{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,25]],"date-time":"2026-03-25T10:52:00Z","timestamp":1774435920923,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Caleo","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,5]],"date-time":"2019-02-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1549324800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Endod J."],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: This ex vivo study aims to investigate the root filling quality of warm vertical technique, single-cone technique with GuttaFlow2, Endoseal MTA and EndoSequence BC sealer as a sealer in artificial internal resorption cavity.Methods: For this study, 40 human single-root teeth were selected. After root preparation, the roots were horizontally sectioned 7 mm from the apex. The hemisphere cavities were created on both sides, and then they were re-approximated. According to filling methods and materials, the samples were randomly assigned to four experimental groups: I: warm vertical compaction technique (WVC), II: single-cone technique with GuttaFlow2 (GF), III: single-cone technique with Endoseal MTA sealer (EM), IV: single-cone technique with EndoSequence BC sealer (ES). Filled roots were radiographed in buccolingual and mesiodistal views to check the obturation, and stored in humid environment at the room temperature for 7 days. Each tooth was sectioned 7 mm from the root apex at the level of the previous cut, and it was then photographed under stereomicroscope. The photographs and radiographs of all samples were imported to an image-analysis software to calculate the percentage of sealer, gutta-percha, and voids. The results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal\u2013Wallis Dunn\u2019s tests. Results: In buccolingual view of radiographs, the WVC and EM groups showed significantly lower percentage of voids (P value<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.14744\/eej.2018.13008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,14]],"date-time":"2018-12-14T03:28:46Z","timestamp":1544758126000},"page":"21-27","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Comparing the Ability of Different Materials and Techniques in Filling Artificial Internal Resorption Cavities"],"prefix":"10.65717","volume":"4","author":[{"given":"Kazem Ashofteh","family":"Yazdi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohsen","family":"Aminsobhani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Parvin","family":"Alemi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"55248","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,5]]},"container-title":["European Endodontic Journal"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.eurendodj.com\/index.php\/pub\/article\/download\/73\/73","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.eurendodj.com\/index.php\/pub\/article\/download\/73\/73","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]],"date-time":"2026-01-22T12:37:02Z","timestamp":1769085422000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.eurendodj.com\/index.php\/pub\/article\/view\/73"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,5]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14744\/eej.2018.13008","relation":{},"ISSN":["2548-0839"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2548-0839","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,5]]}}}