{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T03:18:55Z","timestamp":1792811935451,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":211,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]],"date-time":"2020-01-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580256000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000925","name":"National Health and Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000925","name":"National Health and Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0228196","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]],"date-time":"2020-01-29T18:30:41Z","timestamp":1580322641000},"page":"e0228196","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":67,"title":["A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4463-7615","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Dominiek","family":"Coates","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angela","family":"Makris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christine","family":"Catling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda","family":"Henry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vanessa","family":"Scarf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicole","family":"Watts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deborah","family":"Fox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Purshaiyna","family":"Thirukumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincent","family":"Wong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hamish","family":"Russell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caroline","family":"Homer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"pone.0228196.ref001","unstructured":"Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence. New South Wales Mothers and Babies 2016. Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2017."},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0228196.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2016.07.005","article-title":"Induction of labour","volume":"26","author":"F McCarthy","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogrm.2013.11.004","article-title":"Induction of labour","volume":"24","author":"F McCarthy","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008755","article-title":"Variation in hospital rates of induction of labour: a population-based record linkage study","volume":"5","author":"TA Nippita","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref005","unstructured":"AIHW. National Maternity Data Development Project: Indications for induction of labour\u2014Research brief no. 6. Cat. no. PER 80. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref006","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"P Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"pone.0228196.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"A223","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2014-307384.609","article-title":"Immediate delivery versus expectant care in women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMPT): a multi-centre randomised controlled trial","volume":"99","author":"J Morris","year":"2014","journal-title":"Archives of Disease in Childhood"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0228196.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preghy.2017.11.004","article-title":"Indications for delivery in pre-eclampsia","volume":"1","author":"N Varnier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pregnancy hypertension"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref009","article-title":"Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes and their infants","volume":"2","author":"LM Biesty","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02065.x","article-title":"Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review","volume":"116","author":"EL Mozurkewich","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref011","unstructured":"AIHW. National core maternity indicators. Cat. no. PER 58. Canberra: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit 2013."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref012","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"6","author":"AM Gulmezoglu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref013","unstructured":"NICE. Induction of labour: NICE clinical guideline 70. Manchester: NICE\u2014National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2008."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref014","unstructured":"Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines Program. Queensland maternity and neonatal clinical guideline: induction of labour. Brisbane: Queensland Government.; 2011."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref015","unstructured":"WHO. WHO recommendations for Induction of labour: World Health Organisation; 2011."},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0228196.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30842-2","article-title":"Induction of Labour","volume":"35","author":"D Leduc","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref017","article-title":"Induction of labour indications and timing: A systematic analysis of clinical guidelines","author":"D Coates","year":"2019","journal-title":"Women and Birth"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women","volume":"379","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"The New England Journal of Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2018.08.168","article-title":"Why ARRIVE should not thrive in Australia","volume":"31","author":"M Davies-Tuck","year":"2018","journal-title":"Women and Birth"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref020","unstructured":"Hunt R, Davey MA, Anil S, Kenny S, Wills G, Simon D. Victorian perinatal services performance indicators report 2016\u201317. Melbourne: Safer Care Victoria, Victorian Government; 2018."