{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T13:11:37Z","timestamp":1746709897146,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>OBJECTIVE. As newborn screening (NBS) programs expand to include conditions that challenge traditional public health criteria, little is known about what influences physicians' attitudes toward screening. We examined the effect of state policy and perceived state policy on pediatricians' attitudes toward screening.<\/jats:p><jats:p>METHODS. Six hundred pediatricians from the American Academy of Pediatrics who practiced in Wisconsin, Colorado, Florida, or Illinois were queried about (1) testing high-risk infants and (2) universal NBS for cystic fibrosis (CF), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD), and type 1 diabetes.<\/jats:p><jats:p>RESULTS. A total of 225 (41%) of 548 eligible pediatricians returned 223 surveys with usable data. The majority were supportive of NBS for CF (n = 188 [84%]) and G6PD (n = 130 [58%]), whereas only 25% (n = 55) supported type 1 diabetes screening. Pediatricians who lived in states that screen for a condition were more likely to support screening than those who lived in states that did not (CF: 117 of 119 [98%] vs 71 of 89 [80%]; type 1 diabetes: 32 of 88 [36%] vs 23 of 109 [21%]). Physicians also were more likely to support NBS when they believed that it was offered in their state versus when they believed that it was not (CF: 117 of 119 [98%] vs 52 of 65 [80%]; G6PD: 28 of 32 [88%] vs 75 of 108 [69%]; type 1 diabetes: 7 of 14 [50%] vs 25 of 102 [25%]).<\/jats:p><jats:p>CONCLUSIONS. Most pediatricians are supportive of NBS for CF and G6PD but not type 1 diabetes. Pediatricians who live in states that screen or believe that their states screen are more likely to support screening.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2005-1990","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]],"date-time":"2006-05-01T17:22:05Z","timestamp":1146504125000},"page":"1477-1485","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Does Familiarity Breed Acceptance? The Influence of Policy on Physicians' Attitudes Toward Newborn Screening Programs"],"prefix":"10.1542","volume":"117","author":[{"given":"Joy","family":"Koopmans","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lainie Friedman","family":"Ross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics and MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"417","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021120823245769600_R1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stoddard JJ, Farrell PM. State-to-state variations in newborn screening policies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.\u20081997;151:561\u2013564","DOI":"10.1001\/archpedi.1997.02170430027005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R2","unstructured":"Stephen T, Lam S, Pang CCP. Neonatal and Perinatal Screening. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1997"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Elliman DA, Dezateux C, Bedford HE. Newborn and childhood screening programmes: criteria, evidence, and current policy. Arch Dis Child.\u20082002;87:6\u20139","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.87.1.6"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R4","unstructured":"Webster D; Joint Newborn Screening Committee, Human Genetics Society of Australasia; Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Newborn screening in Australia and New Zealand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health.\u20082003;34(suppl 3):69\u201370"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R5","unstructured":"Wilson JMG, Jungner F. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1968. Public Health Papers, No. 34"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R6","unstructured":"Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders and Genetic Diseases in Newborns and Children. Minutes of Second Meeting, September 22 and 23, 2004. Available at: www.mchb.hrsa.gov\/programs\/genetics\/committee\/2ndmeeting.htm. Accessed October 15, 2005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R7","unstructured":"March of Dimes Statement on Newborn Screening Report; September 2004. Available at: search.marchofdimes.com\/cgi-bin\/MsmGo.exe?grab_id=633&page_id=10289920&query=acmg+report&hiword=REPORTABLE+REPORTED+REPORTER+REPORTERS+REPORTING+REPORTS+acmg+report+. Accessed October 15, 2005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R8","unstructured":"American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)\/Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system. Available at: ftp:\/\/ftp.hrsa.gov\/mchb\/genetics\/screeningdraftforcomment.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R9","unstructured":"AAP Endorses Newborn Screening Report from the American College of Medical Genetics; May 12, 2005. Available at: www.aap.org\/advocacy\/releases\/mayscreening.htm. Accessed October 15, 2005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Acharya K, Ackerman PD, Ross LF. Pediatricians' attitudes toward expanding newborn screening. Pediatrics.\u20082005;116(4). Available at: pediatrics.aappublications.org\/cgi\/reprint\/116\/4\/e476","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2005-0453"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilfond BS, Gollust SE. Policy issues for expanding newborn screening programs: the cystic fibrosis newborn screening experience in the United States. J Pediatr.\u20082005;146:668\u2013674","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2004.11.029"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rewers M, Norris JM, Eisenbarth GS, et al. Beta-cell autoantibodies in infants and toddlers without IDDM relatives: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY). J Autoimmun.\u20081996;9:405\u2013410","DOI":"10.1006\/jaut.1996.0055"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greener M. PANDA identifies babies at risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Mol Med Today.