{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]],"date-time":"2025-09-26T22:26:35Z","timestamp":1758925595135,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1665360000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n<jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Sex impacts birthweight, with male babies heavier on average. Birthweight charts are thus sex specific, but ultrasound fetal weights are often reported by sex neutral standards. We aimed to identify what proportion of infants would be re-classified as SGA if sex-specific charts were used, and if this had a measurable impact on perinatal outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n<jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Retrospective cohort study including all infants born in Victoria, Australia, from 2005\u20132015 (529,261 cases). We applied GROW centiles, either adjusted or not adjusted for fetal sex. We compared overall SGA populations, and the populations of males considered small by sex-specific charts only (SGA<jats:sub>sex-only<\/jats:sub>), and females considered small by sex-neutral charts only (SGA<jats:sub>unadjust-only<\/jats:sub>).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Of those &lt;10<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> centile by sex-neutral charts, 39.6% were male and 60.5% female, but using sex-specific charts, 50.3% were male and 49.7% female. 19.2% of SGA females were reclassified as average for gestational age (AGA) using sex-specific charts. These female newborns were not at increased risk of stillbirth, combined perinatal mortality, NICU admissions, low Apgars or emergency CS compared with an AGA infant, but were at greater risk of being iatrogenically delivered on suspicion of growth restriction. 25.0% male infants were reclassified as SGA by sex-specific charts. These male newborns, compared to the AGA<jats:sub>all<\/jats:sub> infant, were at greater risk of stillbirth (RR 1.94, 95%CI 1.30\u20132.90), combined perinatal mortality (RR 1.80, 95%CI 1.26\u20132.57), NICU admissions (RR 1.38, 95%CI 1.12\u20131.71), Apgars &lt;7 at 5 minutes (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.25\u20131.56) and emergency CS (RR 1.12, 95%CI 1.06\u20131.18).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec004\">\n<jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Use of growth centiles not adjusted for fetal sex disproportionately classifies female infants as SGA, increasing their risk of unnecessary intervention, and fails to identify a cohort of male infants at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Sex-specific charts may help inform decisions and improve outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0274521","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T17:42:25Z","timestamp":1665423745000},"page":"e0274521","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Adjusting growth standards for fetal sex improves correlation of small babies with stillbirth and adverse perinatal outcomes: A state-wide population study"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7388-2193","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Natasha L.","family":"Pritchard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Susan P.","family":"Walker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alexandra R.","family":"Mitchell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephen","family":"Tong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anthea C.","family":"Lindquist","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9774","key":"pone.0274521.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)62233-7","article-title":"Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"377","author":"V Flenady","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet (London, England)"},{"issue":"9778","key":"pone.0274521.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1703","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60064-0","article-title":"Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries","volume":"377","author":"V Flenady","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet (London, England)"},{"issue":"7525","key":"pone.0274521.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38629.587639.7C","article-title":"Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study","volume":"331","author":"J Gardosi","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0274521.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.009","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction","volume":"18","author":"S Kady","year":"2004","journal-title":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"issue":"16","key":"pone.0274521.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1234","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199904223401603","article-title":"Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants","volume":"340","author":"DD McIntire","year":"1999","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0274521.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.233","article-title":"Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy","volume":"188","author":"R Bukowski","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.036","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates","volume":"191","author":"TJ Garite","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00008","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"EK Pallotto","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1067\/S0022-3476(03)00181-1","article-title":"Excess mortality and morbidity among small-for-gestational-age premature infants: a population-based study","volume":"143","author":"RH Regev","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0274521.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116749","article-title":"Perinatal correlates and neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at term gestation","volume":"185","author":"BA Doctor","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0274521.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1113\/JP271402","article-title":"The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome","volume":"594","author":"SL Miller","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Journal of physiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1017\/S0012162200000049","article-title":"Fetal growth and subsequent mental health problems in children aged 4 to 13 years","volume":"42","author":"SR Zubrick","year":"2000","journal-title":"Developmental medicine and child neurology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1001\/archpedi.156.2.179","article-title":"Academic Achievement of Small-for-Gestational-Age Children at Age 10 Years","volume":"156","author":"O Hollo","year":"2002","journal-title":"Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine."},{"key":"pone.0274521.ref014","first-page":"280402","article-title":"The long-term effects of prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction on cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic function","volume":"2010","author":"PYL Chan","year":"2010","journal-title":"International journal of pediatrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00009","article-title":"Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"DJ Barker","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0274521.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1806","article-title":"Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?","volume":"25","author":"PG Lindqvist","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2015.01.005","article-title":"A uniform management approach to optimize outcome in fetal growth restriction","volume":"42","author":"V Seravalli","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0274521.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management","volume":"204","author":"F Figueras","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0274521.ref019","first-page":"187","article-title":"Prenatal detection of fetal growth restriction in newborns classified as small for gestational age: correlates and risk of neonatal morbidity","volume":"31","author":"SP Chauhan","year":"2014","journal-title":"American journal of perinatology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref020","first-page":"148","article-title":"For the Figo Safe Motherhood NHC","volume":"152","author":"GHA Visser","year":"2021","journal-title":"FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use? International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics"},{"issue":"2s","key":"pone.0274521.