{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,12]],"date-time":"2025-10-12T20:04:03Z","timestamp":1760299443318,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Public Library of Science (PLoS)","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,14]],"date-time":"2016-10-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1476403200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["www.plosone.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["PLoS ONE"],"DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0164077","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,14]],"date-time":"2016-10-14T17:38:26Z","timestamp":1476466706000},"page":"e0164077","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.corrections_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Comparison of the Cervex-Brush\u00ae Combi and the Cytobrush+Ayres Spatula Combination for Cervical Sampling in Liquid-Based Cytology"],"prefix":"10.1371","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9022-415X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marcelo","family":"Simonsen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jos\u00e9 Humberto","family":"Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"J\u00falio Cesar","family":"Possati Resende","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"M\u00e1rcio","family":"Antoniazzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Adhemar","family":"Longatto-Filho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Cristovam","family":"Scapulatempo-Neto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01067.x","article-title":"The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales","volume":"92","author":"DM Parkin","year":"1985","journal-title":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"8463","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(85)90917-1","article-title":"Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Dundee and Angus 1962\u201381 and its relation with invasive cervical cancer","volume":"2","author":"HL Duguid","year":"1985","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009","article-title":"Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review","volume":"132","author":"K Nanda","year":"2000","journal-title":"Annals of internal medicine"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref4","first-page":"954","article-title":"Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries","volume":"79","author":"R Sankaranarayanan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2014.12.022","article-title":"Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance","volume":"136","author":"WK Huh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gynecologic oncology"},{"year":"2014","key":"ref6"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3","article-title":"Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"111","author":"M Arbyn","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstetrics and gynecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1159\/000351789","article-title":"The significance of augmented high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion detection on pap test examination: partial results from the RODEO study team","volume":"57","author":"C Scapulatempo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta cytologica"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.22842","article-title":"Gynecologic cytology on conventional and liquid-based preparations: a comprehensive review of similarities and differences","volume":"41","author":"RS Hoda","year":"2013","journal-title":"Diagnostic cytopathology"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref10","first-page":"CD001036","article-title":"Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples","author":"P Martin-Hirsch","year":"2000","journal-title":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref11","first-page":"185","article-title":"Patient characteristics and endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears","volume":"20","author":"JD Allingham","year":"1985","journal-title":"The Journal of family practice"},{"issue":"370","key":"ref12","first-page":"194","article-title":"Does feedback improve the quality of cervical smears? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"43","author":"F Buntinx","year":"1993","journal-title":"The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref13","first-page":"285","article-title":"Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison","volume":"38","author":"DD Harrison","year":"1993","journal-title":"The Journal of reproductive medicine"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00228-7","article-title":"Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening","volume":"90","author":"KR Lee","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstetrics and gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref15","first-page":"168","article-title":"A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques","volume":"84","author":"M Germain","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstetrics and gynecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1438.2006.00629.x","article-title":"A comparative study of two devices used for cervical cell sampling raises some doubts about liquid-based cytology","volume":"16","author":"A Kothari","year":"2006","journal-title":"International journal of gynecological cancer: official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society"},{"year":"2005","author":"D RN Solomon","key":"ref17"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1995.tb02165.x","article-title":"A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods","volume":"35","author":"ZN Kavak","year":"1995","journal-title":"The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology"},{"issue":"7","key":"ref19","first-page":"405","article-title":"Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation","volume":"42","author":"B Risberg","year":"1997","journal-title":"The Journal of reproductive medicine"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2006.00386.x","article-title":"Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi","volume":"17","author":"CE Depuydt","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cytopathology: official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1159\/000345798","article-title":"Optimal sampling devices for liquid-based procedure in screening for cervical cancer: comparison between cotton stick\/Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush","volume":"57","author":"H Kuramoto","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta cytologica"},{"issue":"3","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008875818033","article-title":"Evaluation model of the Mexican national program for early cervical cancer detection and proposals for a new approach","volume":"9","author":"EC Lazcano-Ponce","year":"1998","journal-title":"Cancer causes & control: CCC"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1590\/S1516-31801999000200006","article-title":"Cyto-histological correlation of 219 patients submitted to surgical treatment due to diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"117","author":"SJ Adad","year":"1999","journal-title":"Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1293","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03444.x","article-title":"Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"119","author":"M Underwood","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0339(200002)22:2<86::AID-DC5>3.0.CO;2-4","article-title":"Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method","volume":"22","author":"T Johnson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Diagnostic cytopathology"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1258\/096914104774061056","article-title":"Accuracy of conventional cytology: results from a multicentre screening study in India","volume":"11","author":"R Sankaranarayanan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Journal of medical screening"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref27","first-page":"569","article-title":"Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells","volume":"82","author":"JM Cannon","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstetrics and gynecology"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1159\/000331348","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears","volume":"43","author":"PD Kohlberger","year":"1999","journal-title":"Acta cytologica"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.4103\/1742-6413.45495","article-title":"Collection of the BD SurePath Pap Test with a broom device plus endocervical brush improves disease detection when compared to the broom device alone or the spatula plus endocervical brush combination","volume":"6","author":"S Davis-Devine","year":"2009","journal-title":"CytoJournal"},{"issue":"4","key":"ref30","first-page":"457","article-title":"Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center","volume":"37","author":"A Szarewski","year":"1993","journal-title":"Acta cytologica"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.08.008","article-title":"Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions","volume":"112","author":"A Repse-Fokter","year":"2011","journal-title":"International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics"},{"issue":"3 Suppl","key":"ref32","first-page":"735","article-title":"Correlations between colposcopy and histologic results from colposcopically directed biopsy in cervical precancerous lesions","volume":"53","author":"A Boicea","year":"2012","journal-title":"Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie"},{"issue":"9505","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)67961-0","article-title":"Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review","volume":"367","author":"E Davey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12282","article-title":"Study of accuracy of colposcopy in VIA and HPV detection-based cervical cancer screening program","volume":"54","author":"I Ghosh","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1309\/EWYGWFRRM8798U5P","article-title":"The risk of false-positive histology according to the reason for colposcopy referral in cervical cancer screening: a blind revision of all histologic lesions found in the NTCC trial","volume":"129","author":"P Dalla Palma","year":"2008","journal-title":"American journal of clinical pathology"}],"container-title":["PLOS ONE"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0164077","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,9]],"date-time":"2020-05-09T03:46:05Z","timestamp":1588995965000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0164077"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Marcia Edilaine Lopes","family":"Consolaro","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,14]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,14]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0164077","relation":{},"ISSN":["1932-6203"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1932-6203"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,14]]}}}