{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T02:21:47Z","timestamp":1790907707603,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]],"date-time":"2013-12-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1387497600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0082115","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]],"date-time":"2013-12-20T21:22:14Z","timestamp":1387574534000},"page":"e82115","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"8","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct00702208","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"}],"author":[{"given":"Heidi E.","family":"Jones","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mahesh M.","family":"Mansukhani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guo-Xia","family":"Tong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carolyn L.","family":"Westhoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/dji115","article-title":"Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process","volume":"97","author":"WA Leyden","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"ref2","first-page":"129","article-title":"Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women","volume":"17","author":"TL Byrd","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ethn Dis"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1097\/01.cej.0000236250.71113.7c","article-title":"Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: an application of the Integrated Model for Behavioural Change","volume":"16","author":"T Knops-Dullens","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer Prev"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1679","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.02369-06","article-title":"Agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimen results for detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens from women in Gugulethu, South Africa","volume":"45","author":"HE Jones","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Microbiol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1136\/sti.2004.011858","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis","volume":"81","author":"GS Ogilvie","year":"2005","journal-title":"Sex Transm Infect"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.01.023","article-title":"Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"105","author":"P Petignat","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1097\/01.grf.0000151569.46072.34","article-title":"The role of self-collection devices for cytology and human papillomavirus DNA testing in cervical cancer screening","volume":"48","author":"MA Bidus","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31804a8285","article-title":"Cervical cancer screening in the 21st century: is it time to retire the PAP smear?","volume":"50","author":"TC Wright Jr","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199802123380703","article-title":"Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women","volume":"338","author":"GY Ho","year":"1998","journal-title":"N Eng J Med"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2246","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.24634","article-title":"EUROGIN 2008 roadmap on cervical cancer prevention","volume":"125","author":"S Franceschi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.047","article-title":"2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests","volume":"197","author":"TC Wright Jr","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2114","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.16.2114","article-title":"The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology","volume":"287","author":"D Solomon","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2008.09.007","article-title":"To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains","volume":"35","author":"RW Driggers","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009","article-title":"Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies","volume":"58","author":"A Flahault","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa071430","article-title":"Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer","volume":"357","author":"MH Mayrand","year":"2007","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000220505.18525.85","article-title":"Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy","volume":"108","author":"JC Gage","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1749","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.288.14.1749","article-title":"Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral","volume":"288","author":"SL Kulasingam","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0142(19990625)87:3<113::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-V","article-title":"The effect of the quality of Papanicolaou smears on the detection of cytologic abnormalities","volume":"87","author":"M Mintzer","year":"1999","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1309\/RP84-MD34-8MFN-39UR","article-title":"Endocervical status is not predictive of the incidence of cervical cancer in the years after negative smears","volume":"115","author":"AB Bos","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Clin Pathol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(91)90870-U","article-title":"Longitudinal study of women with negative cervical smears according to endocervical status","volume":"337","author":"H Mitchell","year":"1991","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.23598","article-title":"Adjunctive high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option for disease risk assessment in patients with negative Papanicolaou tests without an endocervical\/transformation zone sample","volume":"114","author":"C Zhao","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2008.00605.x","article-title":"Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate","volume":"20","author":"D Moore","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cytopathology"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2004.00161.x","article-title":"Level of agreement and biopsy correlation using two- and three-tier systems to grade cervical dyskaryosis","volume":"15","author":"CE Anderson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cytopathology"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2518","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.02440-05","article-title":"High concordance of results of testing for human papillomavirus in cervicovaginal samples collected by two methods, with comparison of a novel self-sampling device to a conventional endocervical brush","volume":"44","author":"AATP Brink","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Clin Microbiol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.2.5509.341","article-title":"Detection of cervical cancer by irrigation smear and cervical scraping","volume":"2","author":"JM Muskett","year":"1966","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"ref26","first-page":"268","article-title":"The irrigation smear\u2013a new cytodiagnostic technique for the detection of cancer of the uterine cervix","volume":"96","author":"GH Anderson","year":"1967","journal-title":"Can Med Assoc J"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.3322\/canjclin.17.3.102","article-title":"Cancer of the cervix: further studies of the patient-obtained vaginal irrigation smear","volume":"17","author":"WA Anderson","year":"1967","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"ref28","first-page":"85","article-title":"Cancer detection by cervical scrapings and irrigation smears\/A comparative study comprising 1225 patients","volume":"46","author":"E Brandt-Nielsen","year":"1967","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1965.03080160019004","article-title":"The irrigation smear: false-negative rates in a population with cervical neoplasia","volume":"192","author":"RM Richart","year":"1965","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2012.3512","article-title":"The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women","volume":"21","author":"HE Jones","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"}],"container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0082115","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,23]],"date-time":"2018-10-23T02:04:19Z","timestamp":1540260259000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0082115"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Hamid Reza","family":"Baradaran","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0082115","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]]}}}