{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T19:09:10Z","timestamp":1774292950753,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"6","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100008347","name":"Bezmialem Vakif University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["9450"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["9450"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100008347","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_bmt-2023-0002_abs_001\">\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The aim of the present study was to assess the\u00a0biomechanical behaviour of using a posterior implant design with inclined shoulder designs in all-on-four treatment via three-dimensional finite element analysis.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_bmt-2023-0002_abs_002\">\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Implants with standard and inclined shoulder designs were modelled for posterior implants. Implants were positioned into the maxilla and mandible models according to the all-on-four concept. Compressive stresses in the peri-implant bone, the von Mises stresses in the different components of the prosthetic restoration, and movement of the prosthesis were obtained.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_bmt-2023-0002_abs_003\">\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The compressive stresses of the models with inclined shoulder design resulted in 15\u201358\u202f% decrease compared with standard shoulder design. The von Mises stresses in the posterior implants reduced 18\u201347\u202f%, stresses in the implant body increased 38\u201378\u202f%, stresses in the abutment screw reduced 20\u201365\u202f%, stresses in the framework of prosthesis reduced 1\u201318\u202f% and deformation of the prosthesis was reduced 6\u201337\u202f% in the models of inclined shoulder design\u00a0compared with models of standard shoulder design. The compressive and von Mises stresses were generally higher in the mandible models than in the maxilla models for\u00a0standard and inclined shoulder designs.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_bmt-2023-0002_abs_004\">\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>All evaluated components of the simulated treatment except for posterior abutment bodies showed better biomechanical behaviour with inclined shoulder design. The clinical success of all-on-four treatment maybe enhanced by using posterior implants with an inclined shoulder design.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1515\/bmt-2023-0002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,7]],"date-time":"2023-06-07T10:50:46Z","timestamp":1686135046000},"page":"583-591","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Biomechanical effects of inclined implant shoulder design in all-on-four treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"68","author":[{"given":"Taha","family":"Aktas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Private Practice , Istanbul , T\u00fcrkiye"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7825-1083","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nurettin","family":"Diker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , Bezmialem Vakif University , Istanbul , T\u00fcrkiye"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bhering, CLB, Mesquita, MF, Kemmoku, DT, Noritomi, PY, Consani, RLX, Bar\u00e3o, VAR. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C 2016;69:715\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.msec.2016.07.059.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.msec.2016.07.059"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lofaj, F, Ku\u010dera, J, N\u00e9meth, D, Min\u010d\u00edk, J. Optimization of tilted implant geometry for stress reduction in all-on-4 treatment concept: finite element analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:1287\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.6371.","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.6371"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Malmstrom, H, Gupta, B, Ghanem, A, Cacciato, R, Ren, Y, Romanos, GE. Success rate of short dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed bridges. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:1093\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.12693.","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12693"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Esposito, M, Grusovin, MG, Kwan, S, Worthington, HV, Coulthard, P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Aust Dent J 2009;54:70\u20131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1834-7819.2008.01093.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1834-7819.2008.01093.x"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_005","unstructured":"Krekmanov, L, Kahn, M, Rangert, B, Lindstr\u00f6m, H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:405\u201314."},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mal\u00f3, P, Rangert, B, Nobre, M. All-on-four\u201d immediate-function concept with br\u00e5nemark system\u00ae implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:2\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Soto-Pe\u00f1aloza, D, Zaragoz\u00ed-Alonso, R, Pe\u00f1arrocha-Diago, M, Pe\u00f1arrocha-Diago, M. The all-on-four treatment concept: systematic review. Int J\u00a0Exp Dent Sci 2017;9:e474\u2013488. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4317\/jced.53613.","DOI":"10.4317\/jced.53613"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pera, P, Menini, M, Pesce, P, Bevilacqua, M, Pera, F, Tealdo, T. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants supporting fixed full-arch maxillary prostheses: a 10-year follow-up report. Int J Prosthodont 2018;32:27\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/ijp.5804.","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.5804"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_009","unstructured":"Mal\u00f3, P, Nobre, MDA, Lopes, A. The rehabilitation of completely edentulous maxillae with different degrees of resorption with four or more immediately loaded implants: a 5-year retrospective study and a new classification. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4:227\u201343."},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Duyck, J, R\u00f8nold, HJ, Van Oosterwyck, H, Naert, I, Sloten, JV, Ellingsen, JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2001.012003207.x.","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2001.012003207.x"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Altiparmak, N, Akdeniz, SS, Diker, N, Bayram, B, Uckan, S. Comparison of success rate of dental implants placed in autogenous bone graft regenerated areas and pristine bone. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:1572\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/scs.0000000000006401.","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000006401"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang, SH, Lin, CL, Hsue, SS, Lin, YS, Huang, SR. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Med Eng Phys 2012;34:153\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.medengphy.2011.07.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2011.07.005"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T\u00fcrker, N, B\u00fcy\u00fckkaplan, US, Sadowsky, SJ, \u00d6zarslan, MM. Finite element stress analysis of applied forces to implants and supporting tissues using the \u201call-on-four\u201d concept with different occlusal schemes. J Prosthodont 2019;28:185\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13004.