{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T06:49:15Z","timestamp":1784530155227,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]],"date-time":"2021-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1613001600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n<jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The demand for spinal fusion surgery has increased over the last decades. Health care providers should take costs and cost-effectiveness of these surgeries into account. Open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) are two widely used techniques for spinal fusion. Earlier research revealed that TLIF is associated with less blood loss, shorter surgical time and sometimes shorter length of hospital stay, while effectiveness of both techniques on back and\/or leg pain are equal. Therefore, TLIF could result in lower costs and be more cost-effective than PLIF. This is the first systematic review comparing direct and indirect (partial) economic evaluations of TLIF with PLIF in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Furthermore, methodological quality of included studies was assessed.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n<jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Searches were conducted in eight databases for reporting on eligibility criteria; TLIF or PLIF, lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar instability, and cost. Costs were converted to United States Dollars with reference year 2020. Study quality was assessed using the bias assessment tool of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, the Level of Evidence guidelines of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Of a total of 693 studies, 16 studies were included. Comparison of TLIF and PLIF could only be made indirectly, since no study compared TLIF and PLIF directly. There was a large heterogeneity in health care and societal perspective costs due to different in-, and exclusion criteria, baseline characteristics and the use of costs or charges in calculations. Health care perspective costs, calculated with hospital costs, ranged from $15,867-$43,217 in TLIF-studies and $32,662 in one PLIF-study. Calculated with hospital charges, it ranged from $8,964-$51,469 in TLIF-studies and $21,838-$93,609 in two PLIF-studies. Societal perspective costs and cost-effectiveness, only mentioned in TLIF-studies, ranged from $5,702\/QALY-$48,538\/QALY and $50,092\/QALY-$90,977\/QALY, respectively. Overall quality of studies was low.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec004\">\n<jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This systematic review shows that TLIF and PLIF are expensive techniques. Moreover, firm conclusions about the preferable technique, based on (partial) economic evaluations, cannot be drawn due to limited studies and heterogeneity. Randomized prospective trials and full economical evaluations with direct TLIF and PLIF comparison are needed to obtain high levels of evidence. Furthermore, development of guidelines to perform adequate economic evaluations, specified for the field of interest, will be useful to minimize heterogeneity and maximize transferability of results.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec005\">\n<jats:title>Trial registration<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p><jats:bold>Prospero-database registration number:<\/jats:bold> CRD42020196869.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0245963","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]],"date-time":"2021-02-11T23:08:04Z","timestamp":1613084884000},"page":"e0245963","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2662-7357","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Inge J. M. H.","family":"Caelers","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suzanne L.","family":"de Kunder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kim","family":"Rijkers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wouter L. W.","family":"van Hemert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rob A.","family":"de Bie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Silvia M. A. A.","family":"Evers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henk","family":"van Santbrink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0245963.ref001","article-title":"Lumbar spinal fusion: indications, surgical techniques and post-operative management. A survey among spine surgeons in the Netherlands","volume":"4","author":"R.F.M.R. Kersten","year":"2016","journal-title":"MOJ Orthop Rheumatol"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref002","unstructured":"North American Spine Society. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for multidisciplinary spine care. Matz P.G., editor. Burr Ridge2014."},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-028743","article-title":"Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway","volume":"9","author":"M. Grotle","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jot.2016.11.001","article-title":"Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis epidemiology: A systematic review with a focus on gender-specific and age-specific prevalence","volume":"11","author":"Y.X.J. Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Orthopaedic Translation"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0245963.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb","article-title":"Spinal Fusion in the United States. Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008","volume":"37","author":"S.S. Rajaee","year":"2012","journal-title":"SPINE"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref006","unstructured":"Martin B.I., Mirza S.K., Spina N., Spiker W.R., Lawrence B., Brodke D.S. Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004\u20132015. SPINE."},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0245963.ref007","first-page":"343","article-title":"A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion","volume":"120","author":"J. Harms","year":"1982","journal-title":"Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0245963.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1953.10.2.0154","article-title":"The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care","volume":"10","author":"R.B Cloward","year":"1953","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-009-9053-8","article-title":"Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches","volume":"2","author":"C.D. Cole","year":"2009","journal-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"},{"issue":"17","key":"pone.0245963.