{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T20:37:30Z","timestamp":1791405450367,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745280000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Background<\/jats:bold>\n                    This investigation delves into the potential application of data-driven survival modeling approaches for prognostic assessments of breast cancer survival. The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the ability of machine learning (ML) models and conventional survival analysis techniques, to identify consistent key predictors of breast cancer survival outcomes.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Methods<\/jats:bold>\n                    This study employs data-driven survival modeling approaches to predict breast cancer survival, including survival-specific methods such as the Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) model, Random Survival Forests (RSF), and Cox Proportional Deep Neural Networks (DeepSurv), as well as machine learning models like Random Forests (RF), XGBoost, Support Vector Machines (SVM) with an RBF Kernel, and LightGBM. The dataset, sourced from the National Cancer Institute\u2019s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, comprises 4,024 women diagnosed with infiltrating duct and lobular carcinoma breast cancer between 2006 and 2010. To ensure interpretability across all models, the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was applied to RSF, DeepSurv, Random Forests (RF), and XGBoost. This enabled the identification of key predictors influencing breast cancer survival, highlighting consistent factors across models while uncovering unique insights specific to each approach.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Results<\/jats:bold>\n                    The performance of survival-specific and ML models were evaluated using the Concordance index (C-index), Integrated Brier Score (IBS), mean accuracy, and mean AUC. The CPH model achieved a C-index of 0\u00a0.\u00a071\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00\u00a0.\u00a0015 and an IBS of 0\u00a0.\u00a008\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00\u00a0.\u00a0006, while RSF demonstrated slightly better discriminatory power with a C-index of 0\u00a0.\u00a072\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00\u00a0.\u00a00117. DeepSurv performed comparably, with a C-index of 0\u00a0.\u00a071\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00\u00a0.\u00a00095 and an IBS of 0\u00a0.\u00a009\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00\u00a0.\u00a00008. Both Cox and RSF models achieved the lowest IBS (0\u00a0.\u00a008), indicating accurate survival probability predictions over time. For ML models, RF achieved a mean AUC of 0\u00a0.\u00a074\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00\u00a0.\u00a00021, and XGBoost with a mean AUC 0\u00a0.\u00a069\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00\u00a0.\u00a00183, reflecting fair discriminatory ability but not accounting for censoring in survival data. SHAP analysis for the top-performing models highlighted the extent of lymph node involvement, Regional Node-Positive (number of affected lymph nodes), tumor grade (cell abnormality and growth rate), progesterone status, and age as key predictors of breast cancer survival outcomes.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Conclusions<\/jats:bold>\n                    While ML models like XGBoost and RF can effectively identify important predictors and patterns in breast cancer outcomes, survival-specific methods such as the Cox model, RSF, and DeepSurv provide essential capabilities for handling time-to-event data and censoring, making them more suitable for accurate survival predictions. The primary objective of including ML models in this analysis was to leverage their interpretability in identifying key variables alongside survival-specific models, rather than to directly compare their performance against survival models. By examining both ML and survival models, this research highlights the complementary strengths of each approach. This study contributes to the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare, emphasizing the value of data-driven survival modeling techniques in supporting healthcare professionals with accurate, personalized, and actionable insights for high-risk patients. Together, these approaches enhance the precision of survival predictions, paving the way for more informed clinical decision-making and improved patient care.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0318167","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T16:03:18Z","timestamp":1745337798000},"page":"e0318167","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Data-driven survival modeling for breast cancer prognostics: A comparative study with machine learning and traditional survival modeling methods"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"20","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-8293-7563","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Theophilus Gyedu","family":"Baidoo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2122-2150","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Hansapani","family":"Rodrigo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0318167.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21660","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"71","author":"H Sung","year":"2021","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0318167.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21754","article-title":"Breast cancer statistics, 2022","volume":"72","author":"AN Giaquinto","year":"2022","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0318167.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(08)70179-7","article-title":"Cancer survival in five continents: A worldwide population-based study (CONCORD)","volume":"9","author":"MP Coleman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anderson B, Yip C, Smith R, Shyyan R, Sener S, Eniu A. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: Overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007. Cancer. 2008;113(S8):2221\u201343.","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.23844"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival analysis a self-learning text. Springer; 1996.","DOI":"10.2307\/2532873"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csbj.2014.11.005","article-title":"Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction","volume":"13","author":"K Kourou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Comput Struct Biotechnol J"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kalafi EY, Nor NAM, Taib NA, Ganggayah MD, Town C, Dhillon SK. Machine learning and deep learning approaches in breast cancer survival prediction using clinical data. Folia Biol (Praha). 2019;65(5\u20136):212\u201320. doi: 10.14712\/fb2019065050212 32362304","DOI":"10.14712\/fb2019065050212"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0318167.