{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T15:37:48Z","timestamp":1790523468976,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":65,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625097600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research","award":["2020-2-8022"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2020-2-8022"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This meta-analysis comprehensively compared intraoperative and postoperative complications between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparotomy in the management of cervical cancer. Even though the advantages of laparotomy over MIS in disease-free survival and overall survival for management of gynecological diseases have been cited in the literature, there is a lack of substantial evidence of the advantage of one surgical modality over another, and it is uncertain whether MIS is justifiable in terms of safety and efficacy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this meta-analysis, the studies were abstracted that the outcomes of complications to compare MIS (laparoscopic or robot-assisted) and open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification stage IA1-IIB) cervical cancer. The primary outcomes were intraoperative overall complications, as well as postoperative aggregate complications. Secondary outcomes included the individual complications. Two investigators independently performed the screening and data extraction. All articles that met the eligibility criteria were included in this meta-analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The meta-analysis finally included 39 non-randomized studies and 1 randomized controlled trial (8 studies were conducted on robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) vs open radical hysterectomy (ORH), 27 studies were conducted on laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) vs ORH, and 5 studies were conducted on all three approaches). Pooled analyses showed that MIS was associated with higher risk of intraoperative overall complications (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.07\u20131.86, P&lt;0.05) in comparison with ORH. However, compared to ORH, MIS was associated with significantly lower risk of postoperative aggregate complications (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.34\u20130.48, P = 0.0143). In terms of individual complications, MIS appeared to have a positive effect in decreasing the complications of transfusion, wound infection, pelvic infection and abscess, lymphedema, intestinal obstruction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and urinary tract infection. Furthermore, MIS had a negative effect in increasing the complications of cystotomy, bowel injury, subcutaneous emphysema, and fistula.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec004\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our meta-analysis demonstrates that MIS is superior to laparotomy, with fewer postoperative overall complications (wound infection, pelvic infection and abscess, lymphedema, intestinal obstruction, pulmonary embolism, and urinary tract infection). However, MIS is associated with a higher risk of intraoperative aggregate complications (cystotomy, bowel injury, and subcutaneous emphysema) and postoperative fistula complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0253143","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T14:36:00Z","timestamp":1625150160000},"page":"e0253143","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Yilin","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qingduo","family":"Kong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hongyi","family":"Wei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4877-2694","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Yongjun","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0253143.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21492","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"68","author":"F Bray","year":"2018","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"23","key":"pone.0253143.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1869","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1906.25210230005001b","article-title":"The operative treatment of cancer of the cervix","volume":"XLVII","author":"E. Ries","year":"1906","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2012.06.031","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"127","author":"JD Wright","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"20","key":"pone.0253143.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","article-title":"Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer","volume":"379","author":"PT Ramirez","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"pone.0253143.ref005","unstructured":"National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cervical cancer version 1. Accessed April 1, 2020. https:\/\/www.nccn.org\/professionals\/physician_gls\/pdf\/cervical_blocks.pdf."},{"key":"pone.0253143.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-015-1818-4","article-title":"Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer","volume":"15","author":"YZ Wang","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2016.12.005","article-title":"Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy","volume":"24","author":"E Diver","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0253143.ref008","first-page":"CD006655","article-title":"Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer","volume":"10","author":"K Galaal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588 e1-","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.005","article-title":"Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"215","author":"MM Maenpaa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0253143.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017","article-title":"Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"43","author":"DA Park","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.11.010","article-title":"Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"21","author":"RB Gala","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.12.038","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes","volume":"156","author":"B Brandt","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249 e1-","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.036","article-title":"Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"222","author":"A Obermair","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0253143.ref014","author":"G Wells","year":"2000","journal-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1016\/S0197-2456(99)00026-4","article-title":"Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale","volume":"20","author":"HD Clark","year":"1999","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0253143.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"7414","key":"pone.0253143.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.04.003","article-title":"A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer","volume":"93","author":"H Steed","year":"2004","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1927","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1438.2006.00661.x","article-title":"Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): A comparison with open Wertheim\/Meigs hysterectomy","volume":"16","author":"R Sharma","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04","article-title":"Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"110","author":"M Frumovitz","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.11.011","article-title":"A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer","volume":"105","author":"GY Li","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecologic Oncology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.07.027","article-title":"A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery","volume":"107","author":"S Uccella","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0253143.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.058","article-title":"A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy","volume":"199","author":"JF Boggess","year":"2008","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.08.016","article-title":"Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution","volume":"111","author":"EM Ko","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2009.03.009","article-title":"A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"113","author":"R Estape","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2009.06.039","article-title":"Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study","volume":"115","author":"A Maggioni","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-009-0342-7","article-title":"Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience","volume":"16","author":"M Malzoni","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0253143.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-008-0424-8","article-title":"Early experience of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer","volume":"6","author":"E Papacharalabous","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecological Surgery"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0253143.