{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T14:26:40Z","timestamp":1787840800128,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,19]],"date-time":"2021-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629331200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"\n Background<\/jats:title>\n \n Efforts to trace the rise of childhood vaccine safety concerns in the US often suggest Andrew Wakefield and colleagues\u2019 retracted 1998\n Lancet<\/jats:italic>\n study (AW98)\u2013which alleged that the MMR vaccine can cause children to develop autism\u2013as a primary cause of US vaccine skepticism. However, a lack of public opinion data on MMR safety collected before\/after AW98\u2019s publication obscures whether anecdotal accounts are indicative of a potentially-causal effect.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n \n We address this problem using a regression discontinuity framework to study change in monthly MMR injury claims (N = 74,850; from 1990\u20132019) from the\n Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System<\/jats:italic>\n (VAERS) to proxy concern about vaccine safety. Additionally, we suggest a potential mechanism for the effect of AW98 on vaccine skepticism, via automated sentiment analyses of MMR-related news stories (N = 674; from 1996\u20132000) in major television and newspaper outlets.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n AW98 led to an immediate increase of about 70 MMR injury claims cases per month, averaging across six estimation strategies (meta-analytic effect = 70.44 [52.19, 88.75], p < 0.01). Preliminary evidence suggests that the volume of negative media attention to MMR increased in the weeks following AW98\u2019s publication, across four estimation strategies (meta-analytic effect = 9.59% [3.66, 15.51], p < 0.01).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n Vaccine skepticism increased following the publication of AW98, which was potentially made possible by increased negative media coverage of MMR.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Significance<\/jats:title>\n Childhood vaccine skepticism presents an important challenge to widespread vaccine uptake, and undermines support for pro-vaccine health policies. In addition to advancing our understanding of the previously-obscured origins of US vaccine skepticism, our work cautions that high-profile media attention to inaccurate scientific studies can undermine public confidence in vaccines. We conclude by offering several recommendations that researchers and health communicators might consider to detect and address future threats to vaccine confidence.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0256395","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,19]],"date-time":"2021-08-19T14:08:47Z","timestamp":1629382127000},"page":"e0256395","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":85,"title":["Quantifying the effect of Wakefield et al. (1998) on skepticism about MMR vaccine safety in the U.S."],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2824-6833","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Matthew","family":"Motta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6724-7559","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Dominik","family":"Stecula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0256395.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E199","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.109-3179","article-title":"Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines.","volume":"182","author":"L. Eggertson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Canadian Medical Association. Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0256395.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03730.x","article-title":"MMR, Wakefield and The Lancet: what can we learn","volume":"193","author":"J. Leask","year":"2010","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0256395.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e836","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-1760","article-title":"Media coverage of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism controversy and its relationship to MMR immunization rates in the United States","volume":"121","author":"M. J. Smith","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref004","first-page":"433","article-title":"Overcoming false causal attribution: Debunking the MMR\u2013autism association","author":"N. Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref005","article-title":"The Vaccine Autism Myth Started 20 Years Ago. Here\u2019s Why it Still Endures Today","author":"J.D. Quick","year":"2018","journal-title":"Time Maazine"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0256395.ref006","article-title":"How trust in experts and media use affect acceptance of common anti-vaccination claims","volume":"1","author":"D. A. Stecula","year":"2020","journal-title":"Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0256395.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1586\/14760584.2015.964212","article-title":"Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications","volume":"14","author":"E. Dube","year":"2015","journal-title":"Expert review of vaccines"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0256395.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002578","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002578","article-title":"The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States: A focused examination of nonmedical exemptions in states and counties","volume":"15","author":"J. K. Olive","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS medicine"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2018.06.032","article-title":"Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes.","volume":"211","author":"M. Motta","year":"2018","journal-title":"Social Science & Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref010","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control & Prevention \/ Food & Drug Administration. (2017). VAERS Data Use Guide. Department of Health & Human Services. https:\/\/vaers.hhs.gov\/docs\/VAERSDataUseGuide_October2017.pdf"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0256395.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1177\/0261927X09351676","article-title":"The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods","volume":"29","author":"Y. R. Tausczik","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of language and social psychology"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref012","article-title":"Fewer in US continue to see vaccines as important","author":"RJ Reinhart","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gallup News"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0256395.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1037\/hea0000586","article-title":"The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation","volume":"37","author":"M. J. Hornsey","year":"2018","journal-title":"Health Psychology"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0256395.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2014.190","article-title":"Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States","volume":"174","author":"J. E. Oliver","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA internal medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0256395.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e835","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2013-2365","article-title":"Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial","volume":"133","author":"B. Nyhan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0256395.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e531","DOI":"10.1093\/pubmed\/fdy042","article-title":"Intentions to use a novel Zika vaccine: the effects of misbeliefs about the MMR vaccine and perceptions about Zika","volume":"40","author":"Y. Ophir","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Public Health"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0256395.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1561","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2020.305828","article-title":"Policy Views and Negative Beliefs About Vaccines in the United States, 2019","volume":"110","author":"D. A. Stecula","year":"2020","journal-title":"American journal of public health"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2020.112790","article-title":"Protecting consumers from fraudulent health claims: A taxonomy of psychological drivers, interventions, barriers, and treatments","author":"D. MacFarlane","year":"2020","journal-title":"Social Science & Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0256395.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1002\/mrdd.10029","article-title":"The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders: is the prevalence rising?","volume":"8","author":"L. Wing","year":"2002","journal-title":"Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref020","author":"N.Y. Kim","year":"2021","journal-title":"Deaths After Vaccination Don\u2019t Prove that COVID-19 Vaccine is Lethal."},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref021","article-title":"The Truth Behind Tucker Carlson\u2019s Claims about COVID-19 Vaccine Deaths and the Government\u2019s VAERS Database","author":"J. Brewster","year":"2021","journal-title":"Forbes"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref022","unstructured":"Spencer, S.H. (2021). Tucker Carlson Misrepresents Vaccine Safety Reporting Data. FactCheck.org https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/05\/scicheck-tucker-carlson-misrepresents-vaccine-safety-reporting-data\/"},{"key":"pone.0256395.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-021-01257-8","article-title":"\u2019It\u2019s a minefield\u2019: COVID vaccine safety poses unique communication challenge","author":"A. Remmel","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nature"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0256395","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,19]],"date-time":"2021-08-19T14:09:11Z","timestamp":1629382151000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0256395"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Sergio A.","family":"Useche","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,19]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,19]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0256395","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,19]]}}}