{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T16:01:06Z","timestamp":1792512066265,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,19]],"date-time":"2020-11-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1605744000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:p>The purpose of this retrospective time-lapse data analysis from transferred preimplantation human embryos was to identify early morphokinetic cleavage variables that are related to implantation and live birth following <jats:italic>in vitro fertilization<\/jats:italic> (IVF). All embryos were monitored from fertilization check until embryo transfer for a minimum of 44 hours. The study was designed to assess the association between day 2 embryo morphokinetic variables with implantation and live birth based on Known Implantation Data (KID). The kinetic variables were subjected to quartile-based analysis. The predictive ability for implantation and live birth was studied using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Three morphokinetic variables, time to 2-cells (t2), duration of second cell cycle (cc2) below one threshold and cc2 above another threshold had the highest predictive value with regards to implantation and live birth following IVF treatment. The predictive pre-transfer information has little divergence between fetal heartbeat and live birth data and therefore, at least for early morphokinetic variables up to the four-cell stage (t4), conclusions and models based on fetal heartbeat data can be expected to be valid for live birth datasets as well. The three above mentioned variables (t2, cc2 below one threshold and cc2 above another threshold) may supplement morphological evaluation in embryo selection and thereby improve the outcome of <jats:italic>in vitro fertilization<\/jats:italic> treatments.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0242377","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,19]],"date-time":"2020-11-19T18:37:52Z","timestamp":1605811072000},"page":"e0242377","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["Time-lapse imaging derived morphokinetic variables reveal association with implantation and live birth following in vitro fertilization: A retrospective study using data from transferred human embryos"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2140-3282","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Shabana","family":"Sayed","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marte Myhre","family":"Reigstad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bj\u00f8rn Molt","family":"Petersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arne","family":"Schwennicke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jon","family":"Wegner Hausken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ritsa","family":"Storeng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"pone.0242377.ref001","first-page":"324","article-title":"Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin","volume":"31","author":"K Kirkegaard","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20160032","article-title":"Are there optimal numbers of oocytes, spermatozoa and embryos in assisted reproduction?","volume":"20","author":"T Milachich","year":"2016","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0033-1363553","article-title":"Morphological assessment of embryo viability","volume":"32","author":"M Abeyta","year":"2014","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.05.007","article-title":"Computer-assisted embryo selection: a benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality?","volume":"23","author":"G Paternot","year":"2011","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2009.09.026","article-title":"Comparison of methods to determine the assigned value in an external quality control programme for embryo evaluation","volume":"19","author":"R Ruiz de Assin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1608","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037","article-title":"Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading","volume":"86","author":"BAE Baxter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.012","article-title":"No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study","volume":"30","author":"L Rienzi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3215","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det366","article-title":"Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations","volume":"28","author":"L Sundvall","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew330","article-title":"Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study","volume":"32","author":"A Storr","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref010","first-page":"228","article-title":"Morphology vs morphokinetics: a retrospective comparison of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists on blastocysts with known implantation outcome","volume":"22","author":"E Adolfsson","year":"2018","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.143","article-title":"Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application","volume":"99","author":"AA Chen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref012","first-page":"1","article-title":"Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology","volume":"2","author":"ESHRE working group on Time-lapse technology","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.11.003","article-title":"Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology","volume":"103","author":"K Kirkegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.11.001","article-title":"Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system","volume":"105","author":"Y Motato","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.10.013","article-title":"Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"105","author":"LR Goodman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.10.005","article-title":"Evolution of embryo selection for IVF from subjective morphology assessment to objective time-lapse algorithms improves chance of live birth","volume":"40","author":"S Fishel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.05.016","article-title":"Time-lapse imaging algorithms rank human preimplantation embryos according to the probability of live birth","volume":"37","author":"S Fishel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.01.001","article-title":"Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review","volume":"36","author":"A Reignier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0855-5","article-title":"Morphokinetics of vitrified and warmed blastocysts predicts implantation potential","volume":"34","author":"T Ebner","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2658","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der256","article-title":"The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation","volume":"26","author":"M Meseguer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.02.038","article-title":"A comparison of live birth rates and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates between Europe and North America after ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone","volume":"97","author":"R Boostanfar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref022","first-page":"1786","article-title":"The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017","volume":"32","author":"F Zegers-Hochschild","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh672","article-title":"Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"HG Lukassen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"A Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1080","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1322","article-title":"Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are predictors of a live