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1390","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181ba5e88","article-title":"Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results","volume":"19","author":"P Sobiczewski","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-010-0572-5","article-title":"From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve","volume":"7","author":"HW Schreuder","year":"2010","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.016","article-title":"A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study","volume":"156","author":"EJ Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.02.002","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon\u2019s experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital","volume":"121","author":"MB Sert","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0253143.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.4293\/108680811X13022985132218","article-title":"Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy","volume":"15","author":"SE Taylor","year":"2011","journal-title":"Jsls"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-011-0683-7","article-title":"Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy-perioperative and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer compared to laparoscopic and open radical surgery","volume":"9","author":"G Gortchev","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecological Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0253143.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318256ccc5","article-title":"Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"119","author":"JY Park","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.23347","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer","volume":"108","author":"JY Park","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.03.018","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis","volume":"21","author":"G Bogani","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0253143.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000160","article-title":"Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management","volume":"24","author":"CH Chen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref039","first-page":"1373","article-title":"Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"7","author":"XH Yin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12561","article-title":"Robot-assisted surgery in cervical cancer patients reduces the time to normal activities of daily living","volume":"94","author":"KC Asciutto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"issue":"30","key":"pone.0253143.ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1264","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000001264","article-title":"Total Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer: An Observational Study of 13-Year Experience","volume":"94","author":"M Xiao","year":"2015","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"Suppl 5","key":"pone.0253143.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-016-5489-4","article-title":"The Role of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix","volume":"23","author":"JY Park","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0253143.ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e82","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2017.28.e82","article-title":"Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer","volume":"28","author":"CA Shah","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000001254","article-title":"Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multi-institution Study and a Review of the Literature","volume":"28","author":"G Corrado","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"pone.0253143.ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5903","DOI":"10.2147\/OTT.S156064","article-title":"Laparoscopic procedure compared with open radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer: a retrospective study","volume":"11","author":"J Guo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Onco Targets Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0253143.ref046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e27","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2019.30.e27","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open abdominal surgery","volume":"30","author":"G Bogani","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0253143.ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.09.013","article-title":"Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer","volume":"41","author":"E Matanes","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0253143.ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.08.012","article-title":"Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States","volume":"26","author":"S Piedimonte","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181bf80ee","article-title":"Comparative study of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and open Wertheim-Meigs in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: eleven years of experience","volume":"20","author":"J Pahisa","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01291.x","article-title":"Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up","volume":"114","author":"DJ Morgan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0253143.ref051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1438.2007.00921.x","article-title":"A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program","volume":"17","author":"K Zakashansky","year":"2007","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0253143.ref052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdr360","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study","volume":"23","author":"JH Nam","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2014.10.058","article-title":"Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations","volume":"41","author":"A Ditto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"pone.0253143.ref054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2019.01107","article-title":"Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China","volume":"9","author":"Z Yuan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0253143.ref055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60523-3","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer","volume":"9","author":"CL Lee","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"issue":"12","key":"pone.0253143.ref056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.11622\/smedj.2013242","article-title":"laparoscopic Wertheim\u2019s radical hysterectomy versus Wertheim\u2019s radical abdominal hysterectomy in the management of stage I cervical cancer in Singapore: a pilot study","volume":"54","author":"YK Lim","year":"2013","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"pone.0253143.ref057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-14-293","article-title":"Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"14","author":"LS Campos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0253143.ref058","first-page":"1407","article-title":"Bowel injury in gynecologic laparoscopy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol","volume":"125","author":"NC Llarena","year":"2015"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0253143.ref059","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4716","article-title":"Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy","volume":"91","author":"M van der Voort","year":"2004","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.4293\/108680813X13693422520882","article-title":"Subcutaneous emphysema\u2014beyond the pneumoperitoneum","volume":"18","author":"DE Ott","year":"2014","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0253143.ref061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2019.10.032","article-title":"Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004\u20132015","volume":"156","author":"C Liang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0253143.ref062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1459","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181b76640","article-title":"Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and\/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases","volume":"19","author":"GO Chong","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0253143.ref063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2013.24.4.303","article-title":"Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution","volume":"24","author":"GW Yim","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"17","key":"pone.0253143.ref064","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2012.06.006","article-title":"Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: meta-analysis of 20 studies","volume":"48","author":"JH Hwang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0253143.ref065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017","article-title":"Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"43","author":"DA Park","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0253143","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]],"date-time":"2021-07-01T14:36:56Z","timestamp":1625150216000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0253143"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Antonio Simone","family":"Lagan\u00e0","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]]},"references-count":65,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0253143","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,1]]}}}