{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:49:01Z","timestamp":1792788541791,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1705881600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology","award":["No.23NSFSC1940"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["No.23NSFSC1940"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of 10 formulas for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in cataract eye with an axial length (AL) of more than 28.0 mm.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We searched scientific databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for research published over the past 5 years, up to Sept 2023. The inclusion criteria were case series studies that compared different formulas (Barrett II, EVO, Kane, Hill-RBF, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK\/T, Holladay 1 w-k and SRK\/T w-k), in patients with extremely long AL undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with IOL implantation. The mean difference (MD) of mean absolute error (MAE) and the odds ratio (OR) of both the percentage of eyes within \u00b10.50D of prediction error (PPE\u00b10.50D) and the percentage of eyes within \u00b11.00D of prediction error (PPE\u00b11.00D) among different formulas were pooled using meta-analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 11 studies, involving 1376 eyes, were included to evaluate the 10 formulas mentioned above. Among these formulas, Barrett II, EVO, Kane, and Hill-RBF demonstrated significantly lower MAE values compared to SRK\/T. Furthermore, Kane and Hill-RBF had lower MAE values than EVO. Additionally, Barrett II and Kane yielded significantly lower MAE values than Haigis while Hill-RBF showed significantly lower MAE values than Holladay 1. Moreover, Hill-RBF showed the highest values for both PPE\u00b10.50D and PPE\u00b11.00D, followed by Kane. Both EVO and Kane had higher values of PPE\u00b10.50D and PPE\u00b11.00D compared to Haigis and SRK\/T.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"sec004\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Wang-Koch adjusted formulas and new-generation formulas have shown potential for higher accuracy in predicting IOL power for cataract patients with extremely long AL compared to traditional formulas. Based on the current limited clinical studies, Hill-RBF and Kane formulas seem to be a better choice for eyes with extremely long AL.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0296771","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T13:23:37Z","timestamp":1705929817000},"page":"e0296771","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["How to choose the intraocular lens power calculation formulas in eyes with extremely long axial length? A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"19","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0778-092X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Xiaoyu","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaodong","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0097-684X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Xuan","family":"Liao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"pone.0296771.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.08.020","article-title":"Cataract Surgery From 1918 to the Present and Future-Just Imagine!","volume":"185","author":"R J. Olson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0296771.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0194273","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0194273","article-title":"Comparison of axial length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes","volume":"13","author":"J Dong","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"pone.0296771.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/976847","article-title":"Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Formulas Involving 148 Eyes with Long Axial Lengths: A Retrospective Chart-Review Study","volume":"2015","author":"C Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0296771.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1585","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-020-01684-y","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation for plus and minus lenses in high myopia using partial coherence interferometry","volume":"41","author":"M Fuest","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0296771.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.027","article-title":"Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas","volume":"125","author":"R B Melles","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"pone.0296771.ref006","first-page":"n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"M Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical research ed.)"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0296771.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"P Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Annals of internal medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0296771.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20201123-01","article-title":"A Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in High Myopia","volume":"37","author":"J Bernardes","year":"2021","journal-title":"Journal of Refractive Surgery"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0296771.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20210712-03","article-title":"Comparison of Kane, Hill-RBF 2.0, Barrett Universal II, and Emmetropia Verifying Optical Formulas in Eyes With Extreme Myopia","volume":"37","author":"Y Chen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Journal of Refractive Surgery"},{"key":"pone.0296771.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2020.09.019","article-title":"Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Formulas and Axial Length Adjustments for Highly Myopic Eyes","volume":"223","author":"H Cheng","year":"2021","journal-title":"American Journal of Ophthalmology"},{"key":"pone.0296771.ref011","article-title":"Predictability of 6 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in People With Very High Myopia","volume":"9","author":"Y-C Chu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Frontiers in Medicine"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0296771.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2029","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-021-02194-1","article-title":"Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 29.0 mm","volume":"42","author":"C Guo","year":"2022","journal-title":"International Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0296771.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672119889016","article-title":"Comparison of six methods for the intraocular lens power calculation in high myopic eyes","volume":"31","author":"J Ji","year":"2019","journal-title":"European Journal of Ophthalmology"},{"key":"pone.0296771.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2021.07.017","article-title":"Clinical Accuracy of 6 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Elongated Eyes, According to Anterior Chamber Depth","volume":"233","author":"E Mo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"19","key":"pone.0296771.