{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T14:21:04Z","timestamp":1793715664522,"version":"4.6.1"},"update-to":[{"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004427","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722297600000}}],"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]],"date-time":"2024-07-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1721088000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["DRF-2013-06-171"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DRF-2013-06-171"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000306","name":"Tommy\u2019s Baby Charity","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["1060508"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1060508"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000306","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000833","name":"Rosetrees Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["CM854"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CM854"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000833","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Borne Foundation","award":["GN2870"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GN2870"]}],"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/0324mr378","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosmedicine.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS Med"],"abstract":"\n Background<\/jats:title>\n Cervical cerclage, cervical pessary, and vaginal progesterone have each been shown to reduce preterm birth (PTB) in high-risk women, but to our knowledge, there has been no randomised comparison of the 3 interventions. The SuPPoRT \u201cStitch, Pessary, or Progesterone Randomised Trial\u201d was designed to compare the rate of PTB <37 weeks between each intervention in women who develop a short cervix in pregnancy.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods and findings<\/jats:title>\n \n SuPPoRT was a multicentre, open label 3-arm randomised controlled trial designed to demonstrate equivalence (equivalence margin 20%) conducted from 1 July 2015 to 1 July 2021 in 19 obstetric units in the United Kingdom. Asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies with transvaginal ultrasound cervical lengths measuring <25 mm between 14\n +0<\/jats:sup>\n and 23\n +6<\/jats:sup>\n weeks\u2019 gestation were eligible for randomisation (1:1:1) to receive either vaginal cervical cerclage (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n = 128), cervical pessary (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n = 126), or vaginal progesterone (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n = 132). Minimisation variables were gestation at recruitment, body mass index (BMI), and risk factor for PTB. The primary outcome was PTB <37 weeks\u2019 gestation. Secondary outcomes included PTB <34 weeks\u2019, <30 weeks\u2019, and adverse perinatal outcome. Analysis was by intention to treat.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n A total of 386 pregnant women between 14\n +0<\/jats:sup>\n and 23\n +6<\/jats:sup>\n weeks\u2019 gestation with a cervical length <25 mm were randomised to one of the 3 interventions. Of these women, 67% were of white ethnicity, 18% black ethnicity, and 7.5% Asian ethnicity. Mean BMI was 25.6. Over 85% of women had prior risk factors for PTB; 39.1% had experienced a spontaneous PTB or midtrimester loss (>14 weeks gestation); and 45.8% had prior cervical surgery. Data from 381 women were available for outcome analysis. Using binary regression, randomised therapies (cerclage versus pessary versus vaginal progesterone) were found to have similar effects on the primary outcome PTB <37 weeks (39\/127 versus 38\/122 versus 32\/132,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.4, cerclage versus pessary risk difference (RD) \u22120.7% [\u221212.1 to 10.7], cerclage versus progesterone RD 6.2% [\u22125.0 to 17.0], and progesterone versus pessary RD \u22126.9% [\u221217.9 to 4.1]). Similarly, no difference was seen for PTB <34 and 30 weeks, nor adverse perinatal outcome. There were some differences in the mild side effect profile between interventions (vaginal discharge and bleeding) and women randomised to progesterone reported more severe abdominal pain.\n <\/jats:p>\n A small proportion of women did not receive the intervention as per protocol; however, per-protocol and as-treated analyses showed similar results. The main study limitation was that the trial was underpowered for neonatal outcomes and was stopped early due to the COVID-19 pandemic.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n In this study, we found that for women who develop a short cervix, cerclage, pessary, and vaginal progesterone were equally efficacious at preventing PTB, as judged with a 20% equivalence margin. Commencing with any of the therapies would be reasonable clinical management. These results can be used as a counselling tool for clinicians when managing women with a short cervix.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Trial registration<\/jats:title>\n \n EU Clinical Trials register. EudraCT Number: 2015-000456-15, clinicaltrialsregister.eu., ISRCTN Registry:\n ISRCTN13364447<\/jats:ext-link>\n ,\n isrctn.com<\/jats:ext-link>\n .\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004427","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]],"date-time":"2024-07-16T13:43:37Z","timestamp":1721137417000},"page":"e1004427","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Comparing cervical cerclage, pessary and vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix (SuPPoRT): A multicentre randomised controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Natasha L.","family":"Hezelgrave","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0736-7046","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Natalie","family":"Suff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7904-7933","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Paul","family":"Seed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vicky","family":"Robinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2550-6465","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jenny","family":"Carter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helena","family":"Watson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0988-7229","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Alexandra","family":"Ridout","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0199-6140","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Anna L.","family":"David","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Susana","family":"Pereira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fatemeh","family":"Hoveyda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joanna","family":"Girling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Latha","family":"Vinayakarao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rachel