{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T22:55:05Z","timestamp":1777676105068,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":97,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,26]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>This study investigated how predictability and prosodic phrasing interact in accounting for the variability of syllable duration in Taiwan Southern Min. Speech data were extracted from 8 hours of spontaneous speech. Three predictability measurements were examined: bigram surprisal, bigram informativity, and lexical frequency. Results showed that higher informativity and surprisal led to longer syllables. As for the interaction with prosodic positions, there was a general weakening of predictability effects for syllables closer to the boundary, especially in the pre-boundary position, where pre-boundary lengthening was the strongest. However, the effect of word informativity appeared to be least modulated by this effect of boundary marking. These findings are consistent with a hypothesis that prosodic structure modulates the predictability effects on phonetic variability. The robustness of informativity in predicting syllable duration also suggests a possibility of stored phonetic variants associated with a word's usual contextual predictability.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1515\/phon-2022-0009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,3]],"date-time":"2022-11-03T17:38:52Z","timestamp":1667497132000},"page":"315-352","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The interaction between predictability and pre-boundary lengthening on syllable duration in Taiwan Southern Min"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"79","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6805-6965","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sheng-Fu","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Linguistics , Academia Sinica , Taipei , Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andreeva, Bistra, Bernd M\u00f6bius & James Whang. 2020. Effects of surprisal and boundary strength on phrase-final lengthening. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 146\u2013150. Tokyo, Japan: ISCA.","DOI":"10.21437\/SpeechProsody.2020-30"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00238309040470010201.","DOI":"10.1177\/00238309040470010201"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk. 2006. Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(5). 3048\u20133058. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.2188331.","DOI":"10.1121\/1.2188331"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baese-Berk, Melissa & Matthew Goldrick. 2009. Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language & Cognitive Processes 24(4). 527\u2013554. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01690960802299378.","DOI":"10.1080\/01690960802299378"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bates, Douglas, Martin M\u00e4chler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v067.i01.","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v067.i01"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bell, Alan, Jason M. Brenier, Michelle Gregory, Cynthia Girand & Dan Jurafsky. 2009. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60(1). 92\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2008.06.003.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2008.06.003"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_007","unstructured":"Benner, Uta, Ines Flechsig, Grzegorz Dogil & Bernd M\u00f6bius. 2007. Coarticulatory resistance in a mental syllabary. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 485\u2013488. Dudweiler: Pirrot."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bolinger, Dwight. 1963. Length, vowel, juncture. Linguistics 1(1). 5\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ling.1963.1.1.5.","DOI":"10.1515\/ling.1963.1.1.5"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Accent is predictable (if you\u2019re a mind-reader). Language 48(3). 633\u2013644.","DOI":"10.2307\/412039"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brandt, Erika, Bernd M\u00f6bius & Bistra Andreeva. 2021. Dynamic formant trajectories in German read speech: Impact of predictability and prominence. Frontiers in Communication 6. 643528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcomm.2021.643528.","DOI":"10.3389\/fcomm.2021.643528"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brandt, Erika, Frank Zimmerer, Bistra Andreeva & Bernd M\u00f6bius. 2018. Impact of prosodic structure and information density on dynamic formant trajectories in German. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on speech prosody, 119\u2013123. Pozna\u0144, Poland: ISCA.","DOI":"10.21437\/SpeechProsody.2018-24"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_098","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1990. Tiers in Articulatory Phonology, with Some Implications for Casual Speech. In John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 341\u2013376. Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511627736.019"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00fcrki, Audrey, Mirjam Ernestus & Ulrich H. Frauenfelder. 2010. Is there only one \u201cfen\u00eatre\u201d in the production lexicon? On-line evidence on the nature of phonological representations of pronunciation variants for French schwa words. Journal of Memory and Language 62(4). 421\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2010.01.002.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2010.01.002"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bybee, Joan & Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The\u00a0reduction of don\u2019t in English. Linguistics 37(4). 575\u2013596. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ling.37.4.575.","DOI":"10.1515\/ling.37.4.575"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Byrd, Dani. 1996. A phase window framework for articulatory timing. Phonology 13(2). 139\u2013169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0952675700002086.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0952675700002086"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen, Stanley F. & Joshua Goodman. 1999. An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. Computer Speech & Language 13(4). 