{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T04:50:12Z","timestamp":1747198212333,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,25]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2022-0201_abs_001\">\n                  <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To evaluate the relationship between prenatal ultrasonography (USG) and fetal autopsy findings.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2022-0201_abs_002\">\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Among 453 pregnancy terminations performed because of fetal anomalies on prenatal USG, 54 with skeletal dysplasia on fetal autopsy were included in this retrospective study.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2022-0201_abs_003\">\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The most common diagnoses among the 54 fetal autopsies were osteogenesis imperfecta (n=12), dysostosis (n=10), achondroplasia (n=9), arthrogryposis (n=6), and thanatophoric dysplasia (n=6). The prenatal USG and fetal autopsy findings showed complete agreement in 35 cases (64.8%), partial agreement in nine cases (16.6%), and disagreement in 10 cases (18.5%).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2022-0201_abs_004\">\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Fetal autopsy via perinatal pathology is essential for precise identification of the type of skeletal dysplasia; it should be routinely performed to confirm the diagnosis of prenatally detected fetal anomalies. Autopsy is vital for accurate prenatal diagnosis and the \u2018gold standard\u2019 technique for the identification of clinically important abnormalities.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2022-0201","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,30]],"date-time":"2022-06-30T16:35:02Z","timestamp":1656606902000},"page":"1239-1247","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Fetal autopsy for the diagnosis of skeletal\u00a0dysplasia and comparison with prenatal\u00a0ultrasound findings over a 16-year period"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"50","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2862-0802","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ozge","family":"Ozdemir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine , Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine , Istanbul , Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Figen","family":"Aksoy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology , Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine , Istanbul , Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cihat","family":"Sen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine , Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine , Istanbul , Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dighe, M, Fligner, C, Cheng, E. Fetal skeletal dysplasia: an approach to diagnosis with illustrative cases. Radiographics 2008;28:1061\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/rg.284075122.","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.284075122"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Milks, KS, Hill, LM, Hosseinzadeh, K. Evaluating skeletal dysplasias on prenatal ultrasound: an emphasis on predicting lethality. Pediatr Radiol 2017;47:134\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00247-016-3725-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-016-3725-5"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rimoin, DL, Cohn, D, Krakow, D, Wilcox, W, Lachman, RS, Alanay, Y. The skeletal dysplasias: clinical-molecular correlations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1117:302\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1196\/annals.1402.072.","DOI":"10.1196\/annals.1402.072"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Victoria, T, Zhu, X, Lachman, R, Epelman, M, Oliver, ER, Adzick, NS, et al.. What is new in prenatal skeletal dysplasias? Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:1022\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.17.19337.","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.17.19337"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang, TY, Chung, IF, Wu, WJ, Chang, SP, Lin, WH, Ginsberg, NA, et al.. Whole exome sequencing with comprehensive gene set analysis identified a biparental-origin homozygous c.509G>A mutation in PPIB gene clustered in two Taiwanese families exhibiting fetal skeletal dysplasia during prenatal ultrasound. Diagnostics 2020;10:286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics10050286.","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics10050286"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mac\u00e9, G, Sonigo, P, Cormier-Daire, V, Aubry, MC, Martinovic, J, Elie, C, et al.. Three-dimensional helical computed tomography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:161\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.12298.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12298"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toru, HS, Nur, BG, Sanhal, CY, Mihci, E, Mendilcio\u011flu, I, Yilmaz, E, et al.. Perinatal diagnostic approach to fetal skeletal dysplasias: six years experience of a tertiary center. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2015;34:287\u2013306. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/15513815.2015.1068414.","DOI":"10.3109\/15513815.2015.1068414"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krakow, D, Lachman, RS, Rimoin, DL. Guidelines for the prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias. Genet Med 2009;11:127\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gim.0b013e3181971ccb.","DOI":"10.1097\/GIM.0b013e3181971ccb"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mortier, GR, Cohn, DH, Cormier-Daire, V, Hall, C, Krakow, D, Mundlos, S, et al.. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal\u00a0disorders: 2019 revision. Am J Med Genet A 2019;179:2393\u2013419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajmg.a.61366.","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.61366"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Konstantinidou, AE, Agrogiannis, G, Sifakis, S, Karantanas, A, Harakoglou, V, Kaminopetros, P, et al.. Genetic skeletal disorders of the fetus and infant: pathologic and molecular findings in a series of 41 cases. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2009;85:811\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bdra.20617.","DOI":"10.1002\/bdra.20617"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_011","unstructured":"Vimercati, A, Grasso, S, Abruzzese, M, Chincoli, A, de Gennaro, A, Miccolis, A, et al.. Correlation between ultrasound diagnosis and autopsy findings of fetal malformations. J Prenat Med 2012;6:13\u20137."},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Struksnaes, C, Blaas, HG, Eik-Nes, SH, Vogt, C. Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in 1029 fetuses following termination of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:232\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.15773.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15773"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Basbug, M, Ozgun, MT, Serin, IS, Akgun, H. OC236: prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias: 12-year single-center experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.4342.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4342"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_014","unstructured":"Toru, HS, Yilmaz, GT, Ozbudak, IH, Nur, B, Sanhal, CY, Karaali, K, et al.. Prenatal diagnostic approach to fetal skeletal dysplasia. Virchows Arch 2013;463:184."},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kurt-Sukur, ED, Simsek-Kiper, PO, Utine, GE, Boduroglu, K, Alanay, Y. Experience of a skeletal dysplasia registry in Turkey: a five-years retrospective analysis. Am J Med Genet A 2015;167A:2065\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajmg.a.37122.","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.37122"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Darouich, S, Masmoudi, A. Fetal skeletal dysplasias: radiologic-pathologic classification of 72 cases. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2022;41:179\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15513815.2020.1775735.","DOI":"10.1080\/15513815.2020.1775735"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macedo, MP, Carvalho, F, Guimar\u00e3es, S, Rebelo, S, Ramalho, C. Early gestational diagnosis of lethal skeletal dysplasias: a 15 year retrospective cohort reviewing concordance between ultrasonographic, genetic and morphological features. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2022;41:37\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15513815.2020.1761915.","DOI":"10.1080\/15513815.2020.1761915"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_018","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and Royal College of Pathologists. Fetal and perinatal pathology: report of a joint working party. London: RCOG Press; 2001."},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tennstedt, C, Chaoui, R, Bollmann, R, K\u00f6rner, H, Dietel, M. Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and morphological findings of fetal autopsy. Pathol Res Pract 1998;194:721\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0344-0338(98)80132-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0344-0338(98)80132-5"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossi, AC, Prefumo, F. Correlation between fetal autopsy and prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;210:201\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.12.024.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.12.024"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cassidy, A, Herrick, C, Norton, ME, Ursell, PC, Vargas, J, Kerns, JL. How does fetal autopsy after pregnancy loss or termination for anomalies and other complications change recurrence risk? AJP Rep 2019;9:30\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0039-1681013.","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1681013"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaasen, A, Tuveng, J, Heiberg, A, Scott, H, Haugen, G. Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy finding: a study of second trimester abortions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:925\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.3871.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3871"},{"key":"2023040100455479826_j_jpm-2022-0201_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Piercecchi-Marti, MD, Liprandi, A, Sigaudy, S, Fredouille, C, Adalian, P, Figarella-Branger, D, et al.. Value of fetal autopsy after medical termination of pregnancy. Forensic Sci Int 2004;144:7\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2004.01.022.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.forsciint.2004.01.022"}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2022-0201\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2022-0201\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]],"date-time":"2023-04-01T16:30:04Z","timestamp":1680366604000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2022-0201\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,25]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/jpm-2022-0201"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2022-0201","relation":{},"ISSN":["0300-5577","1619-3997"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0300-5577"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1619-3997"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]]}}}