{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T16:10:49Z","timestamp":1778602249217,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768867200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2025-0528_abs_001\">\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (pmMRI) has emerged as a promising, non-invasive alternative to conventional autopsy for detecting cardiac anomalies in fetal and perinatal deaths and we aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pmMRI in detecting cardiac anomalies in fetal and perinatal deaths.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2025-0528_abs_002\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to analyse studies comparing pmMRI findings to conventional autopsy. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2025-0528_abs_003\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review, and 12 studies (n=1810 fetuses) were meta-analyzed. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of pmMRI for detecting cardiac anomalies were 76\u202f% (95\u202f% CI: 71\u201380\u202f%) and 96\u202f% (95\u202f% CI: 95\u201397\u202f%), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 55.35 (95\u202f% CI: 22.73\u2013134.79), with an area under the SROC curve of 0.89, indicating excellent diagnostic performance. Subgroup analyses showed comparable sensitivity between 1.5 and 3\u202fT scanners, though specificity was slightly higher for 1.5\u202fT. Diagnostic accuracy was generally better in larger fetuses and when higher field strength MRI (9.4\u202fT) was\u00a0used.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"j_jpm-2025-0528_abs_004\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>pmMRI demonstrates high specificity and moderate sensitivity for detecting cardiac anomalies in fetal and perinatal deaths and may serve as a valuable non-invasive adjunct to conventional autopsy. Standardization of imaging protocols and further research into high-field pmMRI integration are recommended to optimize diagnostic reliability.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2025-0528","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T04:56:10Z","timestamp":1768798570000},"page":"593-606","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Diagnostic yield of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac anomalies in fetal and perinatal deaths: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9956-2246","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seetu","family":"Palo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine , 28730 All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Hyderabad , Telangana , India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0708-1037","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mishu","family":"Mangla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Hyderabad , India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-4786-4012","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Monica","family":"Mishra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine , 28730 All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Hyderabad , Telangana , India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7470-7269","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Poojitha Kalyani","family":"Kanikaram","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Hyderabad , India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0164-5751","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Annapurna","family":"Srirambhatla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiodiagnosis , All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Hyderabad , India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hasan, AA, Abu Lehyah, NAA, Al Tarawneh, MK, Abbad, MY, Fraijat, AG, Al-Jammal, RA, et al.. Incidence and types of congenital heart disease at a referral hospital in Jordan: retrospective study from a tertiary center. Front Pediatr 2023;11:1261130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fped.2023.1261130.","DOI":"10.3389\/fped.2023.1261130"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nijkamp, JW, Sebire, NJ, Bouman, K, Korteweg, FJ, Erwich, JJHM, Gordijn, SJ. Perinatal death investigations: what is current practice? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;22:167\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.siny.2017.02.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2017.02.005"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jepson, BM, Metz, TD, Miller, TA, Son, SL, Ou, Z, Presson, AP, et al.. Pregnancy loss in major fetal congenital heart disease: incidence, risk factors and timing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023;62:75\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.26231.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26231"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Struksn\u00e6s, C, Blaas, HK, Eik-Nes, SH, Tegnander, E, Vogt, C. Postmortem assessment of isolated congenital heart defects remains essential following termination of pregnancy. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2021;24:422\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10935266211016184.","DOI":"10.1177\/10935266211016184"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashby, C, Razzak, AN, Kogler, A, Amireh, A, Dempsey, J, Lin, KK, et al.. The practicality of post-mortem imaging in prenatal, perinatal, and pediatric cases. Cureus 2022;14:e28859. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.28859.","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.28859"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mangla, M, Kumar, N. Recurrence risks in congenital anomalies: a comprehensive guide for parental counselling. NeoReviews 2024;25:e793\u2013803. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/neo.25-12-e793.","DOI":"10.1542\/neo.25-12-e793"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whiting, P, Rutjes, AW, Reitsma, JB, Bossuyt, PMM, Kleijnen, J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-3-25.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-3-25"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zamora, J, Abraira, V, Muriel, A, Khan, K, Coomarasamt, A. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:31. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-6-31.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-6-31"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_010","unstructured":"MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.2.6 (MedCalc Software bv, Ostend, Belgium; https:\/\/www.medcalc.org; 2020)."},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gupta, N, Langeh, N, Sharma, A, Mridha, A, Jana, M, Barwad, A, et al.. Minimally invasive autopsy in the evaluation of fetal malformations and stillbirths: a feasibility study. Birth Defects Res 2024;116:e2280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bdr2.2280.","DOI":"10.1002\/bdr2.2280"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R\u00fcegger, CM, Gascho, D, Bode, PK, Bruder, E, Haslinger, C, Ross, S, Virtopsy Study Group, et al.. Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging with computed tomography-guided biopsy for foetuses and infants: a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr 2022;22:464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12887-022-03519-4.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12887-022-03519-4"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tang, H, Zhang, Y, Dai, C, Ru, T, Li, J, Chen, J, et al.. Postmortem 9.4-T MRI for fetuses with congenital heart defects diagnosed in the first trimester. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;8:764587. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcvm.2021.764587.","DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2021.764587"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Staicu, A, Albu, C, Popa-Stanila, R, Bondor, CI, Rotar, IC, Stamatian, F, et al.. Diagnostic value of virtual autopsy using pm-MRI at 3T on malformed second trimester fetuses vs classic autopsy. PLoS One 2021;16:e0260357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0260357.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0260357"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shelmerdine, SC, Sebire, NJ, Arthurs, OJ. Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem ultrasound vs postmortem 1.5-T MRI for non-invasive perinatal autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;57:449\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.22012.