{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T21:49:39Z","timestamp":1790113779207,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":100,"publisher":"Radcliffe Medical Media Ltd","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790035200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/legalcode"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["US Cardiol"],"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper describes the contemporary inpatient management of cardiogenic shock, including critical care management and the use of mechanical circulatory support as part of a cardiogenic shock system of care. It highlights the importance of multidisciplinary shock teams for improving patient outcomes through advanced mechanical circulatory support systems and critical care management strategies. Drawing on successful models in trauma care, the paper discusses the evolution of specialized teams, the reduction of care variability, and the enhancement of survival rates through standardized best practices. A case study illustrates the effective implementation of these principles, resulting in improved short-term survival and long-term recovery for patients<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.15420\/usc.2025.17","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T10:01:57Z","timestamp":1788429717000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 2: The Shock Team and Inpatient Management"],"prefix":"10.15420","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3539-7696","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kari L","family":"Gorder","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02hsexy86","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Riverside Methodist Hospital"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5157-2610","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael J","family":"Lauria","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/00cvxb145","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"University of Washington"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-8353-5077","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"William","family":"Hallinan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/00cvxb145","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"University of Washington"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-1037-7878","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eric","family":"Thomas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4628-6852","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katherine L","family":"Wood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3486-6753","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mir B","family":"Basir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02kwnkm68","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}],"name":"Henry Ford Health"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5656-4401","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexander G","family":"Truesdell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8250-5149","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adam L","family":"Gottula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Minnesota"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"6096","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref0","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lauria M, Gottula AL, Hallinan W, et al. Cardiogenic shock systems of care best practices. Part 1: prehospital and emergency department evaluation and management. US Cardiol 2026;20:eXX. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15420\/usc.2025.16. DOI: 10.15420\/usc.2025.16","DOI":"10.15420\/usc.2025.16"},{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Truesdell AG. War on shock. J Invasive Cardiol 2017;29:e14\u20135. PMID: 28045675."},{"key":"ref2","unstructured":"Truesdell AG, Tehrani B, Singh R, et al. \u2018Combat\u2019 approach to cardiogenic shock. Interv Cardiol 2018;13:81\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15420\/icr.2017:35:3; PMID: 29928313."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kotwal RS, Montgomery HR, Miles EA, et al. Leadership and a casualty response system for eliminating preventable death. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017;82(6S Suppl 1):S9\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/TA.0000000000001428; PMID: 28333833. DOI: 10.1097\/TA.0000000000001428","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0000000000001428"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kotwal RS, Montgomery HR, Kotwal BM, et al. Eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. Arch Surg 2011;146:1350\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archsurg.2011.213; PMID: 21844425. DOI: 10.1001\/archsurg.2011.213","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2011.213"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holcomb JB. Major scientific lessons learned in the trauma field over the last two decades. PLoS Med 2017;14:e1002339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002339; PMID: 28678788. DOI: 10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002339","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002339"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nathens AB, Brunet FP, Maier RV. Development of trauma systems and effect on outcomes after injury. Lancet 2004;363:1794\u2013801. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16307-1; PMID: 15172780. DOI: 10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16307-1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16307-1"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma 2006;60:371\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb; PMID: 16508498. DOI: 10.1097\/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H\u00e9rion FX, Beurton A, Oddos C, et al. Multidisciplinary cardiogenic shock team approach improves the long-term outcomes of patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock treated with short-term mechanical circulatory support. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2023;12:821\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuad108; PMID: 37713615. DOI: 10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuad108","DOI":"10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuad108"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khalil M, Maraey A, Wahadneh OA, et al. Use of a multidisciplinary shock team and inhospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2023;206:200\u20131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.08.087; PMID: 37708751. DOI: 10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.08.087","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.08.087"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Papolos AI, Kenigsberg BB, Berg DD, et al. Management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in cardiac ICUs with versus without shock teams. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:1309\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2021.07.044; PMID: 34556316. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2021.07.044","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2021.07.044"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taleb I, Koliopoulou AG, Tandar A, et al. Shock team approach in refractory cardiogenic shock requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: a proof of concept. Circulation 2019;140:98\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040654; PMID: 31549877. DOI: 10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040654","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040654"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tehrani BN, Sherwood MW, Rosner C, et al. A standardized and regionalized network of care for cardiogenic shock. JACC Heart Fail 2022;10:768\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jchf.2022.04.004; PMID: 36175063. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jchf.2022.04.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jchf.2022.04.004"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tehrani BN, Truesdell AG, Sherwood MW, et al. Standardized team-based care for cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:1659\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.12.084; PMID: 30947919. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.12.084","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.12.084"},{"key":"ref14","unstructured":"Basir MB, Lemor A, Gorgis S, et al. Early utilization of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the national cardiogenic shock initiative. J Am Heart Assoc 2023;12:e031401. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.123.031401; PMID: 38014676."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee F, Hutson JH, Boodhwani M, et al. Multidisciplinary code shock team in cardiogenic shock: a Canadian centre experience. CJC Open 2020;2:249\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cjco.2020.03.009; PMID: 32695976. DOI: 10.1016\/j.cjco.2020.03.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cjco.2020.03.009"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Batchelor WB, Anwaruddin S, Wang DD, et al. The multidisciplinary heart team in cardiovascular medicine: current role and future challenges. JACC Adv 2023;2:100160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacadv.2022.100160; PMID: 38939019. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacadv.2022.100160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacadv.2022.100160"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee C, Tully A, Fang JC, et al. Building and optimizing the interdisciplinary heart team. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2023;2:101067. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jscai.2023.101067; PMID: 39129880. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jscai.2023.101067","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jscai.2023.101067"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scholz KH, Maier SKG, Maier LS, et al. Impact of treatment delay on mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting with and without haemodynamic instability: results from the German prospective, multicentre FITT-STEMI trial. Eur Heart J 2018;39:1065\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehy004; PMID: 29452351. DOI: 10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehy004","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehy004"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Killip T, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol 1967;20:457\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9149(67)90023-9; PMID: 6059183. DOI: 10.1016\/0002-9149(67)90023-9","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9149(67)90023-9"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Senman B, Jentzer JC, Barnett CF, et al. Need for a cardiogenic shock team collaborative \u2013 promoting a team-based model of care to improve outcomes and identify best practices. J Am Heart Assoc 2024;13:e031979. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.123.031979; PMID: 38456417. DOI: 10.1161\/JAHA.123.031979","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.123.031979"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moghaddam N, van Diepen S, So D, et al. Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail 2021;8:988\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ehf2.13180; PMID: 33452763. DOI: 10.1002\/ehf2.13180","DOI":"10.1002\/ehf2.13180"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yau RM, Mitchell R, Afzal A, et al. Blueprint for building and sustaining a cardiogenic shock program: qualitative survey of 12 US programs. J Soc CardioVasc Angiogr Interv 2024;3:102288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jscai.2024.102288; PMID: 39649821. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jscai.2024.102288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jscai.2024.102288"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shaefi S, O\u2019Gara B, Kociol RD, et al. Effect of cardiogenic shock hospital volume on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4:e001462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.114.001462; PMID: 25559014. DOI: 10.1161\/JAHA.114.001462","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.114.001462"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, Barsness GW, et al. Hospital-level disparities in the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2019;124:491\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjcard.2019.05.038; PMID: 31221462. DOI: 10.1016\/j.amjcard.2019.05.038","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2019.05.038"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ya\u2019qoub L, Lemor A, Dabbagh M, et al. Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:653\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcin.2021.01.003; PMID: 33736772. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jcin.2021.01.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2021.01.003"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rab T, Ratanapo S, Kern KB, et al. Cardiac shock care centers: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:1972\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.07.074; PMID: 30309475. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.07.074","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.07.074"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abrams D, Garan AR, Abdelbary A, et al. Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:717\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00134-018-5064-5; PMID: 29450594. DOI: 10.1007\/s00134-018-5064-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-018-5064-5"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacobs AK, Ali MJ, Best PJ, et al. Systems of care for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021;144:e310\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001025; PMID: 34641735. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001025","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001025"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Warren AF, Rosner C, Gattani R, et al. Cardiogenic shock: protocols, teams, centers, and networks. US Cardiol 2021;15:e18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15420\/usc.2021.10; PMID: 39720489. DOI: 10.15420\/usc.2021.10","DOI":"10.15420\/usc.2021.10"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;136:e232\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000525; PMID: 28923988. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000525","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000525"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tchantchaleishvili V, Hallinan W, Massey HT. Call for organized statewide networks for management of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. JAMA Surg 2015;150:1025\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2015.2412; PMID: 26375168. DOI: 10.1001\/jamasurg.2015.2412","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2015.2412"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Adeoye O, Nystr\u00f6m KV, Yavagal DR, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: a 2019 update. Stroke 2019;50:e187\u2013210. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STR.0000000000000173; PMID: 31104615. DOI: 10.1161\/STR.0000000000000173","DOI":"10.1161\/STR.0000000000000173"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blumer V, Hanff TC, Gage A, et al. Cardiogenic shock teams: past, present, and future directions. Circ Heart Fail 2025;18:e011630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011630; PMID: 40151941. DOI: 10.1161\/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011630","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011630"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Senman B, Sinha SS, Truesdell AG, et al. Towards an understanding of best practice: the good, the bad and the future of cardiogenic shock teams. Am Heart J 2025;293:107310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ahj.2025.107310; PMID: 41285212. DOI: 10.1016\/j.ahj.2025.107310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2025.107310"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doll JA, Ohman EM, Patel MR, et al. A team-based approach to patients in cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;88:424\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.26297; PMID: 26526563. DOI: 10.1002\/ccd.26297","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.26297"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mehta A, Vavilin I, Nguyen AH, et al. Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024;11:1354158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1354158; PMID: 38545346. DOI: 10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1354158","DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1354158"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garan AR, Kanwar M, Thayer KL, et al. Complete hemodynamic profiling with pulmonary artery catheters in cardiogenic shock is associated with lower in-hospital mortality. JACC Heart Fail 2020;8:903\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jchf.2020.08.012; PMID: 33121702. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jchf.2020.08.012","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jchf.2020.08.012"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saxena A, Garan AR, Kapur NK, et al. Value of hemodynamic monitoring in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing mechanical circulatory support. Circulation 2020;141:1184\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043080; PMID: 32250695. DOI: 10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043080","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043080"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Damluji AA, Tehrani B, Sinha SS, et al. Position statement on vascular access safety for percutaneous devices in AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022;15:2003\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcin.2022.08.041; PMID: 36265932. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jcin.2022.08.041","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2022.08.041"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chieffo A, Dudek D, Hassager C, et al. Joint EAPCI\/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2021;10:570\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuab015; PMID: 34057173. DOI: 10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuab015","DOI":"10.1093\/ehjacc\/zuab015"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kadosh BS, Berg DD, Bohula EA, et al. Pulmonary artery catheter use and mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit. JACC Heart Fail 2023;11:903\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jchf.2023.04.007; PMID: 37318422. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jchf.2023.04.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jchf.2023.04.007"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sandoval Y, Basir MB, Lemor A, et al. Optimal large-bore femoral access, indwelling device management, and vascular closure for percutaneous mechanical circulatory support. Am J Cardiol 2023;206:262\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.08.024; PMID: 37717476. DOI: 10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.08.024","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.08.024"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stehli J, Dagan M, Dinh DT, et al. Differences in outcomes of patients with in-hospital versus out-of-hospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a registry analysis. BMJ Open 2022;12:e052000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-052000; PMID: 35256441. DOI: 10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-052000","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-052000"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Honarmand K, Wax RS, Penoyer D, et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines on recognizing and responding to clinical deterioration outside the ICU: 2023. Crit Care Med 2024;52:314\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CCM.0000000000006072; PMID: 38240510. DOI: 10.1097\/CCM.0000000000006072","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000006072"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2463\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.CCM.0000235743.38172.6E; PMID: 16878033. DOI: 10.1007\/0-387-27921-0","DOI":"10.1007\/0-387-27921-0"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maharaj R, Raffaele I, Wendon J. Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2015;19:254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13054-015-0973-y; PMID: 26070457. DOI: 10.1186\/s13054-015-0973-y","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-015-0973-y"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zern EK, Young MN, Rosenfield K, Kabrhel C. A pulmonary embolism response team: initial experiences and future directions. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2017;15:481\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14779072.2017.1337509; PMID: 28571513. DOI: 10.1080\/14779072.2017.1337509","DOI":"10.1080\/14779072.2017.1337509"},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hyland SL, Faltys M, H\u00fcser M, et al. Early prediction of circulatory failure in the intensive care unit using machine learning. Nat Med 2020;26:364\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41591-020-0789-4; PMID: 32152583. DOI: 10.1038\/s41591-020-0789-4","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-020-0789-4"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thiele H, de Waha-Thiele S, Freund A, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock. EuroIntervention 2021;17:451\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4244\/EIJ-D-20-01296; PMID: 34413010. DOI: 10.4244\/EIJ-D-20-01296","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJ-D-20-01296"},{"key":"ref50","unstructured":"Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK stage classification expert consensus update: a review and incorporation of validation studies: this statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2022;1:100008. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jscai.2021.100008; PMID: 39130139."},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henry TD, Tomey MI, Tamis-Holland JE, et al. Invasive management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021;143:e815\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000959; PMID: 33657830. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000959","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000959"},{"key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bloom JE, Chan W, Kaye DM, Stub D. State of shock: contemporary vasopressor and inotrope use in cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc 2023;12:e029787. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.123.029787; PMID: 37489740. DOI: 10.1161\/JAHA.123.029787","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.123.029787"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salter BS, Gross CR, Weiner MM, et al. Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices: practical considerations for all stakeholders. Nat Rev Cardiol 2023;20:263\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41569-022-00796-5; PMID: 36357709. DOI: 10.1038\/s41569-022-00796-5","DOI":"10.1038\/s41569-022-00796-5"},{"key":"ref54","unstructured":"M\u00f8ller JE, Engstr\u00f8m T, Jensen LO, et al. Microaxial flow pump or standard care in infarct-related cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2024;390:1382\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa2312572; PMID: 38587239."},{"key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swain L, Reyelt L, Bhave S, et al. Transvalvular ventricular unloading before reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:684\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2020.06.031; PMID: 32762903. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2020.06.031","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2020.06.031"},{"key":"ref56","unstructured":"Berg DD, Barnett CF, Kenigsberg BB, et al. Clinical practice patterns in temporary mechanical circulatory support for shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry. Circ Heart Fail 2019;12:e006635. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006635; PMID: 31707801."