},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.082","article-title":"Trends in planned early birth: a population-based study","volume":"207","author":"JM Morris","year":"2012","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"Supplement 2","key":"pone.0228196.ref022","first-page":"25","article-title":"Impact of early planned birth on child development: A population-based study","volume":"52","author":"JP Bentley","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Paediatr Child Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref023","first-page":"151","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences of induction of labour\u2014findings from a Swedish regional study","volume":"51","author":"I Hildingsson","year":"2011","journal-title":"ANZJOG"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12211","article-title":"Women\u2019s experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study","volume":"92","author":"J Henderson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.02.002","article-title":"Women\u2019s perceptions of induction of labour outcomes: Results of an online-survey in Germany","volume":"35","author":"C Schwarz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000050","article-title":"Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews","volume":"13","author":"M Peters","year":"2015","journal-title":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-5-69","article-title":"Scoping studies: advancing the methodology","volume":"2010","author":"D Levac","year":"2010","journal-title":"Implementation Science"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010","article-title":"What are scoping studies? A review of nursing literature","volume":"46","author":"K Davis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Nurs Stud"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1080\/1364557032000119616","article-title":"Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework","volume":"8","author":"H Arksey","year":"2005","journal-title":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref030","unstructured":"Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D, editors. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2006: American Medical Informatics Association."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref031","unstructured":"Higgins J, Savovi\u0107 J, Page M, Sterne J. Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). 2016."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref032","unstructured":"Sterne J, Higgins J, Reeves B. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) 2016 [20\/02\/1979]. http:\/\/www.riskofbias.info."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref033","unstructured":"Whiting P, Savovi\u0107 J, Higgins J, Caldwell D, Reeves B, Shea B, et al. ROBIS: Tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews: Guidance on how to use ROBIS2018."},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.07.011","article-title":"Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review","volume":"66","author":"JKJ Keulen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"l344","key":"pone.0228196.ref035","article-title":"Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"364","author":"J Keulen","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0228196.ref036","first-page":"644","article-title":"Induction of labour in postdates pregnant women","volume":"22","author":"AN Haq","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0228196.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1174824","article-title":"Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy\u2014is the caesarean section rate really lower?","volume":"36","author":"K Mahomed","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.531302","article-title":"Comparison of two policies for induction of labour postdates","volume":"31","author":"A Kassab","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2008.12.011","article-title":"Comparison of Induction of Labour and Expectant Management in Postterm Pregnancy: A Matched Cohort Study","volume":"54","author":"MAA Hermus","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of midwifery & women\u2019s health"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.806892","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management for pregnancies beyond 41 weeks","volume":"27","author":"G Daskalakis","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1169520","article-title":"When should pregnancies that extended beyond term be induced?","volume":"30","author":"I Bleicher","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0228196.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34241-4","article-title":"Does routine induction of labour at 41 weeks really reduce the rate of caesarean section compared with expectant management?","volume":"31","author":"H Pavicic","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d\u2019obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC"},{"issue":"21","key":"pone.0228196.ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2517","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1255190","article-title":"Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour after 41 + 0 weeks compared to expectant management","volume":"30","author":"EY Teo","year":"2017","journal-title":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0228196.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-107672","article-title":"Induction of Labour in Late and Postterm Pregnancies and its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome","volume":"76","author":"F Thangarajah","year":"2016","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2016.03.002","article-title":"Has perinatal outcome improved after introduction of a guideline in favour of routine induction and increased surveillance prior to 42 weeks of gestation?: A cross-sectional population-based registry study","volume":"10","author":"SL Wolff","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-017-0394-2","article-title":"Management of pregnancy at and beyond 41 completed weeks of gestation in low-risk women: a secondary analysis of two WHO multi-country surveys on maternal and newborn health","volume":"14","author":"KS Mya","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reproductive health"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref047","first-page":"1","article-title":"Postdates induction with an unfavorable cervix and risk of cesarean","author":"J McCoy","year":"2018","journal-title":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6581.1192","article-title":"Randomised comparison of early vs late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy","volume":"294","author":"K Augensen","year":"1987","journal-title":"BMJ (clinical research ed)"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0228196.ref049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909006139","article-title":"Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. A randomized prospective study","volume":"68","author":"P Bergsj\u00f8","year":"1989","journal-title":"Acta obstetricia ET gynecologica scandinavica"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0228196.ref050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12447","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial on early induction compared to expectant management of nulliparous women with prolonged latent phases","volume":"93","author":"E Br\u00e4ne","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta obstetricia ET gynecologica scandinavica"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref051","first-page":"107","article-title":"Comparison of two obstetrical policies with regard to artificial induction of labour at term. A randomised trial","volume":"11","author":"G Breart","year":"1982","journal-title":"Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique ET biologie de la reproduction"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chakravarti S, Goenka B. Conservative policy of induction of labor in uncomplicated postdated pregnancies. XVI FIGO world congress of obstetrics & gynecology; 2000 sept 3\u20138; washington dc, USA. 2000;Book 3:62.