{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T04:16:57Z","timestamp":1747196217485,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,31]],"date-time":"2022-10-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667174400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n<jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Percutaneous pericardial catheter drainage (PCD) for pericardial effusion is generally known to be limited by the high risk associated with effusions that are less than 10 mm thick. The objective was to report cases who underwent percutaneous PCD for symptomatic uremic pericardial effusions, which were less than 10 mm thick after cardiologist declined to perform the PCDs because of the narrow safety margins.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n<jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Thirteen consecutive cases (11 patients) (median age, 56 years, range, 31\u201383) with symptomatic uremic pericardial effusion (thickness &lt;10 mm) affecting the pericardial space anterior to the right ventricle underwent ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous PCD between September 2015 and April 2022. Information regarding the clinical criteria, echocardiographic features, PCD details, nature of effusion, and outcomes, including success and complications were retrospectively evaluated.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Pigtail catheter (8.5-Fr) insertion was successful for all patients, with a median procedure time of 7 minutes (range 4~12) without procedure-related complications. The median amount of drainage on the day of PCD was 700 mL (range, 250\u20131100). The median duration of catheter indwelling was 5 days (range, 1~32). In one case, the catheter was removed after 1 day due to chest pain. For all patients, pericardial effusion evacuation was achieved with relief of associated symptoms, representing 100% clinical success.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec004\">\n<jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Percutaneous PCD may be safely performed for patients with symptomatic uremic pericardial effusions and narrow safety margins of less than 10 mm.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0276498","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,31]],"date-time":"2022-10-31T17:48:03Z","timestamp":1667238483000},"page":"e0276498","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Percutaneous pericardial catheter drainage for symptomatic uremic pericardial effusions with narrow safety margins"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Soon Bae","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eun Hye","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6598-9049","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ji Hoon","family":"Shin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"pone.0276498.ref001","first-page":"1811","volume-title":"Harrison\u2019s Texbook of Internal Medicine, 19th ed","author":"JM Bargman","year":"2015"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0276498.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1097\/00000441-200304000-00009","article-title":"Pericardial Involvement in end-stage renal disease","volume":"325","author":"MA Alpert","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Med Sci"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref003","first-page":"626","volume-title":"Handbook of Dialysis, 5th ed","author":"DE Weiner","year":"2014"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref004","first-page":"590","article-title":"Comparison of surgical pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for pericardial effusion","volume":"24","author":"AJ Saltzman","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Invasive Cardiol"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1016\/0003-4975(93)90982-N","article-title":"Thoracoscopic pericardiectomy for effusive pericardial disease","volume":"56","author":"SR Hazelrigg","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1262","DOI":"10.1378\/chest.104.4.1262","article-title":"Video-assisted thoracic surgical techniques in the diagnosis and management of pericardial effusion in patients with advanced lung cancer","volume":"104","author":"OM Shapira","year":"1993","journal-title":"Chest"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2921","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehv318","article-title":"2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)","volume":"36","author":"Y Adler","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9149(86)90290-0","article-title":"Percutaneous pericardial catheter drainage: report of 42 consecutive cases.","volume":"58","author":"SL Kopecky","year":"1986","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s11886-017-0867-5","article-title":"Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade in the New Millennium","volume":"19","author":"BD Hoit","year":"2017","journal-title":"Curr Cardiol Rep"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-8183.2011.00680.x","article-title":"Percutaneous drainage of postoperative pericardial effusion in cardiac surgery","volume":"25","author":"N Jaussaud","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Interv Cardiol"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S199","DOI":"10.1097\/01.RVI.0000094584.83406.3e","article-title":"Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines","volume":"14","author":"D Sacks","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Vasc Interv Radiol"},{"key":"pone.0276498.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"965","DOI":"10.1016\/j.echo.2013.06.023","article-title":"American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.","volume":"26","author":"AL Klein","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Am Soc Echocardiogr"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0276498","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,31]],"date-time":"2022-10-31T17:48:18Z","timestamp":1667238498000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0276498"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Wisit","family":"Kaewput","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,31]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,31]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0276498","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1932-6203"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,31]]}}}