{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]],"date-time":"2026-01-29T22:12:24Z","timestamp":1769724744123,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,23]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2020-0210_abs_001_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1aab1c16b1Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) has heterogeneous prenatal and postnatal diagnostic criteria. We compared the prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of late-onset FGR and their ability to predict adverse perinatal outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2020-0210_abs_002_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1aab1c16b2Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Retrospective cohort study of 5442 consecutive singleton pregnancies that delivered beyond 34\u00a0+\u00a00\u00a0weeks. Prenatal diagnosis of FGR was based on customized fetal growth standards and fetal Doppler while postnatal diagnosis was based on a birthweight &lt;3rd percentile according to newborn charts (Olsen\u2019s charts and Intergrowth 21st century programme). Perinatal outcomes were analyzed depending on whether the diagnosis was prenatal, postnatal or both.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2020-0210_abs_003_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1aab1c16b3Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>A total of 94 out of 5442 (1.7%) were diagnosed as late-onset FGR prenatally. Olsen\u2019s chart and Intergrowth 21st chart detected that 125\/5442 (2.3%) and 106\/5442 (2.0%) of infants had a birthweight &lt;3rd percentile, respectively. These charts identified 35\/94 (37.2%) and 40\/94 (42.6%) of the newborns with a prenatal diagnosis of late-onset FGR. Prenatally diagnosed late-onset FGR infants were at a higher risk for hypoglycemia, jaundice and polycythemia. Both prenatally and postnatally diagnosed as late-onset FGR had a higher risk for respiratory distress syndrome when compared to non-FGR. The higher risks for intensive care admission and composite adverse outcomes were observed in those with a prenatal diagnosis of late-onset FGR that was confirmed after birth.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2020-0210_abs_004_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1aab1c16b4Aa\">\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Current definitions of pre- and postnatal late-onset FGR do not match in more than half of cases. Infants with a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of this condition have an increased risk of neonatal morbidity even if these diagnoses are not coincident.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2020-0210","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,8]],"date-time":"2020-10-08T19:46:35Z","timestamp":1602186395000},"page":"216-224","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Obstetric and pediatric growth charts for the detection of late-onset fetal growth restriction and neonatal adverse outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Beatriz","family":"Fernandez-Rodriguez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics , University Hospital Del Tajo , Aranjuez , Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Concepci\u00f3n","family":"de Alba","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neonatology , University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid , Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alberto","family":"Galindo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Fetal Medicine Unit-SAMID, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid , Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Recio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neonatology , University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid , Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cecilia","family":"Villalain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Fetal Medicine Unit-SAMID, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid , Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carmen Rosa","family":"Pallas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neonatology , University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid , Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ignacio","family":"Herraiz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Fetal Medicine Unit-SAMID, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid , Madrid , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_001_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b1Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seravalli, V, Baschat, AA. Uniform management approach to optimize outcome in fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2015;42:275\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2015.01.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2015.01.005"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_002_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b2Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beune, IM, Bloomfield, FH, Ganzevoort, W, Embleton, ND, Rozance, PJ, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, AG, et al. Consensus based definition of growth restriction in the newborn. J Pediatr 2018;196:71\u20136.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpeds.2017.12.059.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2017.12.059"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_003_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b3Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Ganzevoort, W. Building consensus and standards in fetal growth restriction studies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;49:117\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.002.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.002"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_004_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b4Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parra-Saavedra, M, Simeone, S, Triunfo, S, Crovetto, F, Botet, F, Nadal, A, et al. Correlation between histological signs of placental underperfusion and perinatal morbidity in late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:149\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.13415.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13415"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_005_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b5Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arcangeli, T, Thilaganathan, B, Hooper, R, Khan, KS, Bhide, A. Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:267\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.11112.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11112"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_006_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b6Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baschat, AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;49:53\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_007_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b7Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Figueras, F, Gratac\u00f3s, E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014;36:86\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000357592.","DOI":"10.1159\/000357592"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_008_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b8Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thilaganathan, B. Ultrasound fetal weight estimation at term may do more harm than good. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52:5\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.19110.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19110"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_009_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1b9Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maso, G, Jayawardane, MA, Alberico, S, Piccoli, M, Senanayake, HM. The implications of diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses using European and South Asian growth charts: an outcome-based comparative study. Sci World J 2014;2014:474809. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2014\/474809.","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/474809"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_010_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c10Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Malin, GL, Morris, RK, Riley, R, Teune, MJ, Khan, KS. When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes. BJOG 2014;121:515\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12517.","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12517"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_011_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c11Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parra-Saavedra, M, Crovetto, F, Triunfo, S, Savchev, S, Peguero, A, Nadal, A, et al. Association of Doppler parameters with placental signs of underperfusion in late onset small-for-gestational-age pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:330\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.13358.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13358"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_012_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c12Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oros, D, Figueras, F, Cruz-Martinez, R, Meler, E, Munmany, M, Gratacos, E. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:191\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.7738.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7738"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_013_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c13Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garcia-Simon, R, Figueras, F, Savchev, S, Fabre, E, Gratacos, E, Oros, D. Cervical condition and fetal cerebral Doppler as determinants of adverse perinatal outcome after labor induction for late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:713\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14807.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14807"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_014_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c14Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mure\u0219an, D, Rotar, IC, Stamatian, F. The usefulness of fetal Doppler evaluation in early versus late onset intrauterine growth restriction. Review of the literature. Med Ultrason 2016;18:103\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11152\/mu.2013.2066.181.dop.","DOI":"10.11152\/mu.2013.2066.181.dop"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_015_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c15Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Man, J, Hutchinson, JC, Ashworth, M, Heazell, AE, Levine, S, Sebire, NJ. Effects of intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight following intrauterine death: implications for assessment of fetal growth restriction at autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:574\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.16018.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.16018"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_016_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c16Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Herraiz, I, Sim\u00f3n, E, G\u00f3mez-Arriaga, PI, Mart\u00ednez-Moratalla, JM, Garc\u00eda-Burguillo, Jim\u00e9nez, EA, Galindo, A. Angiogenesis-related biomarkers (sFlt-1\/PLGF) in the prediction and diagnosis of placental dysfunction: an approach for clinical integration. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:19009\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijms160819009.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijms160819009"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_017_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c17Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Herraiz, I, Sim\u00f3n, E, G\u00f3mez-Arriaga, PI, Quezada, MS, Garc\u00eda-Burguillo, A, L\u00f3pez-Jim\u00e9nez, EA, et al. Clinical implementation of the sFlt-1\/PlGF ratio to identify preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: a prospective cohort study. Pregnancy Hypertens 2018;13:279\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.preghy.2018.06.017.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preghy.2018.06.017"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_018_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c18Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zeisler, H, Llurba, E, Chantraine, F, Vatish, M, Staff, AC, Sennstr\u00f6m, M, et al. Predictive value of the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016;374:13\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/nejmoa1414838.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1414838"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_019_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c19Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Method for estimating due date. Committee opinion No. 611. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:863\u20136 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000454932.15177.be.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000454932.15177.be"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_020_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c20Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4.","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_021_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c21Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sweet, DG, Carnielli, V, Greisen, G, Hallman, M, Ozek, E, Te Pas, A, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants\u20132013 update. Neonatology 2013;103:353\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000349928.","DOI":"10.1159\/000349928"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_022_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c22Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2004;114:297\u2013316 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.114.1.297.","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.114.1.297"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_023_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c23Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boers, KE, van Wyk, L, van der Post, JA, Kwee, A, van Pampus, MG, Spaanderdam, ME, et al. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:344\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.015.e1.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.015"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_024_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c24Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Olsen, IE, Groveman, S, Lawson, ML, Clark, R, Zemel, B. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics 2010;125:e214\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.2009-0913.","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2009-0913"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_025_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c25Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Villar, J, Cheikh Ismail, L, Victora, CG, Ohuma, E, Bertino, E, Altman, D, et al. For the international fetal and newborn growth consortium for the 21st century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the newborn cross-sectional study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Lancet 2014;384:857\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(14)60932-6.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60932-6"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_026_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c26Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Villar, J, Giuliani, F, Bhutta, Z, Bertino, E, Ohuma, EO, Cheikh Ismail, L, et al. For the international fetal and newborn growth consortium for the 21st century (INTERGROWTH-21st). Postnatal growth standards for preterm infants: the preterm postnatal follow-up study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Lancet Glob Health 2015;3:e681\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s2214-109x(15)00163-1.","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(15)00163-1"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_027_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c27Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parra-Saavedra, M, Crovetto, F, Triunfo, S, Savchev, S, Peguero, A, Nadal, A, et al. Placental findings in late-onset SGA births without Doppler signs of placental insufficiency. Placenta 2013;34:1136\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.placenta.2013.09.018.