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13004"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_015","unstructured":"ASM material data sheet for titanium grade 4nd. http:\/\/asm.matweb.com\/search\/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=mtu040 [Accessed 24 Jan 2022]."},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_016","unstructured":"ASM material data sheet for titanium grade 5nd. http:\/\/asm.matweb.com\/search\/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=mtp641 [Accessed 24 Jan 2022]."},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ozan, O, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz, S. Biomechanical comparison of different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:64\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.6201.","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.6201"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vajgel, A, Camargo, IB, Willmersdorf, RB, de Melo, TM, Laureano, F, Vasconcellos, R. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:335\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joms.2012.09.019.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2012.09.019"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mal\u00f3, P, de Ara\u00fajo Nobre, M, Lopes, A, Ferro, A, Gravito, I. All-on-4\u00ae treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: a 7-year clinical and 5-year radiographic retrospective case series with risk assessment for implant failure and marginal bone level. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:e531\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cid.12282.","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12282"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G\u00fcmr\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc, Z, Korkmaz, YT. Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput 2018;56:979\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11517-017-1737-4.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11517-017-1737-4"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li, X, Cao, Z, Qiu, X, Tang, Z, Gong, L, Wang, D. Does matching relation exist between the length and the tilting angle of terminal implants in the all-on-four protocol? Stress distributions by 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:240\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4047\/jap.2015.7.3.240.","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2015.7.3.240"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_020","unstructured":"Capelli, M, Zuffetti, F, Fabbro, MD, Testori, T. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study\u00a0\u2013 PubMed. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:639\u201344."},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, T, Mu, Z, Yu, T, Wang, C, Huang, Y. Biomechanical comparison of implant inclinations and load times with the all-on-4 treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2019;22:585\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10255842.2019.1572120.","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2019.1572120"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"dos Santos, MBF, Meloto, GDO, Bacchi, A, Correr-Sobrinho, L. Stress distribution in cylindrical and conical implants under rotational micromovement with different boundary conditions and bone properties: 3-D FEA. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2017;20:893\u2013900. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10255842.2017.1309394.","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2017.1309394"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Souza Batista, VE, Verri, FR, Almeida, DADF, Santiago Junior, JF, Lemos, CAA, Pellizzer, EP. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2017;20:663\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10255842.2017.1287905.","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2017.1287905"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Takano-Yamamoto, T. Osteocyte function under compressive mechanical force. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2014;50:29\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdsr.2013.10.004.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdsr.2013.10.004"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nurettin, D, Burak, B. Feasibility of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer fixation plates for treatment of atrophic mandibular fracture: a finite element method. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 2018;46:2182\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcms.2018.09.030.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcms.2018.09.030"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sevimay, M, Usumez, A, Eskitascioglu, G. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2005;73B:140\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jbm.b.30191.","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.b.30191"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaleli, N, Sarac, D, K\u00fcl\u00fcnk, S, \u00d6zt\u00fcrk, \u00d6. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:437\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.03.008.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.03.008"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brozovi\u0107, J, Demoli, N, Farka\u0161, N, Su\u0161i\u0107, M, Alar, \u017d, Gabri\u0107 Panduri\u0107, D. Properties of axially loaded implant-abutment assemblies using digital holographic interferometry analysis. Dent Mater 2014;30:e17\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2013.12.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2013.12.005"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gupta, S, Gupta, H, Tandan, A. Technical complications of implant-causes and management: a comprehensive review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2015;6:3\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0975-5950.168233.","DOI":"10.4103\/0975-5950.168233"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goodacre, CJ, Kan, JY, Rungcharassaeng, K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0022-3913(99)70208-8.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(99)70208-8"},{"key":"2023112208504591009_j_bmt-2023-0002_ref_032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horita, S, Sugiura, T, Yamamoto, K, Murakami, K, Imai, Y, Kirita, T. Biomechanical analysis of immediately loaded implants according to the \u201cAll-on-Four\u201d concept. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:123\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijom.2017.02.904.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2016.08.002"}],"container-title":["Biomedical Engineering \/ Biomedizinische Technik"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/bmt-2023-0002\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/bmt-2023-0002\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,22]],"date-time":"2023-11-22T08:52:12Z","timestamp":1700643132000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/bmt-2023-0002\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,7]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,2]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,15]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/bmt-2023-0002"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/bmt-2023-0002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0013-5585","1862-278X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0013-5585","type":"print"},{"value":"1862-278X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,7]]}}}