359\u2013394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/csla.1999.0128.","DOI":"10.1006\/csla.1999.0128"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_017","unstructured":"Cieri, Christopher, David Graff, Owen Kimball, Dave Miller & Kevin Walker. 2005. Fisher English training part 2, transcripts LDC2005T19. Web Download, Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_018","unstructured":"Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2008. Using information content to predict phone deletion. In Proceedings of the 27th west coast conference on formal linguistics, 90\u201398. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_019","unstructured":"Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2012. Sign and signal: Deriving linguistic generalizations from information utility. Stanford University PhD thesis."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2015. Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology 6(2). 243\u2013278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/lp-2015-0008.","DOI":"10.1515\/lp-2015-0008"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2017. Informativity and the actuation of lenition. Language 93(3). 569\u2013597. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/lan.2017.0037.","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.2017.0037"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen Priva, Uriel & T. Florian Jaeger. 2018. The interdependence of frequency, predictability, and informativity in the segmental domain. Linguistics Vanguard 4(s2). 20170028. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/lingvan-2017-0028.","DOI":"10.1515\/lingvan-2017-0028"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Connine, Cynthia M. 2004. It\u2019s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(6). 1084\u20131089. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/bf03196741.","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03196741"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Connine, Cynthia M., Larissa J. Ranbom & David J. Patterson. 2008. Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 70(3). 403\u2013411. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/pp.70.3.403.","DOI":"10.3758\/PP.70.3.403"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_099","unstructured":"Croot, Karen & Kathleen Rastle. 2004. Is there a syllabary containing stored articulatory plans for speech production in English? In Steve Cassidy, Felicity Cox, Robert Mannell & Sallyanne Palethorpe (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Australian International conference on speech science and technology, 376\u2013381. Canberra, Australia: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cutler, Anne & David M. Carter. 1987. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language 2(3\u20134). 133\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0885-2308(87)90004-0.","DOI":"10.1016\/0885-2308(87)90004-0"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_027","unstructured":"Davies, Mark. 2008. The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present [Electronic resource]. Available at: http:\/\/corpus.byu.edu\/coca\/."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deelman, Thomas & Cynthia M. Connine. 2001. Missing information in spoken word recognition: Nonreleased stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27(3). 656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0096-1523.27.3.656.","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-1523.27.3.656"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards, Jan & Mary E. Beckman. 1988. Articulatory timing and the prosodic interpretation of syllable duration. Phonetica 45(2\u20134). 156\u2013174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000261824.","DOI":"10.1159\/000261824"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ernestus, Mirjam. 2014. Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua 142. 27\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lingua.2012.12.006.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lingua.2012.12.006"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ernestus, Mirjam, Harald Baayen & Rob Schreuder. 2002. The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain and Language 81(1\u20133). 162\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/brln.2001.2514.","DOI":"10.1006\/brln.2001.2514"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fon, Janice, Keith Johnson & Sally Chen. 2011. Durational patterning at syntactic and discourse boundaries in Mandarin spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 54(1). 5\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0023830910372492.","DOI":"10.1177\/0023830910372492"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_033","unstructured":"Fon, Yee-Jean Janice 2002. A cross-linguistic study on syntactic and discourse boundary cues in\u00a0spontaneous speech. The Ohio State University PhD thesis."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fougeron, C\u00e9cile & Patricia A. Keating. 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101(6). 3728\u20133740. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.418332.","DOI":"10.1121\/1.418332"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gahl, Susanne. 2008. Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84(3). 474\u2013496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/lan.0.0035.","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.0.0035"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gahl, Susanne. 2015. Lexical competition in vowel articulation revisited: Vowel dispersion in the easy\/hard database. Journal of Phonetics 49. 96\u2013116. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wocn.2014.12.002.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wocn.2014.12.002"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gahl, Susanne & Julia F. Strand. 2016. Many neighborhoods: Phonological and perceptual neighborhood density in lexical production and perception. Journal of Memory and Language 89. 162\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2015.12.006.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2015.12.006"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gahl, Susanne, Yao Yao & Keith Johnson. 2012. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4). 789\u2013806. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2011.11.006.