{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T04:47:38Z","timestamp":1747198058276,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n This paper is concerned with finite element error estimates for second order elliptic PDEs with inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary data in convex polygonal domains.\nThe Dirichlet boundary data are assumed to be irregular such that the solution of the PDE does not belong to \n \n \n \n \n H<\/m:mi>\n 2<\/m:mn>\n <\/m:msup>\n \u2062<\/m:mo>\n \n (<\/m:mo>\n \u03a9<\/m:mi>\n )<\/m:mo>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:math>\n \n {H^{2}(\\Omega)}<\/jats:tex-math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula> but only to \n \n \n \n \n H<\/m:mi>\n r<\/m:mi>\n <\/m:msup>\n \u2062<\/m:mo>\n \n (<\/m:mo>\n \u03a9<\/m:mi>\n )<\/m:mo>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:math>\n \n {H^{r}(\\Omega)}<\/jats:tex-math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula> for some \n \n \n \n r<\/m:mi>\n \u2208<\/m:mo>\n \n (<\/m:mo>\n 1<\/m:mn>\n ,<\/m:mo>\n 2<\/m:mn>\n )<\/m:mo>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:math>\n \n {r\\in(1,2)}<\/jats:tex-math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>. As a consequence, a discretization of the PDE with linear finite elements exhibits a reduced convergence rate in \n \n \n \n \n L<\/m:mi>\n 2<\/m:mn>\n <\/m:msup>\n \u2062<\/m:mo>\n \n (<\/m:mo>\n \u03a9<\/m:mi>\n )<\/m:mo>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:math>\n \n {L^{2}(\\Omega)}<\/jats:tex-math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula> and \n \n \n \n \n H<\/m:mi>\n 1<\/m:mn>\n <\/m:msup>\n \u2062<\/m:mo>\n \n (<\/m:mo>\n \u03a9<\/m:mi>\n )<\/m:mo>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:mrow>\n <\/m:math>\n \n {H^{1}(\\Omega)}<\/jats:tex-math>\n <\/jats:alternatives>\n <\/jats:inline-formula>. In order to restore the best possible convergence rate we propose and analyze in detail the usage of boundary concentrated meshes. These meshes are gradually refined towards the whole boundary. The corresponding grading parameter does not only depend on the regularity of the Dirichlet boundary data and their discrete implementation but also on the norm, which is used to measure the error. In numerical experiments we confirm our theoretical results.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1515\/cmam-2022-0129","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,11]],"date-time":"2022-11-11T06:33:06Z","timestamp":1668148386000},"page":"1007-1021","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Finite Element Approximations for PDEs with Irregular Dirichlet Boundary Data on Boundary Concentrated Meshes"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Johannes","family":"Pfefferer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Computation, Information and Technology , Technical University of Munich , Munich , Germany"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5292-2280","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Max","family":"Winkler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Mathematics , Chemnitz University of Technology , Chemnitz , Germany"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Apel and B. Heinrich,\nMesh refinement and windowing near edges for some elliptic problem,\nSIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31 (1994), no. 3, 695\u2013708.","DOI":"10.1137\/0731037"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Apel, A. L. Lombardi and M. Winkler,\nAnisotropic mesh refinement in polyhedral domains: error estimates with data in \n \n \n \n \n L\n 2\n \n \u2062\n \n (\n \u03a9\n )\n \n \n \n \n L^{2}(\\Omega)\n \n ,\nESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 48 (2014), no. 4, 1117\u20131145.","DOI":"10.1051\/m2an\/2013134"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Apel and G. Lube,\nAnisotropic mesh refinement for a singularly perturbed reaction diffusion model problem,\nAppl. Numer. Math. 26 (1998), no. 4, 415\u2013433.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-9274(97)00106-2"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Apel and S. Nicaise,\nElliptic problems in domains with edges: Anisotropic regularity and anisotropic finite element meshes,\nPartial Differential Equations and Functional Analysis,\nProgr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 22,\nBirkh\u00e4user, Boston (1996), 18\u201334.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-2436-5_2"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Apel, S. Nicaise and J. Pfefferer,\nDiscretization of the Poisson equation with non-smooth data and emphasis on non-convex domains,\nNumer. Methods Partial Differential Equations 32 (2016), no. 5, 1433\u20131454.","DOI":"10.1002\/num.22057"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Apel, S. Nicaise and J. Pfefferer,\nAdapted numerical methods for the Poisson equation with \n \n \n \n L\n 2\n \n \n \n L^{2}\n \n boundary data in nonconvex domains,\nSIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017), no. 4, 1937\u20131957.","DOI":"10.1137\/16M1062077"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Apel, A.-M. S\u00e4ndig and J. R. Whiteman,\nGraded mesh refinement and error estimates for finite element solutions of elliptic boundary value problems in non-smooth domains,\nMath. Methods Appl. Sci. 19 (1996), no. 1, 63\u201385.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-1476(19960110)19:1<63::AID-MMA764>3.0.CO;2-S"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_008","unstructured":"D. N. Arnold, L. R. Scott and M. Vogelius,\nRegular inversion of the divergence operator with Dirichlet boundary conditions on a polygon,\nAnn. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 15 (1988), no. 2, 169\u2013192."},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"I. Babu\u0161ka, R. B. Kellogg and J. Pitk\u00e4ranta,\nDirect and inverse error estimates for finite elements with mesh refinements,\nNumer. Math. 33 (1979), no. 4, 447\u2013471.