{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]],"date-time":"2026-02-19T14:49:26Z","timestamp":1771512566307,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,8]],"date-time":"2016-01-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1452211200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0146676","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,8]],"date-time":"2016-01-08T18:43:15Z","timestamp":1452278595000},"page":"e0146676","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Xingchao","family":"Shentu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xin","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiajing","family":"Tang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiaoning","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","first-page":"38","article-title":"Minimizing the incision in cataract surgery\u2013a continuous challenge","volume":"3","author":"W Omulecki","year":"2004","journal-title":"Okulistyka"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1549","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2005.01.030","article-title":"Visual outcome of microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri.Smart lens","volume":"31","author":"JL Alio","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.10.058","article-title":"Microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Part 1: laboratory studies","volume":"33","author":"RH Osher","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1563","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.04.037","article-title":"Comparison of surgically induced astigmatismafter coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision","volume":"35","author":"Michal Wilczynski","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.013","article-title":"Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery Prospective comparative study","volume":"36","author":"Izzet Can","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2011.10.034","article-title":"Clinical Evaluation of Three Incision Size\u2013Dependent Phacoemulsification Systems","volume":"153","author":"Lixia Luo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.09.037","article-title":"Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery","volume":"34","author":"AA Dosso","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.02.035","article-title":"Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery","volume":"33","author":"AS Crema","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.09.037","article-title":"Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery","volume":"34","author":"Andre\u00b4Alexandre Dosso","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refr act Surg"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLOS Med"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3140","DOI":"10.1182\/blood-2010-05-280883","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology","volume":"116","author":"M Crowther","year":"2010","journal-title":"Blood"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2006.04.004","article-title":"Random-effects model for meta analysis of clinical trials: an update","volume":"28","author":"R Der Simonian","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Trials"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5000521","article-title":"Bimanual microincision versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"25","author":"Chong Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.10.044","article-title":"Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: Randomized comparative clinical study","volume":"33","author":"YZ Liu","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.02.035","article-title":"Comparatie study of coaxial phacoemulsifiatin and microincision cataract surgery: one-year follow-up","volume":"33","author":"AS Crema","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"M Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.2307\/2533446","article-title":"Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias","volume":"50","author":"CB Begg","year":"1994","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"ref19","first-page":"7","article-title":"Comparative analysis of early distance visual acuity in patients after coaxial phacoemulsification through the micro-incision (1.8 mm) and after standard phacoemulsification through the small incision (2.75 mm)","volume":"116","author":"Maria Orczykowska1","year":"2014","journal-title":"Klinika Oczna"},{"key":"ref20","first-page":"314","article-title":"Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision","volume":"113","author":"M Wilczynski","year":"2011","journal-title":"Klin Oczna"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2091","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.08.025","article-title":"Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds","volume":"34","author":"JP Berdahl","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1159\/000329599","article-title":"Comparison of microcoaxial with standard clear corneal incisions in torsional handpiece cataract surgery","volume":"227","author":"YG Park","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ophthalmologica"},{"key":"ref23","article-title":"Surgically Induced Astigmatism: Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery vs. Small-Incision Cataract Surgery","author":"WY Tam","journal-title":"American Academy of Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2014.28.2.130","article-title":"Comparison of surgically-induced astigmatism after combined phacoemulsification and 23-gauge vitrectomy: 2.2-mm vs. 2.75-mm cataract surgery","volume":"28","author":"YK Kim","year":"2014","journal-title":"Korean J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5000207","article-title":"Smaller incision size leads to higher predictability in microcoaxial cataract surgery","volume":"23","author":"MK Klamann","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1460","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.03.036","article-title":"Quantitative measurement of wound architecture in microincision cataract surgery","volume":"38","author":"MP Weikert","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.11.012","article-title":"Corneal wound architecture and integrity after phacoemulsification evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques","volume":"33","author":"JP Berdahl","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e3181f7f149","article-title":"Early changes in morphology and intraocular pressure by size of clear corneal incision","volume":"30","author":"B Cheng","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.3928\/15428877-20091230-23","article-title":"Corneal wound architecture and integrity after torsional and mixed phacoemulsification: evaluation of standard and microincisional coaxial techniques","volume":"41","author":"B Jun","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20150122-02","article-title":"Influence of ocular features and incision width on surgically induced astigmatism after cataract surgery","volume":"31","author":"SW Chang","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref31","first-page":"1424","article-title":"Clinical comparative study of changes in the tear film and ocular surface after 1.8mm and 3.0 mm clear corneal incision phacoemulsification","volume":"32","author":"Wei Cui","year":"2014","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.02.052","article-title":"Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on surgically induced astigmatism in cataract surgery","volume":"39","author":"A Denoyer","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref33","first-page":"268","article-title":"Comparative study of coaxial microincision cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification","volume":"85","author":"MJ Capella","year":"2010","journal-title":"Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol"},{"key":"ref34","first-page":"207","article-title":"Influence of 3.0 mm incision coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery (MICS) on corneal thickness","volume":"111","author":"E Wylega\u0142a","year":"2009","journal-title":"Klin