M.","family":"Tribe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew H.","family":"Shennan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"the SuPPoRT Collaborating Team","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e064547","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2021-064547","article-title":"Interventions to prevent spontaneous preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancy who are at high risk: systematic review and network meta-analysis","volume":"376","author":"A Care","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00217-8","article-title":"Evaluating Progestogens for Preventing Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC): meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials","volume":"397","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000168435.17200.53","article-title":"Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data","volume":"106","author":"V Berghella","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.054","article-title":"Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial","volume":"191","author":"V Berghella","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1098","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.118163","article-title":"Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help","volume":"185","author":"OA Rust","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1849","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16351-4","article-title":"Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial","volume":"363","author":"MS To","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1106","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.118655","article-title":"Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone","volume":"185","author":"SM Althuisius","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1800","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60030-0","article-title":"Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"379","author":"M Goya","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18908","article-title":"Prevention of preterm birth with pessary in singletons (PoPPS): randomized controlled trial","volume":"51","author":"L Dugoff","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1044","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1511014","article-title":"A Randomized Trial of a Cervical Pessary to Prevent Preterm Singleton Birth","volume":"374","author":"KH Nicolaides","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1148-9","article-title":"Rationale and design of SuPPoRT: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare three treatments: cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone, for the prevention of preterm birth in women who develop a short cervix","volume":"16","author":"NL Hezelgrave","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref012","unstructured":"Preterm labour and birth. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2022 Jun 10. PMID: 31971700."},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26161","article-title":"Predicting spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with cervical cerclage","volume":"61","author":"AE Ridout","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref014","first-page":"e371","article-title":"Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length","volume":"201","author":"J Owen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.12.003","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data","volume":"206","author":"R Romero","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.313.7048.36","article-title":"Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods","volume":"313","author":"B Jones","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref017","article-title":"Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples","volume":"3","author":"W Rogers","year":"1994","journal-title":"Stata Technical Bulletin"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2011.10.001","article-title":"CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials","volume":"10","author":"D Moher","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2594","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2012.87802","article-title":"Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement","volume":"308","author":"G Piaggio","year":"2012","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2106","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00350-0","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial","volume":"387","author":"JE Norman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05388-w","article-title":"How are hospitals in England caring for women at risk of preterm birth in 2021? The influence of national guidance on preterm birth care in England: a national questionnaire","volume":"23","author":"N Carlisle","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1588245","article-title":"Cervical cerclage, pessary, or vaginal progesterone in high-risk pregnant women with short cervix: a randomized feasibility study","volume":"34","author":"A Care","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e52412","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0052412","article-title":"Limited relationship between cervico-vaginal fluid cytokine profiles and cervical shortening in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"7","author":"M Chandiramani","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"pmed.1004427.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2023.10812","article-title":"Cervical Pessary for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Individuals With a Short Cervix: The TOPS Randomized Clinical Trial","volume":"330","author":"MK Hoffman","year":"2023","journal-title":"JAMA"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004427","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722297600000}},{"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004594","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,17]],"date-time":"2025-04-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1744848000000}}],"container-title":["PLOS Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004427","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T13:47:43Z","timestamp":1722347263000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004427"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Gordon C.","family":"Smith","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004427","relation":{},"ISSN":["1549-1676"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1549-1676","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]]}}}