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1159\/000012061","article-title":"Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer","volume":"57","author":"M Lundin","year":"1999","journal-title":"Oncology"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Solti D, Zhai H. Predicting BREAST CANCER PATIENT SURVIVAL USING MACHINE LEARNING. Proceedings of the international conference on bioinformatics, computational biology and biomedical informatics; 2013. p. 704\u20135. doi: 10.1145\/2506583.2512376","DOI":"10.1145\/2506583.2512376"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0318167.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20410","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-77220-w","article-title":"A comparison of machine learning methods for survival analysis of high-dimensional clinical data for dementia prediction","volume":"10","author":"A Spooner","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0318167.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1214\/08-AOAS169","article-title":"Random survival forests","volume":"2","author":"H Ishwaran","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Appl Stat"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0318167.ref012","first-page":"25","article-title":"Random survival forests for R","volume":"7","author":"H Ishwaran","year":"2007","journal-title":"R News."},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0318167.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1010933404324","article-title":"Random forests","volume":"45","author":"L Breiman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Mach Learn."},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0318167.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0482-1","article-title":"DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network","volume":"18","author":"JL Katzman","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref015","unstructured":"Weathers B. Comparison of survival curves between Cox proportional hazards, random forests, and conditional inference forests in survival analysis. doi: 10.26076\/e209-46bd"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.953","article-title":"SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique","volume":"16","author":"NV Chawla","year":"2002","journal-title":"jair"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref017","article-title":"R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna","author":"Team R Core","year":"2024"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0318167.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x","article-title":"Regression models and life-tables","volume":"34","author":"DR Cox","year":"1972","journal-title":"J R Stat Soc Ser B: Stat Methodol"},{"issue":"20","key":"pone.0318167.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7048","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.4230","article-title":"The role of deep learning-based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma","volume":"10","author":"H Moradmand","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cancer Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0318167.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780140108","article-title":"A neural network model for survival data","volume":"14","author":"D Faraggi","year":"1995","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref021","first-page":"785","article-title":"Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining","author":"T Chen","year":"2016"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref022","unstructured":"Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in neural information processing systems; 2017. p. 30."},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0318167.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00994018","article-title":"Support-vector networks","volume":"20","author":"C Cortes","year":"1995","journal-title":"Mach Learn"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0318167.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1009715923555","article-title":"A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition","volume":"2","author":"CJ Burges","year":"1998","journal-title":"Data Min Knowl Discov."},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, Ohta T, Koyama M. Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining; 2019. p. 2623\u201331.","DOI":"10.1145\/3292500.3330701"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graf E, Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Stat Med. 1999;18(17\u201318):2529\u201345.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915\/30)18:17\/18<2529::AID-SIM274>3.0.CO;2-5"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0318167.ref027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-021-01386-8","article-title":"A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: Variable selection and predictive performance","volume":"21","author":"Y Liu","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref028","unstructured":"Lundberg S, Lee S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst. 2017:30."},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref029","unstructured":"Eshun S. A machine learning approach to evaluate the effect of sodium- glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on chronic kidney disease in diabetes patients. Theses and dissertations; 2023. p. 1211. https:\/\/scholarworks.utrgv.edu\/etd\/1211"},{"key":"pone.0318167.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Daly B, Olopade OI. A perfect storm: How tumor biology, genomics, and health care delivery patterns collide to create a racial survival disparity in breast cancer and proposed interventions for change. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65(3):221\u201338. doi: 10.3322\/caac.21271 25960198","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21271"},{"issue":"23","key":"pone.0318167.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4384","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.33846","article-title":"Age distributions of breast cancer diagnosis and mortality by race and ethnicity in US women","volume":"127","author":"RE Hendrick","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0318167.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/69.1.239","article-title":"Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model","volume":"69","author":"D Schoenfeld","year":"1982","journal-title":"Biometrika."}],"container-title":["PLOS One"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0318167","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T16:03:28Z","timestamp":1745337808000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0318167"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Guanghui","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0318167","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]}}}