{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T20:13:52Z","timestamp":1793391232210,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]],"date-time":"2025-09-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1758844800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS One"],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"sec001\">\n<jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) is one of the most commonly used methods for lumbar fusion. However, in recent years, the unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF) has also gradually attracted the attention of spine surgeons. This study aims to compare the perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes of the two procedures for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec002\">\n<jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>We collected clinical data of patients who had undergone minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) or unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD) from January 2019 to December 2022. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain (LP), and postoperative complication rate.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec003\">\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>There were no significant differences in the preoperative VAS scores for LBP, LP, or ODI between the two groups. The VAS score for LBP was significantly lower in the UBE-LIF group than in the Mis-TLIF group 1 week postoperatively (1.4\u2009\u00b1\u20091.1 vs. 2.1\u2009\u00b1\u20091.0, P\u2009=\u20090.001). However, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores for LBP, LP, and ODI at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The length of stay was significantly lower in the UBE-LIF than in the Mis-TLIF group (5.2\u2009\u00b1\u20091.1 vs. 6.3\u2009\u00b1\u20091.2 days, P\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). The operative time (188.9\u2009\u00b1\u200919.8 vs. 159.5\u2009\u00b1\u200911.6 minutes, P\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) of the UBE-LIF group was significantly higher than that of the Mis-TLIF group, while the estimated blood loss (131.0\u2009\u00b1\u200921.9 vs. 191.7\u2009\u00b1\u200923.3\u2009ml, P\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) and postoperative drainage volume (123.0\u2009\u00b1\u200955.4 vs. 191.2\u2009\u00b1\u200947.5\u2009ml, P\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) were significantly lower in the UBE-LIF than in the Mis-TLIF group. The complication rate was slightly higher in the UBE-LIF than in the Mis-TLIF group; however, the difference was not significant (11.5% vs. 5.0%, P\u2009=\u20090.299).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"sec004\">\n<jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>UBE-LIF can achieve better perioperative clinical outcomes than Mis-TLIF. However, in the long-term, these two procedures can achieve equivalent clinical efficacy.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0333165","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]],"date-time":"2025-09-26T17:24:43Z","timestamp":1758907483000},"page":"e0333165","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective multicenter cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Xiang","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jingbo","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhihui","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yi","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liang","family":"Shi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-7539-224X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Lang","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0333165.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.SPINE1320","article-title":"Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"SL Parker","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0333165.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218770769","article-title":"Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume","volume":"8","author":"VM Ravindra","year":"2018","journal-title":"Global Spine Journal"},{"issue":"18","key":"pone.0333165.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1398","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002118","article-title":"Epidemiologic and Economic Burden Attributable to First Spinal Fusion Surgery: Analysis From an Italian Administrative Database","volume":"42","author":"PA Cortesi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0333165.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.09.026","article-title":"National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009","volume":"15","author":"H Yoshihara","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0333165.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.10.014","article-title":"Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States","volume":"15","author":"WC Pannell","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"pone.0333165.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E","article-title":"Minimally invasive lumbar fusion","volume":"28","author":"KT Foley","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0333165.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2009.3.2.89","article-title":"The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery","volume":"3","author":"S-H Min","year":"2009","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"issue":"12","key":"pone.0333165.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.07.006","article-title":"Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"JL Heemskerk","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0333165.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.4055\/cios22250","article-title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study","volume":"15","author":"AD Jover-Mendiola","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-024-06231-7","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"166","author":"EMS Ali","year":"2024","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"key":"pone.0333165.ref011","article-title":"Prospective randomized comparison of minimally invasive Tlif versus open Tlif: clinical effectiveness and restoration of working capacity in railway workers","author":"VA Byvaltsev","year":"2024","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.07.004","article-title":"Spinal endoscopy: evidence, techniques, global trends, and future projections","volume":"22","author":"AK Simpson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0333165.ref013","article-title":"Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results","volume":"43","author":"DH Heo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0333165.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-024-08632-9","article-title":"Learning curve insights in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spinal procedures: proficiency cutoffs and the impact on efficiency and complications","volume":"34","author":"J Peng","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"9","key":"pone.0333165.ref015","article-title":"Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in China: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial","volume":"14","author":"Z Wu","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"12","key":"pone.0333165.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2066","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.06.013","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique","volume":"21","author":"M-S Kang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0333165.ref017","article-title":"Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease","volume":"34","author":"J-E Kim","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-04138-0","article-title":"Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"H Han","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0333165.ref019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1345","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07588-6","article-title":"Comparing the efficacy and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic fusion versus minimally invasive fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and mate-analysis","volume":"32","author":"Q Wang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-023-06374-1","article-title":"Comparison of surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcome between unilateral biportal endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"24","author":"X Huang","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"838","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-023-06949-y","article-title":"Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"24","author":"Q Yu","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-024-04813-w","article-title":"Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective study","volume":"19","author":"R Arunakul","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29652","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-81402-1","article-title":"Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"14","author":"K-H You","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"pone.0333165.ref024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-025-08777-8","article-title":"Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective analysis","volume":"26","author":"Z Zhu","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"8","key":"pone.0333165.ref025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199604150-00007","article-title":"Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis","volume":"21","author":"Y Kawaguchi","year":"1996","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"10","key":"pone.0333165.ref026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199905150-00017","article-title":"Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery","volume":"24","author":"R Gejo","year":"1999","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"}],"container-title":["PLOS One"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0333165","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]],"date-time":"2025-09-26T17:24:47Z","timestamp":1758907487000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0333165"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"KOICHIRO","family":"ONO","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"editor"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0333165","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]]}}}