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)80498-1"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00243-9","article-title":"Postterm with favorable cervix: is induction necessary?","volume":"106","author":"B Chanrachakul","year":"2003","journal-title":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref054","unstructured":"Cohn M. R, M. Post maturity; a randomised study in a Hong Kong population. 26th British Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992."},{"issue":"7910","key":"pone.0228196.ref055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(75)92435-6","article-title":"Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial","volume":"1","author":"RA Cole","year":"1975","journal-title":"Lancet (london, england)"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90359-0","article-title":"Management of prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor versus antepartum fetal testing","volume":"156","author":"DC Dyson","year":"1987","journal-title":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1159\/000293605","article-title":"Is induction of labor indicated in prolonged pregnancy? Results of a prospective randomised trial","volume":"27","author":"C Egarter","year":"1989","journal-title":"Gynecologic and obstetric investigation"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores","volume":"120","author":"O Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref059","first-page":"31","article-title":"The canadian multicentre postterm pregnancy trial","volume":"46","author":"M Hannah","year":"1994","journal-title":"International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0228196.ref060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701416929","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy","volume":"86","author":"R Heimstad","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta obstetricia ET gynecologica scandinavica"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0228196.ref061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1969.tb06180.x","article-title":"A controlled trial of surgical induction of labour and amnioscopy in the management of prolonged pregnancy","volume":"76","author":"GR Henry","year":"1969","journal-title":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(92)90325-D","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: the management dilemma","volume":"37","author":"Y Herabutya","year":"1992","journal-title":"International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref063","first-page":"270","article-title":"Management of prolonged pregnancy: a randomized trial of induction of labour and antepartum foetal monitoring","volume":"14","author":"C James","year":"2001","journal-title":"National medical journal of India"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref064","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-350","article-title":"Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week\u201442 week dilemma","volume":"14","author":"JC Kortekaas","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC pregnancy and childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1978.tb10462.x","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of selective planned delivery","volume":"85","author":"DH Martin","year":"1978","journal-title":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref066","first-page":"105","article-title":"Alternative approaches to the management of gravidas with prolonged postterm-postdate pregnancies","volume":"30","author":"JN Martin","year":"1989","journal-title":"Journal of the mississippi state medical association"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref067","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1258","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001154","article-title":"Elective induction of labor compared with expectant management of nulliparous women at 39 weeks of gestation","volume":"126","author":"NR Miller","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstetrics and gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref068","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500139604","article-title":"Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"18","author":"PE Nielsen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref069","first-page":"101","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: procedure guidelines","volume":"40","author":"L Ocon","year":"1997","journal-title":"Progresos de obstetricia y ginecologia"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00179-3","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome beyond 41 weeks gestation","volume":"59","author":"VJ Roach","year":"1997","journal-title":"International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref071","first-page":"454","article-title":"Management of pregnancies beyond forty-one week\u2019s gestation with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"34","author":"W Sahraoui","year":"2005","journal-title":"Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique ET biologie de la reproduction"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref072","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(83)90025-5","article-title":"A prospective randomized study of induction of labor","volume":"21","author":"HA Sande","year":"1983","journal-title":"International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref073","first-page":"58","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: induction or observation","volume":"116","author":"AM Suikkari","year":"1983","journal-title":"Acta obstetricia ET gynecologica scandinavica Supplement"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref074","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347909154610","article-title":"Spontaneous labor and elective induction\u2014a prospective randomized study. I. Effects on mother and fetus","volume":"58","author":"J Tyllesk\u00e4r","year":"1979","journal-title":"Acta obstetricia ET gynecologica scandinavica"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70269-1","article-title":"A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy","volume":"170","author":"Units NIoCHaHDNoMF-M","year":"1994","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0228196.ref076","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117","article-title":"Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older","volume":"374","author":"KF Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"New England journal of medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref077","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999774","article-title":"A randomized trial of induction at 42 weeks gestation