{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]],"date-time":"2026-03-26T06:16:29Z","timestamp":1774505789902,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"1","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["SFRH\/BPD\/115073\/2016"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SFRH\/BPD\/115073\/2016"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["PTDC\/FER-FIL\/28278\/2017"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PTDC\/FER-FIL\/28278\/2017"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,27]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper proposes a method for analyzing the dialogical functions of metaphors in communicative interactions, and more specifically in the context of medical interviews. The dialogical goals proposed and pursued by the interlocutors are coded using a coding scheme that captures seven mutually exclusive categories of dialogical moves. The functions of the moves, including metaphors, can be identified and correlated with other variables relevant to the type of communication under analysis. The coding scheme is used to analyze a corpus of 39 interactions between healthcare providers and patients affected by Type 2 diabetes. The exploratory quantitative analysis, for the purpose of determining the different distributions of metaphor uses between patients and providers, is combined with qualitative analysis in which the thematic areas of the metaphors are considered. The findings show how patients and providers use metaphors for pursuing different dialogical goals and meeting distinct communicative needs.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1515\/text-2019-0166","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,12]],"date-time":"2021-11-12T09:29:42Z","timestamp":1636709382000},"page":"77-103","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Dialogical functions of metaphors in medical interactions"],"prefix":"10.1515","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4170-6336","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Grazia","family":"Rossi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Lisbon , Portugal"}]},{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Lisbon , Portugal"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Bigi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e0 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Milan , Italy"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allbritton, David W. 1995. When metaphors function as schemas: Some cognitive effects of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(1). 33\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327868ms1001_4.","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327868ms1001_4"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_002","unstructured":"Aristotle. 1991. Poetics. In Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, vol. II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_003","unstructured":"Bigi, Sarah. 2014. Healthy reasoning: The role of effective argumentation for enhancing elderly patients\u2019 self-management abilities in chronic care. In Giovanni Riva, Paolo Ajmone Marsan & Claudio Grassi (eds.), Active ageing and healthy living: A human centered approach in research and innovation as source of quality of life, 193\u2013203. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Black, Max. 1955. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 55. 273\u2013294. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aristotelian\/55.1.273.","DOI":"10.1093\/aristotelian\/55.1.273"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bleakley, Alan. 2017. Thinking with metaphors in medicine: The state of the art. New York: Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315389448"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen. 2016. Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory 26(4). 410\u2013430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/comt.12096.","DOI":"10.1111\/comt.12096"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_007","unstructured":"Cameron, Lynne. 2003. Metaphor in educational discourse. London, UK: Continuum."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Casarett, David, Amy Pickard, Jessica M. Fishman, Stewart C. Alexander, Robert M. Arnold, Kathryn I. Pollak & James A. Tulsky. 2010. Can metaphors and analogies improve communication with seriously ill patients? Journal of Palliative Medicine 13(3). 255\u2013260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/jpm.2009.0221.","DOI":"10.1089\/jpm.2009.0221"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chiang, Emily & Tim Grant. 2019. Deceptive identity performance: Offender moves and multiple identities in online child abuse conversations. Applied Linguistics 40(4). 675\u2013698. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/applin\/amy007.","DOI":"10.1093\/applin\/amy007"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.","DOI":"10.1075\/celcr.6"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deignan, Alice. 2010. The evaluative properties of metaphors. In Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan & Lynne Cameron (eds.), Researching and applying Metaphor in the real world, 357\u2013374. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.","DOI":"10.1075\/hcp.26.21dei"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_012","unstructured":"Demj\u00e9n, Zs\u00f3fia & Elena Semino. 2016. Using metaphor in healthcare: Physical health. In Semino Elena & Zs\u00f3fia Demj\u00e9n (eds.), Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 385\u2013399. New York: Routledge."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ervas, Francesca, Elisabetta Gola & Maria Grazia Rossi. 2018. Argumentation as a bridge between metaphor and reasoning. In Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman & J\u00e9r\u00f4me Jacquin (eds.), Argumentation and language \u2013 Linguistic, cognitive and discursive explorations, 153\u2013170. Cham: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-73972-4_7"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_014","unstructured":"Ervas, Francesca, Marcello Montibeller, Maria Grazia Rossi & Pietro Salis. 2016. Expertise and metaphors in health communication. Medicina & Storia 16(9\u201310). 91\u2013108."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ervas, Ervas, Francesca Maria Grazia Rossi, Amitash Ojha & Bipin Indurkhya. 2021. The double framing effect of emotive metaphors in argumentation. Frontiers in Psychology 12. 628460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.628460.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.628460"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2003. Polysemy and conceptual blending. In Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman & David Clarke (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 79\u201394. Berlin, Germany, and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110895698.79"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond. 1992. When is metaphor? The idea of understanding in theories of metaphor. Poetics Today 13(4). 575\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1773290.","DOI":"10.2307\/1773290"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbs, Raymond. 2006. Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language 21(3). 434\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_019","unstructured":"Goatly, Andrew. 2011. The language of metaphors. London, UK: Routledge."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_066","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics: Meaning in language and discourse. Harlow, UK: Pearson."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kilgarriff, Adam, V\u00edt Baisa, Bu\u0161ta Jan, Milo\u0161 Jakub\u00ed\u010dek, Vojt\u011bch Kov\u00e1\u0159, Michelfeit Jan, Pavel Rychl\u00fd & V\u00edt Suchomel. 2014. The Sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1). 