{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T18:18:59Z","timestamp":1783448339596,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Bioscientifica","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781481600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":165,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.bioscientifica.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Ultrasonography remains an important component of abortion care, as it does in early pregnancy in general. We propose that selective use of ultrasonography, in line with World Health Organization recommendations, allows clinicians and services to maximise the advantages of peri-abortion ultrasound while minimising the impact of the disadvantages of the technology. Patient preferences should be prioritised where possible and safe to do so.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Lay summary<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Ultrasound scanning before, during, or after an abortion can be helpful to guide patient care. However, using this for all patients in all scenarios can lead to problems with inappropriate diagnosis or over-diagnosis of conditions and complications. We recommend that ultrasound scanning be used only when needed and guided by evidence-based guidelines and protocols, in line with the World Health Organization.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1530\/raf-25-0190","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]],"date-time":"2026-02-18T14:12:26Z","timestamp":1771423946000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1530\/crossmarkpolicy-13","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Advantages and disadvantages of peri-abortion ultrasonography"],"prefix":"10.1530","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6597-1666","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"John J","family":"Reynolds-Wright","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"1"},{"name":"2"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1168-2276","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sharon T","family":"Cameron","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1"},{"name":"2"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"416","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1464","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16668","article-title":"Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study","volume":"128","author":"Aiken","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-3088-1","article-title":"Expectant versus surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a randomised controlled study","volume":"289","author":"Al-Ma\u2019ani","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12679","article-title":"Use of an at-home multilevel pregnancy test and an automated call-in system to follow-up the outcome of medical abortion","volume":"144","author":"Anger","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2023-202116","article-title":"Patient experiences of undergoing abortion with and without an ultrasound scan in Britain","volume":"50","author":"Blaylock","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1752","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16813","article-title":"Women\u2019s experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation","volume":"128","author":"Boydell","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1760117","article-title":"Medical abortion before confirmed intrauterine pregnancy: a systematic review","volume":"40","author":"Brandell","year":"2022","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1685","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa2401646","article-title":"Randomized trial of very early medication abortion","volume":"391","author":"Brandell","year":"2024","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1989.8.2.71","article-title":"Routine intraoperative ultrasonography for second trimester abortion reduces incidence of uterine perforation","volume":"8","author":"Darney","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200888","article-title":"Utility of a routine ultrasound for detection of ectopic pregnancies amongst women requesting abortion: a retrospective review","volume":"48","author":"Duncan","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.122","article-title":"Uterine structural abnormality and intrauterine device malposition: analysis of ultrasonographic and demographic variables of 517 patients","volume":"220","author":"Gerkowicz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.02.015","article-title":"Outcomes of medical abortion through 63 days in women with twin gestations","volume":"84","author":"Hayes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.01.011","article-title":"Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices","volume":"91","author":"Heinemann","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005675","article-title":"Self-determination of eligibility for medication abortion without ultrasonography using a history-based tool: LMP-SURE","volume":"144","author":"Kerestes","year":"2024","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(08)31388-3","article-title":"Surgical abortion in the second trimester","volume":"16","author":"Lohr","year":"2008","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348509156360","article-title":"The disappearance of human chorionic gonadotropin from plasma and urine following induced abortion. Disappearance of HCG after induced abortion","volume":"64","author":"van der Lugt","year":"1985","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.073","article-title":"Gestational trophoblastic disease I: epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, and management of hydatidiform mole","volume":"203","author":"Lurain","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib17","first-page":"1","article-title":"Outcomes of medical abortion with an intrauterine device in situ: a retrospective review","volume":"31","author":"Marsh","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13731","article-title":"Telephone follow-up after early medical abortion using Australia\u2019s first low sensitivity urine pregnancy test","volume":"63","author":"Melville","year":"2023","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2014.01.010","article-title":"Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test","volume":"89","author":"Michie","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2017-101868","article-title":"Comparison of two low-sensitivity urine pregnancy tests for confirming the success of early medical abortion","volume":"44","author":"Millar","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib21","volume-title":"Abortion Care","author":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence","year":"2019","edition":"NG140 edn"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13877","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update","volume":"155","author":"Ngan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2025.110865","article-title":"Society of family planning clinical recommendation: management of undesired pregnancy of unknown location and abortion at less than 42 days of gestation","volume":"150","author":"Nippita","year":"2025","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00193.x","article-title":"Correlation between self-reported gestational age and ultrasound measurements","volume":"83","author":"Olesen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005016","article-title":"No-test medication abortion: a systematic review","volume":"141","author":"Pearlman Shapiro","year":"2023","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.09.010","article-title":"World Federation for ultrasound in medicine review paper: incidental findings during obstetrical ultrasound","volume":"48","author":"Petousis","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.11.1373","article-title":"Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion","volume":"226","author":"Ralph","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2020.04.005","article-title":"Commentary: no-test medication abortion: a sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond","volume":"101","author":"Raymond","year":"2020","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.02.004","article-title":"\u201cFalse positive\u201d urine pregnancy test results after successful medication abortion","volume":"103","author":"Raymond","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200672","article-title":"Troublesome bleeding following early medical abortion","volume":"47","author":"Reynolds-Wright","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200976","article-title":"Telemedicine medical abortion at home under 12 weeks\u2019 gestation: a prospective observational cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic","volume":"47","author":"Reynolds-Wright","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib32","article-title":"Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and abortion care: information for healthcare professionals","volume-title":"Clinical Guideline","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2020"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib33","article-title":"Best practice in telemedicine for abortion care","volume-title":"Best Practice Paper","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2022"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.conx.2024.100110","article-title":"Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15\u201324 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"6","author":"Sium","year":"2024","journal-title":"Contraception X"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fgwh.2022.811412","article-title":"Introducing the dilation and evacuation technique in Brazil: lessons learned from an international partnership to expand options for Brazilian women and girls","volume":"3","author":"Stifani","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Glob Womens Health"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000006031","article-title":"Dating discrepancies on research ultrasonography and risk of pregnancy loss in a prospective cohort","volume":"146","author":"Sundermann","year":"2025","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2022.0217","article-title":"Outcomes and safety of history-based screening for medication abortion: a retrospective multicenter cohort study","volume":"182","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"key":"2026070714045988000_bib38","article-title":"Abortion care guideline","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2022"}],"container-title":["Reproduction and Fertility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/raf.bioscientifica.com\/view\/journals\/raf\/7\/1\/RAF-25-0190.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/raf.bioscientifica.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/raf\/7\/1\/RAF-25-0190.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.bioscientifica.com\/raf\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1530\/RAF-25-0190\/507700\/raf-25-0190.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.bioscientifica.com\/raf\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1530\/RAF-25-0190\/507700\/raf-25-0190.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T18:05:08Z","timestamp":1783447508000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.bioscientifica.com\/raf\/article\/7\/1\/RAF250190\/75786\/Advantages-and-disadvantages-of-peri-abortion"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1530\/raf-25-0190","relation":{},"ISSN":["2633-8386"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2633-8386","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]]},"article-number":"RAF250190"}}