{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T19:19:10Z","timestamp":1783451950816,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":65,"publisher":"Bioscientifica","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1783382400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":97,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.bioscientifica.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Good contraception care after pregnancy can remove barriers to accessing contraception and reduce future unintended pregnancy. While most methods can be started safely in the immediate post-pregnancy period, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, there are some specific considerations that may influence their use post-pregnancy. This review summarises the current evidence and recommendations around post-pregnancy contraception following abortion, childbirth and early pregnancy loss (miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and molar pregnancy), highlights practical considerations and identifies gaps for future research.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Lay summary<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Fertility can return very quickly following an abortion, childbirth or an early pregnancy loss. Without contraception, women can experience a pregnancy shortly after these episodes, which is often not what they intend. Having the opportunity to discuss future fertility plans and contraceptive options during these pregnancy episodes can empower women to start their chosen method of contraception early, reducing the need to attend appointments to do this later and the possibility of experiencing an unintended pregnancy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1530\/raf-25-0180","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T15:25:17Z","timestamp":1777389917000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1530\/crossmarkpolicy-13","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Post-pregnancy contraception"],"prefix":"10.1530","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3367-3749","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Michelle","family":"Cooper","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"1"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7184-9165","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Helena Kopp","family":"Kallner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"2"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"416","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.02.045","article-title":"Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"223","author":"Averbach","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e380","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(18)30029-9","article-title":"Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model","volume":"6","author":"Bearak","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet Global Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200970","article-title":"Intendedness of pregnancies and preconception contraceptive use in women of Swedish and non-European origins seeking emergency care in early pregnancy","volume":"48","author":"Bergman","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14792","article-title":"Contraceptive uptake and compliance after structured contraceptive counseling-secondary outcomes of the LOWE trial","volume":"103","author":"Bizjak","year":"2024","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.04.019","article-title":"Comparative safety and efficacy of a dedicated postpartum IUD inserter versus forceps for immediate postpartum IUD insertion: a randomized trial","volume":"98","author":"Blumenthal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2020.07.013","article-title":"Contraception provision in the postpartum period: knowledge, views and practices of midwives","volume":"34","author":"Botfield","year":"2021","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2020.1815006","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences of accessing postpartum intrauterine contraception in a public maternity setting: a qualitative service evaluation","volume":"25","author":"Boydell","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1074","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03407.x","article-title":"Effect of contraception provided at termination of pregnancy and incidence of subsequent termination of pregnancy","volume":"119","author":"Cameron","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2009","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14674","article-title":"Feasibility and acceptability of introducing routine antenatal contraceptive counselling and provision of contraception after delivery: the APPLES pilot evaluation","volume":"124","author":"Cameron","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.10.008","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences with immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a mixed-methods study","volume":"97","author":"Carr","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1809","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.295.15.1809","article-title":"Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis","volume":"295","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2006","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13787","article-title":"Provision of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraception after vaginal birth within a public maternity setting: health services research evaluation","volume":"99","author":"Cooper","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2024.2383953","article-title":"Postpartum contraception provision across Europe: preliminary findings from a multi country survey","volume":"29","author":"Cooper","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2024-202479","article-title":"Acceptability of digital health intervention during pregnancy to inform women about postpartum contraception (DIGICAP): a pilot randomised controlled study","volume":"51","author":"Cooper","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14733","article-title":"Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery","volume":"46","author":"Dias","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2022.2085680","article-title":"Uptake of long-acting reversible contraception after telemedicine delivered abortion during Covid-19","volume":"27","author":"Dixon","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004846","article-title":"The 13.5-mg, 19.5-mg, and 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems and risk of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"140","author":"Elgemark","year":"2022","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib18","first-page":"e15","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"123","author":"Elson","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1546","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16754","article-title":"Increasing uptake of long-acting reversible contraception with structured contraceptive counselling: cluster randomised controlled trial (the LOWE trial)","volume":"128","author":"Emtell Iwarsson","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2044","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14243","article-title":"Evaluation of satisfaction with a model of structured contraceptive counseling: results from the LOWE trial","volume":"100","author":"Envall","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib21","volume-title":"Contraception After Pregnancy Guideline","author":"Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","year":"2017"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2024.110362","article-title":"Longitudinal impact of a residency-based postplacental levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion program: expulsion rates in years 1, 2, and 3","volume":"132","author":"Free","year":"2024","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2022-201718","article-title":"Understanding women\u2019s views of and preferences for accessing postpartum contraception: a qualitative evidence synthesis","volume":"49","author":"Freeman-Spratt","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(96)00040-6","article-title":"Who gives advice about postpartum contraception?","volume":"53","author":"Glasier","year":"1996","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.015","article-title":"Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective?","volume":"211","author":"Han","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.03.013","article-title":"Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion","volume":"78","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101165","article-title":"Postpartum contraception: a missed opportunity to prevent unintended pregnancy and short inter-pregnancy intervals","volume":"42","author":"Heller","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1144","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13178","article-title":"Routine provision of intrauterine contraception at elective cesarean section in a national public health service: a service