{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,7]],"date-time":"2025-11-07T18:37:32Z","timestamp":1762540652146},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,26]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare translabial three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler ultrasound with Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound measurements for cervical assessment before induction of labor with dinoprostone or cervical ripening balloon.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and methods:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Translabial cervical volume and length, vascularization indices and transvaginal cervical length were measured. Results were compared among women who had vaginal delivery at 24 h or less and more than 24 h after the insertion of the dinoprostone vaginal insert or cervical ripening balloon and among women who had vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery for failure to go into labor or failure to progress.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p>There was no correlation between the time to delivery after a ripening agent was applied and translabial cervical volume, translabial cervical length, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), vascularization flow index (VFI), transvaginal cervical length and Bishop scores. The ultrasonographic measurements were no different among women who had vaginal delivery at 24 h or less and more than 24 h and among women who had vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery for failure to go into labor or failure to progress.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this study, we failed to demonstrate the superiority of translabial 3D ultrasonography over Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasonography for predicting the success of induction of labor.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2016-0206","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,15]],"date-time":"2016-12-15T10:11:25Z","timestamp":1481796685000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Use of translabial three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound for cervical assessment before labor induction"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Sertac","family":"Esin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bulent","family":"Yirci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Serdar","family":"Yalvac","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Omer","family":"Kandemir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","reference":[{"key":"ref261","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1100","article-title":"The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor","volume":"24","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600797459","article-title":"Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour","volume":"26","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref211","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2805","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"28","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref441","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2805","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"28","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref431","first-page":"2","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"98","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref161","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.11010071.x","article-title":"Cervical sonography: a review","volume":"11","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref221","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6144","article-title":"Three-dimensional power Doppler derived vascular indices: what are we measuring and how are we doing it?","volume":"32","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"ref411","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.913","article-title":"Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment","volume":"22","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1","article-title":"Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor","volume":"285","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref331","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600797459","article-title":"Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour","volume":"26","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref381","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2005.24.7.933","article-title":"Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"24","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"ref451","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6144","article-title":"Three-dimensional power Doppler derived vascular indices: what are we measuring and how are we doing it?","volume":"32","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"ref111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery","volume":"29","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"ref141","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00184.x","article-title":"Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy","volume":"16","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00725-7","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay","volume":"189","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-5629(03)01011-1","article-title":"Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery","volume":"29","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"ref251","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90039-N","article-title":"Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop\u2019s score and transvaginal ultrasound","volume":"40","year":"1991","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref241","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02060384-2.x","article-title":"The uterine cervix, ultrasound and prematurity","volume":"2","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref321","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score","volume":"7","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"ref201","first-page":"2","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"98","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref01","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age","volume":"155","year":"2014","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"ref311","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00725-7","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay","volume":"189","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90039-N","article-title":"Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop\u2019s score and transvaginal ultrasound","volume":"40","year":"1991","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref231","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age","volume":"155","year":"2014","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"ref351","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1","article-title":"Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor","volume":"285","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref361","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-5629(03)01011-1","article-title":"Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery","volume":"29","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x","article-title":"Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor","volume":"18","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref271","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.165","article-title":"Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval","volume":"22","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref291","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x","article-title":"Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor","volume":"18","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref371","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00184.x","article-title":"Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy","volume":"16","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref171","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x","article-title":"Cervical length at 22\u201324 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography","volume":"17","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score","volume":"7","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"ref191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00549.x","article-title":"Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score","volume":"112","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref391","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.11010071.x","article-title":"Cervical sonography: a review","volume":"11","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref401","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x","article-title":"Cervical length at 22\u201324 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography","volume":"17","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref151","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2005.24.7.933","article-title":"Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"24","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"ref281","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction","volume":"182","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction","volume":"182","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref301","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00321-3","article-title":"Factors predicting successful labor induction","volume":"88","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref421","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00549.x","article-title":"Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score","volume":"112","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00321-3","article-title":"Factors predicting successful labor induction","volume":"88","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref181","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.913","article-title":"Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment","volume":"22","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02060384-2.x","article-title":"The uterine cervix, ultrasound and prematurity","volume":"2","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref341","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery","volume":"29","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1100","article-title":"The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor","volume":"24","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.165","article-title":"Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval","volume":"22","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/view\/j\/jpme.2017.45.issue-5\/jpm-2016-0206\/jpm-2016-0206.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2016-0206\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,22]],"date-time":"2021-04-22T01:33:46Z","timestamp":1619055226000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2016-0206\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2016-0206","relation":{},"ISSN":["1619-3997","0300-5577"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1619-3997","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0300-5577","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]]}}}