{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,15]],"date-time":"2025-11-15T19:13:07Z","timestamp":1763233987028},"reference-count":107,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"3","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,25]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Metaphors are considered as instruments crucial for persuasion. However, while many studies and works have focused on their emotive, communicative, and persuasive effects, the argumentative dimension that represents the core of their \u201cpersuasiveness\u201d is almost neglected. This paper addresses the problem of explaining how metaphors can communicate arguments, and how it is possible to reconstruct and justify them. To this purpose, a distinction is drawn between the arguments that are communicated metaphorically and interpreted based on relevance considerations, and the ones that are triggered implicitly by the use of a metaphorical expression. In both cases, metaphorical arguments are reconstructed through different patterns of argument, called argumentation schemes (Walton, Reed and Macagno 2008). However, while the purpose of a metaphorical sequence of discourse (called metaphorical move) can guide and justify the reconstruction of the argument that can sufficiently support the intended conclusion in a persuasive move, a more complex analysis is needed for analyzing the additional inferences that a metaphorical move can trigger. These inferences are claimed to represent part of the connotation of the metaphorical expression and can be captured through its most frequent collocations, determinable using some tools of the corpus linguistics.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2020-3004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,6]],"date-time":"2020-11-06T20:07:02Z","timestamp":1604693222000},"page":"335-363","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["How can metaphors communicate arguments?"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Philosophy and Communication , Faculdade de Ci\u00eancias Sociais e Humanas , Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Lisbon , Portugal"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_001_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b1Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Oswald Ducrot. 1977. Deux mais en fran\u00e7ais?. Lingua 43(1). 23\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0024-3841(77)90046-8.","DOI":"10.1016\/0024-3841(77)90046-8"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_002_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b2Aa","unstructured":"Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Oswald Ducrot. 1983. L\u2019argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles, Belgium: Pierre Mardaga."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_003_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b3Aa","unstructured":"Aristotle. 1991a. Rhetoric. In Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, vol. II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_004_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b4Aa","unstructured":"Aristotle. 1991b. Poetics. In Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, vol. II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_005_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b5Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barchard, Kimberly A, Hensley Spencer, Emily D Anderson & Holly E Walker. 2013. Measuring the ability to perceive the emotional connotations of written language. Journal of personality assessment 95(4). 332\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00223891.2012.736906.","DOI":"10.1080\/00223891.2012.736906"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_006_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b6Aa","unstructured":"Bellack, Arno, Kliebard Herbert, Hyman Ronald & Jr.Frank Smith. 1966. The language of the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_007_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b7Aa","unstructured":"Bigi, Sarah. 2014. Healthy reasoning: The role of effective argumentation for enhancing elderly patients\u2019 self-management abilities in chronic care. In Giovanni Riva, Paolo Ajmone Marsan & Claudio Grassi (eds.), Active ageing and healthy living: A human centered approach in research and innovation as source of quality of life, 193\u2013203. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_008_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b8Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Black, Max. 1955. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian society, new series 55. 273\u2013294.","DOI":"10.1093\/aristotelian\/55.1.273"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_009_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1b9Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bowes, Andrea & Albert Katz. 2015. Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory and Cognition 43(6). 953\u2013963. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-015-0508-4.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-015-0508-4"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_010_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c10Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen. 2016. Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/comt.12096.","DOI":"10.1111\/comt.12096"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_011_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c11Aa","unstructured":"Cameron, Lynne. 2003. Metaphor in educational discourse. London, UK: Continuum."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_012_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c12Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carston, Robyn & Catherine Wearing. 2011. Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition 3(2). 283\u2013312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/langcog.2011.010.","DOI":"10.1515\/langcog.2011.010"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_013_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c13Aa","unstructured":"Carston, Robyn. 2002. Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning - more questions than answers. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14(2002). 83\u2013105."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_014_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c14Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carston, Robyn. 2010. Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110(3pt3). 295\u2013321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9264.2010.00288.x. https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/aristotelian\/article-lookup\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1467-9264.2010.00288.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9264.2010.00288.x"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_015_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c15Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Casarett, David, Amy Pickard, Jessica M. Fishman, Stewart C. Alexander, Robert M. Arnold, Kathryn I. Pollak & James A. Tulsky. 2010. Can metaphors and analogies improve communication with seriously ill patients? Journal of Palliative Medicine 13(3). 255\u2013260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/jpm.2009.0221.","DOI":"10.1089\/jpm.2009.0221"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_016_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c16Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. New York, NY: Palgrave.","DOI":"10.1057\/9780230501706"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_017_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c17Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clark, Herbert. 