birth after euploid blastocyst transfer: a multicenter study","volume":"112","author":"L Rienzi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15161","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rates and perinatal outcomes with the use of time-lapse imaging incubators for embryo culture: a retrospective cohort study of 1882 ART cycles","volume":"126","author":"M Mascarenhas","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.repbio.2015.03.002","article-title":"Time-lapse videography of human embryos: Using pronuclear fading rather than insemination in IVF and ICSI cycles removes inconsistencies in time to reach early cleavage milestones","volume":"15","author":"Y Liu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Reprod Biol"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1458","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1135","article-title":"Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study","volume":"98","author":"I Rubio","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx021","article-title":"The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities","volume":"23","author":"CLR Barratt","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.11.014","article-title":"The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation","volume":"28","author":"J Aguilar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2650","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu278","article-title":"Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group","volume":"29","author":"HN Ciray","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.02.001","article-title":"Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: Proceedings of an expert meeting","volume":"22","author":"B Balaban","year":"2011","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2231","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew188","article-title":"Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3","volume":"31","author":"BM Petersen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.005","article-title":"Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study","volume":"29","author":"MD VerMilyea","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.2307\/2531595","article-title":"Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach","volume":"44","author":"ER DeLong","year":"1988","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.5653\/cerm.2017.44.2.90","article-title":"Evaluation of human embryo development in in vitro fertilization- and intracytoplasmic sperm injection-fertilized oocytes: A time-lapse study","volume":"44","author":"HJ Kim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Exp Reprod Med"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.06.017","article-title":"Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo development timings in an oocyte donation model","volume":"27","author":"M Cruz","year":"2013","journal-title":"Rep Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3434","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.12.3434","article-title":"A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization","volume":"13","author":"DK Gardner","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref039","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Time-lapse cinematography of dynamic changes occurring during in vitro development of human embryos","volume":"199","author":"Y Mio","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1086\/382897","article-title":"Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation","volume":"74","author":"EL Niemitz","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Hum Genet"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2005-872457","article-title":"Genomic imprinting and assisted reproductive technology: connections and potential risks","volume":"23","author":"JR Thompson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Seminars Reprod Med"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.1.182","article-title":"Early cleavage of human embryos to the two-cell stage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection as an indicator of embryo viability","volume":"13","author":"D Sakkas","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg184","article-title":"Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures","volume":"18","author":"A Salumets","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60768-7","article-title":"Early cleavage: an additional predictor of high implantation rate following elective single embryo transfer","volume":"14","author":"C Giorgetti","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu295","article-title":"Which set of embryo variables is most predictive for live birth? A prospective study in 6252 single embryo transfers to construct an embryo score for the ranking and selection of embryos","volume":"30","author":"A Rhenman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mam.2013.03.001","article-title":"Quality control of embryo development","volume":"34","author":"A Ajduk","year":"2013","journal-title":"Mol Aspects Med"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"R37","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-17-0004","article-title":"Time-lapse imaging of cleavage divisions in embryo quality assessment","volume":"154","author":"R Milewski","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reproduction"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-17-0230","article-title":"Dynamics of cytoplasm and cleavage divisions correlates with preimplantation embryo development","volume":"155","author":"R Milewski","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reproduction"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1038\/ncomms2249","article-title":"Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage","volume":"3","author":"SL Chavez","year":"2012","journal-title":"Nat Commun"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7601","DOI":"10.1038\/ncomms8601","article-title":"Prediction model for aneuploidy in early human embryo development revealed by single-cell analysis","volume":"6","author":"M Vera-Rodriguez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Nat Commun"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-015-0440-3","article-title":"A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development","volume":"32","author":"R Milewski","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0649-9","article-title":"Do morphokinetic data sets inform pregnancy potential?","volume":"33","author":"R Milewski","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1900","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.9.1900","article-title":"One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study","volume":"16","author":"H Martikainen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei359","article-title":"In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"21","author":"AP van Montfoort","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"pone.0242377.ref055","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assessing efficacy of day 3 embryo time-lapse algorithms retrospectively: impacts of dataset type and confounding factors","volume":"22","author":"Y Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum. Fertil. (Camb)"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0242377","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,19]],"date-time":"2020-11-19T18:38:17Z","timestamp":1605811097000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0242377"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Stefan","family":"Schlatt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,19]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,19]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0242377","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,19]]}}}