{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T23:52:26Z","timestamp":1790380346587,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Pacini Editore","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital"],"DOI":"10.14639\/0392-100x-a954","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]],"date-time":"2026-04-27T10:03:21Z","timestamp":1777284201000},"page":"120-127","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal voice: cepstral and voicing measures"],"prefix":"10.14639","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"Lucia","family":"D\u2019Alatri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ylenia","family":"Longobardi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosa","family":"Libero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Claudio","family":"Parrilla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michela","family":"Sollazzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria Raffaella","family":"Marchese","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacopo","family":"Galli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"20340","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2001;258:77-82. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s004050000299","DOI":"10.1007\/s004050000299"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D\u2019Alatri L, Bussu F, Scarano E, et al. Objective and subjective assessment of tracheoesophageal prosthesis voice outcome. J Voice 2012;26:607-613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jvoice.2011.08.013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2011.08.013"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dejonckere PH, Moerman MB, Martens JP, et al. Voicing quantification is more relevant than period perturbation in substitution voices: an advanced acoustical study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:1205-1212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-011-1900-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-011-1900-8"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Sluis KE, van Son RJJH, van der Molen L, et al. Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;278:1209-1222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-020-06216-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-020-06216-z"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D\u2019Alatri L, Longobardi Y, Parrilla C, et al. Long-term voice outcomes and quality of life after open partial horizontal laryngectomy type II vs. total laryngectomy: a cross-sectional study. Clin Otolaryngol 2022;47:464-470. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/coa.13924","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.13924"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Brignoli F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngeal cancer questionnaire. Head Neck 2013;35:1606-1615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hed.23198","DOI":"10.1002\/hed.23198"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moerman M, Martens JP, Crevier-Buchman L, et al. The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;26:435-439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-005-1033-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-005-1033-z"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D\u2019Alatri L, Longobardi Y, Marchese MR, et al. Perceptual evaluation of the tracheoesophageal voice: Italian validation of the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Perceptual Scale. J Voice 2023;S0892-1997(23)00367-3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jvoice.2023.11.007 [Epub Ahead of Print].","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2023.11.007"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref9","unstructured":"Titze I. Workshop on acoustic voice analysis: summary statement. National Center for Voice and Speech, Denver, CO; 1995."},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sprecher A, Olszewski A, Jiang JJ, et al. Updating signal typing in voice: addition of type 4 signals. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:3710-3716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.3397477","DOI":"10.1121\/1.3397477"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van As CJ, Hilgers FJ, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, et al. Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice. J Voice 1998;12:239-248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0892-1997(98)80044-1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0892-1997(98)80044-1"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, et al. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. J Voice 2008;24:540-555. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jvoice.2008.12.014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2008.12.014"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, et al. Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: American speech-language-hearing association expert panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2018;27:887-905. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1044\/2018_AJSLP-17-0009","DOI":"10.1044\/2018_AJSLP-17-0009"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murton O, Hillman R, Mehta D. Cepstral peak prominence values for clinical voice evaluation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2020;29:1596-1607. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1044\/2020_AJSLP-20-00001","DOI":"10.1044\/2020_AJSLP-20-00001"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u0130ncebay \u00d6, K\u00f6se A, Esen Aydinli F, et al. Investigation of the cepstral spectral acoustic analysis for classifying the severity of dysphonia. J Voice 2023;S0892-1997(22)00414-3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jvoice.2022.12.012 [Epub Ahead of Print]","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2022.12.012"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maryn Y, Dick C, Vandenbruaene C, et al. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels. Laryngoscope 2009;119:2384-2394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lary.20620","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.20620"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang T, Cook I, Szcz\u0119\u015bniak M, et al. The relationship between biomechanics of pharyngoesophageal segment and tracheoesophageal phonation. Sci Rep 2019;9:9722. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-019-46223-7","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-019-46223-7"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Immerseel LM, Martens JP. Pitch and voiced\/unvoiced determination with an auditory model. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:3511-3526. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.402840","DOI":"10.1121\/1.402840"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moerman M, Pieters G, Martens JP, et al. Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:541-547. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-003-0681-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-003-0681-0"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mozzanica F, Ginocchio D, Borghi E, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). Folia Phoniatr Logop 2013;65:257-265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000356479","DOI":"10.1159\/000356479"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deliyski DD, Shaw HS, Evans MK. Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements. J Voice 2005;19:15-28. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jvoice.2004.07.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2004.07.003"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heller Murray ES, Chao A, Colletti L. A Practical guide to calculating cepstral peak prominence in praat. J Voice 2022;S0892-1997(22)00275-2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jvoice.2022.09.002 [Epub Ahead of Print]","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/yvp4s"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Sluis KE, van der Molen L, van Son RJJH, et al. Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:11-26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00405-017-4790-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-017-4790-6"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bertino G, Bellomo A, Miani C, et al. Spectrographic differences between tracheal-esophageal and esophageal voice. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1996;48:255-261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000266416","DOI":"10.1159\/000266416"},{"key":"10.14639\/0392-100X-A954_ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carding PN, Steen IN, Webb A, et al. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:538-544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x"}],"container-title":["Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.actaitalica.it\/article\/view\/954","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]],"date-time":"2026-04-27T10:05:37Z","timestamp":1777284337000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.actaitalica.it\/article\/view\/954"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14639\/0392-100x-a954","relation":{},"ISSN":["1827-675X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1827-675X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"article-number":"5"}}