{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T14:04:42Z","timestamp":1740146682047,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]],"date-time":"2020-06-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1592870400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000925","name":"National Health and Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["APP1113902"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["APP1113902"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0235113","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]],"date-time":"2020-06-23T18:25:15Z","timestamp":1592936715000},"page":"e0235113","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The pitfalls of using birthweight centile charts to audit care"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4240-5594","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Roshan John","family":"Selvaratnam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mary-Ann","family":"Davey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Euan Morrison","family":"Wallace","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10019","key":"pone.0235113.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)01020-X","article-title":"Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries","volume":"387","author":"V Flenady","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"pone.0235113.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16038","article-title":"Does public reporting of the detection of fetal growth restriction improve clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"127","author":"RJ Selvaratnam","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"pone.0235113.ref003","article-title":"Increasing obstetric intervention for fetal growth restriction is shifting birthweight centiles: a retrospective cohort study","author":"RJ Selvaratnam","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG."},{"volume-title":"New Zealand Maternity Clinical Indicators 2017.","year":"2019","author":"Ministry of Health","key":"pone.0235113.ref004"},{"volume-title":"Scottish Patient Safety Program: MCQIC Maternity Care Core Measurement Plan.","year":"2018","author":"Healthcare Improvement Scotland","key":"pone.0235113.ref005"},{"first-page":"2019","volume-title":"National Maternity and Perinatal Audit: Clinical Report 2019. Based on births in NHS maternity services between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2017","author":"NMPA Project Team","key":"pone.0235113.ref006"},{"year":"2019","author":"RW Hunt","key":"pone.0235113.ref007"},{"issue":"9946","key":"pone.0235113.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60932-6","article-title":"International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21","volume":"384","author":"J Villar","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0235113.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.011","article-title":"The INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care","volume":"218","author":"AT Papageorghiou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0235113.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002220","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002220","article-title":"The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight","volume":"14","author":"T Kiserud","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0235113.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.12.023","article-title":"From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts.","volume":"220","author":"L Hoftiezer","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0235113.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127678.x","article-title":"Australian national birthweight percentiles by gestational age","volume":"170","author":"CL Roberts","year":"1999","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0235113.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.5694\/mja11.11331","article-title":"Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998\u20132007","volume":"197","author":"TA Dobbins","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"volume-title":"Australia\u2019s mothers and babies 2017\u2014in brief","year":"2019","author":"Australian Institute of Health and Welfare","key":"pone.0235113.ref014"},{"issue":"9946","key":"pone.0235113.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60932-6","article-title":"International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"J Villar","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0235113.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1053\/sper.2002.34772","article-title":"Trends in fetal growth among singleton gestations in the United States and Canada, 1985 through 1998","volume":"26","author":"CV Ananth","year":"2002","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0235113.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00989.x","article-title":"Review article: The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring","volume":"113","author":"P Catalano","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0235113.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1111\/obr.12288","article-title":"Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews","volume":"16","author":"J Marchi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obes Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0235113.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F264","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2016-311790","article-title":"Birth weight trends in England and Wales (1986\u20132012): babies are getting heavier","volume":"103","author":"RE Ghosh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0235113.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000141442.59573.cd","article-title":"Reasons for Increasing Trends in Large for Gestational Age Births","volume":"104","author":"PJ Surkan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0235113.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0172910","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0172910","article-title":"Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st project newborn standard for use in Canada","volume":"12","author":"S Liu","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0235113.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002902","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002902","article-title":"Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study","volume":"16","author":"MC Vieira","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0235113.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S692","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.013","article-title":"Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21st standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term","volume":"218","author":"A Francis","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0235113.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.931","article-title":"INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity","volume":"214","author":"NH Anderson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0235113.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1511696","article-title":"INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term","volume":"33","author":"N Pritchard","journal-title":"J Mat Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0235113.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.060","article-title":"Standard vs population reference curves in obstetrics: which one should we use?","volume":"220","author":"CV Ananth","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0235113.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002923","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002923","article-title":"Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study","volume":"16","author":"NL Pritchard","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"2S","key":"pone.0235113.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S609","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.011","article-title":"Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits","volume":"218","author":"J Gardosi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0235113.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01870.x","article-title":"Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?","volume":"115","author":"J Hutcheon","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0235113.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2010.01155.x","article-title":"The case against customised birthweight standards","volume":"25","author":"JA Hutcheon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"issue":"2S","key":"pone.0235113.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S738","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.563","article-title":"The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"218","author":"U Sovio","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0235113.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21999","article-title":"UK stillbirth trends in over 11 million births provide no evidence to support effectiveness of Growth Assessment Protocol program","volume":"55","author":"S Iliodromiti","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0235113.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2009.09.004","article-title":"Distinguishing pathological from constitutional small for gestational age births in population-based studies","volume":"85","author":"CV Ananth","year":"2009","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0235113.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12528","article-title":"Foetal growth standards: Description, prescription, or prediction?","volume":"33","author":"MS Kramer","year":"2019","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0235113.ref035","first-page":"569","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction using ultrasound and the sFLT1\/PlGF ratio in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Child &","volume":"2","author":"F Gaccioli","year":"2018","journal-title":"Adolesc Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0235113.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-020-0804-9","article-title":"A maternal serum metabolite ratio predicts fetal growth restriction at term","volume":"26","author":"U Sovio","year":"2020","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0235113.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10323.x","article-title":"Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age","volume":"98","author":"RT Geirsson","year":"1991","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0235113","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]],"date-time":"2020-06-23T18:25:30Z","timestamp":1592936730000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0235113"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Clive J.","family":"Petry","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0235113","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1932-6203"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,23]]}}}