{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T18:15:17Z","timestamp":1778782517028,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778716800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS One"],"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    This study investigated the characteristics of electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based perpendicular field-by-field patient-specific quality assurance (PFF-PSQA) on the Halcyon linear accelerator by comparing them with the true composite (TC)-PSQA performed using the Delta\n                    <jats:sup>4<\/jats:sup>\n                    Phantom+ (ScandiDos, Sweden) system. Both methods demonstrated excellent dose agreement under the AAPM TG-218 gamma criteria and strong correlations were observed between their results across prostate, nasopharynx, and breast cases. However, gamma passing rate (GPR) reductions due to treatment isocenter displacements were more pronounced in TC-PSQA, whereas EPID-based PFF-PSQA consistently showed relatively higher and more stable GPR values. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA analysis confirmed a significant difference in sensitivity to displacement-induced errors, supporting the clinical robustness of EPID-based PFF-PSQA. In addition, EPID-based PFF-PSQA yielded tolerance and action limits of 99.5% and 99.4%, respectively, which exceed the conventional 95% and 90% thresholds specified in the report of American association of physicists in medicine (AAPM) TG-218, highlighting the necessity of refining evaluation criteria for this approach. Overall, these findings indicate that EPID-based PFF-PSQA can serve as a reliable and clinically alternative to TC-PSQA.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0348615","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T17:41:46Z","timestamp":1778780506000},"page":"e0348615","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Analysis of IMRT patient specific quality assurance using EPID measurement data from the Halcyon linear accelerator"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Shinhaeng","family":"Cho","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jea-Uk","family":"Jeong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yong Hyub","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mee Sun","family":"Yoon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Taek-Keun","family":"Nam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sung-Ja","family":"Ahn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6882-8555","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Ju-Young","family":"Song","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0348615.ref001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v7i2.2230","article-title":"Analysis of the sources of uncertainty for EDR2 film-based IMRT quality assurance","volume":"7","author":"C Shi","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Appl Clin Med Phys"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0348615.ref002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3514120","article-title":"Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT","volume":"38","author":"DA Low","year":"2011","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0348615.ref003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v10i2.2942","article-title":"Comparison of two commercial detector arrays for IMRT quality assurance","volume":"10","author":"JG Li","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Appl Clin Med Phys"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0348615.ref004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.meddos.2009.10.007","article-title":"Evaluation of a 3D diode array dosimeter for helical tomotherapy delivery QA","volume":"35","author":"V Feygelman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Med Dosim"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0348615.ref005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v17i5.6118","article-title":"Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT\/VMAT QA","volume":"17","author":"M Aristophanous","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Appl Clin Med Phys"},{"issue":"5","key":"pone.0348615.ref006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1002\/acm2.12412","article-title":"Practical application of Octavius\u00ae -4D: Characteristics and criticalities for IMRT and VMAT verification","volume":"19","author":"P Urso","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Appl Clin Med Phys"},{"issue":"11","key":"pone.0348615.ref007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5359","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3238104","article-title":"IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119","volume":"36","author":"GA Ezzell","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0348615.ref008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.12810","article-title":"Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218","volume":"45","author":"M Miften","year":"2018","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"pone.0348615.ref009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.16536","article-title":"AAPM Task Group 307: Use of EPIDs for patient-specific IMRT and VMAT QA","volume":"50","author":"N Dogan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"pone.0348615.ref010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/acm2.70025","article-title":"From 2D to 3D gamma passing rate tolerance and action limits for VMAT plan verification with ArcCHECK","volume":"26","author":"C Zarros","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Appl Clin Med Phys"},{"issue":"3","key":"pone.0348615.ref011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1093\/jrr\/rrs112","article-title":"Statistical process control analysis for patient-specific IMRT and VMAT QA","volume":"54","author":"T Sanghangthum","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Radiat Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"pone.0348615.ref012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3268","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v11i4.3268","article-title":"Portal dosimetry for pretreatment verification of IMRT plan: a comparison with 2D ion chamber array","volume":"11","author":"DS Sharma","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Appl Clin Med Phys"},{"key":"pone.0348615.ref013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1186\/s13014-016-0725-4","article-title":"Comparisons of VMAT QA systems: Sensitivity analysis to machine errors","volume":"11","author":"B Liang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Radiat Oncol"},{"issue":"7","key":"pone.0348615.ref014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2015.05.016","article-title":"Gamma index comparison of three VMAT QA systems and evaluation of their sensitivity to delivery errors","volume":"31","author":"L Vieillevigne","year":"2015","journal-title":"Phys Med"},{"key":"pone.0348615.ref015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2018.10.005","article-title":"Error detection during VMAT delivery using EPID-based 3D transit dosimetry","volume":"54","author":"B Mijnheer","year":"2018","journal-title":"Phys Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"pone.0348615.ref016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"025008","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/aa9c60","article-title":"Comparison of forward- and back-projection in vivo EPID dosimetry for VMAT treatment of the prostate","volume":"63","author":"JL Bedford","year":"2018","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"}],"container-title":["PLOS One"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0348615","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T17:41:50Z","timestamp":1778780510000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0348615"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Moshi","family":"Geso","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0348615","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1932-6203","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]]}}}