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2011.11.006"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hashimoto, Daiki. 2021. Probabilistic reduction and mental accumulation in Japanese: Frequency, contextual predictability, and average predictability. Journal of Phonetics 87. 101061. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wocn.2021.101061.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wocn.2021.101061"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_040","unstructured":"Iunn, Un-Gian. 2005. Taiwanese corpus collection and corpus based syllable\/word frequency counts for written taiwanese [t\u00e2i-g\u00fan-b\u00fbn g\u00fa-li\u0101u-kh\u00f2 so-chip kap g\u00fa-li\u0101u-kh\u00f2 \u00fbi pun t\u00e2i-g\u00fa su-b\u012bn-g\u00fa im-chiat s\u00fb-p\u00een t\u00f3ng-k\u00e8]. Final report for research project funded by the National Science Council (NSC 93-2213-E-122-001)."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson, Keith. 2007. Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. In Maria-Josep Sole, Patrice Speeter Beddor & Manjari Ohala (eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology, 25\u201340. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199296675.003.0003"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell & Cynthia Girand. 2002. The role of the lemma in form variation. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7, 3\u201334. De Gruyter, Inc.: Berlin\/Boston.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110197105.1.3"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory & William D. Raymond. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. Typological Studies in\u00a0Language 45. 229\u2013254.","DOI":"10.1075\/tsl.45.13jur"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kemps, Rach\u00e8l, Mirjam Ernestus, Robert Schreuder & Harald Baayen. 2004. Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and Language 90(1\u20133). 117\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0093-934x(03)00425-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0093-934X(03)00425-5"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_045","unstructured":"Kuo, Chen-Hsiu. 2013. Perception and acoustic correlates of the Taiwanese tone sandhi group. UCLA PhD thesis."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511808814"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lavoie, Lisa. 2002. Some influences on the realization of for and four in american English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32(2). 175\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0025100302001032.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0025100302001032"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lenth, Russell V. 2016. Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69(1). 1\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v069.i01.","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v069.i01"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lieberman, Philip. 1963. Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6(3). 172\u2013187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/002383096300600306.","DOI":"10.1177\/002383096300600306"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin, Jo-Wang. 1994. Lexical government and tone group formation in Xiamen Chinese. Phonology 11(2). 237\u2013275. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0952675700001962.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0952675700001962"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_051","unstructured":"Lindblom, Bj\u00f6rn. 1968. Temporal organization of syllable production. Quarterly Progress and Status Report 9(2\u20133). 1\u20135."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindblom, Bj\u00f6rn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alan Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-2037-8_16"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_053","unstructured":"Losiewicz, Beth L. 1992. The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology. The University of Texas at Austin PhD thesis."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Malisz, Zofia, Erika Brandt, Bernd M\u00f6bius, Yoon Mi Oh & Bistra Andreeva. 2018. Dimensions of segmental variability: Interaction of prosody and surprisal in six languages. Frontiers in Communication 3. 25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcomm.2018.00025.","DOI":"10.3389\/fcomm.2018.00025"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_055","unstructured":"Munson, Benjamin. 2007. Lexical access, lexical representation, and vowel production. Laboratory Phonology 9. 201\u2013228."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Munson, Benjamin & Nancy Pearl Solomon. 2004. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47(5). 1048\u20131058. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1044\/1092-4388(2004\/078).","DOI":"10.1044\/1092-4388(2004\/078)"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oller, D. Kimbrough. 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54(5). 1235\u20131247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.1914393.","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1914393"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pan, Ho-hsien & Hsiao-tung Huang. 2020. Lexical propensity and Taiwanese Min tone sandhi rules. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 518\u2013522. ISCA.","DOI":"10.21437\/SpeechProsody.2020-106"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_059","unstructured":"Pan, Ho-hsien, Hsiao-tung Huang & Lyu Shao-ren. 2019. The occurrence of taiwanese min juncture tones before prosodic boundaries and modification marker. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 3423\u20133427. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_060","unstructured":"Peng, Shu-hui & Mary E. Beckman. 2003. Annotation conventions and corpus design in the investigation of spontaneous speech prosody in Taiwanese. ISCA & IEEE workshop on spontaneous speech processing and recognition. ISCA."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_061","unstructured":"Pierce, John Robinson. 1972. Symbols, signals, and noise: The nature and process of communication. Foundations of Language 9(1). 150\u2013151."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In\u00a0Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 137\u2013157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.","DOI":"10.1075\/tsl.45.08pie"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pitt, Mark A. 2009. How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words. Journal of Memory and Language 61(1). 