\u20082000;6:3","DOI":"10.1016\/S1357-4310(99)01625-1"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R14","unstructured":"National Newborn Screening Status Report. Last updated 10\/13\/05. Available at: genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu\/nbsdisorders.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R15","unstructured":"Waldholz M. Expanded newborn testing is urged. Wall Street Journal. September 21, 2004:D05"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R16","unstructured":"McCullough M. A lifesaver for little ones. Philadelphia Inquirer. September 6, 2004:E01"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R17","unstructured":"Kolata G. Panel to advise tests on babies for 29 diseases. New York Times. February 21, 2005:A01, A14"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R18","unstructured":"Brink S. Rare but deadly: some simple, cheap blood tests could save thousands of kids' lives every year. US News World Rep.\u20082005;138(20):44\u201346"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R19","unstructured":"Saving babies lives [commentary[. Rocky Mountain News. November 20, 2004:14C"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R20","unstructured":"Associated Press. State seeks expanded health screening for newborns. Colorado Springs, CO: January 1, 2005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R21","unstructured":"Denver AK. Agencies make wish lists: more tests for newborns among legislative proposals\u2014state officials hope to make improvements, but another tight budget year looms for Colorado. The Denver Post. November 25, 2004:B02"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R22","unstructured":"Associated Press. State to expand genetic disease testing in newborns. St Petersburg, FL: January 31, 2005"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R23","unstructured":"Greene L. Newborn blood to tell more. St Petersburg Times. January 31, 2005:B01"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bradley D, Parsons E. Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Semin Neonatol.\u20081998;3:27\u201334","DOI":"10.1016\/S1084-2756(98)80146-2"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O'Connor KS, MacDonald SE, Hartling L, et al. The influence of prevalence and policy on the likelihood that a physician will offer HIV screening in pregnancy. Can J Public Health.\u20082002;93:31\u201335","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03404414"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kopelman LM, Kopelman AE, Irons TG. Neonatologists, pediatricians, and the Supreme Court criticize the \u201cBaby Doe\u201d regulations. In: Caplan AL, Blank RH, Merrick JC, eds. Compelled Compassion: Government Intervention in the Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc; 1992:237\u2013266","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-0409-1_9"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Todres ID, Guillemin J, Grodin MA, Batten D. Life-saving therapy for newborns: a questionnaire survey in the state of Massachusetts. Pediatrics.\u20081988;81:643\u2013649","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.81.5.643"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Todres ID, Guillemin J, Catlin EA, Marlow A, Nordstrom A. Moral and ethical dilemmas in critically ill newborns: a 20-year follow-up survey of Massachusetts pediatricians. J Perinatol.\u20082000;1:6\u201312","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7200297"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R29","unstructured":"Grosse SD, Boyle CA, Botkin JR, et al; CDC. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs. MMWR Recomm Rep.\u20082004;53:1\u201336"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilfond BS, Thomson EJ. Models of public health genetic policy development. In: Khoury M, Burke W, Thomson E, eds. Genetics and Public Health in the 21st Century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000:61\u201381","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195128307.003.0004"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R31","unstructured":"Holtzman NA. Proceed With Caution: Predicting Genetic Risks in the Recombinant DNA Era. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feldman W. How serious are the adverse effects of screening?J Gen Intern Med.\u20081990;5(suppl):S50\u2013S53","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02600842"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Botkin JR. Research for newborn screening: developing a national framework. Pediatrics.\u20082005;116:862\u2013871","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2004-2571"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Natowicz M. Newborn screening: setting evidence-based policy for protection. N Engl J Med.\u20082005;353:867\u2013870","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp058060"},{"key":"2021120823245769600_R35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol.\u20081997;50:1129\u20131136","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(97)00126-1"}],"container-title":["Pediatrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article-pdf\/117\/5\/1477\/1071064\/zpe00506001477.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article-pdf\/117\/5\/1477\/1071064\/zpe00506001477.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,7]],"date-time":"2023-05-07T08:36:58Z","timestamp":1683448618000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article\/117\/5\/1477\/70018\/Does-Familiarity-Breed-Acceptance-The-Influence-of"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.2005-1990","relation":{},"ISSN":["0031-4005","1098-4275"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0031-4005"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1098-4275"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,5,1]]}}}