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e3235","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000003235","article-title":"Retrospective Comparison of Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of PLIF and TLIF Techniques in Patients Who Underwent Lumbar Spinal Posterior Stabilization","volume":"95","author":"K. Asil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inat.2016.07.001","article-title":"Transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion as operative treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis, a retrospective case series","volume":"5","author":"S.L. De Kunder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.06.018","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"S.L. De Kunder","year":"2017","journal-title":"The Spine Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0245963.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1097\/WNQ.0000000000000197","article-title":"Comparison of Results of 4 Methods of Surgery in Grade 1 Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis","volume":"26","author":"S. Fariborz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Neurosurgery Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0245963.ref014","first-page":"3932","article-title":"Comparison between transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"9","author":"S. Han","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1575","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4086-8","article-title":"A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"25","author":"J. Liu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0245963.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5413.111484","article-title":"Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability","volume":"47","author":"N. Sakeb","year":"2013","journal-title":"Indian J Orthop"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0739-1","article-title":"Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"17","author":"D. Yan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref018","first-page":"340","article-title":"Comparison between Posterior and Transforaminal Approaches for Lumbar Interbody Fusion","volume":"37","author":"J. Park","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4341-z","article-title":"An RCT study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes with the use of PLIF or TLIF after instrumented reduction in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis","volume":"25","author":"E. Yang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Mastrigt G.A.P.G., Hiligsmann M., Arts J.J.C., Broos P.H., Kleijnen J., Evers S.M.A.A., et al. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1\/3). Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 2016.","DOI":"10.1080\/14737167.2016.1246960"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thielen F.W., Van Mastrigt G.A.P.G., Burgers L.T., Bramer W.M., Majoie H.J.M., Evers S.M.A.A., et al. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2\/3). Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 2016.","DOI":"10.1080\/14737167.2016.1246962"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wijnen B.F.M., Van Mastrigt G.A.P.G., Redekop W.K., Majoie H.J.M., De Kinderen R.J.A., Evers S.M.A.A. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3\/3). Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 2016.","DOI":"10.1080\/14737167.2016.1246961"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0245963.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement","volume":"6","author":"D. Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2700","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2700","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration","volume":"339","author":"A. Liberati","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0245963.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S28","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31819bc09d","article-title":"Costing and Perspective in Published Cost-Effectiveness Analysis","volume":"47","author":"P.J Neumann","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0245963.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1080\/15598608.2012.695571","article-title":"Median-Based Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)","volume":"6","author":"H. Bang","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Stat Theory Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0245963.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1332\/174426410X482999","article-title":"A web-based tool for adjusting costs to a specific target currency and price year","volume":"6","author":"I. Shemilt","year":"2010","journal-title":"Evidence and Policy"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref028","unstructured":"Higgins J.P.T., Altman D.G., Sterne J.A.C. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: J.P.T. Higgins SG, editor. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 510. The Cochrane Collaboration2011."},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref029","unstructured":"Howick J., Chalmers I., Glasziou P., Greenhalgh T., Heneghan C., Liberati A., et al. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. In: Evidence OCfE-BMLo, editor. 2011."},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0245963.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462305050324","article-title":"Criteria List For Assessment Of Methodological Quality Of Economic Evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria","volume":"21","author":"S. Evers","year":"2005","journal-title":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5142-3","article-title":"A retrospective review comparing two-year patient-reported outcomes, costs, and healthcare resource utilization for TLIF vs. PLF for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"27","author":"E. Kim","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3238-6","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion vs. posterolateral instrumented fusion: cost-utility evaluation along side an RCT with a 2-year follow-up","volume":"23","author":"A. Christensen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0000000000001196","article-title":"A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up","volume":"78","author":"G.S. Gandhoke","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jazini E., Gum J.L., Glassman S.D., Crawford C.H., Djurasovic M., Owens R.K., et al. