{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T04:15:11Z","timestamp":1776831311104,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Akademiai Kiado Zrt.","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,25]],"date-time":"2018-07-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1532476800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["akjournals.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["IMAS"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,25]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec sec-type=\"objectives\">\n          <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>During mid-trimester, it is necessary to terminate pregnancy due to some fetal anomalies and intrauterine death. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare abortion induction methods and combined use retrospectively.<\/jats:p>\n        <\/jats:sec>\n        <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n          <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>About 112 out of 223 pregnant patients were included in the study. The groups were determined as follows: Group 1 including pregnant patients who were administered misoprostol only (50 patients), Group 2 including pregnant patients who were administered single dose misoprostol (according to FIGO) and subsequently received cervical Foley catheter (30 patients), and Group 3 including pregnant patients who received Foley catheter only (32 patients). These three groups were compared in terms of effectiveness of the method, side effects, and complications as well as their characteristics.<\/jats:p>\n        <\/jats:sec>\n        <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n          <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>In terms of characteristic of the groups, the average age of the women in the Group 1 was significantly higher than other two groups (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001). In terms of effectiveness of the method, the termination period in Groups 1 and 2 was significantly lower than Group 3 (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001). However, in terms of complications, it was observed that uterine rupture was developed in Group 1.<\/jats:p>\n        <\/jats:sec>\n        <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusion\">\n          <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Although medical methods may seem to be more effective in the process of termination, mechanical methods seem more reliable in terms of reliability. Especially combined methods can be used to increase effectiveness and also to reduce complications.<\/jats:p>\n        <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1556\/1646.10.2018.25","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,25]],"date-time":"2018-07-25T11:57:16Z","timestamp":1532519836000},"page":"133-136","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/policypage.crossmark.crossref.2","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Efficacy of second-trimester termination procedure; medical, mechanic, or combine?"],"prefix":"10.1556","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Tuncay","family":"Y\u00fcce","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dilek","family":"Y\u00fcksel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Erkan","family":"Kalafat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Acar","family":"Ko\u00e7","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"425","reference":[{"key":"B1","series-title":"Gomal J Med Sci","first-page":"92","article-title":"Termination of second trimester pregnancy: Extraamniotic foley catheter balon with traction versus combined use of Foley\u2019s catheter balloon and extramniotic instillation of PGF2\u03b1","volume":"11","author":"Surraya\n              H","year":"2013","unstructured":"Surraya\n              H\n            \n            , \n            \n              Syed Muhammad\n              AA\n            \n            , \n            \n              Muhammad\n              S\n            \n          : Termination of second trimester pregnancy: Extraamniotic foley catheter balon with traction versus combined use of Foley\u2019s catheter balloon and extramniotic instillation of PGF2\u03b1. Gomal J Med Sci11, 92\u201396 (2013)"},{"key":"B2","series-title":"Reprod Health Matters","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(08)31371-8","article-title":"Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone\u2013misoprostol and misoprostol alone: A review of methods and management","volume":"16","author":"Gemzell-Danielson\n              K","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gemzell-Danielson\n              K\n            \n            , \n            \n              Lalitkumar\n              S\n            \n          : Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone\u2013misoprostol and misoprostol alone: A review of methods and management. Reprod Health Matters16, 162\u2013172 (2008)10.1016\/S0968-8080(08)31371-8"},{"key":"B3","series-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2010.02.008","article-title":"Issues in second trimester induced abortion","volume":"24","author":"Lee\n              VCY","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lee\n              VCY\n            \n            , \n            \n              Ng\n              EHY\n            \n            , \n            \n              Ho\n              PC\n            \n          : Issues in second trimester induced abortion. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol24, 517\u2013527 (2010)10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2010.02.008"},{"key":"B4","series-title":"Contraception","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.02.005","article-title":"Society of family planning. Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester","volume":"84","author":"Borgatta\n              L","year":"2011","unstructured":"Borgatta\n              L\n            \n            , \n            \n              Kapp\n              N\n            \n          : Society of family planning. Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester. Contraception84, 4\u201318 (2011)10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.02.005"},{"key":"B5","series-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03931.x","article-title":"The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon","volume":"74","author":"Embrey\n              MP","year":"1967","unstructured":"Embrey\n              MP\n            \n            , \n            \n              Mollison\n              BG\n            \n          : The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw74, 44\u201348 (1967)10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03931.x"},{"key":"B6","series-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70149-3","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparasion of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostoglandin E2 gel for preindution cervical ripening","volume":"180","author":"Sciscione\n              AC","year":"1999","unstructured":"Sciscione\n              AC\n            \n            , \n            \n              McCullough\n              H\n            \n            , \n            \n              Manley\n              JS\n            \n            , \n            \n              Shlossman\n              PA\n            \n          : A prospective, randomized comparasion of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostoglandin E2 gel for preindution cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol180, 55\u201360 (1999)10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70149-3"},{"key":"B7","series-title":"Obstet Gynecol","first-page":"1394","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-trimester abortion","volume":"121","year":"2013","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 135: Second-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol121, 1394\u20131406 (2013)"},{"key":"B8","series-title":"AJOG","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs localy applied prostoglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and metaanalysis.","volume":"203","author":"Zvi\n              V","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zvi\n              V\n            \n            , \n            \n              Yaffa\n              K\n            \n            , \n            \n              Dan\n              S\n            \n          : Foley catheter balloon vs localy applied prostoglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and metaanalysis.AJOG203, 418\u2013429 (2010)10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038"},{"key":"B9","series-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12181","article-title":"FIGO\u2019s updated recommendations for misoprostol used alone in gynecology and obstetrics","volume":"138","author":"Morris\n              JL","year":"2017","unstructured":"Morris\n              JL\n            \n            , \n            \n              Winikoff\n              B\n            \n            , \n            \n              Dabash\n              R\n            \n            , \n            \n              Weeks\n              A\n            \n            , \n            \n              Faundes\n              A\n            \n            , \n            \n              Gemzell\u2010Danielsson\n              K\n            \n            , \n            \n              Visser\n              GH\n            \n          : FIGO\u2019s updated recommendations for misoprostol used alone in gynecology and obstetrics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet138, 363\u2013366 (2017)10.1002\/ijgo.12181"},{"key":"B10","series-title":"Obstet Gynecol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000189095.32382.d0","article-title":"Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester","volume":"107","author":"Drey\n              EA","year":"2006","unstructured":"Drey\n              EA\n            \n            , \n            \n              Foster\n              DG\n            \n            , \n            \n              Jackson\n              RA\n            \n            , \n            \n              Lee\n              SJ\n            \n            , \n            \n              Cardenas\n              LH\n            \n            , \n            \n              Darney\n              PD\n            \n          : Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol107, 128\u2013135 (2006)10.1097\/01.AOG.0000189095.32382.d0"},{"key":"B11","series-title":"Obstet Gynecol","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop\n              EH","year":"1964","unstructured":"Bishop\n              EH\n            \n          : Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol24, 266\u2013268 (1964)"},{"key":"B12","series-title":"Ginekol pol","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.17772\/gp\/1774","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol alone versus intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotik Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination: An observational study","volume":"85","author":"Topta\u015f\n              T","year":"2014","unstructured":"Topta\u015f\n              T\n            \n            , \n            \n              Mendilcio\u011flu\n              I\n            \n            , \n            \n              \u015eim\u015fek\n              M\n            \n            , \n            \n              Ta\u015fk\u0131n\n              O\n            \n          : Intravaginal misoprostol alone versus intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotik Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination: An observational study. Ginekol pol85, 577\u2013581 (2014)10.17772\/gp\/1774"},{"key":"B13","series-title":"Hum Reprod Update","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dml049","article-title":"Mid-trimester induced abortion: A review","volume":"13","author":"Lalitkumar\n              S","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lalitkumar\n              S\n            \n            , \n            \n              Bygdeman\n              M\n            \n            , \n            \n              Gemzell-Danielsson\n              K\n            \n          : Mid-trimester induced abortion: A review. Hum Reprod Update13, 37\u201352 (2007)10.1093\/humupd\/dml049"},{"key":"B14","series-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev","first-page":"CD005216","article-title":"Medical methods for midtrimester termination of pregnancy","volume":"1","author":"Wildschut\n              H","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wildschut\n              H\n            \n            , \n            \n              Both\n              MI\n            \n            , \n            \n              Medema\n              S\n            \n            , \n            \n              Thomee\n              E\n            \n            , \n            \n              Wildhagen\n              MF\n            \n            , \n            \n              Kapp\n              N\n            \n          : Medical methods for midtrimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev1, CD005216 (2011)"},{"key":"B15","series-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1314","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1046831","article-title":"Comparison of two misoprostol regimens for mid-trimester pregnancy terminations after FIGO\u2019s misoprostol dosage recommendation in","volume":"29","author":"Cetin\n              C","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cetin\n              C\n            \n            , \n            \n              Buyukkurt\n              S\n            \n            , \n            \n              Seydaoglu\n              G\n            \n            , \n            \n              Kahveci\n              B\n            \n            , \n            \n              Soysal\n              C\n            \n            , \n            \n              Ozgunen\n              FT\n            \n          : Comparison of two misoprostol regimens for mid-trimester pregnancy terminations after FIGO\u2019s misoprostol dosage recommendation in. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med29, 1314\u20131317 (2016)10.3109\/14767058.2015.1046831"},{"key":"B16","series-title":"BJOG","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02190.x","article-title":"Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: A systematic review","volume":"116","author":"Berghella\n              V","year":"2009","unstructured":"Berghella\n              V\n            \n            , \n            \n              Airoldi\n              J\n            \n            , \n            \n              O\u2019Neill\n              AM\n            \n            , \n            \n              Einhorn\n              K\n            \n            , \n            \n              Hoffman\n              M\n            \n          : Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: A systematic review. BJOG116, 1151\u20131157 (2009)10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02190.x"}],"container-title":["Interventional Medicine and Applied Science"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.akademiai.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1556\/1646.10.2018.25","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/view\/journals\/1646\/10\/3\/article-p133.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/1646\/10\/3\/article-p133.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/1646\/10\/3\/article-p133.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,3]],"date-time":"2024-01-03T16:18:40Z","timestamp":1704298720000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/akjournals.com\/view\/journals\/1646\/10\/3\/article-p133.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,25]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/1646.10.2018.25","relation":{},"ISSN":["2061-1617","2061-5094"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2061-1617","type":"print"},{"value":"2061-5094","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,25]]}}}