versus expectant management for postdates pregnancies","volume":"4","author":"FR Witter","year":"1987","journal-title":"American journal of perinatology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref078","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802555948","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: Is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?","volume":"88","author":"UB Wennerholm","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"pone.0228196.ref079","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S5","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2458-11-S3-S5","article-title":"Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"11","author":"AA Hussain","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref080","first-page":"1312","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"101","author":"L Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref081","article-title":"Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more)","volume":"1","author":"P Middleton","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref082","article-title":"Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome","volume":"3","author":"DM Bond","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref083","first-page":"156","article-title":"Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes at term: immediate versus delayed induction of labour","volume":"28","author":"A Omole-Ohonsi","year":"2009","journal-title":"West Afr J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref084","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4165-z","article-title":"Premature rupture of the membranes at term: time to reevaluate the management","volume":"294","author":"D Sadeh-Mestechkin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0017","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes at term in low risk women: how long should we wait in the 'latent phase'?","volume":"42","author":"A Pintucci","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of perinatal medicine"},{"issue":"412","key":"pone.0228196.ref086","article-title":"Ruptured membranes at 30 to 34 weeks: intentional delivery vs expectant management","volume":"172","author":"S Cox","year":"1995","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0228196.ref087","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial)","volume":"7","author":"DP Van der Ham","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref088","first-page":"43","article-title":"Conservative management of premature membrane rupture in pregnancy of 28\u201334 weeks. Aleatory clinical trial [Manejo conservador de ruptura prematura de membranas en embarazos de 28 a 34 semanas. Essayo clinico aleatorio]","volume":"65","author":"J Eroiz-Hernandez","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref089","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(15)33270-1","article-title":"Prospective randomised study in corticosteroids in the management of premature rupture of the membranes and the premature gestation","volume":"141","author":"T Garite","year":"1981","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90419-3","article-title":"Management of preterm prematurely ruptured membranes: a prospective randomized comparison of observation vs use of steroids and timed delivery","volume":"151","author":"J Iams","year":"1985","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"pone.0228196.ref091","article-title":"Incidence of sepsis in late preterm babies born from pregnancies complicated with premature preterm rupture of membranes","volume":"41","author":"G Koroveshi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref092","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90004-3","article-title":"Induction vs expectant management in premature rupture of the membranes with mature amniotic fluid at 32 to 36 weeks: a randomized trial","volume":"169","author":"B Mercer","year":"1993","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref093","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70638-6","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks\u2019 gestation: aggressive versus conservative management","volume":"178","author":"R Naef","year":"1998","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref094","first-page":"55","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes: a prospective, randomized evaluation of steroids, latent phase, and expectant management","volume":"66","author":"L Nelson","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref095","first-page":"196","article-title":"Preterm premature rupture of the membranes with fetal pulmonary maturity present: a prospective study","volume":"69","author":"J Spinnato","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref096","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.07.024","article-title":"Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: the PPROMEXIL-2 trial","volume":"207","author":"DP Van der Ham","year":"2012","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref097","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03399.x","article-title":"Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: no advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours","volume":"39","author":"D Akyol","year":"1999","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref098","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/S1028-4559(08)60079-0","article-title":"Pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in patients with an unfavorable cervix: active versus conservative management","volume":"47","author":"A Ayaz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref099","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1055\/s-1999-5969","article-title":"Randomized, double-blind trial of caulophyllum D4 for induction of labour after premature rupture of the membranes at term [Caulophyllum D4 zur geburtsinduktion bei vorzeitigem blasensprung: eine doppelblindstudie]","volume":"59","author":"A Beer","year":"1999","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0228196.ref100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1128","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600589636","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial","volume":"85","author":"P Cheung","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1992.tb01892.x","article-title":"Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term and unfavourable cervix: a randomized placebo-controlled trial on early intervention with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel","volume":"32","author":"T Chung","year":"1992","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref102","first-page":"1353","article-title":"Expectant vs active management of prelabour rupture of membranes at term","volume":"9","author":"S Fatima","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S32","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)80145-7","article-title":"Inducing