1987. Relevance to what? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10(4). 714\u2013715. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0140525x00055394.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X00055394"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_018_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c18Aa","unstructured":"Cruse, Alan. 1992. Antonymy revisited: Some thoughts on the relationship between words and concepts. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts, 289\u2013306. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_019_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c19Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davidson, Donald. 1978. What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5(1). 31\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/447971.","DOI":"10.1086\/447971"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_020_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c20Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deignan, Alice. 2003. Metaphorical expressions and culture: An indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol 18(4). 255\u2013271. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327868ms1804_3.","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327868MS1804_3"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_021_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c21Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dobrzy\u0144ska, Teresa. 1995. Translating metaphor: Problems of meaning. Journal of pragmatics 24(6). 595\u2013604. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0378-2166(95)00022-K.","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-2166(95)00022-K"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_022_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c22Aa","unstructured":"Ducrot, Oswald. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Paris, France: Hermann."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_023_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c23Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ducrot, Oswald. 1979. Les lois de discours. Langue fran\u00e7aise 42. 21\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3406\/lfr.1979.6152.","DOI":"10.3406\/lfr.1979.6152"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_024_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c24Aa","unstructured":"Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris, France: Minuit."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_025_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c25Aa","unstructured":"Ducrot, Oswald. 1993. Les topoi dans la \u201cTh\u00e9orie de l\u2019argumentation dans la langue.\u201d In Christian Plantin (ed.), Lieux communs, topoi, st\u00e9r\u00e9otypes, 233\u2013248. Paris, France: Kim\u00e9."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_026_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c26Aa","unstructured":"Ervas, Francesca, Marcello Montibeller, Maria Grazia Rossi & Pietro Salis. 2016. Expertise and metaphors in health communication. Medicina & Storia 16(9\u201310). 91\u2013108."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_027_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c27Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ervas, Francesca, Elisabetta Gola & Maria Grazia Rossi. 2018. Argumentation as a bridge between metaphor and reasoning. In Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman & J\u00e9r\u00f4me Jacquin (eds.), Argumentation and language \u2013 linguistic, cognitive and discursive explorations, 153\u2013170. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-73972-4_7"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_028_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c28Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garza-Cuar\u00f3n, Beatriz. 1991. Connotation and meaning. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110867916"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_029_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c29Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond & Lynne Cameron. 2008. The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research. Elsevier 9(1\u20132). 64\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogsys.2007.06.008.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogsys.2007.06.008"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_030_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c30Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond, Markus Tendahl & Lacey Okonski. 2011. Inferring pragmatic messages from metaphor. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 7(1). 3\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/v10016-011-0002-9.","DOI":"10.2478\/v10016-011-0002-9"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_031_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c31Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond. 1984. Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science 8(3). 275\u2013304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15516709cog0803_4.","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog0803_4"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_032_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c32Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond. 1987. Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference. Journal of Pragmatics 11(5). 561\u2013588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0378-2166(87)90180-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-2166(87)90180-9"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_033_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c33Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond. 1992. When is metaphor? The idea of understanding in theories of metaphor. Poetics Today 13(4). 575\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1773290.","DOI":"10.2307\/1773290"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_034_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c34Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond. 2006. Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language 21(3). 434\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_035_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c35Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glucksberg, Sam & Boaz Keysar. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review 97(1). 3\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.97.1.3.","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.97.1.3"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_036_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c36Aa","unstructured":"Goatly, Andrew. 2011. The language of metaphors. London, UK: Routledge."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_037_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c37Aa","unstructured":"Grosz, Barbara & Candace Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3). 175\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5555\/12457.12458."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_038_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c38Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hesse, Mary. 1965. Aristotle\u2019s logic of analogy. The Philosophical Quarterly 15(61). 