7\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40607-014-0009-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s40607-014-0009-9"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_021","unstructured":"Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_022","unstructured":"Leech, Geoffrey. 1981. Semantics: The study of meaning. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2008. Dialectical relevance and dialogical context in Walton\u2019s pragmatic theory. Informal Logic 28(2). 102\u2013128. 10.22329\/il.v28i2.542.","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v28i2.542"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2020. How can metaphors communicate arguments? Intercultural Pragmatics 17(3). 335\u2013363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2020-3004.","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2020-3004"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi. 2017. Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues. Discourse Studies 19(2). 148\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1461445617691702.","DOI":"10.1177\/1461445617691702"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi. 2018. Types of dialogue and pragmatic ambiguity. In Steve Oswald, J\u00e9r\u00f4me Jacquin & Thierry Herman (eds.), Argumentation and language, 191\u2013218. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-73972-4_9"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi. 2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication\u00a0\u2013 Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9(2). 167\u2013198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/jaic.18044.mac.","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.18044.mac"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Maria Grazia Rossi. 2019. Metaphors and problematic understanding in chronic care communication. Journal of Pragmatics 151. 103\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2019.03.010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2019.03.010"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio & Maria Grazia Rossi. 2021. The communicative functions of metaphors between explanation and persuasion. In Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone (eds.), Inquiries in philosophical pragmatics. Theoretical developments, 171\u2013191. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-56437-7_12"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Naik, Aanand D., R. Teal Cayla, Elisa Rodriguez & Haidet Paul. 2011. Knowing the ABCs: A comparative effectiveness study of two methods of diabetes education. Patient Education and Counseling 85. 383\u2013389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pec.2011.01.010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2011.01.010"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1). 1\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10926480709336752.","DOI":"10.1080\/10926480709336752"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rapanta, Chrysi & Andri Christodoulou. 2019. Walton\u2019s types of argumentation dialogues as classroom discourse sequences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction Advance Online Publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lcsi.2019.100352, (Epub ahead of print).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lcsi.2019.100352"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_032","unstructured":"Rossi, Maria Grazia. 2016. Metaphors for patient education. A pragmatic-argumentative approach applying to the case of diabetes care. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 10(2). 34\u201348."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossi, Maria Grazia. 2021. Metaphors and persuasion in healthcare communication. Langages 222(2). 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/lang.222.0059.","DOI":"10.3917\/lang.222.0059"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossi, Maria Grazia & Fabrizio Macagno. 2020. Coding problematic understanding in patient\u2013provider interactions. Health Communication 35(12). 1487\u20131496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10410236.2019.1652384.","DOI":"10.1080\/10410236.2019.1652384"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Searle, John. 2002. Consciousness and language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511606366"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511816802.015"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Semino, Elena, Zs\u00f3fia Demj\u00e9n & Jane Demmen. 2016. An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics 39(5). 625\u2013645. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/applin\/amw028.","DOI":"10.1093\/applin\/amw028"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Semino, Elena, Zsofia Demjen, Andrew Hardie, Sheila Alison Payne & Paul Edward Rayson. 2018. Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. New York: Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315629834"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sopory, Pradeep & James Price Dillard. 2002. The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research 28(3). 382\u2013419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hcr\/28.3.38210.1111\/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_067","unstructured":"Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-J\u00f6rg Schmid. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Harlow, UK: Pearson."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Stee, Stephanie K. 2018. Meta-analysis of the persuasive effects of metaphorical vs. literal messages. Communication Studies 69(5). 545\u2013566. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10510974.2018.1457553.","DOI":"10.1080\/10510974.2018.1457553"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_041","unstructured":"Tay, Dennis. 2016. Using metaphor in healthcare: Mental health interventions. In Semino Elena & Zs\u00f3fia Demj\u00e9n (eds.), Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 371\u2013384. New York: Routledge."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_042","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1989. Informal logic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1999. Dialectical relevance in persuasion dialogue. Informal Logic 19. 119\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v19i2.2323.","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v19i2.2323"},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_044","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 2007. Dialogical models of explanation. In Homas Roth-Berghofer, Stefan Schulz, Daniel Bahls & David Leake (eds.), Explanation-aware computing, papers from the 2007 AAAI workshop, vol. 2007, 1\u20139. Menlo Park: AAAI Press."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_045","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 2010. Types of dialogue and burdens of proof. In Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin & Guillermo Simari (eds.), Computational models of argument (COMMA), 13\u201324. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press."},{"key":"2023040102361695650_j_text-2019-0166_ref_046","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas & Erik Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press."}],"container-title":["Text &amp; Talk"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/text-2019-0166\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/text-2019-0166\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,12]],"date-time":"2023-11-12T15:00:13Z","timestamp":1699801213000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/document\/doi\/10.1515\/text-2019-0166\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,11]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,27]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1515\/text-2019-0166"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/text-2019-0166","relation":{},"ISSN":["1860-7330","1860-7349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1860-7330","type":"print"},{"value":"1860-7349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,11]]}}}