labor with iv oxytocin may reduce the risk of neonatal infection in GBS positive women with PROM at term","volume":"176","author":"M Hannah","year":"1997","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.29309\/TPMJ\/2008.15.02.2770","article-title":"Management prelabour rupture of the membranes at term; induction of labour compared with expectant","volume":"15","author":"M Javaid","year":"2008","journal-title":"Professional Medical Journal"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0228196.ref105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00700.x","article-title":"Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of membranes at term","volume":"112","author":"F Gra\u00e7a Krupa","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14466.x","article-title":"Role of prostaglandin in the management of prelabour rupture of the membranes at term","volume":"99","author":"T Mahmood","year":"1992","journal-title":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(94)00316-6","article-title":"A randomized trial of management of pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in multiparous women using vaginal prostaglandin gel","volume":"85","author":"T Mahmood","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"pone.0228196.ref108","first-page":"346","article-title":"Premature rupture of the membranes: early induction of labor versus expectant management","volume":"51","author":"L Milasinovic","year":"1998","journal-title":"Medicinski Pregled"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70062-1","article-title":"Management of premature rupture of membranes at term: randomized trial","volume":"171","author":"R Natale","year":"1994","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref110","first-page":"223","article-title":"A randomized trial of expectant vs active management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term","volume":"20","author":"H Ottervanger","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of perinatal medicine"},{"issue":"12","key":"pone.0228196.ref111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1447","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701645287","article-title":"Does acupuncture used in nulliparous women reduce time from prelabour rupture of membranes at term to active phase of labour? A randomised controlled trial","volume":"86","author":"T Selmer-Olsen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-012-0172-6","article-title":"Premature rupture of membrane at term: Early induction versus expectant management","volume":"62","author":"K Shah","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00031-L","article-title":"Comparison of 12-and 72-hour expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in term pregnancies","volume":"85","author":"E Shalev","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349309021155","article-title":"Management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"72","author":"L Sperling","year":"1993","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1159\/000293318","article-title":"Premature rupture of the membranes\u2014intervention or not","volume":"29","author":"L Tamsen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref116","first-page":"66","article-title":"Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM) at term","volume":"39","author":"N Tasnim","year":"2000","journal-title":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref117","first-page":"93","article-title":"A comparison of early and delayed induction of labour with spontaneous rupture of membranes at term","volume":"74","author":"M Wagner","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref118","article-title":"Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term","volume":"1","author":"C Cluver","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0228196.ref119","article-title":"Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation","author":"D Churchill","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0228196.ref120","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe pre-eclampsia","author":"MMR Amorim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.016","article-title":"Expectant management of severe preeclampsia remote from term: the MEXPRE Latin Study, a randomized, multicenter clinical trial","volume":"209","author":"P Vigil-De Gracia","year":"2013","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"10204","key":"pone.0228196.ref122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(19)31963-4","article-title":"Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled trial","volume":"394","author":"LC Chappell","year":"2019","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0228196.ref123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03405.x","article-title":"Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial","volume":"119","author":"P Tajik","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.928689","article-title":"Maternal outcomes according to mode of delivery in women with severe preeclampsia: a cohort study","volume":"28","author":"MMR Amorim","year":"2015","journal-title":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0228196.ref125","first-page":"19325","article-title":"Does aggressive and expectant management of severe preeclampsia affect the neurologic development of the infant?","volume":"8","author":"AA Ertekin","year":"2015","journal-title":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220141245","article-title":"Induction or caesarean section for preterm pre-eclampsia?","volume":"22","author":"CD Mashiloane","year":"2002","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.076","article-title":"Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes","volume":"199","author":"MC Alanis","year":"2008","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S34","DOI":"10.1016\/S2210-7789(10)60140-7","article-title":"Optimal timing of delivery in pregnancies with pre-existing hypertension","author":"J Hutcheon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pregnancy hypertension"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.009","article-title":"What is the optimal time for delivery in women with gestational hypertension?","volume":"207","author":"MO Cruz","year":"2012","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref130","first-page":"485","article-title":"Severe preeclampsia and the very low birth weight infant: is induction of labor harmful?","volume":"93","author":"JM Alexander","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.5.305.311","article-title":"Labor induction for the preterm severe pre-eclamptic patient: is it worth the effort?","volume":"10","author":"SC Blackwell","year":"2001","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref132","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70133-4","article-title":"Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery?","volume":"179","author":"AH