{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T15:56:32Z","timestamp":1787500592408,"version":"build-2736575974"},"update-to":[{"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004513","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770163200000}}],"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769126400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000664","name":"Health Technology Assessment Programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["16\/151\/01"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["16\/151\/01"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000664","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosmedicine.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS Med"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Vaginal cervical cerclage and progesterone are established treatments for prevention of pregnancy loss and prematurity. There is limited data to assess the effect of these treatments in combination. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between progesterone and no progesterone treatment on pregnancy outcomes in women at high risk of preterm birth who had received a vaginal cervical cerclage.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods and findings<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This is a secondary post-hoc analysis of women recruited to the C-STICH randomised controlled trial, which recruited in 75 obstetric units in the UK between 2015 and 2021. In the C-STICH trial, women with a singleton pregnancy, receiving a vaginal cervical cerclage due to a history of pregnancy loss or premature birth, or if indicated by ultrasound, were randomised to cerclage with braided or monofilament suture, with a primary outcome of pregnancy loss, defined as miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death in the first week of life. In this secondary analysis, the primary outcome was pregnancy loss, defined as miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life. Secondary maternal outcomes included miscarriage and previable neonatal death; stillbirth; gestational age at delivery; preterm pre labour rupture of membranes, and sepsis. Secondary neonatal outcomes included early\/late neonatal death and sepsis. For each outcome, regression models were fitted adjusting for prespecified prognostic variables.<\/jats:p>\n                    <jats:p>From the 2,048 women recruited to C-STICH, 1943 (95%) women had a vaginal cerclage placed and available progesterone data. Of these, 834 (43%) women received progesterone and 1,109 (57%) did not receive progesterone. In women with primary outcome data available, in our predefined analysis pregnancy loss occurred in 49 (5.9%) of 832 women who received progesterone and 91 (8.3%) of 1,103 women who did not receive progesterone (adjusted* risk ratio 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.50, 0.99]); adjusted risk difference \u22120.02 (95% CI [\u22120.04, \u22120.001], *adjusted for indication, obstetric history, surgical technique, and maternal age). Further exploratory analysis excluding women who had termination of pregnancy for foetal anomaly demonstrated a nonsignificant reduction in the risk of pregnancy loss. Key limitations of this study include a nonrandomised trial design and unknown confounding relating to variation in progesterone use.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In women with a vaginal cervical cerclage and concomitant progesterone there appears to be an association with a reduced risk of pregnancy loss. This combination therapy may be an important opportunity to further reduce the risk of pregnancy loss in this high-risk cohort.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004513","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T18:56:53Z","timestamp":1769194613000},"page":"e1004513","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Pregnancy outcomes in women at high risk of preterm birth receiving a vaginal cervical cerclage with, or without, progesterone: A retrospective, secondary analysis of the C-STICH randomised controlled trial data"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"23","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9817-4313","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Victoria","family":"Hodgetts Morton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1247-429X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Katie","family":"Morris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Philip","family":"Toozs-Hobson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lee","family":"Middleton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole","family":"Pilarski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-7379-4107","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lilah","family":"Bell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-4531-5615","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Martha","family":"Hogg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0983-7590","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Rebecca","family":"Man","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fidan","family":"Israfil-Bayli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5273-3132","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Andrew","family":"Shennan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nigel","family":"Simpson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christoph","family":"Lees","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0473-0532","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Catherine","family":"Moakes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6198","key":"pmed.1004513.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1251816","article-title":"Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes","volume":"345","author":"R Romero","year":"2014","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"10280","key":"pmed.1004513.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00217-8","article-title":"Evaluating Progestogens for Preventing Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC): meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials","volume":"397","author":"EPPPIC Group","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"pmed.1004513.ref003","article-title":"Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy","volume":"6","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10033","key":"pmed.1004513.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2106","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00350-0","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial","volume":"387","author":"JE Norman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1004513.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004427","article-title":"Comparing cervical cerclage, pessary and vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix (SuPPoRT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"21","author":"NL Hezelgrave","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1004513.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101351","article-title":"Concurrent progestogen and cerclage to reduce preterm birth: a multicenter international retrospective cohort","volume":"6","author":"JE Tolosa","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"8","key":"pmed.1004513.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0637-9324","article-title":"Rescue adjuvant vaginal progesterone may improve outcomes in cervical cerclage failure","volume":"78","author":"AR Roman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"issue":"1","key":"pmed.1004513.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-021-05629-3","article-title":"C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes-a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"F Israfil-Bayli","year":"2021","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"10361","key":"pmed.1004513.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1426","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01808-6","article-title":"Monofilament suture versus braided suture thread to improve pregnancy outcomes after vaginal cervical cerclage (C-STICH): a pragmatic randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial","volume":"400","author":"V Hodgetts Morton","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"5","key":"pmed.1004513.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.10.026","article-title":"Perioperative complications of a transvaginal cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"228","author":"CE van Dijk","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"pmed.1004513.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17438","article-title":"McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"130","author":"L McAuliffe","year":"2023","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"8","key":"pmed.1004513.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.7215","article-title":"Accounting for competing risks in randomized controlled trials: a review and recommendations for improvement","volume":"36","author":"PC Austin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"pmed.1004513.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2012.09.017","article-title":"A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions","volume":"66","author":"A Latouche","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"pmed.1004513.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.022","article-title":"The biological basis and prevention of preterm birth","volume":"52","author":"GC Di Renzo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1004513.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.12.006","article-title":"Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence","volume":"223","author":"A Coomarasamy","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pmed.1004513.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/S2352-4642(21)00311-4","article-title":"Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals","volume":"6","author":"J Perin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet Child Adolesc Health"},{"issue":"10","key":"pmed.1004513.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040296","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"4","author":"E von Elm","year":"2007","journal-title":"PLoS Med"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004513","type":"new_version","label":"New version","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770163200000}}],"container-title":["PLOS Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004513","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T18:42:22Z","timestamp":1770230542000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004513"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Annettee","family":"Nakimuli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004513","relation":{},"ISSN":["1549-1676"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1549-1676","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]]}}}