},{"key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Basir MB, Kapur NK, Patel K, et al. Improved outcomes associated with the use of shock protocols: updates from the national cardiogenic shock initiative. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019;93:1173\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.28307; PMID: 31025538. DOI: 10.1002\/ccd.28307","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.28307"},{"key":"ref58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fadel RA, Almajed MR, Parsons A, et al. Feasibility and outcomes of a cardiovascular medicine inclusive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) service. J Soc CardioVasc Angiogr Interv 2024;3:101359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jscai.2024.101359; PMID: 39132589. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jscai.2024.101359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jscai.2024.101359"},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kraai E, Teixeira JP, Patel IA, et al. An intensivist-led extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program: design, implementation, and outcomes of the first five years. ASAIO J 2023;69:451\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAT.0000000000001870; PMID: 36525671. DOI: 10.1097\/MAT.0000000000001870","DOI":"10.1097\/MAT.0000000000001870"},{"key":"ref60","unstructured":"Guglin M, Zucker MJ, Bazan VM, et al. Venoarterial ECMO for adults: JACC scientific expert panel. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:698\u2013716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.11.038; PMID: 30765037."},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ramzy D, Soltesz E, Anderson M. New surgical circulatory support system outcomes. ASAIO J 2020;66:746\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAT.0000000000001194; PMID: 32541335. DOI: 10.1097\/MAT.0000000000001194","DOI":"10.1097\/MAT.0000000000001194"},{"key":"ref62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hershenhouse KS, Ferrell BE, Glezer E, et al. A profile of the Impella 5.5 for the clinical management of cardiogenic shock and a review of the current indications for use and future directions. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024;21:1087\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17434440.2024.2436122; PMID: 39604145. DOI: 10.1080\/17434440.2024.2436122","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2024.2436122"},{"key":"ref63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kwon JH, Bentley D, Cevasco M, et al. Patient characteristics and early clinical outcomes with Impella 5.5: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ASAIO J 2024;70:557\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MAT.0000000000002169; PMID: 38386980. DOI: 10.1097\/MAT.0000000000002169","DOI":"10.1097\/MAT.0000000000002169"},{"key":"ref64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carnicelli AP, Diepen SV, Gage A, et al. Pragmatic approach to temporary mechanical circulatory support in acute right ventricular failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024;43:1894\u2013904. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.healun.2024.07.006; PMID: 39059594. DOI: 10.1016\/j.healun.2024.07.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healun.2024.07.006"},{"key":"ref65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e004905. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004905; PMID: 30354364. DOI: 10.1161\/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004905","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004905"},{"key":"ref66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Damluji AA, van Diepen S, Katz JN, et al. Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021;144:e16\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000985; PMID: 34126755. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000985","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000000985"},{"key":"ref67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tsiouris A, Slaughter MS, Jeyakumar AKC, Protos AN. Left ventricular assist devices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Artif Organs 2024;27:335\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10047-024-01436-0; PMID: 38451441. DOI: 10.1007\/s10047-024-01436-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s10047-024-01436-0"},{"key":"ref68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coniglio AC, Patel CB, Kittleson M, et al. Innovations in heart transplantation: a review. J Card Fail 2022;28:467\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cardfail.2021.10.011; PMID: 34752907. DOI: 10.1016\/j.cardfail.2021.10.011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cardfail.2021.10.011"},{"key":"ref69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walker DM, West NEJ, Ray SG, British Cardiovascular Society Working Group on Acute Cardiac Care. Republished: from coronary care unit to acute cardiac care unit: the evolving role of specialist cardiac care. Postgrad Med J 2012;88:431\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/postgradmedj-2011-301459rep; PMID: 22822225. DOI: 10.1136\/postgradmedj-2011-301459rep","DOI":"10.1136\/postgradmedj-2011-301459rep"},{"key":"ref70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morrow DA, Fang JC, Fintel DJ, et al. Evolution of critical care cardiology: transformation of the cardiovascular intensive care unit and the emerging need for new medical staffing and training models: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012;126:1408\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0b013e31826890b0; PMID: 22893607. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0b013e31826890b0","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0b013e31826890b0"},{"key":"ref71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kasaoka S. Evolved role of the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU). J Intensive Care 2017;5:72. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40560-017-0271-7; PMID: 29299313. DOI: 10.1186\/s40560-017-0271-7","DOI":"10.1186\/s40560-017-0271-7"},{"key":"ref72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kirigaya J, Iwahashi N, Terasaka K, Takeuchi I. Prevention and management of critical care complications in cardiogenic shock: a narrative review. J Intensive Care 2023;11:31. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40560-023-00675-2; PMID: 37408036. DOI: 10.1186\/s40560-023-00675-2","DOI":"10.1186\/s40560-023-00675-2"},{"key":"ref73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dudzinski DM, Januzzi JL. The evolving medical complexity of the modern cardiac intensive care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:2008\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2017.01.061; PMID: 28427575. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2017.01.061","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2017.01.061"},{"key":"ref74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Na SJ, Chung CR, Jeon K, et al. Association between presence of a cardiac intensivist and mortality in an adult cardiac care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2637\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2016.09.947; PMID: 27978948. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2016.09.947","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2016.09.947"},{"key":"ref75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miller PE, Chouairi F, Thomas A, et al. Transition from an open to closed staffing model in the cardiac intensive care unit improves clinical outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e018182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.120.018182; PMID: 33412899. DOI: 10.1161\/JAHA.120.018182","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.120.018182"},{"key":"ref76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meraj PM, O\u2019Neill WW. Cardiogenic shock management should be a team sport. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:1318\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2021.07.041; PMID: 34556317. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2021.07.041","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2021.07.041"},{"key":"ref77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hasin Y, Danchin N, Filippatos GS, et al. Recommendations for the structure, organization, and operation of intensive cardiac care units. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1676\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehi202; PMID: 15781435. DOI: 10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehi202","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehi202"},{"key":"ref78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sinha SS, Geller BJ, Katz JN, et al. Evolution of critical care cardiology: an update on structure, care delivery, training, and research paradigms: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2025;151:e687\u2013707. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001300; PMID: 39945062. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001300","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001300"},{"key":"ref79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuster V. The (r)evolution of the CICU: better for the patient, better for education. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2269\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.09.018; PMID: 30360831. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.09.018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.09.018"},{"key":"ref80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Malley RG, Olenchock B, Bohula-May E, et al. Organization and staffing practices in US cardiac intensive care units: a survey on behalf of the American Heart Association Writing Group on the Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2013;2:3\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2048872612472063; PMID: 24062928. DOI: 10.1177\/2048872612472063","DOI":"10.1177\/2048872612472063"},{"key":"ref81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Diepen S, Fordyce CB, Wegermann ZK, et al. Organizational structure, staffing, resources, and educational initiatives in cardiac intensive care units in the United States: an American Heart Association acute cardiac care committee and American College of Cardiology critical care cardiology working group cross-sectional survey. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017;10:e003864. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003864; PMID: 28794122. DOI: 10.1161\/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003864","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003864"},{"key":"ref82","unstructured":"Kapur NK, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, et al. Criteria for defining stages of cardiogenic shock severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:185\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2022.04.049; PMID: 35835491."},{"key":"ref83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sinha SS, Morrow DA, Kapur NK, et al. 2025 Concise clinical guidance: an ACC expert consensus statement on the evaluation and management of cardiogenic shock: a report of the American College of Cardiology solution set oversight committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 2025;85:1618\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2025.02.018; PMID: 40100174. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2025.02.018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2025.02.018"},{"key":"ref84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al. Escalating and de-escalating temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022;146:e50\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001076; PMID: 35862152. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001076","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001076"},{"key":"ref85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laghlam D, Benghanem S, Ortuno S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care 2024;14:45. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13613-024-01260-y; PMID: 38553663. DOI: 10.1186\/s13613-024-01260-y","DOI":"10.1186\/s13613-024-01260-y"},{"key":"ref86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Binanay C, Califf RM, Hasselblad V, et al. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the Escape trial. JAMA 2005;294:1625\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.294.13.1625; PMID: 16204662. DOI: 10.1001\/jama.294.13.1625","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.294.13.1625"},{"key":"ref87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yoo TK, Miyashita S, Davoudi F, et al. Clinical impact of pulmonary artery catheter in patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2023;55:58\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.carrev.2023.04.008; PMID: 37100652. DOI: 10.1016\/j.carrev.2023.04.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2023.04.008"},{"key":"ref88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA\/ACC\/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology\/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2022;145:e876\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001062; PMID: 35363500. DOI: 10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001073","DOI":"10.1161\/CIR.0000000000001073"},{"key":"ref89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Josan E, Pastis N, Shaman Z. Ultrasound guided pulmonary artery catheter insertion: an alternative to fluoroscopic guidance. Respir Med Case Rep 2022;38:101678. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rmcr.2022.101678; PMID: 35656092. DOI: 10.1016\/j.rmcr.2022.101678","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rmcr.2022.101678"},{"key":"ref90","unstructured":"Mathew R, Di Santo P, Jung RG, et al. Milrinone as compared with dobutamine in the treatment of cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2021;385:516\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa2026845; PMID: 34347952."},{"key":"ref91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patel SM, Berg DD, Bohula EA, et al. Contemporary practice patterns of vasoactive use in cardiogenic shock in the American Heart Association cardiogenic shock registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2025;14:e044373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.125.044373; PMID: 41147380. DOI: 10.1161\/JAHA.125.044373","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.125.044373"},{"key":"ref92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Archilletti F, Giuliani L, Dangas GD, et al. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022;99:998\u20131005. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ccd.30137; PMID: 35182020. DOI: 10.1002\/ccd.30137","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.30137"},{"key":"ref93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Basir MB, Schreiber TL, Grines CL, et al. Effect of early initiation of mechanical circulatory support on survival in cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:845\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjcard.2016.11.037; PMID: 28040188. DOI: 10.1016\/j.amjcard.2016.11.037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2016.11.037"},{"key":"ref94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prunea DM, Bachl E, Herold L, et al. Impact of the timing of mechanical circulatory support on the outcomes in myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: subanalysis of the PREPARE CS registry. J Clin Med 2024;13:1552. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13061552; PMID: 38541778. DOI: 10.20944\/preprints202401.0889.v1","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13061552"},{"key":"ref95","unstructured":"Smith TG, Gorder K. Regionalization and protocolization of the treatment of cardiogenic shock and need for mechanical circulatory support devices. In: Abraham J, Parrillo J, eds. Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in the Intensive Care Unit: Post-implant Care and Management. Mount Prospect: Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2021;Ch. 21."},{"key":"ref96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tehrani B, Truesdell A, Singh R, et al. Implementation of a cardiogenic shock team and clinical outcomes (INOVA-SHOCK registry): observational and retrospective study. JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7:e160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/resprot.9761; PMID: 29954728. DOI: 10.2196\/resprot.9761","DOI":"10.2196\/resprot.9761"},{"key":"ref97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gorder KR, Raymond T, Rudick SG, Smith TD. Bedside removal of Impella devices in cardiogenic shock patients is feasible and safe. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2023;2(Suppl):100958. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jscai.2023.100958. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jscai.2023.100958","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jscai.2023.100958"},{"key":"ref98","unstructured":"Truesdell AG, Vavilin I, Boedikker J, et al. Hemodynamic collapse in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: prevent, prepare, manage, and recover. Cardiac Interventions Today 2024;18:45\u201350."},{"key":"ref99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gottula AL, Gorder K, Lauria M, et al. Cardiogenic shock systems of care best practices, part 3: regionalization of care, organizational components, and critical care transport medicine. US Cardiol 2026;20:eXX. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15420\/usc.2025.18.","DOI":"10.15420\/usc.2025.18"}],"container-title":["US Cardiology Review"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.uscjournal.com\/articleindex\/usc.2025.17","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T11:01:03Z","timestamp":1790074863000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.uscjournal.com\/articleindex\/usc.2025.17"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]]},"references-count":100,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15420\/usc.2025.17","relation":{},"ISSN":["1758-3896","1758-390X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1758-3896","type":"print"},{"value":"1758-390X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]]},"article-number":"e22"}}