evaluation","volume":"96","author":"Heller","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2484","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew238","article-title":"Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion - a randomized controlled equivalence trial","volume":"31","author":"Hognert","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2021-201265","article-title":"Long-acting reversible contraception and satisfaction with structured contraceptive counselling among non-migrant, foreign-born migrant and second-generation migrant women: evidence from a cluster randomised controlled trial (the LOWE trial) in Sweden","volume":"48","author":"Emtell Iwarsson","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ce18c","article-title":"Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review","volume":"117","author":"Jackson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.009","article-title":"Patients' attitudes and experiences related to receiving contraception during abortion care","volume":"84","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12874","article-title":"Likelihood of repeat abortion in a Swedish cohort according to the choice of post-abortion contraception: a longitudinal study","volume":"95","author":"Kilander","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.01.017","article-title":"Systemic hormonal contraception initiation after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Kim","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2020.1718091","article-title":"Risk of abortion within 1\u20132 years after childbirth in relation to contraceptive choice: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"25","author":"Lichtenstein Liljeblad","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14331","article-title":"Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: an open-label, randomized, multicenter study","volume":"101","author":"Lichtenstein Liljeblad","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib37","article-title":"Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception","volume":"2015","author":"Lopez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2015-101198","article-title":"Views of general practitioners on providing contraceptive advice and long-acting reversible contraception at the 6-week postnatal visit: a qualitative study","volume":"42","author":"Lunniss","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12600","article-title":"FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: complication rates across six countries","volume":"143","author":"Makins","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2013-100770","article-title":"Midwives\u2019 experiences and views of giving postpartum contraceptive advice and providing long-acting reversible contraception: a qualitative study","volume":"40","author":"McCance","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12166","article-title":"Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth?","volume":"120","author":"McDonald","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255666.78427.c5","article-title":"Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes","volume":"109","author":"Mohllajee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2022-201480","article-title":"Views of clinicians towards providing contraceptive advice and contraception to women following early pregnancy loss: a qualitative study","volume":"48","author":"Narayanan","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2020.1726887","article-title":"Contraceptive use at the time of and after an ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"25","author":"Nordstr\u00f6m","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.5694\/mja2.52438","article-title":"General practitioners\u2019 views and experiences of postpartum contraception counselling and provision: a qualitative\u2013descriptive study","volume":"221","author":"Perkins","year":"2024","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.05.016","article-title":"Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women","volume":"72","author":"Ogburn","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.010","article-title":"Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review","volume":"94","author":"Phillips","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001627","article-title":"Effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection timing on medical abortion efficacy and repeat pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"128","author":"Raymond","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001274","article-title":"Effect of immediate compared with delayed insertion of etonogestrel implants on medical abortion efficacy and repeat pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"127","author":"Raymond","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2024-202391","article-title":"A post-abortion contraception text-and-call service to support patients to access effective contraception after telemedicine abortion","volume":"51","author":"Reynolds-Wright","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1611","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13944","article-title":"Information on early medical abortion for women using an audiovisual animation vs face-to-face consultation: a consortium randomized and quasi-randomized trial","volume":"99","author":"Reynolds-Wright","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37-e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.102","article-title":"Impact of long-acting reversible contraception on return for repeat abortion","volume":"206","author":"Rose","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz040","article-title":"Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: systematic review with meta-analyses","volume":"26","author":"Schmidt-Hansen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.013","article-title":"Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol","volume":"84","author":"Schreiber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2014.971454","article-title":"Intrauterine device insertion in the postpartum period: a systematic review","volume":"20","author":"Sonalkar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.07.008","article-title":"Administration of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant on the day of mifepristone for medical abortion: a pilot study","volume":"88","author":"Sonalkar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib57","article-title":"Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception","volume":"2017","author":"Sothornwit","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2021.5688","article-title":"Association of Medicaid reimbursement for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception with infant birth outcomes","volume":"176","author":"Steenland","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.05.006","article-title":"Combined hormonal contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: an updated systematic review","volume":"94","author":"Tepper","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2018-200078","article-title":"Immediate postnatal contraception: what women know and think","volume":"45","author":"Thwaites","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.04.015","article-title":"Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?","volume":"206","author":"Tocce","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.09.032","article-title":"Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"103","author":"Washington","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)62071-1","article-title":"The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal-3)","volume":"382","author":"Wellings","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib64","volume-title":"Report of a WHO Technical Consultation on Birth Spacing","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2006"},{"key":"2026070714151279000_bib65","volume-title":"Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2025","edition":"6th edn"}],"container-title":["Reproduction and Fertility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/raf.bioscientifica.com\/view\/journals\/raf\/7\/2\/RAF-25-0180.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/raf.bioscientifica.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/raf\/7\/2\/RAF-25-0180.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.bioscientifica.com\/raf\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1530\/RAF-25-0180\/521424\/raf-25-0180.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.bioscientifica.com\/raf\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1530\/RAF-25-0180\/521424\/raf-25-0180.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T18:16:43Z","timestamp":1783448203000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.bioscientifica.com\/raf\/article\/7\/2\/RAF250180\/77655\/Post-pregnancy-contraception"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"references-count":65,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1530\/raf-25-0180","relation":{},"ISSN":["2633-8386"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2633-8386","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]]},"article-number":"RAF250180"}}