{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T18:30:38Z","timestamp":1783535438338,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,2]],"date-time":"2013-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1380672000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0076530","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,2]],"date-time":"2013-10-02T21:48:16Z","timestamp":1380750496000},"page":"e76530","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Single Incision versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Liangyuan","family":"Geng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Changhua","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jianfeng","family":"Bai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","first-page":"416","article-title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--late results","author":"E M\u00fche","year":"1991","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800840536","article-title":"One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"84","author":"G Navarra","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3008","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-1661-x","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison with the gold standard","volume":"25","author":"S Joseph","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1689","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2657-x","article-title":"Comparison between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective trial of the Club Coelio","volume":"27","author":"P Hauters","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2823","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2253-0","article-title":"Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study","volume":"26","author":"D Solomon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2011.0391","article-title":"Comparison of cosmetic outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an objective study","volume":"22","author":"P Garg","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481207800443","article-title":"Surgical stress response and clinical outcomes of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective nonrandomized study","volume":"78","author":"HJ Han","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1618","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-012-1906-6","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"16","author":"P Garg","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182685d0a","article-title":"Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"L Hao","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-2051-0","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"SR Markar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1790","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-012-1956-9","article-title":"Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC)","volume":"16","author":"A Pisanu","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2644","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-012-1719-5","article-title":"Single-Incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials","volume":"36","author":"MS Sajid","year":"2012","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2012.06284.x","article-title":"Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis","volume":"82","author":"Z Wang","year":"2012","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2011.0521","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single-Site versus traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"X Zhong","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.8937","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"100","author":"S Trastulli","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2293","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2763-9","article-title":"Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"A Arezzo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref17","article-title":"Grp P","author":"D Moher","year":"2009"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(95)00134-4","article-title":"Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?","volume":"17","author":"AR Jadad","year":"1996","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","article-title":"Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample","volume":"5","author":"SP Hozo","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2482-11-24","article-title":"Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)","volume":"11","author":"DC Steinemann","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"ref21","first-page":"S35","article-title":"Conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus silstm port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first prospective randomized sham controlled trial","volume":"25","author":"R Tacchino","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9003","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"100","author":"S Saad","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2556-1","article-title":"Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"FA Madureira","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1758-5910.2012.00154.x","article-title":"Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"6","author":"SK Chang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.039","article-title":"Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"48","author":"DJ Ostlie","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v19.i3.394","article-title":"Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Prospective randomized study","volume":"19","author":"MX Pan","year":"2013","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182402448","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a prospective randomized study","volume":"22","author":"H Sinan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.97586","article-title":"Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases","volume":"8","author":"R Vilallonga","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minim Access Surg"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-2028-z","article-title":"Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"26","author":"MS Phillips","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3435","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2359-4","article-title":"Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)","volume":"26","author":"JF Noguera","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182631a9a","article-title":"Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"22","author":"A Sasaki","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2589-5","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"27","author":"RA Luna","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.038","article-title":"Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison","volume":"215","author":"D Leung","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.3109\/13645706.2011.577787","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study","volume":"21","author":"M Zheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012","article-title":"Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data","volume":"201","author":"J Marks","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3182192f89","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"254","author":"J Ma","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.06.019","article-title":"Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial","volume":"202","author":"MM Lirici","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009","article-title":"Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"202","author":"EC Lai","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes","volume":"21","author":"ZG Cao","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7689","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"98","author":"P Bucher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2010.11.885","article-title":"Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study","volume":"66","author":"G Aprea","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1842","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-0887-3","article-title":"Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"24","author":"EC Tsimoyiannis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7087","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"97","author":"PC Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref44","first-page":"122","article-title":"Four port versus single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"15","author":"Z Mehmood","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Surg Pakistan (International)"},{"key":"ref45","first-page":"595","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a new advantage of gallbladder surgery","volume":"34","author":"Z Rasi\u0107","year":"2010","journal-title":"Coll Antropol"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1080\/110241599750007478","article-title":"Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"165","author":"F Bresadola","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur J Surg"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2008.07.009","article-title":"Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status","volume":"54","author":"D Canes","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006798.pub3","article-title":"Day-case versus overnight stay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy","volume":"16","author":"KS Gurusamy","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2008.12.033","article-title":"Pre-incision local in\ufb01ltration with levobupivacaine reduces pain and analgesic consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a new device for day-case procedure","volume":"6","author":"F Cantore","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-011-0769-8","article-title":"Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. 'conventional' laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study","volume":"396","author":"M Kilian","year":"2011","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"ref51","first-page":"38","article-title":"Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS)","volume":"27","author":"M Zahid","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2012.814","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review","volume":"147","author":"TC Hall","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-005-0016-x","article-title":"Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a critical review","volume":"20","author":"M Kapischke","year":"2006","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0076530","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,7]],"date-time":"2022-03-07T19:23:19Z","timestamp":1646680999000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0076530"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Robert\u00a0K","family":"Hills","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,2]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0076530","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,2]]}}}