{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,28]],"date-time":"2026-05-28T00:30:47Z","timestamp":1779928247747,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium Advisory Board","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]],"date-time":"2016-07-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1468454400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p> Due to the recent \u201cRight to be Forgotten\u201d (RTBF) ruling, for queries about an individual, Google and other search engines now delist links to web pages that contain \u201cinadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive\u201d information about that individual. In this paper we take a data-driven approach to study the RTBF in the traditional media outlets, its consequences, and its susceptibility to inference attacks. First, we do a content analysis on 283 known delisted UK media pages, using both manual investigation and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). We find that the strongest topic themes are violent crime, road accidents, drugs, murder, prostitution, financial misconduct, and sexual assault. Informed by this content analysis, we then show how a third party can discover delisted URLs along with the requesters\u2019 names, thereby putting the efficacy of the RTBF for delisted media links in question. As a proof of concept, we perform an experiment that discovers two previously-unknown delisted URLs and their corresponding requesters. We also determine 80 requesters for the 283 known delisted media pages, and examine whether they suffer from the \u201cStreisand effect,\u201d a phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely. To measure the presence (or lack of presence) of a Streisand effect, we develop novel metrics and methodology based on Google Trends and Twitter data. Finally, we carry out a demographic analysis of the 80 known requesters. We hope the results and observations in this paper can inform lawmakers as they refine RTBF laws in the future.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1515\/popets-2016-0046","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,18]],"date-time":"2016-07-18T08:14:59Z","timestamp":1468829699000},"page":"389-402","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["The Right to be Forgotten in the Media: A Data-Driven Study"],"prefix":"10.56553","volume":"2016","author":[{"given":"Minhui","family":"Xue","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"East China Normal University (ECNU) and NYU Shanghai"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gabriel","family":"Magno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Evandro","family":"Cunha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and Leiden University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Virgilio","family":"Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and Harvard University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keith W.","family":"Ross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"New York University (NYU) and NYU Shanghai"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"35752","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]]},"container-title":["Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/content.sciendo.com\/view\/journals\/popets\/2016\/4\/article-p389.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.sciendo.com\/article\/10.1515\/popets-2016-0046","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,20]],"date-time":"2022-07-20T16:29:32Z","timestamp":1658334572000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/petsymposium.org\/popets\/2016\/popets-2016-0046.php"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/popets-2016-0046"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/popets-2016-0046","relation":{},"ISSN":["2299-0984"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2299-0984","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]]}}}