{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:49:20Z","timestamp":1792788560244,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]],"date-time":"2025-08-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756080000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"NIHR YH PSTRC"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS One"],"abstract":"\n Background<\/jats:title>\n Excessive midwifery workload is a growing concern that may affect safety and quality of care, with potential consequences for mothers and babies.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Aims<\/jats:title>\n To assess how midwife workload affects delivery of care, and maternal and neonatal outcomes; and whether maternal, neonatal, and staffing factors modify these relationships.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n This systematic review updated a prior review (January 1998 to June 2014) with revisions to search strategies. We searched for new evidence (June 2014 to October 2023) across 11 academic databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley); CINAHL (EBSCOhost); EconLit (EBSCOhost; Embase (Ovid); Epistemonikos; Health Management Information Consortium (Ovid); International HTA Database (INAHTA); Maternity & Infant Care Database (Ovid); Ovid MEDLINE(R); CEA Registry) and 10 grey literature websites. Screening involved multiple reviewers, with 10% of records independently double-screened. Inclusion criteria were intrapartum births in maternity wards in OECD countries, a measure of midwifery workload, and outcomes related to provision of care, mode of birth, and maternal or neonatal morbidity and mortality. A single reviewer conducted data extraction, bias assessments, and a narrative synthesis.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n We included 23 studies (15 new, 8 from the original review) from the UK, USA, Italy, France, and Germany, covering 2,943,120 births. Only three studies were rated as high quality. Many outcomes showed no significant effects, or inconsistent effects across studies. High workload was significantly linked to care delays, increased instrumental and caesarean births, and some maternal outcomes (e.g., perineal trauma). Associations were modified by maternal characteristics, including clinical risk, parity, and civil status. No significant associations were found between workload and neonatal outcomes, except for one low-quality study reporting increased neonatal ward admissions.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n High midwifery workload may alter care provision, potentially affecting mother and baby outcomes. Further robust research is needed to address limitations in current evidence.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0329117","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]],"date-time":"2025-08-25T17:23:07Z","timestamp":1756142587000},"page":"e0329117","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The impact of midwife workload on delivery of care, and mother and baby outcomes in maternity settings in OECD countries: A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"20","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7517-5233","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Richard","family":"Mattock","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"Bojke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Judy","family":"Wright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomasina","family":"Stacey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"pone.0329117.ref001","volume-title":"Maternity services in England","author":"National Audit Office N","year":"2013"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0329117.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12544","article-title":"The dangers of the day of birth","volume":"121","author":"KF Walker","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref003","volume-title":"Better births. Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. A five year forward view for maternity care","author":"National Maternity Review","year":"2016"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref004","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study","volume":"343","author":"Group Birthplace in England Collaborative","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref005","volume-title":"Intrapartum care. QS105","author":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)","year":"2017"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref006","volume-title":"Position statement","author":"Royal College of Midwives (RCM)","year":"2022"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref007","volume-title":"The health and social care committee\u2019s expert panel: Evaluation of the government\u2019s progress against its policy commitments in the area of maternity services in England","author":"J Dacre","year":"2021"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref008","volume-title":"Ockenden Report - Final. Findings, Conclusions and Essential Actions from the Independent Review of Maternity Services at The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust","author":"Department of Health and Social Care","year":"2022"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref009","volume-title":"The report of the Morecambe Bay investigation","author":"B Kirkup","year":"2015"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref010","volume-title":"Evidence review 2: Safe midwifery staffing for maternity settings","author":"NICE","year":"2015"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref011","unstructured":"Safe midwifery staffing for maternity settings. NICE guideline [NG4]. Published: 27 February 2015 [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng4"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref012","article-title":"JBI manual for evidence synthesis-chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk","author":"S Moola","year":"2020"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0329117.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2021.0546","article-title":"PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews","volume":"156","author":"S Arya","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref014","volume-title":"Safe Midwife Staffing for Maternity settings. Evidence review 3 \u2013 Economic evidence review","author":"NICE guideline","year":"2015"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021","article-title":"PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement","volume":"75","author":"J McGowan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of clinical epidemiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0329117.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.5195\/jmla.2021.978","article-title":"The NICE OECD countries\u2019 geographic search filters: Part 1-methodology for developing the draft MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid) filters","volume":"109","author":"L Ayiku","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Med Libr Assoc"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2021.103118","article-title":"Midwifery and nurse staffing of inpatient maternity services - A systematic scoping review of associations with outcomes and quality of care","volume":"103","author":"L Turner","year":"2021","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref018","volume-title":"Checking for duplicates guidance","author":"J Wright","year":"2016"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref019","unstructured":"Study Quality Assessment Tools. Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies [Internet]. 2013 [cited 18\/11\/2022]. Available from: https:\/\/www.nhlbi.nih.gov\/health-topics\/study-quality-assessment-tools"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0329117.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1787","DOI":"10.1111\/apa.15180","article-title":"Midwife-to-newborn ratio and neonatal outcome in healthy term infants","volume":"109","author":"C Dani","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jebo.2022.03.013","article-title":"Low staffing in the maternity ward: Keep calm and call the surgeon","volume":"197","author":"G Facchini","year":"2022","journal-title":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0329117.