{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,11]],"date-time":"2026-10-11T17:52:32Z","timestamp":1791741152765,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]],"date-time":"2023-02-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677024000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The risk of intrauterine death (IUD) at term varies from less than one to up to three cases per 1,000 ongoing pregnancies. The cause of death is often largely undefined. Protocols and criteria to prevent and define the rates and causes of stillbirth are the subjects of important scientific and clinical debates. We examined the gestational age and rate of stillbirth at term in a 10-year period at our maternity hub to evaluate the possible favorable impact of a surveillance protocol on maternal and fetal well-being and growth.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods and findings<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our cohort included all women with singleton pregnancies resulting in early term to late term birth at our maternity hub between 2010 and 2020, with the exclusion of fetal anomalies. As per our protocol for monitoring term pregnancies, all women underwent near term to early term maternal and fetal well-being and growth surveillance. If risk factors were identified, outpatient monitoring was initiated and early- or full-term induction was indicated. Labor was induced at late term (41+0\u201341+4 weeks of gestation), if it did not occur spontaneously. We retrospectively collected, verified, and analyzed all cases of stillbirth at term. The incidence of stillbirth at each week of gestation, was calculated by dividing the number of stillbirths observed that week by the number of women with ongoing pregnancies in that same week. The overall rate of stillbirth per 1000 was also calculated for the entire cohort. Fetal and maternal variables were analyzed to assess the possible causes of death.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 57,561 women were included in our study, of which 28 cases of stillbirth (overall rate, 0.48 per 1000 ongoing pregnancies; 95% CI: 0.30\u20130.70) were identified. The incidence of stillbirth in the ongoing pregnancies measured at 37, 38, 39, 40, and 41 weeks of gestation was 0.16, 0.30, 0.11, 0.29, and 0.0 per 1000, respectively. Only three cases occurred after 40\n                      <jats:sup>+0<\/jats:sup>\n                      weeks of gestation. Six patients had an undetected small for gestational age fetus. The identified causes included placental conditions (n = 8), umbilical cord conditions (n = 7), and chorioamnionitis (n = 4). Furthermore, the cases of stillbirth included one undetected fetal abnormality (n = 1). The cause of fetal death remained unknown in eight cases.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec004\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In a referral center with an active universal screening protocol for maternal and fetal prenatal surveillance at near and early term, the rate of stillbirth was 0.48 per 1000 in singleton pregnancies at term in a large, unselected population. The highest incidence of stillbirth was observed at 38 weeks of gestation. The vast majority of stillbirth cases occurred before 39 weeks of gestation and 6 of 28 cases were SGA, and the median percentile of the remaining case was the 35\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0277262","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]],"date-time":"2023-02-22T13:37:08Z","timestamp":1677073028000},"page":"e0277262","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Risk of stillbirth in singleton fetuses with advancing gestational age at term: A 10-year experience of late third trimester prenatal screenings of 50,000 deliveries in a referral center in northern Italy"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"18","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5130-2266","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Francesco","family":"D\u2019Ambrosi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marta","family":"Ruggiero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicola","family":"Cesano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matteo","family":"Di Maso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giulia Emily","family":"Cetera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Beatrice","family":"Tassis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ilma Floriana","family":"Carbone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Ferrazzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"pone.0277262.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002838","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002838","article-title":"Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies","volume":"16","author":"J Muglu","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.16016","article-title":"Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: factors affecting determination of cause of death at autopsy","volume":"48","author":"J Man","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14971","article-title":"Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth","volume":"125","author":"HE Reinebrant","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1204","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07853.x","article-title":"Classifying perinatal death: an obstetric approach","volume":"93","author":"SK Cole","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(80)92717-8","article-title":"Monitoring perinatal mortality. A pathophysiological approach","volume":"2","author":"JS Wigglesworth","year":"1980","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38629.587639.7C","article-title":"Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study","volume":"331","author":"J Gardosi","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-9-22","article-title":"Causes of death and associated conditions (Codac): a utilitarian approach to the classification of perinatal deaths","volume":"9","author":"JF Froen","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l6131","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l6131","article-title":"Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial","volume":"367","author":"UB Wennerholm","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref009","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"P Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref010","unstructured":"SOCG Clinical Practice Guideline: Induction of Labour. No. 296, September 2013."},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000452744.06088.48","article-title":"146: Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies","volume":"124","author":"ACOG Practice bulletin no.","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref012","article-title":"Induction of labour","author":"NICE National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clinical Guideline 70"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e287","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1587322","article-title":"Influence of Birthweight on the Prospective Stillbirth Risk in the Third Trimester: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study","volume":"6","author":"S Contag","year":"2016","journal-title":"AJP Rep"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x","article-title":"A critical evaluation of sonar crown rump length measurements","volume":"82","author":"HP Robinson","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br J Obstet and Gynaecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref015","author":"Linea guida sulla gravidanza fisiologica","year":"2011","journal-title":"Sistema nazionale per le linee guida (SNLG)"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1497","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.04.010","article-title":"Guideline No. 388-Determination of Gestational Age by Ultrasound","volume":"41","author":"K Butt","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70477-6","article-title":"How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?","volume":"178","author":"FA Chervenak","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.152.2.6739822","article-title":"Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters","volume":"152","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1984","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001246","article-title":"Chorioamnionitis Workshop Participants. Evaluation and Management of Women and Newborns With a Maternal Diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis: Summary of a Workshop","volume":"127","author":"RD Higgins","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i4353","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4353","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"354","author":"F Cheong-See","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref021","first-page":"353","article-title":"Neonatal Anthropometric Charts: The Italian neonatal study compared with other European studies","volume":"51","author":"E Bertino","year":"2010","journal-title":"JPGN"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref022","article-title":"MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2018","author":"E. Draper","year":"2020","journal-title":"Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref023","article-title":"Trends in Stillbirths and Stillbirth Phenotypes in the United States: An Analysis of 131.5 Million Births","author":"D. Dongarwar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J MCH AIDS"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref024","article-title":"Perinatal death beyond 41 weeks pregnancy: an evaluation of causes and substandard care factors as identified in perinatal audit in the Netherlands","author":"JC Kortekaas","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002425","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002425","article-title":"Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study","volume":"14","author":"HE Knight","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref026","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"7","author":"P Middleton","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199604183341601","article-title":"Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group","volume":"334","author":"ME Hannah","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women","volume":"379","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref029","first-page":"1","article-title":"The ARRIVE trial will not \"arrive\" to Europe","volume":"26","author":"F Facchinetti","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17287","article-title":"Birth weight in live births and stillbirths","volume":"48","author":"LC Poon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"CC Lees","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"LJ Salomon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2022.2048810","article-title":"Preeclampsia: state of art and future perspectives. A special focus on possible preventions","volume":"42","author":"\u00d6 Kahramanoglu","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13794","article-title":"Timing of delivery and blood pressure cut-off in chronic hypertension during pregnancy: State of art and new proposals","volume":"157","author":"G Sisti","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2459","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2011.1823","article-title":"Causes of death among stillbirths","volume":"306","author":"Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group","year":"2011","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802086669","article-title":"Etiology of stillbirth at term: a 10-year cohort study","volume":"21","author":"CA Walsh","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"pone.0277262.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(00)00305-X","article-title":"Are Randomized Clinical Trials Good for Us (in the Short Term)? Evidence for a \u2018Trial Effect","volume":"54","author":"DA Braunholtz","year":"2001","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0277262","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]],"date-time":"2023-02-22T13:37:34Z","timestamp":1677073054000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0277262"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Antonio Simone","family":"Lagan\u00e0","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0277262","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]]}}}