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22012"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ulm, B, Dovjak, GO, Scharrer, A, Muin, DA, Zimpfer, D, Prayer, D, et al.. Diagnostic quality of 3\u202fTesla postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with and without congenital heart disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.030"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shelmerdine, SC, Arthurs, OJ, Gilpin, I, Norman, W, Jones, R, Taylor, AM, et al.. Is traditional perinatal autopsy needed after detailed fetal ultrasound and post-mortem MRI? Prenat Diagn 2019;39:818\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.5448.","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5448"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kang, X, Sanchez, TC, Arthurs, OJ, Bevilacqua, E, Cannie, MM, Segers, V, et al.. Postmortem fetal imaging: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:791\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20217.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20217"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shruthi, M, Gupta, N, Jana, M, Mridha, AR, Kumar, A, Agarwal, R, et al.. Conventional vs virtual autopsy with postmortem MRI in phenotypic characterization of stillbirths and fetal malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:236\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.17468.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17468"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashwin, C, Hutchinson, JC, Kang, X, Langan, D, Jones, R, Norman, W, et al.. Learning effect on perinatal post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging reporting: single reporter diagnostic accuracy of 200 cases. Prenat Diagn 2017;37:566\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.5043.","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5043"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kang, X, Cannie, MM, Arthurs, OJ, Segers, V, Fourneau, C, Bevilacqua, E, et al.. Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy. Eur Radiol 2017;27:354253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-016-4725-4.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4725-4"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taylor, AM, Sebire, NJ, Ashworth, MT, Schievano, S, Scott, RJ, Wade, A, et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging autopsy study collaborative group. Postmortem cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses and children: a masked comparison study with conventional autopsy. Circulation 2014;129:1937\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/circulationaha.113.005641.","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005641"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sandaite, I, Dymarkowski, S, De Catte, L, Moerman, P, Gewillig, M, Fedele, L, et al.. Fetal heart pathology on postmortem 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 2014;34:223\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.4283.","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4283"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Votino, C, Jani, J, Verhoye, M, Bessieres, B, Fierens, Y, Segers, V, et al.. Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation: a comparison of high-field MRI at 9.4\u00a0T with lower-field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:437\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.11191.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11191"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cannie, M, Votino, C, Moerman, P, Vanheste, R, Segers, V, Van Berkel, K, et al.. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:659\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.10079.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10079"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Breeze, AC, Jessop, FA, Set, PA, Whitehead, AL, Cross, JJ, Lomas, DJ, et al.. Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:317\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.8844.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8844"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grant, EK, Evans, MJ. Cardiac findings in fetal and pediatric autopsies: a five-year retrospective review. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2009;12:103\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2350\/08-03-0440.1.","DOI":"10.2350\/08-03-0440.1"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tegnander, E, Williams, W, Johansen, OJ, Blaas, HG, Eik-Nes, SH. Prenatal detection of heart defects in a non-selected population of 30,149 fetuses--detection rates and outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:252\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.2710.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2710"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taylor, AM, Arthurs, OJ, Sebire, NJ. Postmortem cardiac imaging in fetuses and children. Pediatr Radiol 2015;45:549\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00247-014-3164-0.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00247-014-3164-0"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Isaksen, CV, Eik-Nes, SH, Blaas, HG, Tegnander, E, Torp, SH. Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:117\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13020117.x.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.13020117.x"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shelmerdine, SC, Sebire, NJ, Arthurs, OJ. Perinatal post mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a practical approach. Insights Imaging 2019;10:35. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13244-019-0723-9.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-019-0723-9"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Votino, C, Cannie, M, Segers, V, Dobrescu, O, Dessy, H, Gallo, V, et al.. Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:679\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.11150.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11150"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hutchinson, JC, Arthurs, OJ, Ashworth, MT, Ramsey, AT, Mifsud, W, Lombardi, CM, et al.. Clinical utility of postmortem microcomputed tomography of the fetal heart: diagnostic imaging vs macroscopic dissection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:58\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.15764.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15764"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alderliesten, ME, Peringa, J, van der Hulst, VP, Blaauwgeers, HL, van Lith, JM. Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. BJOG 2003;110:378\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02076.x.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02076.x"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thayyil, S, Chandrasekaran, M, Chitty, LS, Wade, A, Skordis-Worrall, J, Bennett-Britton, I, et al.. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:e142\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2009.10.007.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2009.10.007"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jawad, N, Sebire, NJ, Wade, A, Taylor, AM, Chitty, LS, Arthurs, OJ. Body weight lower limits of fetal postmortem MRI at 1.5\u00a0T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:92\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14948.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14948"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thayyil, S, Sebire, NJ, Chitty, LS, Wade, A, Chong, W, Olsen, O, et al.. MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 2013;382:223\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736-13-60134-8.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)60134-8"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Birkl, C, Langkammer, C, Golob-Schwarzl, N, Leoni, M, Haybaeck, J, Goessler, W, et al.. Effects of formalin fixation and temperature on MR relaxation times in the human brain. NMR Biomed 2016;29:458\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nbm.3477.","DOI":"10.1002\/nbm.3477"},{"key":"2026051215133580150_j_jpm-2025-0528_ref_039","unstructured":"Royal College of Radiologists, British Society of Paediatric Radiology. Standards for radiological autopsy practice in perinatal and paediatric cases. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2017. Available from: https:\/\/www.rcr.ac.uk\/publication\/standards-radiological-autopsy-practice-perinatal-and-paediatric-cases."}],"container-title":["Journal of Perinatal Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2025-0528\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2025-0528\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T15:26:00Z","timestamp":1778599560000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/jpm-2025-0528\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/jpm-2025-0528"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2025-0528","relation":{},"ISSN":["0300-5577","1619-3997"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0300-5577","type":"print"},{"value":"1619-3997","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]]}}}