{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,6]],"date-time":"2026-04-06T13:10:07Z","timestamp":1775481007557,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,27]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0041_s_999\"><jats:title id=\"d11421495e28559\">Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To identify socio-cultural and clinician determinants in the decision-making process in the choice for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) in delivering women.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0041_s_998\"><jats:title id=\"d11421495e28567\">Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A tailored questionnaire focused on epidemiological, socio-cultural and obstetric data was administered to 133 patients; of these, 95 were admitted for assistance at birth at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario \u201cA. Gemelli\u201d (FPG) IRCCS, Rome, and 38 at S. Chiara Hospital (SCH), Trento, Italy. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression modeling were performed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0041_s_997\"><jats:title id=\"d11421495e28575\">Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rates were higher at SCH than at FPG (68.4% vs. 23.2%; P\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). Maternal age in the TOLAC\/VBAC group was significantly higher at SCH than at FPG (37.1 vs. 34.9 years, P\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). High levels of education and no-working condition corresponded to a lower rate of VBAC. Proposal on delivery mode after a previous CS was missed in the majority of cases. Participation in prenatal course was significantly less among women in the ERCS groups. Using logistic regression, the following determinants were found to be statistically significant in the decision-making process: maternal age [odds ratio (OR)\u2009=\u20090.968 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.941\u20130.999); P\u2009=\u20090.019], education level [OR\u2009=\u20090.618 (95% CI 0.419\u20130.995); P\u2009=\u20090.043], information received after the previous CS [OR\u2009=\u20090.401 (95% CI 0.195\u20131.252); P\u2009=\u20090.029], participation in antenatal courses [OR\u2009=\u20090.534 (95% CI 0.407\u20131.223); P\u2009=\u20090.045] and self-determination in attempting TOLAC [OR\u2009=\u20090.756 (95% CI 0.522\u20131.077); P\u2009=\u20090.037].<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0041_s_996\"><jats:title id=\"d11421495e28583\">Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>In the attempt to promote person-centered care, increases in TOLAC\/VBAC rates could be achieved by focusing on individual maternal needs. An<jats:italic>ad hoc<\/jats:italic>strategy for making birth safer should begin from accurate information at the time of the previous CS.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2019-0041","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,18]],"date-time":"2019-06-18T09:03:13Z","timestamp":1560848593000},"page":"656-664","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Socio-cultural and clinician determinants in the maternal decision-making process in the choice for trial of labor vs. elective repeated cesarean section: a questionnaire comparison between Italian settings"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"Stefania","family":"Triunfo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Claudia","family":"Minciotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Barbara","family":"Burlon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Franca","family":"Giovannangeli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michelangela","family":"Danza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Saverio","family":"Tateo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Antonio","family":"Lanzone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","reference":[{"key":"ref81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.15553","article-title":"Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality","volume":"314","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Am Med Assoc"},{"key":"ref451","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-2018-4","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean birth in Italy: variations among areas of residence and hospitals","volume":"18","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0148343","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","article-title":"The increasing trend in cesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990\u20132014","volume":"11","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref241","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2005.01496.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women\u2019s perceptions","volume":"16","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"ref411","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030","article-title":"Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital","volume":"189","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref381","first-page":"23","article-title":"Classification of cesarean sections","volume":"12","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"ref561","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12882","article-title":"Authors\u2019 reply: antenatal discussion of the risks and benefits of VBAC and ERCS","volume":"121","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2014.29.10.1341","article-title":"Changes in the cesarean section rate in Korea (1982\u20132012) and a review of the associated factors","volume":"29","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Korean Med Sci"},{"key":"ref91","first-page":"23","article-title":"Classification of cesarean sections","volume":"12","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"ref511","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01154.x","article-title":"Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study","volume":"114","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref141","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1144-0","article-title":"Clinicians\u2019 views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates","volume":"16","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x","article-title":"Rates of cesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates","volume":"21","year":"2007","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref181","article-title":"Cost analysis for deliveries according to maternal age classes for moving to a personalized approach in the health care","journal-title":"JMFNM"},{"key":"ref11","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births in the United States, 2016","volume":"287","year":"2017","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"ref531","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2005.01496.