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3147","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2016.2512","article-title":"Gatekeepers at Work: An Empirical Analysis of a Maternity Unit","volume":"63","author":"M Freeman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Management Science"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hollowell J, Rowe R, Townend J, Knight M, Li Y, Linsell L. The Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study: further analyses to enhance policy and service delivery decision-making for planned place of birth. 2015.","DOI":"10.3310\/hsdr03360"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.04.017","article-title":"Administration of oxytocin during spontaneous labour: A national vignette-based study among midwives","volume":"62","author":"J Isidore","year":"2018","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-300","article-title":"The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system","volume":"14","author":"N Knape","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0329117.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000000832","article-title":"Initial preference for labor without neuraxial analgesia and actual use: results from a national survey in France","volume":"121","author":"L Kp\u00e9a","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesthesia & Analgesia"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref027","unstructured":"Draper E, Kurinczuk J, Kenyon S. Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: term, singleton, intrapartum stillbirth and intrapartum-related neonatal death 2017 [updated 2017. Available from: https:\/\/www.npeu.ox.ac.uk\/downloads\/files\/mbrrace-uk\/reports\/MBRRACE-UK%20Intrapartum%20Confidential%20Enquiry%20Report%202017%20-%20final%20version.pdf, https:\/\/www.npeu.ox.ac.uk\/mbrrace-uk\/reports, https:\/\/www.npeu.ox.ac.uk\/mbrrace-uk"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0329117.ref028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1097\/NNR.0000000000000620","article-title":"Nurse-Reported Staffing Guidelines and Exclusive Breast Milk Feeding","volume":"71","author":"A Lyndon","year":"2022","journal-title":"Nurs Res"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref029","article-title":"Delivery Volume, Nurse Staffing and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes [10D]","volume":"127","author":"BM Mercer","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0329117.ref030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-045577","article-title":"Delay in the induction of labour process: a retrospective cohort study and computer simulation of maternity unit workload","volume":"11","author":"K Robertson","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0329117.ref031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2022.02.005","article-title":"The association between midwifery staffing levels and the experiences of mothers on postnatal wards: Cross sectional analysis of routine data","volume":"35","author":"L Turner","year":"2022","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0329117.ref032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.13500","article-title":"Midwifery Workforce Density Moderates the Association Between Independent Practice and Pregnancy Outcomes","volume":"68","author":"J Vanderlaan","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0329117.ref033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.outlook.2020.07.003","article-title":"Identifying optimal labor and delivery nurse staffing: The case of cesarean births and nursing hours","volume":"69","author":"BL Wilson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Nurs Outlook"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0329117.ref034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0207379","article-title":"Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit","volume":"13","author":"S Zbiri","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"640379","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/640379","article-title":"Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval","volume":"2011","author":"A Cerbinskaite","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pregnancy"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref036","volume-title":"The association between midwifery staffing and outcomes in maternity units in England: observational study using routinely collected data","author":"V Gerova","year":"2010"},{"issue":"6","key":"pone.0329117.ref037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1080\/0144361021000020385","article-title":"Predictors of obstetric intervention rates: case-mix, staffing levels and organisational factors of hospital of birth","volume":"22","author":"R Joyce","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0329117.ref038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/fn.89.1.F51","article-title":"Associations between perinatal interventions and hospital stillbirth rates and neonatal mortality","volume":"89","author":"R Joyce","year":"2004","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0329117.ref039","article-title":"Service configuration, unit characteristics and variation in intervention rates in a national sample of obstetric units in England: an exploratory analysis","volume":"4","author":"RE Rowe","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"38","key":"pone.0329117.ref040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3310\/hsdr02380","article-title":"The efficient use of the maternity workforce and the implications for safety and quality in maternity care: a population-based, cross-sectional study","volume":"2","author":"J Sandall","year":"2014","journal-title":"Health Services and Delivery Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0329117.ref041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1054\/midw.2000.0224","article-title":"A randomised study of midwifery caseload care and traditional \u201cshared-care\u201d","volume":"16","author":"Team North Staffordshire Changing Childbirth Research","year":"2000","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0329117.ref042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3016.2003.00524.x","article-title":"Is midwife workload associated with quality of process of care (continuous electronic fetal monitoring [CEFM]) and neonatal outcome indicators? A prospective study in consultant-led labour wards in Scotland","volume":"17","author":"J Tucker","year":"2003","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.004","article-title":"Post-operative mortality, missed care and nurse staffing in nine countries: A cross-sectional study","volume":"78","author":"JE Ball","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Nurs Stud"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0329117.ref044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/s12960-024-00925-w","article-title":"Increasing the number of midwives is necessary but not sufficient: using global data to support the case for investment in both midwife availability and the enabling work environment in low- and middle-income countries","volume":"22","author":"A Nove","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum Resour Health"},{"key":"pone.0329117.ref045","unstructured":"Birthrate Plus Workforce Planning Methodology and Birthrate Plus Intrapartum Acuity Tool [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng4\/resources\/birthrate-plus-workforce-planning-methodology-and-birthrate-plus-intrapartum-acuity-tool-pdf-3300074199493"}],"container-title":["PLOS One"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0329117","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]],"date-time":"2025-08-25T17:23:16Z","timestamp":1756142596000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0329117"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Maria","family":"W\u0119grzynowska","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0329117","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,25]]}}}