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5947","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11195947","article-title":"Accuracy of Six Intraocular Lens Power Calculations in Eyes with Axial Lengths Greater than 28.0 mm","volume":"11","author":"M Moshirfar","year":"2022","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Medicine"},{"issue":"16","key":"pone.0296771.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4848","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11164848","article-title":"Investigating the Prediction Accuracy of Recently Updated Intraocular Lens Power Formulas with Artificial Intelligence for High Myopia","volume":"11","author":"M Omoto","year":"2022","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Medicine"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0296771.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.025","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas","volume":"45","author":"X Rong","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0296771.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_937_18","article-title":"Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia","volume":"67","author":"D Zhou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian journal of ophthalmology"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0296771.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.07.005","article-title":"Update on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Study Protocols","volume":"128","author":"K J Hoffer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0296771.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.07.006","article-title":"Pursuing perfection in IOL calculations. II. Measurement foibles: Measurement errors, validation criteria, IOL constants, and lane length","volume":"43","author":"W E Hill","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0296771.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.08.003","article-title":"Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: III. Criteria for analyzing outcomes","volume":"43","author":"L Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0296771.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.10.064","article-title":"Prospective Intrapatient Comparison of 6.0-Millimeter Optic Single-Piece and 3-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Foldable Intraocular Lenses","volume":"113","author":"R Nejima","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0296771.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80338-0","article-title":"The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas","volume":"19","author":"K J Hoffer","year":"1993","journal-title":"Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0296771.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13184","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Q Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0296771.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-022-02466-4","article-title":"Comparing the accuracy of the new-generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in axial myopic eyes: a meta-analysis","volume":"43","author":"H Li","year":"2022","journal-title":"International Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0296771.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20210712-08","article-title":"Accuracy of Newer Generation IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes With High Axial Myopia","volume":"37","author":"L Lin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Journal of Refractive Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0296771.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.eye.6702954","article-title":"Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery","volume":"23","author":"R P Gale","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eye"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0296771.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2018-312209","article-title":"Cataract surgery refractive outcomes: representative standards in a National Health Service setting","volume":"103","author":"K Brogan","year":"2019","journal-title":"The British journal of ophthalmology"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0296771.ref029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2020-317822","article-title":"Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and intraocular lens calculation formula accuracy: nine formulas comparison","volume":"106","author":"D Hipolito-Fernandes","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0296771.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.07.032","article-title":"Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK\/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry","volume":"37","author":"P Aristodemou","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0296771.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1097\/IIO.0000000000000180","article-title":"Effect of Gender and Race on Ocular Biometry","volume":"57","author":"K Hoffer","year":"2017","journal-title":"International ophthalmology clinics"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0296771.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1829","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.05.031","article-title":"Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK\/T formula: The T2 formula","volume":"36","author":"R M Sheard","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0296771.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.042","article-title":"Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm","volume":"37","author":"L Wang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0296771.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2881","DOI":"10.1007\/s40123-023-00799-6","article-title":"Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas\u2014A Systematic Review","volume":"12","author":"W Stopyra","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ophthalmology and Therapy"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0296771.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e000251","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjophth-2018-000251","article-title":"Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection","volume":"4","author":"B J Connell","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology"},{"key":"pone.0296771.ref036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2019.04.019","article-title":"Accuracy and Precision of Intraocular Lens Calculations Using the New Hill-RBF Version 2.0 in Eyes With High Axial Myopia","volume":"205","author":"K H Wan","year":"2019","journal-title":"American Journal of Ophthalmology"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0325030","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,21]],"date-time":"2025-05-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747785600000}}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0296771","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T13:24:03Z","timestamp":1705929843000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0296771"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Andrzej","family":"Grzybowski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0296771","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]]}}}