328\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2218258.","DOI":"10.2307\/2218258"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_039_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c39Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hopper, Robert, Mark L Knapp & Lorel Scott. 1981. Couples\u2019 personal idioms: Exploring intimate talk. Journal of Communication 31(1). 23\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01201.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01201.x"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_040_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c40Aa","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics: Meaning in language and discourse. Harlow, UK: Pearson."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_041_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c41Aa","unstructured":"Jeshion, Robin. 2016. Slur creation, bigotry formation: The power of expressivism. Phenomenology and Mind 11. 130\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13128\/Phe_Mi-20113."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_042_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c42Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan & Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(2). 331\u2013355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec.","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_043_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c43Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan. 2003. Situation-bound utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin, Germany, and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110894035"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_044_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c44Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40(3). 385\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_045_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c45Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan. 2013. Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199892655.001.0001"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_046_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c46Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan. 2019. Impoverished pragmatics? The semantics-pragmatics interface from an intercultural perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics 16(5). 489\u2013515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2019-0026.","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2019-0026"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_047_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c47Aa","unstructured":"Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1977. La connotation. Lyon, France: Presses Universitaires de Lyon."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_049_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c48Aa","unstructured":"Kinneavy, James. 2002. Kairos in classical and modern rhetorical theory. In Phillip Sipiora & James, Baumlin (eds.), Rhetoric and kairos: Essays in history, theory, and praxis, 58\u201376. Albany, NY: SUNY Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_050_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c49Aa","unstructured":"Kittay, Eva Feder. 1989. Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_051_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c50Aa","unstructured":"K\u00f6vecses, Zolt\u00e1n. 2003. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_052_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c51Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00f6vecses, Zolt\u00e1n. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511614408"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_053_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c52Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00f6vecses, Zolt\u00e1n. 2010. Metaphor, language, and culture. DELTA: Documenta\u00e7\u00e3o de Estudos em Ling\u00fc\u00edstica Te\u00f3rica e Aplicada 26. 739\u2013757. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/s0102-44502010000300017.","DOI":"10.1590\/S0102-44502010000300017"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_054_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c53Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kovecses, Zoltan. 2015. Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Pres.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190224868.001.0001"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_055_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c54Aa","unstructured":"Labov, William & David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_056_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c55Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lascarides, Alex & Nicholas Asher. 2008. Segmented discourse representation theory: Dynamic semantics with discourse structure. In Harry Bunt & Reinhard Muskens (eds.), Computing meaning, 87\u2013124. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-5958-2_5"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_057_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c56Aa","unstructured":"Leech, Geoffrey. 1981. Semantics: The study of meaning. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_058_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c57Aa","unstructured":"Levinson, Stephen. 1992. Activity types and language. In Paul, Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 66\u2013100. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_059_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c58Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Levinson, Stephen. 2012. Action formation and ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 101\u2013130. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118325001.ch6"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_060_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c59Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi. 2017a. Understanding misunderstandings. Presuppositions and presumptions in doctor-patient chronic care consultations. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(1). 49\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2017-0003.","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2017-0003"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_061_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c60Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi. 2017b. Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues. Discourse Studies 19(2). 148\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1461445617691702.","DOI":"10.1177\/1461445617691702"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_062_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c61Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi. 2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication \u2013 Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context. Advance online publication.","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.18044.mac"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_063_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c62Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton. 2018. Practical reasoning arguments: A modular approach. Argumentation 32(4). 519\u2013547. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-018-9450-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-018-9450-5"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_064_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c63Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Maria Grazia Rossi. 2019. Metaphors and problematic understanding in chronic care communication. Journal of Pragmatics 151. 