{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,18]],"date-time":"2025-10-18T20:37:45Z","timestamp":1760819865219,"version":"3.28.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Communication <html_ent glyph=\"@amp;\" ascii=\"&\"\/> Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,26]]},"DOI":"10.1515\/come.2005.2.2.123","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,18]],"date-time":"2006-04-18T10:55:13Z","timestamp":1145357713000},"page":"123-135","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Comparing homeopathic and general practice consultations: The case of problem presentation"],"prefix":"10.3138","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Johanna","family":"Ruusuvuori","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1696","container-title":["Communication <html_ent glyph=\"@amp;\" ascii=\"&\"\/> Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/view\/j\/come.1.2005.2.issue-2\/come.2005.2.2.123\/come.2005.2.2.123.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,4]],"date-time":"2024-11-04T10:32:47Z","timestamp":1730716367000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/come.2005.2.2.123\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,26]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,26]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/come.2005.2.2.123"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/come.2005.2.2.123","relation":{},"ISSN":["1612-1783","1613-3625"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1612-1783"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1613-3625"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,26]]}}}