19\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2009.02.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2009.02.005"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_064","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pitt, Mark A., Laura Dilley & Michael Tat. 2011. Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics 39(3). 304\u2013311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wocn.2010.07.004.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wocn.2010.07.004"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pluymaekers, Mark, Mirjam Ernestus & R. Harald Baayen. 2005a. Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica 62(2\u20134). 146\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000090095.","DOI":"10.1159\/000090095"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_066","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pluymaekers, Mark, Mirjam Ernestus & R. Harald Baayen. 2005b. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(4). 2561\u20132569. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.2011150.","DOI":"10.1121\/1.2011150"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_067","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pr\u00e9vot, Laurent, Shu-Chuan Tseng, Klim Peshkov & Alvin Cheng-Hsien Chen. 2015. Processing units in conversation: A comparative study of French and Mandarin data. Language and Linguistics 16(1). 69\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1606822x14556605.","DOI":"10.1177\/1606822X14556605"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_068","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Racine, Isabelle & Fran\u00e7ois Grosjean. 2005. Le co\u00fbt de l\u2019effacement du schwa lors de la reconnaissance des mots en fran\u00e7ais. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology\/Revue canadienne de psychologie exp\u00e9rimentale 59(4). 240. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0088052.","DOI":"10.1037\/h0088052"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_069","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ranbom, Larissa J. & Cynthia M. Connine. 2007. Lexical representation of phonological variation in\u00a0spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 57(2). 273\u2013298. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2007.04.001.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2007.04.001"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scarborough, Rebecca. 2010. Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels. Laboratory Phonology 10. 557\u2013586.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110224917.5.557"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_071","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scarborough, Rebecca. 2012. Lexical similarity and speech production: Neighborhoods for nonwords. Lingua 122(2). 164\u2013176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lingua.2011.06.006.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lingua.2011.06.006"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_072","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scarborough, Rebecca. 2013. Neighborhood-conditioned patterns in phonetic detail: Relating coarticulation and hyperarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 41(6). 491\u2013508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wocn.2013.09.004.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wocn.2013.09.004"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_073","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schweitzer, Antje & Bernd M\u00f6bius. 2004. Exemplar-based production of prosody: Evidence from segment and syllable durations. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody. Nara, Japan: ISCA.","DOI":"10.21437\/SpeechProsody.2004-105"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_074","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seyfarth, Scott. 2014. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition 133(1). 140\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2014.06.013.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2014.06.013"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shannon, Claude Elwood. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27(3). 379\u2013423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.","DOI":"10.1002\/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_076","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sharp, Alan E. 1960. The analysis of stress and juncture in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 59(1). 104\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-968x.1960.tb00312.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-968X.1960.tb00312.x"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_077","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shaw, Jason A. & Shigeto Kawahara. 2019. Effects of surprisal and entropy on vowel duration in Japanese. Language and Speech 62(1). 80\u2013114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0023830917737331.","DOI":"10.1177\/0023830917737331"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_078","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shih, Shu-hao. 2017. Binarity and focus in prosodic phrasing: New evidence from Taiwan Mandarin. In Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology, 4. LSA.","DOI":"10.3765\/amp.v4i0.3988"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_079","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00f3skuthy, M\u00e1rton & Jennifer Hay. 2017. Changing word usage predicts changing word durations in\u00a0New Zealand English. Cognition 166. 298\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.05.032.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.05.032"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stolcke, Andreas. 2002. SRILM-an extensible language modeling toolkit. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2002). Denver, USA: ISCA.","DOI":"10.21437\/ICSLP.2002-303"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_081","unstructured":"Stolcke, Andreas, Jing Zheng, Wen Wang & Victor Abrash. 2011. SRILM at sixteen: Update and outlook. In Proceedings of IEEE automatic speech recognition and understanding workshop, 5. Waikoloa: ASRU."