Nassar","year":"1998","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref133","first-page":"443","volume":"53","author":"TP Bernardes","year":"2019","journal-title":"Delivery or expectant management for prevention of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an individual participant data meta-analysis"},{"issue":"9986","key":"pone.0228196.ref134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2492","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61998-X","article-title":"Immediate delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"K Broekhuijsen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9694","key":"pone.0228196.ref135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"CM Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref136","first-page":"118","article-title":"Study on induction of labour versus expectant management in gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia after 36 weeks of gestation","author":"A Majeed","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref137","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.04.010","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes of expectant management of stable mild to moderate chronic hypertension as compared with planned delivery","volume":"127","author":"HO Hamed","year":"2014","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0228196.ref138","first-page":"208","article-title":"Management of preeclampsia when diagnosed between 34\u201337 weeks gestation: deliver now or deliberate until 37 weeks?","volume":"55","author":"M Owens","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","author":"Grit Study Group","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref140","first-page":"175","article-title":"Severe preterm preeclampsia: aggressive or expectant management","volume":"71","author":"E Mesbah","year":"2003","journal-title":"Medical Journal of Cairo University"},{"issue":"1070","key":"pone.0228196.ref141","article-title":"Aggressive or Expectant Management for Patients With Severe Preeclampsia Between 28\u2013","volume":"76","author":"HJ Odendaal","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90104-X","article-title":"Aggressive versus expectant management of severe preeclampsia at 28 to 32 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"171","author":"BM Sibai","year":"1994","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref143","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4281-9","article-title":"Elective delivery versus expectant management for pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of RCTs","volume":"295","author":"Y Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"issue":"1, Supplement","key":"pone.0228196.ref144","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S246","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.532","article-title":"486: Temporizing management versus termination of pregnancy in women with severe preeclampsia at 28\u201334 weeks (TOTEM-Trial)","volume":"212","author":"J Duvekot","year":"2015","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref145","article-title":"Elective delivery in diabetic pregnant women","author":"M Boulvain","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref146","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.005","article-title":"Delivery timing and cesarean delivery risk in women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus","volume":"211","author":"AL Sutton","year":"2014","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref147","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.14341\/DM2004130-33","article-title":"A comparison of the clinical outcomes of induced and spontaneous labour in patients with gestational diabetes","volume":"19","author":"OA Bettikher","year":"2016","journal-title":"Diabetes Mellitus"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref148","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.03.006","article-title":"Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes","volume":"215","author":"MN Feghali","year":"2016","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref149","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.5603\/GP.a2017.0016","article-title":"Labour in women with gestational diabetes mellitus","volume":"88","author":"K Grabowska","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ginekologia polska"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.021","article-title":"Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus","volume":"214","author":"N Melamed","year":"2016","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref151","first-page":"79","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term","volume":"300","author":"D Vitner","year":"2019","journal-title":"AoG"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref152","first-page":"299","volume":"300","author":"A Hochberg","year":"2019","journal-title":"Perinatal outcome following induction of labor in patients with good glycemic controlled gestational diabetes: does timing matter?"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref153","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90631-R","article-title":"Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management","volume":"169","author":"S Kjos","year":"1993","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref154","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14389","article-title":"Immediate delivery or expectant management in gestational diabetes at term: the GINEXMAL randomised controlled trial","volume":"124","author":"S Alberico","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"issue":"14","key":"pone.0228196.ref155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0902430","article-title":"A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes","volume":"361","author":"MB Landon","year":"2009","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref156","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks' gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy","author":"J Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref157","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0566-4","article-title":"Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study","volume":"15","author":"M Jonsson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref158","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"940","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13521","article-title":"Trial of labour in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"123","author":"H de Castro","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"issue":"23","key":"pone.0228196.ref159","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3999","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1152252","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin gestation: lessons from a population