{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,9]],"date-time":"2026-06-09T05:48:38Z","timestamp":1780984118449,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,25]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0143_s_999_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1aab1c16b1Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We aimed to analyze the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentations performed in our center between March 2011 and March 2016. We evaluated factors related to a successful ECV, delivery mode, complications and newborn status after ECV.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0143_s_998_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1aab1c16b2Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Analysis of assembled data of 327 consecutive ECVs in the third trimester was done.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0143_s_997_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1aab1c16b3Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The total success rate was 56.6%. After a successful ECV, 85.9% of the fetuses were delivered vaginally. Logistic regression analysis of background factors leading to a successful ECV showed that tocolysis with ritodrine and anterior placenta were each significantly correlated with the rate of successful version. No severe complications were registered during the ECVs, and all babies had normal Apgar scores at delivery.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2019-0143_s_996_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1aab1c16b4Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>These findings suggest that attempting an ECV in breech presentations, once or even twice, seems to be an appropriate management given that a successful ECV decreases the rate of cesarean section in this group of patients and by doing so, it might also decrease the risk of cesarean sections in future pregnancies.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2019-0143","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]],"date-time":"2019-08-01T09:03:44Z","timestamp":1564650224000},"page":"717-723","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"Duna","family":"Trobo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara\u00f1\u00f3n, Universidad Complutense , 48 O\u2019 Donnell Street , 28009 Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pilar","family":"Pintado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara\u00f1\u00f3n, Universidad Complutense , 48 O\u2019 Donnell Street , 28009 Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Virginia","family":"Ortega","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara\u00f1\u00f3n, Universidad Complutense , 48 O\u2019 Donnell Street , 28009 Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F\u00e1tima","family":"Yllana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara\u00f1\u00f3n, Universidad Complutense , 48 O\u2019 Donnell Street , 28009 Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Concepci\u00f3n","family":"Hern\u00e1ndez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara\u00f1\u00f3n, Universidad Complutense , 48 O\u2019 Donnell Street , 28009 Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rafael","family":"Mendiz\u00e1bal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara\u00f1\u00f3n, Universidad Complutense , 48 O\u2019 Donnell Street , 28009 Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juan","family":"De Le\u00f3n-Luis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara\u00f1\u00f3n, Universidad Complutense , 48 O\u2019 Donnell Street , 28009 Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_001_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b1Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375\u201383.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_002_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b2Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Impey LWM, Murphy DJ, Griffiths M, Penna LK, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Breech Presentation. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2017;124:e151\u201377.","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14465"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_003_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b3Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins \u2013 Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 161: External Cephalic Version. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:e54\u201361.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001312"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_004_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b4Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:693\u2013711.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_005_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b5Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sociedad Espa\u00f1ola de Ginecolog\u00eda y Obstetricia. Versi\u00f3n cef\u00e1lica externa (update march 2014). Prog Obstet Ginecol 2015;58:337\u201340.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pog.2014.11.007"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_006_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b6Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosman AN, Guijt A, Vlemmix F, Rijnders M, Mol BWJ, Kok M. Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:137\u201342.","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12011"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_007_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b7Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boucher M, Marquette GP, Varin J, Champagne J, Bujold E.Fetomaternal hemorrhage during external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:79\u201384.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318179978c"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_008_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b8Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hutton EK, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;CD000084.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000084.pub3"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_009_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1b9Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cluver C, Hofmeyr GJ, Gyte GM, Sinclair M. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;1:CD000184.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000184.pub3"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_010_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c10Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stergiotou I, Talbot F, Yoong W. The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:927\u20139.","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701343123"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_011_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c11Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burgos J, Eguiguren N, Quintana E, Cobos P, Centeno M del M, Larrieta R, et al. Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study. J Perinat Med 2010;38:23\u20138.","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2010.010"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_012_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c12Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burgos J, Cobos P, Osuna C, de Mar Centeno M, Fern\u00e1ndez-Llebrez L, Astorquiza TM, et al. Nitrous oxide for analgesia in external cephalic version at term: prospective comparative study. J Perinat Med 2013;41:719\u201323.","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0046"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_013_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c13Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mu\u00f1oz H, Guerra S, Perez-Vaquero P, Valero Martinez C, Aizpuru F, Lopez-Picado A. Remifentanil versus placebo for analgesia during external cephalic version: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014;23:52\u20137.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2013.07.006"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_014_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c14Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saling E, M\u00fcller-Holve W. External cephalic version under tocolysis. J Perinat Med 1975;3:115\u201322.","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1975.3.2.115"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_015_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c15Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ben-Meir A, Elram T, Tsafrir A, Elchalal U, Ezra Y. The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:157.e1\u20133.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.10.889"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_016_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c16Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lau TK, Lo KW, Wan D, Rogers MS. Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:798\u2013802.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12023.x"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_017_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c17Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BWJ, van der Post JA. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1143\u201351.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_018_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c18Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ye J, Betr\u00e1n AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth 2014;41:237\u201344.","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12104"},{"key":"2023033123583577891_j_jpm-2019-0143_ref_019_w2aab3b7c41b1b6b1ab2b1c19Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mittal S, Pardeshi S, Mayadeo N, Mane J. Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2014;64:251\u20134.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-013-0491-2"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/view\/j\/jpme.2019.47.issue-7\/jpm-2019-0143\/jpm-2019-0143.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0143\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0143\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]],"date-time":"2023-04-01T13:32:06Z","timestamp":1680355926000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0143\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,18]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,25]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/jpm-2019-0143"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0143","relation":{},"ISSN":["1619-3997","0300-5577"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1619-3997","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0300-5577","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]]}}}