103\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2019.03.010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2019.03.010"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_065_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c64Aa","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Maria Grazia Rossi. Forthcoming, 2020. The communicative functions of metaphors between explanation and persuasion. In Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone (eds.), Inquiries in philosophical pragmatics. Theoretical developments. Cham, Switzerland: Springer."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_066_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c65Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Benedetta Zavatta. 2014. Reconstructing metaphorical meaning. Argumentation 28(4). 453\u2013488. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-014-9329-z.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-014-9329-z"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_067_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c66Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton & Christopher Tindale. 2017. Analogical arguments: Inferential structures and defeasibility conditions. Argumentation 31(2). 221\u2013243. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-016-9406-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-016-9406-6"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_068_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c67Aa","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017. The logical and pragmatic structure of arguments from analogy. Logique et Analyse 60(240). 465\u2013490. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2143\/LEA.240.0.3254093."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_069_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c68Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2018. Assessing relevance. Lingua 210\u2013211. 42\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lingua.2018.04.007.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lingua.2018.04.007"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_070_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c69Aa","unstructured":"Mel\u2019\u010duk, Igor & Lidija Iordanskaja. 2009. Connotation (in linguistic semantics). In Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds.), Die slavischen sprachen (ein internationales handbuch zu ihrer struktur, ihrer geschichte und ihrer erforschung), 875\u2013882. Berlin, Germany, and New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_071_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c70Aa","unstructured":"Mel\u2019\u010duk, Igor. 2015. Semantics: From meaning to text. Vol. 3. Amsterdam, Netherlands-Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_072_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c71Aa","unstructured":"Merin, Arthur. 1994. Algebra of elementary social acts. In Savas Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of speech act theory, 242\u2013272. London, UK: Routledge."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_073_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c72Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moran, Richard. 2017. Artifice and persuasion: The work of metaphor in the rhetoric. In Richard Moran (ed.), The philosophical imagination: Selected essays, 49\u201360. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190633776.003.0003"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_074_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c73Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Musolff, Andreas. 2015. Metaphor interpretation and cultural linguistics. Language and Semiotic Studies 1(3). 35\u201351.","DOI":"10.1515\/lass-2015-010303"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_075_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c74Aa","unstructured":"O\u2019Keefe, Daniel. 2004. Trends and prospects in persuasion theory and research. In Robert Gass & John Seiter (eds.), Readings in persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining, 31\u201343. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_076_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c75Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ortony, Andrew. 1975. Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory 25(1). 45\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_077_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c76Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oswald, Steve & Alain Rihs. 2014. Metaphor as argument: Rhetorical and epistemic advantages of extended metaphors. Argumentation 28(2). 133\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-013-9304-0.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-013-9304-0"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_078_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c77Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ottati, Victor & Randall Renstrom. 2010. Metaphor and persuasive communication: A multifunctional approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(9). 783\u2013794. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1751-9004.2010.00292.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-9004.2010.00292.x"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_079_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c78Aa","unstructured":"Pilkington, Adrian. 2000. Poetic effects: A relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam, Netherlands-Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_080_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c79Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Read, Stephen J, Ian L. Cesa, David K. Jones & Nancy L. Collins. 1990. When is the federal budget like a baby? Metaphor in political rhetoric. Metaphor and Symbol 5(3). 125\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327868ms0503_1.","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327868ms0503_1"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_081_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c80Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. On understanding poetic metaphor. Poetics. Elsevier 5(4). 383\u2013402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0304-422x(76)90017-6.","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-422X(76)90017-6"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_082_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c81Aa","unstructured":"Ricoeur, Paul. 1976. Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_083_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c82Aa","unstructured":"Rossi, Maria Grazia, Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi. Submitted. Dialogical functions of metaphors in medical communication."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_084_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c83Aa","unstructured":"Rossi, Maria Grazia. 2016. Metaphors for patient education. A pragmatic-argumentative approach applying to the case of diabetes care. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 10(2). 34\u201348."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_085_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c84Aa","unstructured":"Rychl\u00fd, Pavel. 2008. A lexicographer-friendly association score. In Petr Sojka & Ale\u0161 Hor\u00e1k (eds.), Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN, 6\u20139. Brno, Czech Republic: Masaryk University."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_086_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c85Aa","unstructured":"Sanders, Robert. 