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion. The Spine Journal. 2018.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.03.019"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.08.227","article-title":"Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5\u2013S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis","volume":"18","author":"E.Y. Tye","year":"2018","journal-title":"The Spine Journal"},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"pone.0245963.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2011.09.013","article-title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Associated Low-Back and Leg Pain Over Two Years","volume":"78","author":"S.L. Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"World Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"pone.0245963.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.041","article-title":"Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis","volume":"82","author":"S.L. Parker","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Neurosurgery"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE10562","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"15","author":"O. Adogwa","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.6.SPINE1965","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive midline lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"32","author":"M. Djurasovic","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.12.SPINE09621","article-title":"An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"12","author":"M.Y. Wang","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref041","first-page":"65","article-title":"Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period","volume":"5","author":"J.C. Lucio","year":"2012","journal-title":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.10.053","article-title":"A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"14","author":"K. Singh","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Spine Journal"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref043","article-title":"Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Grades 1\u20132: Patient-Reported Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Utility Analysis","volume":"14","author":"W.A.R. Sulaiman","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Ochsner Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0245963.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1097\/00002517-200104000-00002","article-title":"Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior\u2013Posterior Interbody Fusion of the Lumbar Spine: A Financial Analysis. 2001","volume":"14","author":"T.S. Whitecloud","journal-title":"Journal of Spinal Disorders"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.9.SPINE1932","article-title":"Index episode-of-care propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques: open traditional TLIF versus midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) versus robot-assisted MIDLIF","volume":"31","author":"M.L.P. Ver","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.14444\/6052","article-title":"A 5-Year Review of Hospital Costs and Reimbursement in the Surgical Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis","volume":"13","author":"K.W. Lyons","year":"2019","journal-title":"International Journal of Spine Surgery"},{"issue":"suppl I","key":"pone.0245963.ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i89","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.2009.117150","article-title":"The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method","volume":"69","author":"W.B Van den Hout","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1080\/14034940701271882","article-title":"Register-based follow-up of social benefits and other transfer payments: Accuracy and degree of completeness in a Danish interdepartmental administrative database compared with a population-based survey","volume":"35","author":"N.H. Hjolland","year":"2007","journal-title":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health"},{"issue":"13","key":"pone.0245963.ref049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.2165\/00019053-200422130-00004","article-title":"A Decision Chart for Assessing and Improving the Transferability of Economic Evaluation Results Between Countries","volume":"22","author":"R. Welte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Pharmacoeconomics"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0245963.ref050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS1447","article-title":"Variations in cost calculations in spine surgery cost-effectiveness research","volume":"36","author":"M.D. Alvin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0245963.ref051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2014.1414","article-title":"Extreme Markup: The Fifty US Hospitals With The Highest Charge-To-Cost Ratios","volume":"34","author":"G. Bai","year":"2015","journal-title":"Health Affairs"},{"issue":"h3285","key":"pone.0245963.ref052","article-title":"Some US hospitals charge 10 times the cost of services, study finds","volume":"350","author":"M McCarthy","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0245963.ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-96-1-102","article-title":"The distinction between cost and charges","volume":"96","author":"S.A Finkler","year":"1982","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"276","key":"pone.0245963.ref054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1996.03540150055031","article-title":"Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine","volume":"16","author":"M.C. Weinstein","year":"1996","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"pone.0245963.ref055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1415","DOI":"10.1177\/009286159502900447","article-title":"Design of prospective cost-effectiveness clinical trials: the critical role of the comparator group","volume":"29","author":"M.L Berger","year":"1995","journal-title":"Durg Information Journal"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0245963","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]],"date-time":"2021-02-11T23:08:41Z","timestamp":1613084921000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0245963"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Carlos Alberto","family":"Z\u00faniga-Gonz\u00e1lez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0245963","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,11]]}}}