{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T04:15:33Z","timestamp":1747196133781,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,29]],"date-time":"2021-09-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1632873600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"\nPurpose<\/jats:title>\nLimited work has been performed for the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer surveillance imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between two different DBT implementations in breast cancer surveillance imaging, for patients with a personal history of breast cancer.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n\nMethod<\/jats:title>\nThe DBT implementations investigated were: (1) 2-view 2D digital mammography and 2-view DBT (2vDM&2vDBT) (2) 1-view (cranial-caudal) DM and 1-view (mediolateral-oblique) DBT (1vDM&1vDBT). Clinical performance of these two implementations was assessed retrospectively using observer studies with 118 sets of real patient images, from a single imaging centre, and six observers. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) using the Jack-knife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) analysis were evaluated.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n\nResults<\/jats:title>\nResults suggest that the two DBT implementations are not significantly different in terms of sensitivity, specificity and AUC. When looking at the two main different lesion types, non-calcifications and calcifications, and two different density levels, no difference in the performance of the two DBT implementations was found.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n\nConclusions<\/jats:title>\nSince 1vDM&1vDBT exposes the patient to half the dose of 2vDM&2vDBT, it might be worth considering 1vDM&1vDBT in breast cancer surveillance imaging. However, larger studies are required to conclude on this matter.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0256514","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,29]],"date-time":"2021-09-29T19:30:23Z","timestamp":1632943823000},"page":"e0256514","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8147-7844","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Andria","family":"Hadjipanteli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Petros","family":"Polyviou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ilias","family":"Kyriakopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marios","family":"Genagritis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Natasa","family":"Kotziamani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Demetris","family":"Moniatis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Papoutsou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anastasia","family":"Constantinidou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"pone.0256514.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1938","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-5167-3","article-title":"One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?","volume":"28","author":"A Rodriguez-Ruiz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3803-3","article-title":"Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malm\u00f6 Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study","volume":"26","author":"K L\u00e5ng","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref003","first-page":"1","volume":"19","author":"FJ Gillbert","year":"2015","journal-title":"The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme\u2014a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with di"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.11240","article-title":"Diagnostic Accuracy and Recall Rates for Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Combined With One-View and Two-View Tomosynthesis: Results of an Enriched Reader Study","volume":"202","author":"EA Rafferty","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120674","article-title":"Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Compared with Digital Mammography Alone: Results of a Multicenter, multireader trial","volume":"266","author":"EA Rafferty","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref006","first-page":"47","volume":"267","author":"P Skaane","year":"2013","journal-title":"Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11103514","article-title":"Two-View and Single-View Tomosynthesis versus Full-Field Digital Mammography: High-Resolution X-Ray Imaging Observer Study","volume":"262","author":"MG Wallis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1545","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-009-1699-5","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study","volume":"20","author":"G Gennaro","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2012.03.009","article-title":"A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis","volume":"67","author":"MJ Michell","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref010","first-page":"445","article-title":"Screening mammography findings from one standard projection only in the era of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis","volume":"211","author":"EO Cohen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Women\u2019s Imaging"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-016-3695-1","article-title":"Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium","volume":"156","author":"EF Conant","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.14131319","article-title":"Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography","volume":"274","author":"M Durand","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/658929","article-title":"Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Changes Management in Patients Seen at a Tertiary Care Breast Center","volume":"2014","author":"L Margolies","year":"2014","journal-title":"ISRN Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1401","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.17.18839","article-title":"Tomosynthesis impact on breast cancer screening in patients younger than 50 years old","volume":"210","author":"SL Rose","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2016164018","article-title":"Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program","volume":"280","author":"RE Sharpe","year":"2016","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2061","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-2820-3","article-title":"Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration","volume":"23","author":"P Skaane","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2018.03.013","article-title":"The effect of the addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography on reader recall rate and reader confidence in the UK prevalent screening round","volume":"73","author":"N Upadhyay","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2018.07.008","article-title":"Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists\u2019 true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study","volume":"106","author":"D Bernardi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2014.04.008","article-title":"A Reader Study Comparing Prospective Tomosynthesis Interpretations with Retrospective Readings of the Corresponding FFDM Examinations","volume":"21","author":"SL Rose","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1401","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.9672","article-title":"Implementation of Breast Tomosynthesis in a Routine Screening Practice: An Observational Study","volume":"200","author":"SL Rose","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2018.11.014","article-title":"The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.","volume":"57","author":"A Hadjipanteli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Phys