{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T13:27:17Z","timestamp":1770816437063,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Radcliffe Medical Media Ltd","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,18]],"date-time":"2021-10-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1634515200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/legalcode"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Interv Cardiol"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an essential tool in the management of myocarditis and is conventionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA). Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB) is a novel alternative and the authors sought to determine its safety and feasibility by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline was searched in 2020, and cohort demographics, procedural details and complications were extracted from selected studies. Four observational studies with a combined total of 496 procedures were included. TRA-EMB was most frequently performed with a sheathless MP1 guide catheter via the right radial artery. The most common complication was pericardial effusion (up to 11% in one study), but pericardial drainage for tamponade was rare (one reported case). Death and mitral valve damage have not been reported. TRA-EMB was successful in obtaining samples in 99% of reported procedures. The authors concluded that TRA-EMB is a safe and feasible alternative to TFA-EMB and the most common complication is uncomplicated pericardial effusion.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.15420\/icr.2021.20","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,18]],"date-time":"2021-10-18T16:30:05Z","timestamp":1634574605000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Is This the Prime Time for Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy?"],"prefix":"10.15420","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2008-6211","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zaccharie","family":"Tyler","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"St Bartholomew\u2019s Hospital, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6886-0443","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Oliver P","family":"Guttmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St Bartholomew\u2019s Hospital, London, UK; UCL Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1966-1880","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Konstantinos","family":"Savvatis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St Bartholomew\u2019s Hospital, London, UK; UCL Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1441-0417","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St Bartholomew\u2019s Hospital, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6931-4647","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Constantinos","family":"O\u2019Mahony","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St Bartholomew\u2019s Hospital, London, UK; UCL Centre for Heart Muscle Disease, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"6096","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M, et al. Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. Circulation 2010;122:900\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924167; PMID:\u00a020713901.","DOI":"10.1161\/circulationaha.109.924167"},{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Frustaci A, Pieroni M, Chimenti C. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies. Ital Hear J 2002;3:348\u201353; PMID:\u00a012116798."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chimenti C, Frustaci A. Contribution and risk of left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in patients with cardiomyopathies: a retrospective study over a 28-year period. Circulation 2013;128:1531\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009355; PMID:\u00a025047591.","DOI":"10.1161\/circulationaha.114.009355"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seferovi\u0107 PM, Tsutsui H, McNamara DM, et al. Heart Failure Association of the ESC, Heart Failure Society of America and Japanese Heart Failure Society position statement on endomyocardial biopsy. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:854\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejhf.2190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejhf.2190; PMID:\u00a034010472.","DOI":"10.1002\/ejhf.2190"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mitchell MD, Hong JA, Lee BY, et al. Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:454\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965269; PMID:\u00a022740010.","DOI":"10.1161\/circoutcomes.112.965269"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60404-2; PMID:\u00a021470671.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(11)60404-2"},{"key":"ref6","unstructured":"Bagur R, Bertrand OF, Beliveau P, et al. Feasibility of using a sheathless guiding catheter for left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy performed by transradial approach. J Invasive Cardiol 2014;26:E161\u20133; PMID:\u00a025480998."},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4ufele TG, Spittler R, Karagianni A, et al. Transradial left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: assessment of safety and efficacy. Clin Res Cardiol 2015;104:773\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00392-015-0844-1; PMID:\u00a025832352.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00392-015-0844-1"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schulz E, Jabs A, Gori T, et al. Feasibility and safety of left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy via transradial access: technique and initial experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:761\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.25834; PMID:\u00a025586731","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.25834"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bagur R, Gilchrist IC. Transradial approach to take a little piece of heart. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:766\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.26229; PMID:\u00a026386240.","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.26229"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kherad B, K\u00f6hncke C, Spillmann F, et al. Postprocedural radial artery occlusion rate using a sheathless guiding catheter for left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy performed by transradial approach. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2016;16:1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12872-016-0432-y; PMID:\u00a027931184.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12872-016-0432-y"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Choudhury T, Sch\u00e4ufele TG, Lavi S, et al. Transradial approach for left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. Can J Cardiol 2018;34:1283\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cjca.2018.05.007; PMID:\u00a030078693.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2018.05.007"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Choudhury T, Lurz P, Sch\u00e4ufele TG, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. EuroIntervention 2019;15:678\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4244\/eij-d-18-01061; PMID:\u00a030741639","DOI":"10.4244\/eij-d-18-01061"},{"key":"ref13","unstructured":"Tyler Z, Guttmann OP, Dhinoja M, et al. The safety and feasibility of transitioning from transfemoral to transradial access left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. J Invasive Cardiol 2020;32:E349\u201354; PMID:\u00a033168780."},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nobre Menezes M, Infante Oliveira E, Costa e Silva A, et al. Transradial left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy feasibility, safety and clinical usefulness: Initial experience of a tertiary university center. Rev Port Cardiol 2020;39:53\u2013460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.repc.2019.11.004; PMID:\u00a032753337.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.repc.2019.11.004"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"G\u00f6bel S, Schwuchow-Thonke S, Jansen T, et al. Safety of transradial and transfemoral left ventricular compared with transfemoral right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. ESC Hear Fail 2020;7:4015\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ehf2.13006; PMID:\u00a032949187.","DOI":"10.1002\/ehf2.13006"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion \u2013 Patent Hemostasis Evaluation Trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:335\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.21639; PMID:\u00a018726956.","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.21639"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Uhlemann M, M\u00f6bius-Winkler S, Mende M, et al. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:36\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcin.2011.08.011; PMID:\u00a022230148.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2011.08.011"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohsen A, Alqasrawi M, Shantha GPS, et al. Comparison of radial artery occlusion following transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention using sheath-based versus sheathless technique. Sci Rep 2018;8:12026 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-018-30462-1; PMID:\u00a030104697.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-30462-1"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kado H, Patel AM, Suryadevara S, et al. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:810\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcin.2013.11.026; PMID:\u00a024954573.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2013.11.026"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dominici M, Diletti R, Milici C, et al. Left radial versus right radial approach for coronary artery catheterization: a prospective comparison. J Interv Cardiol 2012;25:203\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-8183.2011.00689.x; PMID:\u00a022272568.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-8183.2011.00689.x"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kawashima O, Endoh N, Terashima M, et al. Effectiveness of right or left radial approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;61:333\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.10769; PMID:\u00a014988891.","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.10769"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R, et al. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1057\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcin.2009.07.014; PMID:\u00a019926044.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2009.07.014"}],"container-title":["Interventional Cardiology: Reviews, Research, Resources"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.icrjournal.com\/articleindex\/icr.2021.20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,19]],"date-time":"2021-10-19T14:31:40Z","timestamp":1634653900000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.icrjournal.com\/articleindex\/icr.2021.20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,18]]},"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15420\/icr.2021.20","relation":{},"ISSN":["1756-1485","1756-1477"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1756-1485","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1756-1477","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,18]]},"article-number":"e29"}}