1987. Cognitive foundations of calculated speech: Controlling understandings in conversation and persuasion. Albany, NY: Suny Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_087_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c86Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanders, Robert. 2013. The duality of speaker meaning: What makes self-repair, insincerity, and sarcasm possible. Journal of Pragmatics 48(1). 112\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.11.020.Get.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.11.020"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_088_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c87Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Santib\u00e1\u00f1ez, Cristi\u00e1n. 2010. Metaphors and argumentation: The case of Chilean parliamentarian media participation. Journal of Pragmatics. Elsevier 42(4). 973\u2013989. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2009.08.019.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2009.08.019"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_089_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c88Aa","unstructured":"Schiappa, Edward. 2003. Defining reality. Definitions and the politics of meaning. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_090_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c89Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Semino, Elena, Zs\u00f3fia Demj\u00e9n, Jane Demmen, Veronika Koller, Sheila Payne, Andrew Hardie & Rayson Paul. 2015. The online use of violence and journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ supportive & palliative care 7(1). 60\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjspcare-2014-000785.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjspcare-2014-000785"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_091_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c90Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Semino, Elena, Zs\u00f3fia Demj\u00e9n & Jane Demmen. 2016. An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics 39(5). 625\u2013645. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/applin\/amw028.","DOI":"10.1093\/applin\/amw028"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_092_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c91Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Semino, Elena. 2008a. Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511816802.015"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_093_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c92Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Semino, Elena. 2008b. Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, vol. 280, 463\u2013476. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316339732.029"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_094_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c93Aa","unstructured":"Sinclair, Michael & Malcolm Coulthard. 1992. Towards an analysis of discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis, 1\u201334. London, UK: Routledge."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_095_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c94Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sopory, Pradeep & James Price Dillard. 2002. The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research 28(3). 382\u2013419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hcr\/28.3.382.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_096_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c95Aa","unstructured":"Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_097_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c96Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 2008. A deflationary account of metaphors. In Gibbs Raymond (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 84\u2013106. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511816802.007"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_098_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c97Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steen, Gerard. 2008. The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 23(4). 213\u2013241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10926480802426753.","DOI":"10.1080\/10926480802426753"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_099_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c98Aa","unstructured":"Stubbs, Michael. 1983. Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Vol. 4. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_100_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1c99Aa","unstructured":"Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_102_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d100Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_103_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d101Aa","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1989. Informal logic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_104_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d102Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1990a. What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy 87. 399\u2013419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2026735.","DOI":"10.2307\/2026735"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_105_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d103Aa","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1990b. Practical reasoning. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_106_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d104Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 2004. A new dialectical theory of explanation. Philosophical Explorations 7(1). 71\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1386979032000186863.","DOI":"10.1080\/1386979032000186863"},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_107_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d105Aa","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 2007. The speech act of clarification in a dialogue model. Studies in Communication Sciences 7(2). 165\u2013197."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_108_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d106Aa","unstructured":"Widdowson, Henry George. 1979. Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2023033119323429431_j_ip-2020-3004_ref_109_w2aab3b7c10b1b6b1ab2b1d107Aa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston. 2006. Metaphor, relevance and the \u201cemergent property\u201d issue. Mind and Language 21(3). 404\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00284.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00284.x"}],"container-title":["Intercultural Pragmatics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/view\/journals\/iprg\/17\/3\/article-p335.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/ip-2020-3004\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/ip-2020-3004\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,11]],"date-time":"2023-10-11T18:18:00Z","timestamp":1697048280000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/ip-2020-3004\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,1]]},"references-count":107,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,25]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/ip-2020-3004"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2020-3004","relation":{},"ISSN":["1613-365X","1612-295X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1613-365X","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1612-295X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,1]]}}}