Medica"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref022","article-title":"Performance comparison of breast imaging modalities using a 4AFC human observer study. Medical Imaging 2015","volume":"9412","author":"P Elangovan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Physics of Medical Imaging"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref023","article-title":"An observer study to assess the detetion of calcification clusters using 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetic 2D imaging","volume":"10952","author":"A Mackenzie","year":"2019","journal-title":"SPIE Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance and Technology Assessment"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3402-8","article-title":"Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study","volume":"25","author":"A Tagliafico","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.4656","article-title":"Detection and Classification of Calcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison","volume":"196","author":"ML Spangler","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"858","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/aa4f6e","article-title":"The effect of system geometry and dose on the threshold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis","volume":"62","author":"A Hadjipanteli","year":"2017","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7893","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/60\/20\/7893","article-title":"Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Comparison of phantom and patient data","volume":"60","author":"RW Bouwman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0256514.ref028","article-title":"The Optimisation of Radiological Protection\u2014Broadening the Process","volume":"36","author":"ICRP","year":"2006","journal-title":"ICRP Publication 101b Ann. ICRP"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-4991-9","article-title":"Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations","volume":"28","author":"J Garayoa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13131391","article-title":"Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images","volume":"271","author":"P Skaane","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9277","DOI":"10.2147\/CMAR.S210979","article-title":"The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: A manufacturer- and metrics-specific analysis","volume":"11","author":"A Hadjipanteli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cancer Manag Res"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1913","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.2017170032","article-title":"Strengths and Weaknesses of Synthetic Mammography in Screening","volume":"37","author":"L Ratanaprasatporn","year":"2017","journal-title":"RadioGraphics"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2016.04.007","article-title":"A prospective study comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammography in surveillance after breast cancer treatment","volume":"61","author":"J Sia","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref034","first-page":"1","article-title":"Imaging of the treated breast post breast conservation surgery\/oncoplasty: Pictorial review","volume":"6124","author":"SK Ramani","year":"2011","journal-title":"World J Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref035","first-page":"287","article-title":"Mammographic evaluation of the postsurgical and irradiated breast","volume":"68","author":"ME Peters","year":"1988","journal-title":"Radiol Technol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.6881","article-title":"The Postconservation Breast: Part 2, Imaging Findings of Tumor Recurrence and Other Long-Term Sequelae","volume":"198","author":"T Chansakul","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol."},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.16.16300","article-title":"Imaging surveillance after primary breast cancer treatment","volume":"208","author":"DL Lam","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1831","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780141611","article-title":"On the sample size for one\u2010sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar\u2019s test.","volume":"14","author":"Y Lu","year":"1995","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/nch512","article-title":"Recent advances in observer performance methodology: Jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).","volume":"114","author":"DP Chakraborty","year":"2005","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosimetry"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10091394","article-title":"BI-RADS data should not be used to estimate ROC cruves","volume":"256","author":"Y Jiang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2008.07.018","article-title":"Validation and Statistical Power Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Free-response Observer Performance Studies.","volume":"15","author":"DP Chakraborty","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0256514.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.175.3.1750603","article-title":"Sample Size Tables For Receiver Operating Characteristic Studies","volume":"175","author":"NA Obuchowski","year":"2000","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2014.10.022","article-title":"Added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography according to reader experience","volume":"84","author":"I Thomassin-Naggara","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3399-z","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density","volume":"25","author":"SU Shin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2087","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-2831-0","article-title":"Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: Per lesion analysis","volume":"23","author":"G Gennaro","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2016.09.007","article-title":"Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DB","volume":"85","author":"H-J Kang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3202","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4718571","article-title":"Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography","volume":"39","author":"LM Warren","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2011.10.003","article-title":"Dose Reduction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Screening using Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images","volume":"19","author":"D Gur","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/53282892","article-title":"Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: A comparison of diagnostic accuracy","volume":"85","author":"TM Svahn","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-018-5585-x","article-title":"Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications","volume":"29","author":"JS Choi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0256514.ref051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2004.11.026","article-title":"\u201cMemory effect\u201d in observer performance studies of mammograms","volume":"12","author":"LA Hardesty","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0256514","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,29]],"date-time":"2021-09-29T19:31:15Z","timestamp":1632943875000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0256514"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Gayle E.","family":"Woloschak","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,29]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,29]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0256514","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1932-6203"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,29]]}}}