based study","volume":"29","author":"B Hamou","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1205554","article-title":"Induction of labour vs. spontaneous vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy after 36 weeks of gestation","volume":"37","author":"MV Tavares","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"49","key":"pone.0228196.ref161","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1159\/000010207","article-title":"Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy","volume":"2000","author":"S Suzuki","year":"2000","journal-title":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0228196.ref162","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03356.x","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial","volume":"119","author":"Group TToBT","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref163","article-title":"Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy","author":"V Gurung","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref164","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.012","article-title":"The risk of infant and fetal death by each additional week of expectant management in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy by gestational age","volume":"212","author":"A Puljic","year":"2015","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0228196.ref165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1342","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1212833","article-title":"Outcome after implementation of a modern management strategy for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy","volume":"30","author":"KS Kohari","year":"2017","journal-title":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref166","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e3799","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e3799","article-title":"Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, and early term delivery versus expectant management, in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: semifactorial randomised clinical trial","volume":"344","author":"L Chappell","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref167","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.048","article-title":"Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"217","author":"T Kawakita","year":"2017","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref168","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002408","article-title":"Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring","volume":"131","author":"C Pickens","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref169","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13807","article-title":"Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study","volume":"123","author":"V Lee","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.034","article-title":"Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term","volume":"211","author":"H Wolfe","year":"2014","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref171","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.11.004","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management at term by subgroups of maternal age: an individual patient data meta-analysis","volume":"197","author":"KF Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0228196.ref172","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002425","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002425","article-title":"Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study","volume":"14","author":"HE Knight","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0228196.ref173","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00169.x","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome in women with heart disease undergoing induction of labour","volume":"111","author":"G Oron","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref174","article-title":"Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia","author":"M Boulvain","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0228196.ref175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200211000-00030","article-title":"Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review","volume":"100","author":"L Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref176","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x","article-title":"Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?","volume":"119","author":"YW Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref177","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14435","article-title":"Induction of labour for suspected macrosomia at term in non-diabetic women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"124","author":"ER Magro-Malosso","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref178","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"M Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1, Part 2","key":"pone.0228196.ref179","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90803-X","article-title":"A prospective randomized trial of induction versus expectant management in nondiabetec pregnancies with fetal macrosomia","volume":"172","author":"A Tey","year":"1995","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00149-X","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study","volume":"89","author":"O Gonen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref181","unstructured":"Thornton JG. Leave alone or induce for the big baby (LIBBY). Unpublished pilot randomized control trial (ISRCTN98146741). 1998."},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref182","article-title":"Elective preterm birth for fetal gastroschisis","author":"NH Grant","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref183","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.048","article-title":"Delivery planning for pregnancies with gastroschisis: findings from a prospective national registry","volume":"213","author":"A Al-Kaff","year":"2015","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0228196.ref184","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1726","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2005.07.047","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of elective preterm delivery of fetuses with gastroschisis","volume":"40","author":"HL Logghe","year":"2005","journal-title":"Journal of pediatric surgery"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0228196.ref185","article-title":"Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes","author":"DM Bond","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref186","article-title":"Immediate versus deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise for improving outcomes","volume":"7","author":"SJ Stock","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref187","first-page":"1","article-title":"Induction of labor in cases of late preterm isolated