Oczna"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.3341\/jkos.2015.56.1.19","article-title":"Comparison of Clinical Results between 2.2 mm and 2.8 mm Incision Cataract Surgery Using Ellips Ultrasound","volume":"56","author":"De Jin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society"},{"key":"ref36","first-page":"379","article-title":"Comparative Study of Induced Corneal Astigmatism After 2.2 Mm and 3.3 Mm Incisions in Coaxial Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery","volume":"1","author":"FX Brousseaud","year":"2008","journal-title":"IOVS"},{"key":"ref37","first-page":"636","article-title":"Conventional Phaco versus Microincision Cataract Surgery (MICS)","volume":"47","author":"RM Torres","year":"2006","journal-title":"IOVS"},{"key":"ref38","first-page":"25","article-title":"Surgical outcome of coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound after a 2.4 mm versus 3.2 mm clear corneal temporal incision","volume":"315","author":"MS Kocabora","year":"2010","journal-title":"Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.10.048","article-title":"Randomized intraindividual comparison of posterior capsule opacification between a microincision intraocular lens and a conventional intraocular lens","volume":"35","author":"Georgia Cleary","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of Cataract and Refreactive Surgery"},{"key":"ref40","article-title":"Microcoaxial Phacoemulsification vs. Conventional Phacoemulsification","author":"SJ Hashemian","year":"2007","journal-title":"American Academy of Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref41","article-title":"Comparison of macular thickness and inflammatory cytokine levels after microincision versus small incision coaxial cataract surgery","author":"Ho Sik Hwang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-014-0331-7","article-title":"Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal micro-incision versus small-incision cataract surgery","volume":"58","author":"K Hayashi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20090101-04","article-title":"Induced Astigmatism With 2.2- and 3.0-mm Coaxial Phacoemulsification Incisions","volume":"25","author":"Samuel Masket","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.5455\/medarh.2012.66.125-128","article-title":"Corneal astigmatism after micro-incision cataract operation","volume":"66","author":"Z Musanovic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med Arh"},{"key":"ref45","first-page":"903","article-title":"Clinical evaluation on the coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery","volume":"47","author":"K Yao","year":"2011","journal-title":"Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.04.024","article-title":"Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract","volume":"37","author":"EC Kim","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-011-0007-5","article-title":"Early changes in corneal edema following torsional phacoemulsification using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug photography","volume":"55","author":"YJ Li","year":"2011","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2009.02117.x","article-title":"The effect of micro-incision and small-incision coaxial phaco-emulsification on corneal astigmatism","volume":"37","author":"J Wang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Experiment Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.10.031","article-title":"Postoperative corneal shape changes: Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery","volume":"35","author":"Ken Hayashi","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2009.11.041","article-title":"Corneal shape changes after 2.0-mm or 3.0-mm clear corneal versus scleral tunnel incision cataract surgery","volume":"117","author":"K Hayashi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref51","first-page":"13","article-title":"Clinical Comparison of Conventional Coaxial Phacoemulsification and Coaxial Microincision Phacoemulsification","volume":"22","author":"Hassan Hashemi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref52","first-page":"1433","article-title":"Comparison of 2. 2mm micro incision and 3.0mm incision coaxial phacoemulsification","volume":"14","author":"Jian-Gang Zhu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Eye Sci"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.12.031","article-title":"Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system","volume":"35","author":"KM Lee","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1083","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20061102-14","article-title":"Changes in corneal astigmatism and high order aberrations after clear corneal tunnel phacoemulsification guided by corneal topography","volume":"22","author":"Y Jiang","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1079","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20061102-13","article-title":"Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision","volume":"22","author":"K Yao","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1997","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.06.024","article-title":"Outcomes of microincisional cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification","volume":"112","author":"JL Alio","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.11.016","article-title":"Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemuosification: prospective study","volume":"33","author":"GM Cavallini","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(95)30983-9","article-title":"The correlation between incision size and corneal shape changes in sutureless cataract surgery","volume":"102","author":"K Hayashi","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(94)31224-3","article-title":"Continued endothelial cell loss ten years after lens implantation","volume":"101","author":"WM Bourne","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2004.12.080","article-title":"Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly to corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery","volume":"139","author":"B Lundberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.02.070","article-title":"Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: microincision versus standard technique","volume":"32","author":"R Mencucci","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(96)80272-0","article-title":"Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision","volume":"22","author":"HB Dick","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(96)80121-0","article-title":"Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification","volume":"22","author":"K Hayashi","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1997","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.06.024","article-title":"Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsifiatin","volume":"112","author":"J Ali\u00f3","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.01.013","article-title":"Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma aftr bimanual microincision and conventinal small-incision coaxial phaco- emulsifiatin","volume":"33","author":"G Kahraman","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.07.035","article-title":"Real-time intraocular pressure measurement in standard and microcoaxial phacoemulsification","volume":"36","author":"Thomas C. Kreutzer","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"ref67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.12.029","article-title":"Corneal endothelial cell density andassociated factors in a population-based study in Japan: the Kumejima study","volume":"149","author":"A Higa","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0146676","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,13]],"date-time":"2020-09-13T19:20:21Z","timestamp":1600024821000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0146676"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Haotian","family":"Lin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,8]]},"references-count":67,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,8]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0146676","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,8]]}}}