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S605","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.217","article-title":"Fetal size standards to diagnose a small- or a large-for-gestational-age fetus","volume":"218","author":"R Romero","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2, Supplement","key":"pone.0274521.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S609","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.011","article-title":"Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits","volume":"218","author":"J Gardosi","year":"2018","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"2s","key":"pone.0274521.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.011","article-title":"The INTERGROWTH-21(st) fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care","volume":"218","author":"AT Papageorghiou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2s","key":"pone.0274521.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.010","article-title":"The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application","volume":"218","author":"T Kiserud","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8788","key":"pone.0274521.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91342-6","article-title":"Customised antenatal growth charts","volume":"339","author":"J Gardosi","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet (London, England)"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0274521.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136581","article-title":"Gender differences at birth and differences in fetal growth","volume":"2","author":"MA Crawford","year":"1987","journal-title":"Human reproduction (Oxford, England)"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0274521.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.5694\/mja11.11331","article-title":"Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998\u20132007","volume":"197","author":"TA Dobbins","year":"2012","journal-title":"The Medical journal of Australia"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.966","article-title":"Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15\u201340 weeks of gestation","volume":"23","author":"P Schw\u00e4rzler","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0274521.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17347","article-title":"International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project","volume":"49","author":"J Stirnemann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0274521.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91352-1","article-title":"Gender-specific second-trimester biometry","volume":"173","author":"JC Smulian","year":"1995","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19073","article-title":"Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts","volume":"52","author":"KH Nicolaides","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"9946","key":"pone.0274521.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60932-6","article-title":"International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"J Villar","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0274521.ref033","first-page":"113","article-title":"Data accuracy in the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection: Results of a validation study of 2011 data","volume":"46","author":"MM Flood","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Inf Manag"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0274521.ref034","first-page":"12","article-title":"Methodological processes in validating and analysing the quality of population-based data: a case study using the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection","volume":"42","author":"MA Davey","year":"2013","journal-title":"Health Inf Manag"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology."},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0274521.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002923","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002923","article-title":"Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study","volume":"16","author":"NL Pritchard","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLOS Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0274521.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"SJ Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"CC Lees","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":";4","key":"pone.0274521.ref039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010","article-title":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012)","volume":"223","author":"JG Martins","year":"2020","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002220","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002220","article-title":"The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight","volume":"14","author":"T Kiserud","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLOS Medicine"},{"issue":"9946","key":"pone.0274521.ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"AT Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet (London, England)"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2013.32.1.35","article-title":"Fetal sex and intrauterine growth patterns","volume":"32","author":"N Melamed","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"pone.0274521.ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1186\/s13293-016-0119-1","article-title":"Sex-specific differences in fetal and infant growth patterns: a prospective population-based cohort study","volume":"7","author":"ZA Broere-Brown","year":"2016","journal-title":"Biol Sex Differ"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00308.x","article-title":"Gender differences of placental dysfunction in severe prematurity","volume":"112","author":"A Ghidini","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0274521.ref045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903300969","article-title":"Fetal gender and pregnancy outcome","volume":"23","author":"N Melamed","year":"2010","journal-title":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2012.11.007","article-title":"Fetal sex and preterm birth","volume":"34","author":"J Challis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"issue":"20","key":"pone.0274521.ref047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00022.x","article-title":"Gender aspects of preterm birth","volume":"110","author":"I. Ingemarsson","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S1550-8579(07)80004-0","article-title":"Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome?","volume":"4","author":"GC Di Renzo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gender Medicine"},{"key":"pone.0274521.ref049","article-title":"Association between fetal sex, birthweight percentile and adverse pregnancy outcome","author":"BJ Voskamp","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.961","article-title":"Gender-specific fetal biometry standards.","volume":"23","author":"M. Mongelli","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0274521.ref051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2010.01155.x","article-title":"The case against customised birthweight standards","volume":"25","author":"JA Hutcheon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0274521.ref052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17381","article-title":"Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies","volume":"50","author":"G Chiossi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"2s","key":"pone.0274521.ref053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S692","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.013","article-title":"Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21(st) standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term","volume":"218","author":"A Francis","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0274521","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T17:43:34Z","timestamp":1665423814000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0274521"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Dylan A.","family":"Mordaunt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0274521","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1932-6203"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]}}}