{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,9]],"date-time":"2026-07-09T21:08:04Z","timestamp":1783631284443,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective.We undertook a survey of all practicing neonatologists in New England to determine their attitudes and practices regarding prenatal consultations for infants at the border of viability.<\/jats:p>\n               <jats:p>Methods.A self-administered anonymous survey, mailed to every practicing neonatologist in the 6 Northeast states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont, explored respondent attitudes and practices with respect to a hypothetical clinical scenario of a prenatal consultation for an infant at the border of viability.<\/jats:p>\n               <jats:p>Results.Our final sample included 149 surveys from 175 eligible neonatologists, giving a response rate of 85%. Seventy-seven percent of respondents indicated that they thought neonatologists and parents should make the decision jointly to withhold resuscitation. Only 40% indicated that the decision actually is made by both parties. A majority of neonatologists (58%) saw their primary role during the prenatal consultation as providing factual information to the parents. Far fewer (27%) thought that their main role was to assist the parents in weighing the risks and benefits of various management options. A majority of respondents indicated that parental understanding of the mother's current medical situation (96%), desired parental role (77%), and parental prior experience with premature or handicapped children (64%) were frequently or always discussed. However, far fewer respondents reported frequently or always asking about parental interpretations of a \u201cgood quality of life\u201d (42%), parental prior experiences with death or dying (30%), and parental religious or spiritual beliefs (25%). Short-term outcomes and complications such as the need for surfactant\/respiratory distress syndrome (89%) and the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (81%) were discussed more extensively than long-term outcomes such as motor delays or cerebral palsy (68%), cognitive delays or learning disabilities (63%), and chronic lung disease (61%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed 2 characteristics that were significant predictors of shared decision-making for the final decision regarding resuscitation in the delivery room for extremely premature infants, ie, believing that the main role of the neonatologist during prenatal consultations is to help parents weigh the risks and benefits of each resuscitation option (odds ratio: 4.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.6\u201310.9) and having &amp;gt;10 years of clinical experience (odds ratio: 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.5\u20138.8).<\/jats:p>\n               <jats:p>Conclusions.Overall, our results showed that neonatologists are quite consistent in discussing clinical issues but quite varied in discussing social and ethical issues. If neonatologists are to perform complete prenatal consultations for infants at the border of viability as described by the latest American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, then they will be expected to address quality-of-life values more robustly, to explain long-term outcomes, and to incorporate parental preferences during their conversations. Potential barriers to shared decision-making have yet to be outlined.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2004-1427","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,2]],"date-time":"2005-08-02T14:55:38Z","timestamp":1122994538000},"page":"407-413","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":104,"title":["Prenatal Consultation Practices at the Border of Viability: A Regional Survey"],"prefix":"10.1542","volume":"116","author":[{"given":"Tara K.","family":"Bastek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Newborn Medicine Program"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Douglas K.","family":"Richardson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Newborn Medicine Program"},{"name":"Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John A.F.","family":"Zupancic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Newborn Medicine Program"},{"name":"Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey P.","family":"Burns","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"417","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021121003172775100_R1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Stevenson DK, et al. Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, May 1991 through December 1992. Am J Obstet Gynecol.\u20081995;173:1423\u20131431","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90628-2"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, et al. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991\u20131999. Pediatrics.\u20082002;110:143\u2013151","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.110.1.143"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996: NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics.\u20082001;107(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org\/cgi\/content\/full\/107\/1\/e1","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.107.1.e1"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993\u20131994. Pediatrics.\u20082000;105:1216\u20131226","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.105.6.1216"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Duff RS, Campbell AG. Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery. N Engl J Med.\u20081973;289:890\u2013894","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197310252891705"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doroshow RW, Hodgman JE, Pomerance JJ, et al. Treatment decisions for newborns at the threshold of viability: an ethical dilemma. J Perinatol.\u20082000;20:379\u2013383","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7200010"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Finer NN, Barrington KJ. Decision-making in delivery room resuscitation: a team sport. Pediatrics.\u20081998;102:644\u2013645","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.102.3.644"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Campbell DE, Fleischman AR. Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers. Am J Perinatol.\u20082001;18:117\u2013128","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2001-14530"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paris JJ, Reardon F. Bad cases make bad law: HCA v. Miller is not a guide for resuscitation of extremely premature newborns. J Perinatol.