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2013.09.018"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_028_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c28Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savchev, S, Figueras, F, Sanz-Cortes, M, Cruz-Lemini, M, Triunfo, S, Botet, F, et al. Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014;36:99\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000355525.","DOI":"10.1159\/000355525"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_029_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c29Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mateus, J, Newman, RB, Zhang, C, Pugh, SJ, Grewal, J, Kim, S, et al. Fetal growth patterns in pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders: NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221:635\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.028.e1.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.028"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_030_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c30Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Villala\u00edn, C, Herraiz, I, Quezada, MS, G\u00f3mez-Arriaga, PI, G\u00f3mez-Montes, E, Galindo, A. Fetal biometry and Doppler study for the assessment of perinatal outcome in stage I late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2018;44:264\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000485124.","DOI":"10.1159\/000485124"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_031_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c31Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parra-Saavedra, M, Crovetto, F, Triunfo, S, Savchev, S, Parra, G, Sanz, M, et al. Added value of umbilical vein flow as a predictor of perinatal outcome in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:189\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.12380.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12380"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_032_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c32Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rizzo, G, Mappa, I, Bitsadze, V, S\u0142odki, M, Khizroeva, J, Makatsariya, A, et al. Role of Doppler ultrasound at time of diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;55:793\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20406.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20406"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_033_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c33Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Verkauskiene, R, Figueras, F, Deghmoun, S, Chevenne, D, Gardosi, J, Levy-Marchal, M. Birth weight and long-term metabolic outcomes: does the definition of smallness matter?. Horm Res 2008;70:309\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000157878.","DOI":"10.1159\/000157878"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_034_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c34Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chiossi, G, Pedroza, C, Costantine, MM, Truong, VTT, Gargano, G, Saade, GR. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:156\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.17381.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17381"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_035_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c35Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Crispi, F, Miranda, J, Gratac\u00f3s, E. Long-term cardiovascular consequences of fetal growth restriction: biology, clinical implications, and opportunities for prevention of adult disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:S869\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.012.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.012"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_036_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c36Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rizzo, G, Mattioli, C, Mappa, I, Bitsadze, V, Khizroeva, J, S\u0142odki, M, et al. Hemodynamic factors associated with fetal cardiac remodeling in late fetal growth restriction: a prospective study. J Perinat Med 2019;47:683\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2019-0217.","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2019-0217"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_037_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c37Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Odibo, AO, Nwabuobi, C, Odibo, L, Leavitt, K, Obican, S, Tuuli, MG. Customized fetal growth standard compared with the INTERGROWTH-21st century standard at predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:1381\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13394.","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13394"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_038_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c38Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kabiri, D, Romero, R, Gudicha, DW, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Pacora, P, Benshalom-Tirosh, N, et al. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;55:177\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20299.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20299"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_039_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c39Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boers, KE, van Wyk, L, van der Post, JA, Kwee, A, van Pampus, MG, Spaanderdam, ME, et al. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:344\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.015.e1.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.015"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_040_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c40Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Qu\u00eanya, I, Araujo, E, Machado, L, Galv\u00e3o, C, Parana\u00edba, V, Borges, A. Perinatal outcomes of fetuses with early growth restriction, late growth restriction, small for gestational age, and adequate for gestational age. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019;41:688\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0039-1697987.","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1697987"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_041_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c41Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fernandez-Rodriguez, B, de Alba, C, Villalain, C, Pall\u00e1s, CR, Galindo, A, Herraiz, I. Obstetric and pediatric growth charts for the detection of fetal growth restriction and neonatal adverse outcomes in preterm newborns before 34 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;9:1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2019.1626368.","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1626368"},{"key":"2023040100154845811_j_jpm-2020-0210_ref_042_w2aab3b7c56b1b6b1ab2b1c42Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sharma, D, Shastri, S, Sharma, P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin Med Insights Pediatr 2016;10:67\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4137\/cmped.s40070.","DOI":"10.4137\/CMPed.S40070"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/view\/journals\/jpme\/ahead-of-print\/article-10.1515-jpm-2020-0210\/article-10.1515-jpm-2020-0210.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2020-0210\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2020-0210\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]],"date-time":"2023-04-01T14:29:41Z","timestamp":1680359381000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2020-0210\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,7]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,4]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,23]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/jpm-2020-0210"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2020-0210","relation":{},"ISSN":["1619-3997","0300-5577"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1619-3997","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0300-5577","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,7]]}}}