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01399326"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Bartels, C. Carstensen and G. Dolzmann,\nInhomogeneous Dirichlet conditions in a priori and a posteriori finite element error analysis,\nNumer. Math. 99 (2004), no. 1, 1\u201324.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00211-004-0548-3"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Berggren,\nApproximations of very weak solutions to boundary-value problems,\nSIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2004), no. 2, 860\u2013877.","DOI":"10.1137\/S0036142903382048"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Bertoluzza, E. Burman and C. He,\nAn a posteriori error estimate of the outer normal derivative using dual weights,\nSIAM J. Numer. Anal. 60 (2022), no. 1, 475\u2013501.","DOI":"10.1137\/20M1358219"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Dauge,\nElliptic Boundary Value Problems on Corner Domains,\nLecture Notes in Math. 1341,\nSpringer, Berlin, 1988.","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0086682"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Deckelnick, A. G\u00fcnther and M. Hinze,\nFinite element approximation of Dirichlet boundary control for elliptic PDEs on two- and three-dimensional curved domains,\nSIAM J. Control Optim. 48 (2009), no. 4, 2798\u20132819.","DOI":"10.1137\/080735369"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Demlow, J. Guzm\u00e1n and A. H. Schatz,\nLocal energy estimates for the finite element method on sharply varying grids,\nMath. Comp. 80 (2011), no. 273, 1\u20139.","DOI":"10.1090\/S0025-5718-2010-02353-1"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Dupont and R. Scott,\nPolynomial approximation of functions in Sobolev spaces,\nMath. Comp. 34 (1980), no. 150, 441\u2013463.","DOI":"10.1090\/S0025-5718-1980-0559195-7"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. A. French and J. T. King,\nApproximation of an elliptic control problem by the finite element method,\nNumer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 12 (1991), no. 3\u20134, 299\u2013314.","DOI":"10.1080\/01630569108816430"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_018","unstructured":"P. Grisvard,\nElliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains,\nMonogr. Stud. Math. 24,\nPitman, Boston, 1985."},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Horger, J. M. Melenk and B. Wohlmuth,\nOn optimal \n \n \n \n L\n 2\n \n \n \n L^{2}\n \n - and surface flux convergence in FEM,\nComput. Vis. Sci. 16 (2013), no. 5, 231\u2013246.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00791-015-0237-z"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. C. Hsiao and W. L. Wendland,\nBoundary Integral Equations,\nAppl. Math. Sci. 164,\nSpringer, Berlin, 2008.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-68545-6"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"V. John and G. Matthies,\nMooNMD\u2014a program package based on mapped finite element methods,\nComput. Vis. Sci. 6 (2004), no. 2\u20133, 163\u2013169.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00791-003-0120-1"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. N. Khoromskij and J. M. Melenk,\nAn efficient direct solver for the boundary concentrated FEM in 2D,\nComputing 69 (2002), no. 2, 91\u2013117.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00607-002-1452-2"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. N. Khoromskij and J. M. Melenk,\nBoundary concentrated finite element methods,\nSIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41 (2003), no. 1, 1\u201336.","DOI":"10.1137\/S0036142901391852"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. May, R. Rannacher and B. Vexler,\nError analysis for a finite element approximation of elliptic Dirichlet boundary control problems,\nSIAM J. Control Optim. 51 (2013), no. 3, 2585\u20132611.","DOI":"10.1137\/080735734"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L. A. Oganesjan and L. A. Ruhovec,\nVariational-difference schemes for second order linear elliptic equations in a two-dimensional region with a piecewise-smooth boundary,\nZh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 8 (1968), 97\u2013114.","DOI":"10.1016\/0041-5553(68)90008-6"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Pfefferer and M. Winkler,\nFinite element error estimates for normal derivatives on boundary concentrated meshes,\nSIAM J. Numer. Anal. 57 (2019), no. 5, 2043\u20132073.","DOI":"10.1137\/18M1181341"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. H. Schatz and L. B. Wahlbin,\nInterior maximum norm estimates for finite element methods,\nMath. Comp. 31 (1977), no. 138, 414\u2013442.","DOI":"10.1090\/S0025-5718-1977-0431753-X"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. H. Schatz and L. B. Wahlbin,\nOn the finite element method for singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion problems in two and one dimensions,\nMath. Comp. 40 (1983), no. 161, 47\u201389.","DOI":"10.1090\/S0025-5718-1983-0679434-4"},{"key":"2023100411150458556_j_cmam-2022-0129_ref_029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. I. Shishkin,\nApproximation of solutions of singularly perturbed boundary value problems with a corner boundary layer,\nZh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 27 (1987), no. 9, 1360\u20131374, 1438.","DOI":"10.1016\/0041-5553(87)90044-9"}],"container-title":["Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/cmam-2022-0129\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/cmam-2022-0129\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,4]],"date-time":"2023-10-04T11:16:03Z","timestamp":1696418163000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/cmam-2022-0129\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,11]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/cmam-2022-0129"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/cmam-2022-0129","relation":{},"ISSN":["1609-4840","1609-9389"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1609-4840"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1609-9389"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,11]]}}}