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_082","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tang, Kevin & Ryan Bennett. 2018. Contextual predictability influences word and morpheme duration in a morphologically complex language (Kaqchikel Mayan). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144(2). 997\u20131017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.5046095.","DOI":"10.1121\/1.5046095"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_083","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tang, Kevin & Jason A Shaw. 2021. Prosody leaks into the memories of words. Cognition 210. 104601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2021.104601.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2021.104601"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_084","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turk, Alice. 2010. Does prosodic constituency signal relative predictability? A smooth signal redundancy hypothesis. Laboratory Phonology 1(2). 227\u2013262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/labphon.2010.012.","DOI":"10.1515\/labphon.2010.012"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turk, Alice & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2014. Timing in talking: What is it used for, and how is it controlled? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1658). 20130395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rstb.2013.0395.","DOI":"10.1098\/rstb.2013.0395"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_086","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turk, Alice & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2020a. Speech timing: implications for theories of phonology, speech production, and speech motor control, vol.\u00a05. USA: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198795421.001.0001"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_087","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turk, Alice & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2020b. Timing evidence for symbolic phonological representations and phonology-extrinsic timing in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology 10. 2952. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.02952.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.02952"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_088","unstructured":"Van Son, Rob J.\u00a0J.\u00a0H. & Louis C. W. Pols. 2003. How efficient is speech. In Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 25, 171\u2013184. University of Amsterdam."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_089","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Son, Rob J.\u00a0J.\u00a0H. & Jan P. H. Van Santen. 2005. Duration and spectral balance of intervocalic consonants: A case for efficient communication. Speech Communication 47(1\u20132). 100\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.specom.2005.06.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.specom.2005.06.005"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vitevitch, Michael S. 2002. The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28(4). 735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0278-7393.28.4.735.","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0278-7393.28.4.735"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_091","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, Sheng-Fu. 2013. Durational Cues at discourse Boundaries in Taiwan Southern Min spontaneous speech. National Taiwan University Master\u2019s thesis.","DOI":"10.21437\/SpeechProsody.2012-151"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_092","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, Sheng-Fu & Janice Fon. 2012. Durational cues at discourse boundaries in Taiwan Southern Min. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody. ISCA.","DOI":"10.21437\/SpeechProsody.2012-151"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_093","unstructured":"Wang, Sheng-Fu & Janice Fon. 2013. A Taiwan Southern Min spontaneous speech corpus for discourse prosody. In The Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody, 20\u201323. Aix-en-Provence, France: Labratoire Parole et Langage."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_094","unstructured":"Wang, Sheng-Fu & Janice Fon. 2015. Syllable duration and discourse organization at intonational phrase boundaries in Taiwan Southern Min. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK."},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whang, James. 2019. Effects of phonotactic predictability on sensitivity to phonetic detail. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 10(1). 1\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/labphon.125.","DOI":"10.5334\/labphon.125"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_096","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whiteside, Sandra P. & Rosemary A. Varley. 1998. Dual-route phonetic encoding: Some acoustic evidence. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Sydney, Australia: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.","DOI":"10.21437\/ICSLP.1998-812"},{"key":"2025080113012294269_j_phon-2022-0009_ref_097","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wurm, Lee H. & Sebastiano A. Fisicaro. 2014. What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language 72. 37\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2013.12.003.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2013.12.003"}],"container-title":["Phonetica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/phon-2022-0009\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/phon-2022-0009\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T13:01:38Z","timestamp":1754053298000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/phon-2022-0009\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,1]]},"references-count":97,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,3]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,26]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/phon-2022-0009"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/phon-2022-0009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0031-8388","1423-0321"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0031-8388","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-0321","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,1]]}}}