{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]],"date-time":"2026-09-07T18:26:52Z","timestamp":1788805612505,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>OBJECTIVE. Legal and ethical standards require resuscitation when it is considered to be in the patient's best interest. We hypothesized that newborn infants might be dealt with according to different standards, compared with older patients.<\/jats:p><jats:p>METHODS. An anonymous questionnaire describing 8 currently incompetent patients with potential neurologic sequelae who required resuscitation was administered to groups of physicians and students. Survival and morbidity rates were explicitly described; a very preterm infant, a full term infant and a 2-month-old infant had identical outcomes. Two patients, a 7-month-old infant and an 80-year-old patient, were previously significantly impaired. Respondents were asked whether resuscitation was in the patient's best interest and whether they would comply with the families' wishes if resuscitation was refused.<\/jats:p><jats:p>RESULTS. There was an 85% response rate (n = 524). The largest proportions of respondents stated that it was in the best interests of the 2-month-old infant and the 7-year-old child to be resuscitated (97% and 94%, respectively), followed by the 50-year-old patient and the term infant (87%), the 2 patients with 5% chance of survival (76% and 80%), the premature infant (69%), and finally the 80-year-old patient (32%). Approximately one fifth of the respondents who thought that it was in a patient's best interests to be resuscitated would nevertheless accept the family's refusal of resuscitation for all scenarios except the 80-year-old patient (72% acceptance) and the preterm infant (54% acceptance).<\/jats:p><jats:p>CONCLUSIONS. Whether resuscitation is considered in a patient's best interests is not closely related to survival rates or disability. Newborn infants and particularly preterm infants are systematically devalued, in comparison with older patients whose outcomes are the same or worse. Accepting a family's refusal of resuscitation, even among respondents who thought that resuscitation was in the patient's best interest, was much more common for the newborns.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-1520","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,1]],"date-time":"2008-05-01T14:30:12Z","timestamp":1209652212000},"page":"963-969","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":93,"title":["The Best-Interest Standard Is Not Applied for Neonatal Resuscitation Decisions"],"prefix":"10.1542","volume":"121","author":[{"given":"Annie","family":"Janvier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Pediatrics"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Isabelle","family":"Leblanc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keith James","family":"Barrington","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Pediatrics"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"417","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2021120908253284600_R1","unstructured":"Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001:102\u2013103"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R2","unstructured":"Sneiderman B, Irvine JC, Osborne PH. The mentally incompetent patient. In: Canadian Medical Law: An Introduction for Physicians, Nurses and Other Health Professionals. 3rd ed. Toronto, Canada: Thomson-Carswell; 2003:501\u2013577"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R3","unstructured":"American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics.\u20081994;93(3):532\u2013536"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R4","unstructured":"President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1983"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Diekema DS. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med Bioeth.\u20082004;25(4):243\u2013264","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-004-3146-6"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Religious objections to medical care. Pediatrics.\u20081997;99(2):279\u2013281","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.99.2.279"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Silverman WA. Medical decisions: an appeal for reasonableness. Pediatrics.\u20081996;98(6):1182\u20131184","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.98.6.1182"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R8","unstructured":"Waring D. Fair innings and need over lifetime. In: Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery: An Egalitarian Approach to Patient Selection. Toronto, Canada: Springer; 2004:89\u201397"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R9","unstructured":"Callahan D. Setting Limits: Medical Goals for an Aging Society. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1987:17"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R10","unstructured":"Jahnigen DW, Binstock RH. Economic and clinical realities: heath care for elderly people. In: Binstock RH, Post SG, eds. Too Old for Health Care? MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991:17 Controversies in Medicine, Law, Economics, and Ethics. Baltimore: 23\u201330"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Childress JF. Ensuring care, respect, and fairness for the elderly. Hastings Cent Rep.\u20081984;14(5):27\u201331","DOI":"10.2307\/3561094"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R12","unstructured":"Griffin J. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; 1986"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R13","unstructured":"Waring D. An egalitarian ethos. In: Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery: An Egalitarian Approach to Patient Selection. Toronto, Canada: Springer; 2004:115\u2013131"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R14","unstructured":"Danish Council of Ethics. Extreme Prematurity, Ethical Aspects. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Council of Ethics; 1995"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R15","unstructured":"Swiss Society of Neonatologists. Guidelines: recommendation for the care of infants born at the limit of viability (gestational age 22\u201326 weeks). Available at: www.neonet.ch\/assets\/doc\/Infants_born_at_the_limit_of_viability_-_english_final.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2007"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R16","unstructured":"Salle B, Sureau C. The premature of less than 28 weeks, resuscitation and outcomes: report of the academy of medicine, 2006 [in French]. Available at: www.academie-medecine.fr\/upload\/anciens\/rapports_289_fichier_lie.rtf. Accessed March 18, 2008"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R17","unstructured":"Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: ethical issues. Available at: www.nuffieldbioethics.org\/go\/ourwork\/prolonginglife\/publication_406.html. Accessed April 3, 2007"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R18","unstructured":"Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. CMAJ.\u20081994;151(5):547\u2013553"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R19","unstructured":"American Academy of Pediatrics. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2006"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sherlock RL, Anderson PJ, Doyle LW. Neurodevelopmental sequelae of intraventricular haemorrhage at 8 years of age in a regional cohort of ELBW\/very preterm infants. Early Hum Dev.\u20082005;81(11):909\u2013916","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2005.07.007"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Serenius F, Ewald U, Farooqi A, Holmgren PA, Hakansson S, Sedin G. Short-term outcome after active perinatal management at 23\u201325 weeks of gestation: a study from two Swedish tertiary care centres, part 2: infant survival. Acta Paediatr.\u20082004;93(8):1081\u20131089","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02721.x"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lefebvre F, Mazurier E, Tessier R. Cognitive and educational outcomes in early adulthood for infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth. Acta Paediatr.\u20082005;94(6):733\u2013740","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01973.x"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lorenz JM, Wooliever DE, Jetton JR, Paneth N. A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adeolesc Med.\u20081998;152(5):425\u2013435","DOI":"10.1001\/archpedi.152.5.425"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lorenz JM. The outcome of extreme prematurity. Semin Perinatol.\u20082001;25(5):348\u2013359","DOI":"10.1053\/sper.2001.27164"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, Poole WK, Higgins RD, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age among infants of less than 25 weeks' gestational age born in 1993\u20131999. Pediatrics.\u20082005;115(6):1645\u20131651","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2004-2215"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boyle RJ, Salter R, Arnander MW. Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby. J Med Ethics.\u20082004;30(4):402\u2013405","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2002.000745"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R27","unstructured":"The fetus as a person. CMAJ.\u20081990;143(11):1156"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burkhart J. The social construction of personhood. Soc Thought.\u20081989;15:2\u201313","DOI":"10.1080\/15426432.1989.10383658"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R29","unstructured":"Singer P. Practical Ethics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1979:137"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R30","unstructured":"Engelhardt HT. Ethical issues in aiding the death of young children. In: Kohl M, ed. Beneficent Euthanasia. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus; 1975:185\u2013201"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R31","unstructured":"Tooley M. Personhood. In: Singer P, Kuhse H, eds. A Companion to Bioethics. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers; 1998:117\u2013126"},{"key":"2021120908253284600_R32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peerzada JM, Richardson DK, Burns JP. Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viability. J Pediatr.\u20082004;145(4):492\u2013498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2004.06.018"}],"container-title":["Pediatrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article-pdf\/121\/5\/963\/1175285\/zpe00508000963.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article-pdf\/121\/5\/963\/1175285\/zpe00508000963.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,18]],"date-time":"2023-05-18T01:50:55Z","timestamp":1684374655000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/publications.aap.org\/pediatrics\/article\/121\/5\/963\/73425\/The-Best-Interest-Standard-Is-Not-Applied-for"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,1]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.2007-1520","relation":{},"ISSN":["0031-4005","1098-4275"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0031-4005","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-4275","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,1]]}}}