oligohydramnios: is it justified?","volume":"31","author":"NA Brzezinski-Sinai","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0228196.ref188","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1302423","article-title":"Late preterm and early term: when to induce a growth restricted fetus? A population-based study","volume":"31","author":"A Rabinovich","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref189","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16809-8","article-title":"Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial","volume":"364","author":"GRIT study group","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.06.018","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction at term: Induction or spontaneous labour?: Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): A pilot study","volume":"125","author":"MML van den Hove","year":"2006","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.10.019","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term (The Digitat Trial): A multicentre randomised controlled trial","author":"K Boers","year":"2009","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref192","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"K Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Bmj"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref193","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1159\/000083901","article-title":"Oligohydramnios in uncomplicated pregnancies beyond 40 completed weeks","volume":"20","author":"S Ek","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fetal diagnosis and therapy"},{"issue":"2 Part 1","key":"pone.0228196.ref194","first-page":"390","article-title":"Management of Late-Term and Postterm Pregnancies. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 146","volume":"124","author":"ACOG","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0228196.ref195","first-page":"700.e1","article-title":"Length of rupture of membranes in the setting of premature rupture of membranes at term and infectious maternal morbidity","volume":"198","author":"SH Tran","year":"2008","journal-title":"JAjoo, gynecology"},{"issue":"20","key":"pone.0228196.ref196","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2677","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.290.20.2677","article-title":"Chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy in term and near-term infants","volume":"290","author":"YW Wu","year":"2003","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref197","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15821","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: The Role of Ultrasound in Twin Pregnancy","volume":"47","author":"A Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0228196.ref198","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1482","DOI":"10.1002\/hep.26617","article-title":"Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study","volume":"59","author":"V Geenes","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hepatology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref199","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1002\/hep.20336","article-title":"Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates","volume":"40","author":"A Glantz","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hepatology"},{"issue":"10174","key":"pone.0228196.ref200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31877-4","article-title":"Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses","volume":"2","author":"C Ovadia","year":"2019","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1111\/cch.12320","article-title":"Long-term cognitive and school outcomes of late-preterm and early-term births: a systematic review","volume":"42","author":"E Chan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Child: care, health and development"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref202","volume-title":"How to Implement Evidence-Based Healthcare","author":"T Greenhalgh","year":"2018"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g3725","article-title":"Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?","volume":"348","author":"T Greenhalgh","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref204","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-6-26","article-title":"How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability","volume":"6","author":"L Lemieux-Charles","year":"2011","journal-title":"Implementation Science"},{"issue":"10056","key":"pone.0228196.ref205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2176","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31472-6","article-title":"Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide","volume":"388","author":"S Miller","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0228196.ref206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2009.00372.x","article-title":"Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"37","author":"M Foureur","year":"2010","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref207","article-title":"Shared decision making implementation: a case study analysis to increase uptake in New South Wales","author":"T Dimopoulos-Bick","year":"2019","journal-title":"Australian Health Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0228196.ref208","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12060","article-title":"Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review","volume":"120","author":"F Vlemmix","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1177\/2374289516654712","article-title":"The Ethics of Ambiguity:Rethinking the Role and Importance of Uncertainty in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"3","author":"RE Domen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Academic Pathology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0228196.ref210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x","article-title":"A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies","volume":"26","author":"MJ Grant","year":"2009","journal-title":"Health Information & Libraries Journal"},{"key":"pone.0228196.ref211","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.10.014","article-title":"Which intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term benefit from early labour induction? A secondary analysis of the DIGITAT randomised trial","volume":"172","author":"P Tajik","year":"2014","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0228196","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T21:06:17Z","timestamp":1722373577000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0228196"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Salvatore Andrea","family":"Mastrolia","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]]},"references-count":211,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0228196","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,29]]}}}