moderate to high probability (posterior probability: 89.5% and 85.1%, respectively) of a reduction of HIE (RR, 0.32; 95% CrI 0.0.05, 1.77) and extended perinatal mortality rates (RR, 0.21; 95% CrI 0.01, 3.00). Using informative priors, the proportion of all term breech presentations that were undiagnosed was 69% lower after the initiation of universal POCUS (RR, 0.31; 95% CrI 0.21, 0.45) with a posterior probability greater of 99.9%. There was also a very high probability (99.5%) of a reduced rate of low Apgar score (&lt;7) at 5 minutes by 40% (RR, 0.60; 95% CrI 0.39, 0.88). We do not have reliable data on number of facility-based ultrasound scans via the standard antenatal referral pathway or external cephalic versions (ECVs) performed during the study period.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n<jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>In our study, we observed that both a policy of routine facility-based third trimester ultrasound or POCUS are associated with a reduction in the proportion of term breech presentations that were undiagnosed, with an improvement in neonatal outcomes. The findings from our study support the policy of third trimester ultrasound scan for fetal presentation. Future studies should focus on exploring the cost-effectiveness of POCUS for fetal presentation.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004192","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,6]],"date-time":"2023-04-06T17:52:50Z","timestamp":1680803570000},"page":"e1004192","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Impact of point-of-care ultrasound and routine third trimester ultrasound on undiagnosed breech presentation and perinatal outcomes: An observational multicentre cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Samantha","family":"Knights","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2329-4470","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Smriti","family":"Prasad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0658-138X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Erkan","family":"Kalafat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anahita","family":"Dadali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pam","family":"Sizer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7932-9276","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Francoise","family":"Harlow","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2802-7670","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Asma","family":"Khalil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref001","unstructured":"Management of Breech Presentation (Green-top Guideline No. 20b) [Internet]. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. [cited 2022 May 1]. Available from: https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/en\/guidelines-research-services\/guidelines\/gtg20b\/"},{"issue":"4","key":"pmed.1004192.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4283-7","article-title":"Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors-a nationwide population based cohort study","volume":"295","author":"G Macharey","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"pmed.1004192.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12834","article-title":"Breech presentation: its predictors and consequences. An analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer Obstetric Database (1996\u20132011)","volume":"95","author":"L Zsirai","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004192.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1278-8","article-title":"Risk factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in planned vaginal breech labors at term: a retrospective population-based case-control study.","volume":"17","author":"G Macharey","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth."},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1004192.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1378328","article-title":"Vaginal breech delivery at term and neonatal morbidity and mortality\u2014a population-based cohort study in Sweden.","volume":"32","author":"C Ek\u00e9us","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004192.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-153","article-title":"Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study.","volume":"13","author":"I Vistad","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth."},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004192.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-0941-9","article-title":"Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States.","volume":"16","author":"CF Weiniger","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth."},{"issue":"8","key":"pmed.1004192.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30174-2","article-title":"Detecting Breech Presentation Before Labour: Lessons From a Low-Risk Maternity Clinic.","volume":"37","author":"O Ressl B","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can."},{"issue":"7568","key":"pmed.1004192.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38919.681563.4F","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for detection of non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy: cross sectional analytic study","volume":"333","author":"N Nassar","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref010","unstructured":"Universal ultrasound in late pregnancy did not reduce serious harms to babies [Internet]. NIHR Evidence. [cited 2022 May 1]. Available from: https:\/\/evidence.nihr.ac.uk\/alert\/universal-ultrasound-in-late-pregnancy-did-not-reduce-serious-harms-to-babies\/"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref011","volume-title":"Identification of breech presentation: Antenatal care: Evidence review L","author":"National Guideline Alliance (UK)","year":"2021"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref012","unstructured":"Overview | Antenatal care | Guidance | NICE [Internet]. NICE; [cited 2022 May 1]. Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng201"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref013","unstructured":"Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus, Investigation and Management (Green-top Guideline No. 31) [Internet]. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. [cited 2022 May 1]. Available from: https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/en\/guidelines-research-services\/guidelines\/gtg31\/"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref014","unstructured":"Perinatal Institute: Programme [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 1]. Available from: https:\/\/www.perinatal.org.uk\/GAP\/programme"},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1004192.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21902","article-title":"Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35\u201337\u2009weeks\u2019 gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.","volume":"55","author":"H De Castro","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"4","key":"pmed.1004192.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002778","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002778","article-title":"Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis.","volume":"16","author":"D Wastlund","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"issue":"15","key":"pmed.1004192.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta25150","article-title":"Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.","volume":"25","author":"GCS Smith","year":"2021","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess."},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004192.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1003503","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003503","article-title":"The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study.","volume":"18","author":"I Salim","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"issue":"10","key":"pmed.1004192.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.05.024","article-title":"Training Midwives to Perform Basic Obstetric Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Rural Areas Using a Tablet Platform and Mobile Phone Transmission Technology\u2014A WFUMB COE Project","volume":"43","author":"S Vinayak","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pmed.1004192.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.018","volume":"124","author":"N Greenwold","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2022.101333","article-title":"Task shifting for point of care ultrasound in primary healthcare in low- and middle-income countries-a systematic review.","volume":"45","author":"SK Abrokwa","year":"2022","journal-title":"eClinicalMedicine."},{"issue":"9","key":"pmed.1004192.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.07.003","article-title":"Guideline No. 421: Point of Care Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"43","author":"O Jain V","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can."},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref023","unstructured":"British Journal of Midwifery\u2014Detection of breech presentation: Abdominal palpation and hand-held scanning by midwives [Internet]. Br J Midwifery. [cited 2022 May 1]. Available from: https:\/\/www.britishjournalofmidwifery.com\/articles\/detection-of-breech-presentation-abdominal-palpation-and-hand-held-scanning-by-midwives\/"},{"issue":"4","key":"pmed.1004192.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"552.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.11.031","article-title":"Incorporating personal-device-based point-of-care ultrasound into obstetric care: a validation study.","volume":"226","author":"CB Leggett","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004192.ref025","first-page":"1","article-title":"B\u00fcrkner PC brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan","volume":"80","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"English P The its.analysis R Package\u2013Modelling Short Time Series Data (June 6, 2019). Available from: https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3398189. doi: 10.2139\/ssrn.3398189","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3398189"},{"issue":"4","key":"pmed.1004192.ref027","first-page":"285","volume":"31","author":"MG Kawooya","year":"2015","journal-title":"Impact of Introducing Routine Antenatal Ultrasound Services on Reproductive Health Indicators in Mpigi District, Central Uganda Ultrasound Q"},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004192.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-019-0748-z","article-title":"Detection of high-risk pregnancies in low-resource settings: a case study in Guatemala.","volume":"16","author":"PH Crisp\u00edn Milart","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Health."},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004192.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-016-0237-6","article-title":"Use of a portable system with ultrasound and blood tests to improve prenatal controls in rural Guatemala","volume":"13","author":"PH Crisp\u00edn Milart","year":"2016","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref030","unstructured":"UK NSC minutes March 2021 [Internet]. GOV.UK. [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/uk-nsc-meeting-march-2021\/uk-nsc-minutes-march-2021"},{"key":"pmed.1004192.ref031","unstructured":"21\/582 Point of care ultrasound for breech presentation at term commissioning brief [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 1]. Available from: https:\/\/www.nihr.ac.uk\/documents\/21582-point-of-care-ultrasound-for-breech-presentation-at-term-commissioning-brief\/29207"}],"container-title":["PLOS Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004192","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,6]],"date-time":"2023-04-06T17:53:13Z","timestamp":1680803593000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004192"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,6]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004192","relation":{},"ISSN":["1549-1676"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1549-1676","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,6]]}}}