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women\u2019s perceptions","volume":"16","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"ref551","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12082","article-title":"Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis","volume":"41","year":"2014","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13284","article-title":"Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study","volume":"123","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref461","first-page":"e020011","article-title":"Role of maternal characteristics and epidural analgesia on caesarean section rate in groups 1 and 3 according to Robson\u2019s classification: a cohort study in an Italian university hospital setting","volume":"8","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br Med J Open"},{"key":"ref521","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12082","article-title":"Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis","volume":"41","year":"2014","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12971","article-title":"China\u2019s 50% delivery section rate: is it too high?","volume":"122","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref211","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12386","article-title":"Women\u2019s preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean","volume":"46","year":"2019","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref301","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births in the United States, 2016","volume":"287","year":"2017","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"ref191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12270","article-title":"Do women have a choice? Care providers\u2019 and decision makers\u2019 perspectives on barriers to access of health services for birth after a previous cesarean","volume":"44","year":"2017","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref351","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x","article-title":"Rates of cesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates","volume":"21","year":"2007","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref171","first-page":"e020011","article-title":"Role of maternal characteristics and epidural analgesia on caesarean section rate in groups 1 and 3 according to Robson\u2019s classification: a cohort study in an Italian university hospital setting","volume":"8","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br Med J Open"},{"key":"ref271","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12882","article-title":"Authors\u2019 reply: antenatal discussion of the risks and benefits of VBAC and ERCS","volume":"121","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref371","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.15553","article-title":"Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality","volume":"314","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Am Med Assoc"},{"key":"ref431","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1144-0","article-title":"Clinicians\u2019 views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates","volume":"16","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref471","article-title":"Cost analysis for deliveries according to maternal age classes for moving to a personalized approach in the health care","journal-title":"JMFNM"},{"key":"ref121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030","article-title":"Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital","volume":"189","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref161","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-2018-4","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean birth in Italy: variations among areas of residence and hospitals","volume":"18","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref361","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0148343","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","article-title":"The increasing trend in cesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990\u20132014","volume":"11","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref321","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2014.29.10.1341","article-title":"Changes in the cesarean section rate in Korea (1982\u20132012) and a review of the associated factors","volume":"29","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Korean Med Sci"},{"key":"ref491","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0639-4","article-title":"Women\u2019s reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section","volume":"15","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref441","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0441-3","article-title":"Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review","volume":"15","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref251","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2017.04.009","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: views of women from countries with low VBAC rates","volume":"30","year":"2017","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"ref501","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12386","article-title":"Women\u2019s preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean","volume":"46","year":"2019","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref261","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12082","article-title":"Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis","volume":"41","year":"2014","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref331","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13284","article-title":"Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study","volume":"123","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref221","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01154.x","article-title":"Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study","volume":"114","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref151","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0441-3","article-title":"Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review","volume":"15","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref481","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12270","article-title":"Do women have a choice? Care providers\u2019 and decision makers\u2019 perspectives on barriers to access of health services for birth after a previous cesarean","volume":"44","year":"2017","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0639-4","article-title":"Women\u2019s reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section","volume":"15","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref231","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12082","article-title":"Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis","volume":"41","year":"2014","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"ref341","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12971","article-title":"China\u2019s 50% delivery section rate: is it too high?","volume":"122","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Obstect Gynecol"},{"key":"ref541","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2017.04.009","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: views of women from countries with low VBAC rates","volume":"30","year":"2017","journal-title":"Women Birth"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/view\/j\/jpme.2019.47.issue-6\/jpm-2019-0041\/jpm-2019-0041.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0041\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,19]],"date-time":"2024-07-19T21:54:52Z","timestamp":1721426092000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0041\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,27]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0041","relation":{},"ISSN":["1619-3997","0300-5577"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1619-3997","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0300-5577","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,27]]}}}