\u20082001;21:541\u2013544","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7210610"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Montalvo N, Vila BP. Parent's grand rounds speech on neonatal intensive care unit experience. J Perinatol.\u20081999;19:525\u2013527","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7200266"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harrison H. The principles for family-centered neonatal care. Pediatrics.\u20081993;92:643\u2013650","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.92.5.643"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hurst I. Providing information to parents of extremely premature newborns. JAMA.\u20082002;287:41\u201342","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.1.41"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saigal S, Burrows E, Stoskopf BL, Rosenbaum PL, Streiner D. Impact of extreme prematurity on families of adolescent children. J Pediatr.\u20082000;137:701\u2013706","DOI":"10.1067\/mpd.2000.109001"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R14","unstructured":"US District Court Middle District of Georgia. Parham v J.R., June 20, 1979. US Rep.\u20081979;442:584\u2013639"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fleischman AR, Nolan K, Dubler NN, et al. Caring for gravely ill children. Pediatrics.\u20081994;94:433\u2013439","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.94.4.433"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R16","unstructured":"Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001:xi"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paris JJ, DeLisser HM, Savani RC. Ending innovative therapy for infants at the margins of viability: case of twins H. J Perinatol.\u20082000;20:251\u2013256","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7200348"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MacDonald H. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics.\u20082002;110:1024\u20131027","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.110.5.1024"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul DA, Epps S, Leef KH, Stefano JL. Prenatal consultation with a neonatologist prior to preterm delivery. J Perinatol.\u20082001;21:431\u2013437","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7210559"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Partridge JC, Freeman H, Weiss E, Martinez AM. Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely low birthweight infants in California. J Perinatol.\u20082001;21:27\u201333","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7200477"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wall SN, Partridge JC. Death in the intensive care nursery: physician practice of withdrawing and withholding life support. Pediatrics.\u20081997;99:64\u201370","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.99.1.64"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doron MW, Veness-Meehan KA, Margolis LH, Holoman EM, Stiles AD. Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely premature infants. Pediatrics.\u20081998;102:574\u2013582","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.102.3.574"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R23","unstructured":"Sanders MR, Donohue PK, Oberdorf MA, Rosenkrantz TS, Allen MC. Perceptions of the limit of viability: neonatologists' attitudes toward extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol.\u20081995;15:494\u2013502"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA.\u20081992;267:2221\u20132226","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.267.16.2221"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med.\u20081997;44:681\u2013692","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(96)00221-3"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med.\u20081999;49:651\u2013661","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(99)00145-8"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?BMJ.\u20081999;319:780\u2013782","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7212.780"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roter DL, Larson S, Fischer GS, Arnold RM, Tulsky JA. Experts practice what they preach: a descriptive study of best and normative practices in end-of-life discussions. Arch Intern Med.\u20082000;160:3477\u20133485","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.160.22.3477"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wenrich MD, Curtis JR, Shannon SE, Carline JD, Ambrozy DM, Ramsey PG. Communicating with dying patients within the spectrum of medical care from terminal diagnosis to death. Arch Intern Med.\u20082001;161:868\u2013874","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.161.6.868"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns JP, Mitchell C, Griffith JL, Truog RD. End-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit: attitudes and practices of pediatric critical care physicians and nurses. Crit Care Med.\u20082001;29:658\u2013664","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-200103000-00036"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, et al. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill: Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. JAMA.\u20081995;273:703\u2013708","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.273.9.703"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ballard DW, Li Y, Evans J, Ballard RA, Ubel PA. Fear of litigation may increase resuscitation of infants born near the limits of viability. J Pediatr.\u20082002;140:713\u2013718","DOI":"10.1067\/mpd.2002.124184"},{"key":"2021121003172775100_R33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zupancic JA, Kirpalani H, Barrett J, et al. Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.\u20082002;87:F113\u2013F117","DOI":"10.1136\/fn.87.2.F113"}],"container-title":["Pediatrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article-pdf\/116\/2\/407\/1004616\/zpe00805000407.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article-pdf\/116\/2\/407\/1004616\/zpe00805000407.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,10]],"date-time":"2021-12-10T09:50:24Z","timestamp":1639129824000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article\/116\/2\/407\/62881\/Prenatal-Consultation-Practices-at-the-Border-of"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,1]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.2004-1427","relation":{},"ISSN":["0031-4005","1098-4275"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0031-4005","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-4275","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,8,1]]}}}