{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,3]],"date-time":"2026-10-03T03:53:33Z","timestamp":1790999613693,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,12]],"date-time":"2014-08-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1407801600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0104846","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,12]],"date-time":"2014-08-12T18:11:15Z","timestamp":1407867075000},"page":"e104846","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":70,"title":["Role of Editorial and Peer Review Processes in Publication Bias: Analysis of Drug Trials Submitted to Eight Medical Journals"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Marlies","family":"van Lent","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Overbeke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henk Jan","family":"Out","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Sterne J, Egger M, Moher D, the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (2011) Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: The Cochrane Collaboration."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e66844","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0066844","article-title":"Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review","volume":"8","author":"K Dwan","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K (2009) Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: MR000006.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000006.pub3"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e217","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0050217","article-title":"Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation","volume":"5","author":"K Rising","year":"2008","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"ref5","first-page":"MR000033","article-title":"Industry sponsorship and research outcome","volume":"12","author":"A Lundh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00006","article-title":"Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov","volume":"153","author":"FT Bourgeois","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.290.7.921","article-title":"Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?","volume":"290","author":"B Als-Nielsen","year":"2003","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref8","first-page":"477","article-title":"Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials","volume":"170","author":"M Bhandari","year":"2004","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1001\/archinternmed.2009.100","article-title":"Editorial policies and publication bias: the importance of negative studies","volume":"169","author":"L Sridharan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1934","DOI":"10.1001\/archinternmed.2010.406","article-title":"Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"170","author":"GB Emerson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2825","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.21.2825","article-title":"Publication bias in editorial decision making","volume":"287","author":"CM Olson","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00418.x","article-title":"Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals","volume":"184","author":"KP Lee","year":"2006","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"ref13","first-page":"1010","article-title":"Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not","volume":"89","author":"JR Lynch","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.00279","article-title":"Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)","volume":"90","author":"K Okike","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-9-79","article-title":"Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies","volume":"9","author":"F Song","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa065779","article-title":"Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy","volume":"358","author":"EH Turner","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.326.7400.1171","article-title":"Evidence b(i)ased medicine\u2014selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications","volume":"326","author":"H Melander","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000354","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000354","article-title":"Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study","volume":"7","author":"A Lundh","year":"2010","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1321","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.794016","article-title":"Differential citation rates of major cardiovascular clinical trials according to source of funding: a survey from 2000 to 2005","volume":"118","author":"D Conen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e403","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0000403","article-title":"Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature","volume":"2","author":"AV Kulkarni","year":"2007","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e4212","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e4212","article-title":"High reprint orders in medical journals and pharmaceutical industry funding: case-control study","volume":"344","author":"AE Handel","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462303000680","article-title":"How important is the size of a reprint order?","volume":"19","author":"S Hopewell","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Technol Assess Health Care"},{"key":"ref23","unstructured":"International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2013) Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Available: <ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/icmje-recommendations.pdf\" xlink:type=\"simple\">http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/icmje-recommendations.pdf<\/ext-link>. Accesssed 2014 Jul 22."},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-13-120","article-title":"Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source","volume":"13","author":"M van Lent","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"iii","key":"ref25","first-page":"ix","article-title":"Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases","volume":"14","author":"F Song","year":"2010","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1992.03480030052036","article-title":"Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards","volume":"267","author":"K Dickersin","year":"1992","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2432","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.01687","article-title":"Nonscientific factors associated with acceptance for publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)","volume":"90","author":"K Okike","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f5248","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f5248","article-title":"&quot;Hardly worth the effort&quot;? Medical journals&apos; policies and their editors&apos; and publishers&apos; views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study","volume":"347","author":"E Wager","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref29","first-page":"182","article-title":"Publication bias: direction of outcome is less important than scientific quality","volume":"11","author":"NC Abbot","year":"1998","journal-title":"Perfusion"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e10072","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0010072","article-title":"Editorial peer reviewers&apos; recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?","volume":"5","author":"RL Kravitz","year":"2010","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Senn S (2012) Misunderstanding publication bias: editors are not blameless after all. F1000Research 1.","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.1-59.v1"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.331.7517.638-a","article-title":"Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: here&apos;s a proposal for editors that may help reduce publication bias","volume":"331","author":"MM Glymour","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.03.023","article-title":"A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias","volume":"66","author":"YM Smulders","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0104846","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,23]],"date-time":"2020-08-23T04:54:19Z","timestamp":1598158459000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0104846"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Roberta W.","family":"Scherer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,12]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,12]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0104846","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,12]]}}}